{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T22:33:02Z","timestamp":1757543582449,"version":"3.38.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]],"date-time":"2024-12-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734307200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]],"date-time":"2024-12-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734307200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100017607","name":"Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["JCYJ20200109150429414"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JCYJ20200109150429414"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100017607","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Research Team of Female Reproductive Health and Fertility Preservation","award":["SZSM202211043"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SZSM202211043"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]],"date-time":"2024-12-16T12:52:59Z","timestamp":1734353579000},"page":"507-517","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["How to balance the live birth rate and the multiple pregnancy rate by selecting the cleavage-stage embryo number and quality for POSEIDON Group 1 and Group 2? A retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"311","author":[{"given":"Huiqing","family":"He","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rang","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Qiuju","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lan","family":"Geng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zhenhui","family":"Hou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chang","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yanpei","family":"Cao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8297-6266","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xi","family":"Xia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"7850_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.02.026","volume":"117","author":"MI Cedars","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cedars MI (2022) Managing poor ovarian response in the patient with diminished ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 117:655\u2013656","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005","volume":"105","author":"C Alviggi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K et al (2016) A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril 105:1452\u20131453","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz046","volume":"26","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Zhang C, Shu J et al (2020) Adjuvant treatment strategies in ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 26:247\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmz046","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7850_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/8.2.141","volume":"8","author":"ER te Velde","year":"2002","unstructured":"te Velde ER, Pearson PL (2002) The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update 8:141\u2013154","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7850_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.01.024","volume":"117","author":"G Bildik","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bildik G, Esmaeilian Y, Hela F et al (2022) Cholesterol uptake or trafficking, steroid biosynthesis, and gonadotropin responsiveness are defective in young poor responders. Fertil Steril 117:1069\u20131080","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2021.06.004","volume":"2","author":"MF Neblett","year":"2021","unstructured":"Neblett MF, Kim T, Jones TL et al (2021) Is there still a role for a cleavage-stage embryo transfer? F S Rep 2:269\u2013274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xfre.2021.06.004","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"key":"7850_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","author":"D Glujovsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM et al (2016) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7850_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmab042","volume":"28","author":"N Marconi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Marconi N, Allen CP, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A (2022) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 28:255\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmab042","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7850_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.10.025","volume":"111","author":"A Busnelli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Busnelli A, Dallagiovanna C, Reschini M et al (2019) Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 111:302\u2013317","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.022","volume":"114","author":"C Bergh","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bergh C, Kamath MS, Wang R, Lensen S (2020) Strategies to reduce multiple pregnancies during medically assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 114:673\u2013679","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c6945","volume":"341","author":"DJ McLernon","year":"2010","unstructured":"McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C et al (2010) Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 341:c6945. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.c6945","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7850_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2001","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07019-3","volume":"307","author":"V Holschbach","year":"2023","unstructured":"Holschbach V, Kordes H, Dietrich JE et al (2023) Patient- and cycle-specific factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307:2001\u20132010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07019-3","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7850_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.06.050","volume":"116","author":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies","year":"2021","unstructured":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (2021) Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 116:651\u2013654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.06.050","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1530","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab056","volume":"36","author":"SC Esteves","year":"2021","unstructured":"Esteves SC, Yarali H,\nVuong LN et al (2021) Antral follicle count and anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone to classify low-prognosis women under the\nPOSEIDON criteria: a classification agreement study of over 9000 patients. Hum Reprod 36:1530\u20131541.\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deab056","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7850_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1097\/CM9.0000000000002609","volume":"136","author":"D Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li D, Parmegiani L, Yang D et al (2023) Expert consensus on the morphological evaluation of human cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts. Chin Med J (Engl) 136:1009\u20131011. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CM9.0000000000002609","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"issue":"deae108","key":"7850_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae108.137","volume":"39","author":"GD Adamson","year":"2024","unstructured":"Adamson GD, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F et al (2024) O-122 ICMART Preliminary World Report 2020. Hum Reprod 39(deae108):137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deae108.137","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7850_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","author":"K Devine","year":"2015","unstructured":"Devine K, Connell MT, Richter KS et al (2015) Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth. Fertil Steril. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V47N11p451","volume":"47","author":"LK Kwek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kwek LK, Saffari SE, Tan HH et al (2018) Comparison between single and double cleavage-stage embryo transfers, single and double blastocyst transfers in a South East Asian in vitro fertilisation centre. Ann Acad Med Singap 47:451\u2013454","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"7850_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-024-01443-y","volume":"17","author":"R Liu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Liu R, Zhang Q, Geng L et al (2024) What is the optimal number of embryos to transfer for POSEIDON group 1 and group 2? A retrospective study. J Ovarian Res 17:117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13048-024-01443-y","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"key":"7850_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.01.001","volume":"42","author":"G Karl\u0131kaya","year":"2021","unstructured":"Karl\u0131kaya G, Boynukalin FK, Gultomruk M et al (2021) Euploidy rates of embryos in young patients with good and low prognosis according to the POSEIDON criteria. Reprod Biomed Online 42:733\u2013741","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"659","key":"7850_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.01.033","volume":"111","author":"J Daar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Daar J, Benward J, Collins L et al (2019) Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: an\u00a0Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 111(659):663. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.01.033","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.023","volume":"104","author":"N Gleicher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gleicher N, Vega MV, Darmon SK et al (2015) Live-birth rates in very poor prognosis patients, who are defined as poor responders under the Bologna criteria, with nonelective single embryo, two-embryo, and three or more embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 104:1435\u20131441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7850_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01139.x","volume":"90","author":"I Jonsdottir","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jonsdottir I, Lundin K, Bergh C (2011) Double embryo transfer gives good pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders with a modest increase in multiple birth rates: results from an observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:761\u2013766. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01139.x","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"7850_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae010","volume":"39","author":"A Alteri","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alteri A, Arroyo G, Baccino G et al (2024) ESHRE guideline: number of embryos to transfer during IVF\/ICSI\u2020. Hum Reprod 39:647\u2013657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deae010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7850_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4756","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.87.12.4756","volume":"87","author":"BC Paria","year":"1990","unstructured":"Paria BC, Dey SK (1990) Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:4756\u20134760","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A"},{"key":"7850_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-020-00656-2","volume":"18","author":"W Wang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wang W, Cai J, Liu L et al (2020) Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? Reprod Biol Endocrinol 18:97. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-020-00656-2","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"7850_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt025","volume":"19","author":"CHE Weimar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Weimar CHE, Macklon NS, Post Uiterweer ED et al (2013) The motile and invasive capacity of human endometrial stromal cells: implications for normal and impaired reproductive function. Hum Reprod Update 19:542\u2013557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmt025","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7850_CR28","first-page":"394","volume":"20","author":"I El-Danasouri","year":"2016","unstructured":"El-Danasouri I, Sterzik K, Rinaldi L et al (2016) Effect of transferring a morphologically impaired embryo with a good quality embryo on the pregnancy and implantation rates. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:394\u2013398","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"7850_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-016-0297-9","volume":"10","author":"EM Wintner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wintner EM, Hershko-Klement A, Tzadikevitch K et al (2017) Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome? J Ovarian Res 10:2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13048-016-0297-9","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"key":"7850_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2427","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312","volume":"10","author":"C Giorgetti","year":"1995","unstructured":"Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P et al (1995) Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 10:2427\u20132431","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7850_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.7.1545","volume":"12","author":"S Ziebe","year":"1997","unstructured":"Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S et al (1997) Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 12:1545\u20131549","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7850_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2020.00930","volume":"11","author":"Q Zhu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhu Q, Lin J, Gao H et al (2020) The association between embryo quality, number of transferred embryos and live birth rate after vitrified cleavage-stage embryos and blastocyst transfer. Front Physiol 11:930","journal-title":"Front Physiol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,8]],"date-time":"2025-03-08T11:10:52Z","timestamp":1741432252000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]}},"alternative-id":["7850"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07850-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 July 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"This manuscript is approved by all the authors for publication.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}}]}}