{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T23:25:16Z","timestamp":1782602716743,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]],"date-time":"2024-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732147200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]],"date-time":"2024-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732147200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]],"date-time":"2024-11-21T08:33:20Z","timestamp":1732178000000},"page":"3165-3171","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Evaluation of uterocervical angle in intrauterine device displacement cases"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2697-7501","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Burcu","family":"Dincgez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6076-2563","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fatma","family":"Ketenci Gencer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"7823_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0199724","author":"JN Sanders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sanders JN, Adkins DE, Kaur S, Storck K, Gawron LM, Turok DK (2018) Bleeding, cramping, and satisfaction among new copper IUD users: a prospective study. PLoS ONE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0199724","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"7823_CR2","first-page":"156","volume":"117","author":"MM Baron","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baron MM, Potter B, Schrager S (2018) A review of long-acting reversible contraception methods and barriers to their use. WMJ 117(4):156\u2013159 (PMID:30407765)","journal-title":"WMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"7823_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.07.006","volume":"78","author":"FF de Araujo","year":"2008","unstructured":"de Araujo FF, Barbieri M, Guazzelli CA, Lindsey PC (2008) The T 380A intrauterine device: a retrospective 5-year evaluation. Contraception 78(6):474\u2013478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.07.006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"7823_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4711-y","volume":"297","author":"S Fadiloglu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fadiloglu S, Dilbaz B, Fadiloglu E, Dilbaz S (2018) Relationship between copper IUD complications and ultrasonographic findings. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(4):989\u2013996. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4711-y","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"7823_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07438-w","volume":"310","author":"Y Jin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jin Y, Wu T, Liao J, Liu Y, Gan X (2024) Minimally invasive surgery for removal of migrated intrauterine devices in a postmenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310(1):607\u2013608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07438-w","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"7823_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05713-0","volume":"302","author":"FN\u0130 \u00c7intesun","year":"2020","unstructured":"\u00c7intesun FN\u0130, \u00c7intesun E, Esenkaya \u00dc, G\u00fcnenc O (2020) Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens? Arch Gynecol Obstet 302(5):1181\u20131187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05713-0","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"7823_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000144","volume":"123","author":"J Aoun","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aoun J, Dines VA, Stovall DW, Mete M, Nelson CB, Gomez-Lobo V (2014) Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 123(3):585\u2013592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000144","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7823_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.03.033","volume":"215","author":"M Dziadosz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C, West Honart A, Pham A, Lee SS, Pivo S, Roman AS (2016) Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(3):376.e1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.03.033","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"7823_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.31083\/j.ceog5008175","volume":"50","author":"O Karadeniz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Karadeniz O, Koyan GNK, Yaman I, Yilmaz B, Bestel A, Ozdemir I (2023) Measurement of the anterior uterocervical angle for predicting the displacement of copper intrauterine devices (T-Cu380A): a prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 50(8):175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31083\/j.ceog5008175","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7823_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.07.016","volume":"107","author":"JE Lawn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lawn JE, Lee AC, Kinney M, Sibley L, Carlo WA, Paul VK, Darmstadt GL (2009) Two million intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: where, why, and what can be done? Int J Gynecol Obstet 107:5\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.07.016","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7823_CR11","first-page":"552","volume":"16","author":"SC Wu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wu SC, Li L, Zou Y, Dong J, Lei ZW (2008) clinical effect comparison of seven types of \u0131ud placement during intermenstruum. Chin J Fam Plann 16:552\u2013556","journal-title":"Chin J Fam Plann"},{"issue":"5","key":"7823_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2057","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07457-7","volume":"309","author":"H Watad","year":"2024","unstructured":"Watad H, Ifrach U, Stockheim D, Yulzari V, Meron OC, Blank M, Sredni B, Weisz B, Cohen SB (2024) The contradictive findings between ultrasound, hysteroscopy and cytokines in women with nonhormonal IUDs suffering from menorrhagia: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309(5):2057\u20132062. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07457-7","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7823_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.glohj.2021.05.002","volume":"5","author":"X Xu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xu X, Ruan X, Rabe T (2021) Intrauterine contraception and menstrual bleeding. Glob J Health Sci 5:66\u201369","journal-title":"Glob J Health Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"7823_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182316308","volume":"118","author":"KP Braaten","year":"2011","unstructured":"Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, Goldberg AB (2011) Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 118(5):1014\u20131020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182316308","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7823_CR15","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Penalvo FJ (2019) Women and STEM disciplines in Latin America: The W-STEM European Project"},{"issue":"6","key":"7823_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.16440","volume":"43","author":"G Doulaveris","year":"2024","unstructured":"Doulaveris G, Jou J, Leung WK, Bircaj E, Orfanelli T, Atrio J, Rotenberg O (2024) Association of intrauterine device malposition with previous cesarean delivery and related uterine anatomical changes. J Ultrasound Med 43(6):1121\u20131129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jum.16440","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"7823_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(90)90059-5","volume":"41","author":"IC Chi","year":"1990","unstructured":"Chi IC, Farr G, Dominik R, Robinson N (1990) Do retroverted uteri adversely affect insertions and performance of IUDs? Contraception 41(5):495\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0010-7824(90)90059-5","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"7823_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2020.11.003","volume":"34","author":"L Keenahan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Keenahan L, Bercaw-Pratt JL, Adeyemi O, Hakim J, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Dietrich JE (2021) Rates of intrauterine device expulsion among adolescents and young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 34(3):362\u2013365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpag.2020.11.003","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7823_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000475","volume":"124","author":"T Madden","year":"2014","unstructured":"Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura GM, Eisenberg DL, Peipert JF (2014) Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion. Obstet Gynecol 124(4):718\u2013726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000475","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7823_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.049","volume":"213","author":"SB Teal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Teal SB, Romer SE, Goldthwaite LM, Peters MG, Kaplan DW, Sheeder J (2015) Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(4):515.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.049","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"7823_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13662","volume":"98","author":"K Gemzell-Danielsson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gemzell-Danielsson K, Jensen JT, Monteiro I, Peers T, Rodriguez M, Di Spiezio SA, Bahamondes L (2019) Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: an updated review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(12):1500\u20131513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13662","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"7823_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2021.1874337","volume":"26","author":"F Tabatabaei","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tabatabaei F, Masoumzadeh M (2021) Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 26(2):160\u2013166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13625187.2021.1874337","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"7","key":"7823_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1580","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev102","volume":"30","author":"J Kaislasuo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kaislasuo J, Heikinheimo O, L\u00e4hteenm\u00e4ki P, Suhonen S (2015) Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception. Hum Reprod 30(7):1580\u20131588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dev102","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"7823_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","volume":"220","author":"SA Gerkowicz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gerkowicz SA, Fiorentino DG, Kovacs AP, Arheart KL, Verma U (2019) Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220(2):183.e1-183.e8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7823_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14801","volume":"46","author":"N Sochacki-W\u00f3jcicka","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sochacki-W\u00f3jcicka N, Wojcicki J, Bomba-Opon D, Wielgos M (2015) Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(3):377\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14801","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7823_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00003","volume":"43","author":"J Ludmir","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ludmir J, Sehdev HM (2000) Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43(3):433\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00003","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7823_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07076-8","volume":"308","author":"A \u0130leri","year":"2023","unstructured":"\u0130leri A, Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Karaca S, G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 H, Ad\u0131yeke M, Budak A, \u00d6zer M, \u0130leri H, Bi\u00e7er M, \u015eenkaya AR, Ar\u0131 SA, \u00c7eliker Tosun \u00d6, Karaca \u0130 (2023) Diagnostic accuracy of pre-induction cervical elastography, volume, length, and uterocervical angle for the prediction of successful induction of labor with dinoprostone. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308(4):1301\u20131311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07076-8","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"11","key":"7823_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13879","volume":"99","author":"A Farr\u00e0s Llobet","year":"2020","unstructured":"Farr\u00e0s Llobet A, Higueras T, Calero IZ, Reginc\u00f3s Mart\u00ed L, Maiz N, Goya MM, Carreras E (2020) Prospective evaluation of the uterocervical angle as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99(11):1511\u20131518. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13879","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T02:03:55Z","timestamp":1734487435000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7823"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07823-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}