{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T00:31:15Z","timestamp":1790469075637,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]],"date-time":"2025-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748304000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]],"date-time":"2025-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748304000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Unidade Local de Sa\u00fade de Santo Ant\u00f3nio"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study aims to evaluate and summarize the existing literature regarding the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of various energy sources in minimally invasive gynecological surgeries.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A systematic review was conducted by searching the PubMed\/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. We included studies that compared different energy sources used in laparoscopic and robotic gynecological surgeries, focusing on their advantages and complications. 37 studies were ultimately included in this review.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Among the 37 studies, 24 were randomized controlled trials, 11 were retrospective studies, and 1 was prospective. In laparoscopic procedures, advanced energy sources were associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative times. Specifically, ultrasonic devices demonstrated significantly less thermal damage and facilitated easier postoperative histologic assessment of lymph nodes compared to conventional electrosurgery. In robotic assisted surgeries, the literature reported shorter hospital stays and reduced thermal injury during colpotomy when utilizing laser energy. No significant differences were observed in other perioperative outcomes across both minimally invasive approaches.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Advanced energy devices may offer advantages in gynecological minimally invasive surgery, particularly in minimizing tissue trauma and enhancing surgical precision. However, evidence on outcomes such as lateral thermal spread and tissue healing remains limited and inconsistent. Further high-quality comparative studies are needed to clarify the clinical implications of each energy source and guide optimal instrument selection, especially in robotic assisted procedures.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]],"date-time":"2025-05-27T09:38:30Z","timestamp":1748338710000},"page":"691-719","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Applications of different energy devices in laparoscopic and robotic gynecological surgery: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"312","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4402-8836","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tiago","family":"Meneses Alves","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu\u00eds","family":"Ferreira De Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ant\u00f3nio","family":"Tom\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H\u00e9lder","family":"Ferreira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"8055_CR1","unstructured":"Handa VL, Van Le L (2020) Principles of electrical and laser energy applied to gynecologic surgery. In: Victoria L. Handa and Linda Van Le Te Linde\u2019s operative gynecology, 12th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 191\u2013216"},{"key":"8055_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.52198\/22.STI.40.GY1544","volume":"40","author":"M Grube","year":"2022","unstructured":"Grube M, Martin W, Walter CB et al (2022) Electrosurgery and other technical advancements in minimally invasive gynecological surgery \u2013 an update. Surg Technol Int 40:190\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52198\/22.STI.40.GY1544","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"key":"8055_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.01.014","volume":"20","author":"KSK Law","year":"2013","unstructured":"Law KSK, Lyons SD (2013) Comparative studies of energy sources in gynecologic laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:308\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.01.014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8","volume":"309","author":"PC Zorzato","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zorzato PC, Ferrari FA, Garzon S et al (2023) Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309:1165\u20131174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8055_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2023.2274396","volume":"33","author":"M Abi Antoun","year":"2024","unstructured":"Abi Antoun M, Etrusco A, Chiantera V et al (2024) Outcomes of conventional and advanced energy devices in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 33:1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645706.2023.2274396","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"issue":"12","key":"8055_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000130","volume":"69","author":"KS Law","year":"2014","unstructured":"Law KS, Abbott JA, Lyons SD (2014) Energy sources for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 69(12):763\u2013776. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000130","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"8055_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05308-3","author":"M Kalinderis","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kalinderis M, Kalinderi K, Athanasiadis A, Kalogiannidis I (2024) \u0395lectrosurgery: understanding of basic principles, safe practices and applications in gynecologic surgery. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05308-3","journal-title":"Minerva Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"e2014","key":"8055_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00293","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2014.00293","volume":"18","author":"H-C Hur","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hur H-C, Green I, Modest AM et al (2014) Needs assessment for electrosurgery training of residents and faculty in obstetrics and gynecology. JSLS 18(e2014):00293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2014.00293","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"8055_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, Hr\u00f3bjartsson A, Boutron I, Reeves B, Eldridge S (2016) A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials In: Chandler J, McKenzie J, Boutron I, Welch V (eds). Cochrane methods. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, issue 10 (Suppl 1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD201601","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD201601"},{"key":"8055_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"8055_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.001","volume":"21","author":"A Fagotti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F et al (2014) Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:447\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.001","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"8055_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1089\/10926420260188065","volume":"12","author":"Z Holub","year":"2002","unstructured":"Holub Z, Jabor A, Kliment L, Lukac J, Voracek J (2002) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection using ultrasonically activated shears: comparison with electrosurgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(3):175\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/10926420260188065","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"8055_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2017.0639","volume":"28","author":"S Ta\u015fk\u0131n","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ta\u015fk\u0131n S, \u015e\u00fck\u00fcr YE, Alt\u0131n D et al (2018) Bipolar energy instruments in laparoscopic uterine cancer surgery: a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28:645\u2013649. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2017.0639","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"8055_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00429-8","volume":"100","author":"Z Holub","year":"2001","unstructured":"Holub Z, Jabor A, Kliment L et al (2001) Laparoscopic staging of endometrial cancer using laparosonic instruments: comparison with electrosurgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100:81\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00429-8","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"8055_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-005-0173-x","volume":"3","author":"Z Holub","year":"2006","unstructured":"Holub Z, Jabor A (2006) Laparoscopic surgical staging for uterine malignancies using harmonic shears (UltraCision) in comparison to electrosurgery: operative technique, feasibility and complications. Gynecol Surg 3:25\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10397-005-0173-x","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"8055_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.029","volume":"105","author":"C-L Lee","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lee C-L, Huang K-G, Wang C-J et al (2007) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 105:620\u2013624. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.029","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"8055_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.2000.16.33","volume":"16","author":"Z Holub","year":"2000","unstructured":"Holub Z, Vor\u00e1\u010dek J, Jun LK, Lukac J (2000) Laparoscopic hysterectomy: randomized study of harmonic scalpel and electrosurgery. J Gynecol Surg 16:33\u201339","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"8055_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-023-01938-6","volume":"74","author":"M Gorginzadeh","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gorginzadeh M, Mehdizadehkashi A, Chaichian S et al (2024) Comparing thermal damage using monopolar hook versus harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy; a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynecol India 74:424\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13224-023-01938-6","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"issue":"e2018","key":"8055_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00001","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00001","volume":"22","author":"BD Beran","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beran BD, Shockley M, Padilla PF et al (2018) Laser angiography to assess the vaginal cuff during robotic hysterectomy. JSLS 22(e2018):00001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00001","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"8055_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcma.2017.04.012","volume":"81","author":"H-Y Huang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Huang H-Y, Liu Y-C, Li Y-C et al (2018) Comparison of three different hemostatic devices in laparoscopic myomectomy. J Chin Med Assoc 81:178\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcma.2017.04.012","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc"},{"key":"8055_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x","volume":"33","author":"F Demirturk","year":"2007","unstructured":"Demirturk F, Aytan H, Caliskan AC (2007) Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:341\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"05","key":"8055_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.4172\/2161-0932.1000137","volume":"02","author":"A Ta","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ta A (2012) Bipolar vessel sealer versus harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet 02(05):5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4172\/2161-0932.1000137","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8055_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.5455\/2320-1770.ijrcog20141226","volume":"3","author":"V Bansal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bansal V, Bansal A, Bansal A, Kumar A (2014) Comparison between bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure vessel sealer) and harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 3:1006. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5455\/2320-1770.ijrcog20141226","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_69_20","volume":"11","author":"S Batra","year":"2022","unstructured":"Batra S, Bhardwaj P, Dagar M (2022) Comparative analysis of peri-operative outcomes following total laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional bipolar-electrosurgery versus high-pressure pulsed LigaSure use. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 11:105\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/GMIT.GMIT_69_20","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"8055_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.47009\/jamp.2023.5.3.96","volume":"5","author":"RA Hasabe","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hasabe RA, Hivre M, Khapre S (2023) Comparison between three instruments for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: harmonic scalpel, ligasure, and bipolar shearer. Int J Acam Med Pharm 5(3):445\u2013448. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.47009\/jamp.2023.5.3.96","journal-title":"Int J Acam Med Pharm"},{"key":"8055_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3852","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2994-4","volume":"27","author":"R Rothmund","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rothmund R, Szyrach M, Reda A et al (2013) A prospective, randomized clinical comparison between UltraCision and the novel sealing and cutting device BiCision in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 27:3852\u20133859. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-013-2994-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"8055_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.049","volume":"94","author":"P Litta","year":"2010","unstructured":"Litta P, Fantinato S, Calonaci F et al (2010) A randomized controlled study comparing harmonic versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 94:1882\u20131886. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.049","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"8055_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2015.12.023","volume":"56","author":"HH Kuo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kuo HH, Li Y, Wang C-J et al (2017) A case-controlled study comparing harmonic versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic myomectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 56:73\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2015.12.023","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4415","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6183-3","volume":"32","author":"C Choi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Choi C, Do I-G, Song T (2018) Ultrasonic versus monopolar energy-based surgical devices in terms of surgical smoke and lateral thermal damage (ULMOST): a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 32:4415\u20134421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6183-3","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"8055_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1089\/109264204322973817","volume":"14","author":"C-S Ou","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ou C-S, Joki J, Wells K et al (2004) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using multifunction grasping, coagulating, and cutting forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14:67\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/109264204322973817","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"8055_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736259","volume":"16","author":"H-Y Cho","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cho H-Y, Choi K-J, Lee Y-L et al (2012) Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 16:456\u2013460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/108680812X13462882736259","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"8055_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.08.881","volume":"23","author":"MB Holloran-Schwartz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Holloran-Schwartz MB, Gavard JA, Martin JC et al (2016) Single-use energy sources and operating room time for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:72\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.08.881","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4599-y","volume":"297","author":"M Hasanov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hasanov M, Denschlag D, Seemann E et al (2018) Bipolar vessel-sealing devices in laparoscopic hysterectomies: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297:409\u2013414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4599-y","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8055_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.04.014","volume":"20","author":"R Rothmund","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rothmund R, Kraemer B, Brucker S et al (2013) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using EnSeal vs standard bipolar coagulation technique: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:661\u2013666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.04.014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.11.024","volume":"58","author":"C-L Lee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee C-L, Wu K-Y, Huang C-Y, Yen C-F (2019) Comparison of LigaSure\u2122 tissue fusion system and a conventional bipolar device in hysterectomy via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 58:128\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.11.024","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2009.05.002","volume":"50","author":"H Su","year":"2011","unstructured":"Su H, Han C-M, Wang C-J et al (2011) Comparison of the efficacy of the pulsed bipolar system and conventional electrosurgery in laparoscopic myomectomy\u2014a retrospective matched control study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 50:25\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2009.05.002","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0193611","volume":"13","author":"Y-C Li","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li Y-C, Chao A, Yang L-Y et al (2018) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device (LigaSure\u2122) versus conventional diathermy in laparoscopic myomectomy: a propensity-matched analysis. PLoS ONE 13:e0193611. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0193611","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"8055_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2884","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2274-8","volume":"26","author":"PF Janssen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Janssen PF, Br\u00f6lmann HAM, Van Kesteren PJM et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure\u2122 compared to conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2884\u20132891. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-012-2274-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"8055_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13217","volume":"60","author":"C Wong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wong C, Goh A, Merkur H (2020) Comparison of surgical outcomes using Gyrus PKS\u2122 vs LigaSure\u2122 in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 60:790\u2013796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.13217","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8055_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.006","volume":"25","author":"L-DJ Shiber","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shiber L-DJ, Ginn DN, Jan A et al (2018) Comparison of industry-leading energy devices for use in gynecologic laparoscopy: articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure energy devices. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:467-473.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2220","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14096","volume":"45","author":"B Aykan Yuksel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aykan Yuksel B, Karadag B, Mulayim B (2019) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two advanced vessel sealing technologies in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45:2220\u20132227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14096","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"8055_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2005.15.361","volume":"15","author":"C-J Wang","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wang C-J, Yuen L-T, Yen C-F et al (2005) Comparison of the efficacy of the pulsed bipolar system and conventional bipolar electrosurgery in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 15:361\u2013364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2005.15.361","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"8055_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x","volume":"118","author":"P Janssen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Janssen P, Br\u00f6lmann H, Van Kesteren P et al (2011) Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial: LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar during laparoscopic hysterectomy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118:1568\u20131575. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8055_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10033-1431","volume":"14","author":"L Velayudam","year":"2021","unstructured":"Velayudam L, Talwar P, Kumarachar SH, Fathima T (2021) Efficacy and safety of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer vs ENSEAL in total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus: a comparative study in Mysuru, South India. World J Laparosc Surg DVD 14:5\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5005\/jp-journals-10033-1431","journal-title":"World J Laparosc Surg DVD"},{"issue":"3","key":"8055_CR45","first-page":"323","volume":"115","author":"S Lu","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lu S, Xiang J, Qing C, Jin S, Liao Z, Shi J (2002) Effect of necrotic tissue on progressive injury in deep partial thickness burn wounds. Chin Med J (Engl) 115(3):323\u2013325","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"8055_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.06.005","volume":"22","author":"S Choussein","year":"2015","unstructured":"Choussein S, Srouji SS, Farland LV, Gargiulo AR (2015) Flexible carbon dioxide laser fiber versus ultrasonic scalpel in robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:1183\u20131190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.06.005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"8055_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.08.097","volume":"21","author":"M Billow","year":"2014","unstructured":"Billow M, Cheng M, Cornella J et al (2014) Histological characterization of vaginal cuff tissue using different energy sources during robotic hysterectomy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6):S1-238","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21037\/ales.2020.03.06","author":"KJ Wikiel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wikiel KJ, Robinson TN, Jones EL (2021) Energy in robotic surgery. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/ales.2020.03.06","journal-title":"Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"8055_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1760","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-016-3217-9","volume":"20","author":"DC Steinemann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Steinemann DC, Lamm SH, Zerz A (2016) Efficacy and safety of combined ultrasonic and bipolar energy source in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 20(10):1760\u20131768. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-016-3217-9","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"8055_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-008-0400-33","volume":"6","author":"L Mencaglia","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mencaglia L, Lugo E, Consigli S et al (2009) Bipolar resectoscope the future perspective of hysteroscopic surgery. Gynecol Surg 6:15\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10397-008-0400-33","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"8055_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gmit.2017.08.002","volume":"6","author":"A Jaiswal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jaiswal A, Huang K-G (2017) Energy devices in gynecological laparoscopy\u2014archaic to modern era. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 6:147\u2013151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gmit.2017.08.002","journal-title":"Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther"},{"key":"8055_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.009","volume":"205","author":"DD Gruber","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gruber DD, Warner WB, Lombardini ED et al (2011) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using various energy sources in swine: a histopathologic assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:494.e1-494.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8055_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.11.035","volume":"71","author":"CK Phillips","year":"2008","unstructured":"Phillips CK, Hruby GW, Durak E et al (2008) Tissue response to surgical energy devices. Urology 71(4):744\u2013748. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2007.11.035","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"8055_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1089\/109264202753486957","volume":"12","author":"SL Goldstein","year":"2002","unstructured":"Goldstein SL, Harold KL, Lentzner A et al (2002) Comparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the laparo-sonic ultrasonic shears and the ligasure system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(1):61\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/109264202753486957","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"3","key":"8055_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6901","volume":"97","author":"PA Sutton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sutton PA, Awad S, Perkins AC, Lobo DN (2010) Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the harmonic scalpel and the ligasure. Br J Surg 97(3):428\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.6901","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"8055_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.12.021","volume":"24","author":"BD Beran","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beran BD, Shockley M, Arnolds K et al (2017) Laser angiography with indocyanine green to assess vaginal cuff perfusion during total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:432\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.12.021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"8055_CR57","first-page":"282","volume":"34","author":"H Ferreira","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ferreira H, Smith AV, Wattiez A (2019) Application of indocyanine green in gynecology: review of the literature. Surg Technol Int 34:282\u2013292","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"8055_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina60010053","volume":"60","author":"I Alkatout","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alkatout I, O\u2019Sullivan O, Peters G, Maass N (2024) Expanding robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology using the potential of an advanced robotic system. Medicina (Kaunas) 60(1):53. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina60010053","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,6]],"date-time":"2025-09-06T15:54:40Z","timestamp":1757174080000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["8055"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08055-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 February 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 May 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate\/to publish"}}]}}