{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T19:45:59Z","timestamp":1789069559437,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]],"date-time":"2025-04-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744156800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]],"date-time":"2025-04-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744156800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]],"date-time":"2025-04-09T20:52:16Z","timestamp":1744231936000},"page":"1233-1240","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Second trimester soft markers: still worth to be mentioned?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"311","author":[{"given":"Karl Oliver","family":"Kagan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Hoopmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiri","family":"Sonek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"8021_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.11.003","volume":"40","author":"H Cuckle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cuckle H, Maymon R (2016) Development of prenatal screening\u2014a historical overview. Semin Perinatol 40:12\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.11.003","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"8021_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03115.x","volume":"94","author":"HS Cuckle","year":"1987","unstructured":"Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Thompson SG (1987) Estimating a woman\u2019s risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down\u2019s syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:387\u2013402","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8021_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06477-5","volume":"305","author":"KO Kagan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kagan KO, Sonek J, Kozlowski P (2022) Antenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305:825\u2013835. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06477-5","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8021_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gim.2022.03.019","volume":"24","author":"NC Rose","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rose NC, Barrie ES, Malinowski J et al (2022) Systematic evidence-based review: the application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies. Genet Med 24:1379\u20131391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gim.2022.03.019","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"key":"8021_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12364","volume":"41","author":"M Agathokleous","year":"2013","unstructured":"Agathokleous M, Chaveeva P, Poon LCY et al (2013) Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:247\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12364","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00203.x","volume":"16","author":"GR DeVore","year":"2000","unstructured":"DeVore GR (2000) Trisomy 21: 91% detection rate using second-trimester ultrasound markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:133\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00203.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"(SMFM) S for M-FM, Prabhu M, Kuller JA, Biggio JR (2021) Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester (replaces consults #10, single umbilical artery, October 2010; #16, Isolated echogenic bowel diagnosed on second-trimester ultrasound, August 2011; #17, evaluation and management of isolated renal pelviectasis on second-trimester ultrasound, December 2011; #25, isolated fetal choroid plexus cysts, April 2013; #27, isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, August 2013). Am J Obstet Gynecol 225:B2\u2013B15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.079"},{"key":"8021_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"(2020) Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 226. Obstetrics Gynecol 136:859\u2013867. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000004107","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000004107"},{"key":"8021_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101072","volume":"5","author":"L Pan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pan L, Wu J, Liang D et al (2023) Association analysis between chromosomal abnormalities and fetal ultrasonographic soft markers based on 15,263 fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 5:101072. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101072","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"8021_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0298365","volume":"19","author":"HE Jones","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jones HE, Battaglia S, Hurt L et al (2024) Echogenic intracardiac foci detection and location in the second-trimester ultrasound and association with fetal outcomes: a systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 19:e0298365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0298365","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"8021_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2375-0118","volume":"46","author":"I Sapantzoglou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sapantzoglou I, Asimakopoulos G, Fasoulakis Z et al (2024) Prenatal detection of mild fetal ventriculomegaly\u2014a systematic review of the modern literature. Ultraschall Med Eur J Ultrasound 46:73\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2375-0118","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"8021_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/mgg3.70016","volume":"12","author":"C Luo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Luo C, Wen E, Liu Y et al (2024) Application of whole-exome sequencing in the prenatal diagnosis of foetuses with central nervous system abnormalities. Mol Genet Genom Med 12:e70016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mgg3.70016","journal-title":"Mol Genet Genom Med"},{"key":"8021_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5735","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13195735","volume":"13","author":"C Tangshewinsirikul","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tangshewinsirikul C, Wattanasirichaigoon D, Tim-Aroon T et al (2024) Prenatal sonographic features of Noonan syndrome: case series and literature review. J Clin Med 13:5735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13195735","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"8021_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07644-6","volume":"310","author":"KO Kagan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kagan KO, Hoopmann M, Geipel A et al (2024) Prenatal parvovirus B19 infection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310:2363\u20132371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07644-6","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8021_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2006-0120","volume":"118","author":"RS Lee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, Nguyen HT (2006) Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 118:586\u2013593. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2006-0120","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"8021_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2024.39.e70","volume":"39","author":"U Kim","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kim U, Jung YM, Oh S et al (2023) Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers: a meta-analysis of the current evidence. J Korean M\u00e9d Sci 39:e70. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3346\/jkms.2024.39.e70","journal-title":"J Korean M\u00e9d Sci"},{"key":"8021_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.080","volume":"192","author":"R Chaoui","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chaoui R, Heling K-S, Sarioglu N et al (2005) Aberrant right subclavian artery as a new cardiac sign in second- and third-trimester fetuses with Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:257\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.080","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20208","volume":"53","author":"L Sagi-Dain","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sagi-Dain L, Singer A, Josefsberg S et al (2019) Microarray analysis has no additional value in fetal aberrant right subclavian artery: description of 268 pregnancies and systematic literature review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:810\u2013815. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20208","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5092","volume":"37","author":"R Svirsky","year":"2017","unstructured":"Svirsky R, Reches A, Brabbing-Goldstein D et al (2017) Association of aberrant right subclavian artery with abnormal karyotype and microarray results. Prenat Diagn 37:808\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.5092","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"8021_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1186\/s13023-024-03066-4","volume":"19","author":"Y Liu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Liu Y, Liu S, Liu J et al (2024) Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with isolated ultrasound soft markers in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age. Orphanet J Rare Dis 19:56. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13023-024-03066-4","journal-title":"Orphanet J Rare Dis"},{"key":"8021_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2475","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07122-5","volume":"309","author":"X Xie","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xie X, Su L, Li Y et al (2024) Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) analysis for fetuses with abnormal nasal bone. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309:2475\u20132482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07122-5","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8021_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14662","volume":"46","author":"FI Vos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vos FI, Jong-Pleij EAPD, Bakker M et al (2015) Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46:66\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14662","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12261","volume":"41","author":"B Yazdi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yazdi B, Sonek J, Oettling C et al (2013) Prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:262\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12261","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11120","volume":"40","author":"J Sonek","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sonek J, Molina F, Hiett AK et al (2012) Prefrontal space ratio: comparison between trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40:293\u2013296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.11120","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14020441","volume":"14","author":"T Ghahremani","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ghahremani T, Britt AB, Ray E et al (2025) Perinatal outcomes and management of umbilical vein varix: a comprehensive review of 392 cases. J Clin Med 14:441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14020441","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"8021_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1159\/000433431","volume":"39","author":"P Wagner","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wagner P, Sonek J, Hoopmann M et al (2015) Increased umbilical artery pulsatility index in third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 21. Fetal Diagn Ther 39:100\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000433431","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"8021_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3703-4","volume":"292","author":"A Fl\u00f6ck","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fl\u00f6ck A, Remig I, M\u00fcller A et al (2015) Conflicting umbilical artery Doppler findings in fetuses with trisomy 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:613\u2013617. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3703-4","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8021_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7717","volume":"36","author":"T Dagklis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dagklis T, Defigueiredo D, Staboulidou I et al (2010) Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:291\u2013295. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.7717","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1002\/ajum.12180","volume":"22","author":"G Prentice","year":"2019","unstructured":"Prentice G, Welsh A, Howat A et al (2019) Isolated \u2018soft signs\u2019 of fetal choroid plexus cysts or echogenic intracardiac focus\u2014consequences of their continued reporting. Australas J Ultrasound Med 22:253\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajum.12180","journal-title":"Australas J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"8021_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6085","volume":"42","author":"L Pomar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pomar L, Ochoa J, Cabet S et al (2022) Prenatal diagnosis of Aicardi syndrome based on a suggestive imaging pattern: a multicenter case-series. Prenat Diagn 42:484\u2013494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.6085","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"8021_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1159\/000500471","volume":"47","author":"JC Bishop","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bishop JC, McCormick B, Johnson CT et al (2020) The double bubble sign: duodenal atresia and associated genetic etiologies. Fetal Diagn Ther 47:98\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000500471","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"8021_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1159\/000538857","volume":"51","author":"LMS de Lucas","year":"2024","unstructured":"de Lucas LMS, \u00c1lvarez PO, de Marzo LC et al (2024) Prenatal management and perinatal outcome in a large series of hydrops fetalis. Fetal Diagn Ther 51:335\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000538857","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"8021_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.32655","volume":"149A","author":"C Bellini","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bellini C, Hennekam RCM, Fulcheri E et al (2009) Etiology of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: a systematic review. Am J M\u00e9d Genet A 149A:844\u2013851. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajmg.a.32655","journal-title":"Am J M\u00e9d Genet A"},{"key":"8021_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1007\/s00246-024-03477-x","volume":"45","author":"I Ayhan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ayhan I, Demirci O, Odac\u0131lar A\u015e et al (2024) Revisiting atrioventricular septal defects: exploring chromosomal abnormalities, cardiac and extracardiac anomalies in a contemporary prenatal cohort. Pediatr Cardiol 45:1036\u20131047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00246-024-03477-x","journal-title":"Pediatr Cardiol"},{"key":"8021_CR35","unstructured":"Group E working EUROCAT prevalence data tables. http:\/\/www.eurocat-network.eu\/newprevdata\/showPDF.aspx?winx=1416&winy=741&file=allsubgroups.aspx. Accessed 1 Mar 2025"},{"key":"8021_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5224","volume":"31","author":"T Dagklis","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dagklis T, Plasencia W, Maiz N et al (2008) Choroid plexus cyst, intracardiac echogenic focus, hyperechogenic bowel and hydronephrosis in screening for trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:132\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.5224","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8021_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17483","volume":"49","author":"LJ Salomon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Audibert F et al (2017) ISUOG updated consensus statement on the impact of cfDNA aneuploidy testing on screening policies and prenatal ultrasound practice. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49:815\u2013816. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17483","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]],"date-time":"2025-04-26T19:52:21Z","timestamp":1745697141000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]}},"alternative-id":["8021"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08021-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 March 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests. Karl Oliver Kagan is the editor in chief of this journal and that Jiri Sonek is one of the associate editors.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}}]}}