{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T21:14:57Z","timestamp":1790111697443,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738108800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738108800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]],"date-time":"2025-01-29T13:36:00Z","timestamp":1738157760000},"page":"827-839","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["The correlation between blastocyst morphological parameters and chromosomal euploidy, aneuploidy and other chromosomal abnormalities following pre-implantation genetic testing\u2014a single center retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"311","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7387-409X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alyssa","family":"Hochberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liliane","family":"Amoura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiao Yun","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael H.","family":"Dahan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Asangla","family":"Ao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"7968_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/J.BEEM.2019.04.001","volume":"33","author":"A Tiitinen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tiitinen A (2019) Single embryo transfer: why and how to identify the embryo with the best developmental potential. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 33:77\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.BEEM.2019.04.001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab"},{"key":"7968_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","volume":"73","author":"DK Gardner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J et al (2000) Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73:1155\u20131158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1466","DOI":"10.1126\/SCIENCE.AAV7321","volume":"365","author":"JR Gruhn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gruhn JR, Zielinska AP, Shukla V et al (2019) Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. Science 365:1466\u20131469. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/SCIENCE.AAV7321","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"7968_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2013.11.004","author":"JM Franasiak","year":"2014","unstructured":"Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH et al (2014) The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2013.11.004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMUPD\/DMX026","volume":"23","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Hoffmann ER, Cimadomo D et al (2017) Human female meiosis revised: new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation and aneuploidies from advanced genomics and time-lapse imaging. Hum Reprod Update 23:706\u2013722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMUPD\/DMX026","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7968_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/GENES11060602","author":"M Viotti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Viotti M (2020) Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal abnormalities: aneuploidy, mosaicism, and structural rearrangements. Genes (Basel). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/GENES11060602","journal-title":"Genes (Basel)"},{"key":"7968_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.08.076","volume":"112","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Alikani M, Tomkin G et al (2019) Reprint of: embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 112:e71\u2013e80. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.08.076","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4939-8889-1_2","volume":"1885","author":"JL Simpson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Simpson JL, Kuliev A, Rechitsky S (2019) Overview of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): historical perspective and future direction. Methods Mol Biol 1885:23\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4939-8889-1_2","journal-title":"Methods Mol Biol"},{"key":"7968_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"F29","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-17-0683","volume":"156","author":"DK Griffin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Griffin DK, Ogur C (2018) Chromosomal analysis in IVF: just how useful is it? Reproduction 156:F29\u2013F50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1530\/REP-17-0683","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"key":"7968_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2549","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEX324","volume":"32","author":"D Babariya","year":"2017","unstructured":"Babariya D, Fragouli E, Alfarawati S et al (2017) The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 32:2549\u20132560. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEX324","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1212","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2020.11.041","volume":"115","author":"M Viotti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL et al (2021) Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril 115:1212\u20131224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2020.11.041","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/S10815-018-01399-1","volume":"36","author":"K Ozgur","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H et al (2019) Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 36:629\u2013636. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10815-018-01399-1","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2019.07.1346","volume":"112","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL et al (2019) Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 112:1071-1079.e7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2019.07.1346","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEU303","volume":"30","author":"E Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM (2015) The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod 30:473\u2013483. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEU303","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/JCM10173895","author":"WH Shi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shi WH, Jiang ZR, Zhou ZY et al (2021) Different strategies of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies in women of advanced maternal age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/JCM10173895","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"7968_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2012.01.104","volume":"97","author":"RT Scott","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scott RT, Ferry K, Su J et al (2012) Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 97:870\u2013875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2012.01.104","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/S10815-017-0890-X","volume":"34","author":"AM Mahfoudh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mahfoudh AM, Moon JH, Henderson S et al (2017) Relationship between pre-ICSI meiotic spindle angle, ovarian reserve, gonadotropin stimulation, and pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 34:609\u2013615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10815-017-0890-X","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1007\/S10815-018-1262-X","volume":"35","author":"A Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang A, Kort J, Behr B, Westphal LM (2018) Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 35:1565\u20131572. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10815-018-1262-X","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2005.03.031","volume":"84","author":"M Bielanska","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bielanska M, Jin S, Bernier M et al (2005) Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 84:336\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2005.03.031","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMUPD\/DMZ050","volume":"26","author":"M Popovic","year":"2020","unstructured":"Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A et al (2020) Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Hum Reprod Update 26:313\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMUPD\/DMZ050","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"7968_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEAD213","volume":"39","author":"M Popovic","year":"2024","unstructured":"Popovic M, Borot L, Lorenzon AR et al (2024) Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts. Hum Reprod 39:258\u2013274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEAD213","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2018.10.019","volume":"111","author":"AR Victor","year":"2019","unstructured":"Victor AR, Tyndall JC, Brake AJ et al (2019) One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies. Fertil Steril 111:280\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2018.10.019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2017.09.025","volume":"109","author":"F Spinella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Biricik A et al (2018) Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments. Fertil Steril 109:77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2017.09.025","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/J.EJMG.2019.103741","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2020","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Spinella F, Grifo J et al (2020) Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing- further insights. Eur J Med Genet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.EJMG.2019.103741","journal-title":"Eur J Med Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2017.05.002","volume":"108","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2017","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Blazek J, Large M et al (2017) Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril 108:62-71.e8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2017.05.002","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMC1500421","volume":"373","author":"E Greco","year":"2015","unstructured":"Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F (2015) Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med 373:2089\u20132090. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMC1500421","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"7968_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1007\/S00439-017-1797-4","volume":"136","author":"E Fragouli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K et al (2017) Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Genet 136:805\u2013819. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00439-017-1797-4","journal-title":"Hum Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1002\/PD.1970130610","volume":"13","author":"JS Fryburg","year":"1993","unstructured":"Fryburg JS, Dimaio MS, Yang-Feng TL, Mahoney MJ (1993) Follow-up of pregnancies complicated by placental mosaicism diagnosed by chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 13:481\u2013494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/PD.1970130610","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"7968_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1126\/SCIENCE.6867735","volume":"221","author":"DK Kalousek","year":"1983","unstructured":"Kalousek DK, Dill FJ (1983) Chromosomal mosaicism confined to the placenta in human conceptions. Science 221:665\u2013667. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/SCIENCE.6867735","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"7968_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1186\/1755-8166-1-26","volume":"1","author":"IY Iourov","year":"2008","unstructured":"Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2008) Chromosomal mosaicism goes global. Mol Cytogenet 1:26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1755-8166-1-26","journal-title":"Mol Cytogenet"},{"key":"7968_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/JOURNAL.PONE.0000558","author":"YB Yurov","year":"2007","unstructured":"Yurov YB, Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG et al (2007) Aneuploidy and confined chromosomal mosaicism in the developing human brain. PLoS One. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/JOURNAL.PONE.0000558","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"7968_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/S13059-016-1110-1","author":"R Acuna-Hidalgo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Acuna-Hidalgo R, Veltman JA, Hoischen A (2016) New insights into the generation and role of de novo mutations in health and disease. Genome Biol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S13059-016-1110-1","journal-title":"Genome Biol"},{"key":"7968_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1038\/EJHG.2011.246","volume":"20","author":"D Wellesley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wellesley D, Dolk H, Boyd PA et al (2012) Rare chromosome abnormalities, prevalence and prenatal diagnosis rates from population-based congenital anomaly registers in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 20:521\u2013526. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/EJHG.2011.246","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2009.07.989","volume":"93","author":"MC Mart\u00ednez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mart\u00ednez MC, M\u00e9ndez C, Ferro J et al (2010) Cytogenetic analysis of early nonviable pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil Steril 93:289\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2009.07.989","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/S40246-019-0253-Z","author":"Z Ou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ou Z, Chen Z, Yin M et al (2020) Re-analysis of whole blastocysts after trophectoderm biopsy indicated chromosome aneuploidy. Hum Genom. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S40246-019-0253-Z","journal-title":"Hum Genom"},{"key":"7968_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEY327","volume":"34","author":"AR Victor","year":"2019","unstructured":"Victor AR, Griffin DK, Brake AJ et al (2019) Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst. Hum Reprod 34:181\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEY327","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1093\/MOLEHR\/GAAA012","volume":"26","author":"R Navratil","year":"2020","unstructured":"Navratil R, Horak J, Hornak M et al (2020) Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 26:269\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/MOLEHR\/GAAA012","journal-title":"Mol Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/J.AJHG.2020.03.005","volume":"106","author":"L Girardi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Girardi L, Serdarogullari M, Patassini C et al (2020) Incidence, origin, and predictive model for the detection and clinical management of segmental aneuploidies in human embryos. Am J Hum Genet 106:525\u2013534. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.AJHG.2020.03.005","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1007\/S10815-017-0944-0","volume":"34","author":"OO Barash","year":"2017","unstructured":"Barash OO, Ivani KA, Willman SP et al (2017) Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 34:1007\u20131016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10815-017-0944-0","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"7968_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEW183","volume":"31","author":"MG Minasi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T et al (2016) Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod 31:2245\u20132254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEW183","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEX059","volume":"32","author":"V Poulsen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Poulsen V, Ingerslev HJ, Kirkegaard K (2017) Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5. Hum Reprod 32:1238\u20131243. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEX059","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"P V, G A, S S-R, et al (2023) Aneuploidy in oocytes from women of advanced maternal age: analysis of the causal meiotic errors andimpact on embryo development. Hum Reprod https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEAD201","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEAD201"},{"key":"7968_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEU033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D et al (2014) Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29:1173\u20131181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEU033","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e28","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(22)00213-8","volume":"5","author":"J Barnes","year":"2023","unstructured":"Barnes J, Brendel M, Gao VR et al (2023) A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study. Lancet Digit Health 5:e28\u2013e40. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2589-7500(22)00213-8","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"key":"7968_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/FENDO.2022.858042","author":"N Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li N, Guan Y, Ren B et al (2022) Effect of blastocyst morphology and developmental rate on euploidy and live birth rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with single-embryo transfer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/FENDO.2022.858042","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"7968_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20210008","volume":"26","author":"JP Bilibio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bilibio JP, Lorenzzoni PL, de Oliveira BM et al (2022) Associations among morphological parameters, clinical factors and euploid blastocyst formation. JBRA Assist Reprod 26:199\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5935\/1518-0557.20210008","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"7968_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-9-127","author":"G Paternot","year":"2011","unstructured":"Paternot G, Wetsels AM, Thonon F et al (2011) Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1477-7827-9-127","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"7968_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2006.05.037","volume":"86","author":"AE Baxter Bendus","year":"2006","unstructured":"Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Shipley SK, Catherino WH (2006) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril 86:1608\u20131615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.FERTNSTERT.2006.05.037","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7968_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2141","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEL106","volume":"21","author":"JC Arce","year":"2006","unstructured":"Arce JC, Ziebe S, Lundin K et al (2006) Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod 21:2141\u20132148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/HUMREP\/DEL106","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]],"date-time":"2025-03-18T15:44:44Z","timestamp":1742312684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["7968"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-07968-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 September 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 January 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interest statement"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study received ethical approval from the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) research ethics board (IRB00010120).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"N\/A.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}}]}}