{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,5]],"date-time":"2025-11-05T07:59:17Z","timestamp":1762329557507,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]],"date-time":"2025-08-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756166400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]],"date-time":"2025-08-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756166400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universitat de Valencia"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare neonatal outcomes for immediate pushing and delayed pushing in the second stage of labor in women receiving epidural analgesia.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data sources<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Systematic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL without restrictions by language, date of publication, or methodological quality.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Study selection<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The inclusion criteria were based on methodological and clinical factors such as population (pregnant women with epidural analgesia), intervention and control (delayed versus immediate pushing), neonatal outcomes, and study design (systematic reviews).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data extraction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The outcome measures were Apgar scores at 1 and 5\u00a0min, neonatal intensive care unit admission, prevalence of low umbilical artery cord pH, and umbilical artery cord pH. The methodological quality was analyzed using the Assessing the Methodological Study Tool for Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) scales, and the strength of evidence was established according to the Guidelines Advisory Committee grading criteria. For the umbilical artery cord pH variable, standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data synthesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Seven systematic reviews with meta-analysis were included. The results suggest no difference between groups for Apgar test scores at 5\u00a0min, nor in the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Mixed results were found for delayed pushing leading to improvements in Apgar test scores at 1\u00a0min. No statistically significant between-group differences in the umbilical artery cord pH were found.\u00a0The total duration of the second stage in the delayed pushing group was not significantly correlated with the umbilical artery cord pH.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Delayed pushing produces at least the same neonatal outcomes as immediate pushing in healthy pregnant women receiving epidural analgesia with a single fetus in vertex presentation with a limited quality of evidence.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>Review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42023397616).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]],"date-time":"2025-08-26T03:41:39Z","timestamp":1756179699000},"page":"1419-1433","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Umbrella review and meta-analysis of the effect of delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of labor on neonatal outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"312","author":[{"given":"Paula","family":"Deusa-L\u00f3pez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ferran","family":"Cuenca-Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vanessa","family":"S\u00e1nchez-Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N\u00faria","family":"Sempere-Rubio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"8118_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195512000-00001","volume":"6","author":"EA Friedman","year":"1955","unstructured":"Friedman EA (1955) Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol diciembre de 6(6):567\u2013589","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol diciembre de"},{"key":"8118_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandstr\u00f6m A, Altman M, Cnattingius S, Johansson S, Ahlberg M, Stephansson O. Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study. J Perinatol [Internet]. marzo de 2017 [citado 1 de febrero de 2022];37(3):236\u201342. Disponible en: http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp2016214","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.214"},{"key":"8118_CR3","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [citado 16 de febrero de 2022]. Disponible en: https:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/handle\/10665\/260178"},{"key":"8118_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Antsaklis et al. Natural Methods to Assist Delivery during the Second Stage of Labour: Part II: Timing and Type of Pushing. Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology SSN: 2241\u20139276. 2020","DOI":"10.33574\/hjog.1925"},{"issue":"1","key":"8118_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-023-02265-7","volume":"12","author":"L Belbasis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Belbasis L, Brooker RD, Zavalis E, Pezzullo AM, Axfors C, Ioannidis JP (2023) Mapping and systematic appraisal of umbrella reviews in epidemiological research: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study. Syst Rev 12(1):123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-023-02265-7","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"issue":"11","key":"8118_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000368","volume":"71","author":"AC Gimovsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gimovsky AC, Berghella V (2016) Prolonged second stage: what is the optimal length?. Obstet Gynecol Surv 71(11):667\u2013674","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"8118_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grantz KL, Sundaram R, Ma L, Hinkle S, Berghella V, Hoffman MK, et\u00a0al. Reassessing the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity. Obstetrics & Gynecology [Internet]. febrero de 2018 [citado 21 de febrero de 2022];131(2):345\u201353. Disponible en: https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006250-201802000-00020","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002431"},{"issue":"5S","key":"8118_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1063","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.11.1299","volume":"228","author":"X He","year":"2023","unstructured":"He X, Zeng X, Troendle J, Ahlberg M, Tilden EL, Souza JP et al (2023) New insights on labor progression: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol mayo de 228(5S):S1063\u2013S1094","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol mayo de"},{"issue":"1","key":"8118_CR9","first-page":"29","volume":"99","author":"SL Hansen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hansen SL, Clark SL, Foster JC (2002) Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol enero de 99(1):29\u201334","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol enero de"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12199","volume":"59","author":"ML Kopas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kopas ML (2014) A review of evidence-based practices for management of the second stage of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health 59(3):264\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jmwh.12199","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"8118_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1945016","volume":"42","author":"AE Ara\u00fajo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ara\u00fajo AE, Delgado A, Maia JN, Lima Campos S, Wanderley Souto Ferreira C, Lemos A (2022) Efficacy of spontaneous pushing with pursed lips breathing compared with directed pushing in maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol 42(5):854\u2013860. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2021.1945016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.12.011","volume":"52","author":"J Roberts","year":"2007","unstructured":"Roberts J, Hanson L (2007) Best practices in second stage labor care: maternal bearing down and positioning. J Midwifery Womens Health 52(3):238\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.12.011","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"8118_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003103","volume":"17","author":"AE Seijmonsbergen-Schermers","year":"2020","unstructured":"Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L et al (2020) Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med mayo de 17(5):e1003103","journal-title":"PLoS Med mayo de"},{"issue":"2","key":"8118_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00833.x","volume":"23","author":"JA Thorp","year":"1996","unstructured":"Thorp JA, Breedlove G (1996) Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits. Birth junio de 23(2):63\u201383","journal-title":"Birth junio de"},{"key":"8118_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 21 de mayo de 2018;5(5):CD000331","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub4"},{"key":"8118_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Callahan EC, Lim S, George RB. Neuraxial labor analgesia: maintenance techniques. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. mayo de 2022;36(1):17\u201330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpa.2022.03.001"},{"issue":"4","key":"8118_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154889.47063.84","volume":"105","author":"J Sen\u00e9cal","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sen\u00e9cal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD, Pushing Early Or Pushing Late with Epidural study group (2005) Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):763\u2013772","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","volume":"22","author":"ML McHugh","year":"2012","unstructured":"McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22(3):276\u2013282","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"8118_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zipori Y, Grunwald O, Ginsberg Y, Beloosesky R, Weiner Z. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. febrero de 2019 [citado 2 de febrero de 2022];220(2):191.e1\u2013191.e7. Disponible en: https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937818309128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.028"},{"key":"8118_CR20","unstructured":"Hutchison J, Mahdy H, Hutchison J. Stages of Labor. En: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [citado 27 de octubre de 2023]. Disponible en: http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK544290\/"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"8118_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.16276","volume":"32","author":"Y Zang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zang Y, Hu Y, Lu H (2023) Effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration: an overview of systematic reviews. J Clin Nurs 32(7\u20138):996\u20131013","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"8118_CR22","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care for healthy women and their babies during childbirth (NICE Guideline NG234) [Internet]. London: NICE; 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng23414"},{"key":"8118_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev. 10 de febrero de 2016;5:28","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0204-x"},{"key":"8118_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Caughey AB, Richter HE, Gregory WT, et\u00a0al. Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 9 de octubre de 2018;320(14):1444\u20131454","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.13986"},{"issue":"5","key":"8118_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105197","volume":"182","author":"WD Fraser","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M (2000) sander. Am J Obstet Gynecol mayo de 182(5):1165\u20131172","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol mayo de"},{"key":"8118_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brancato RM, Church S, Stone PW. A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. enero de 2008 [citado 16 de febrero de 2022];37(1):4\u201312. Disponible en: https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0884217515337229","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2007.00205.x"},{"issue":"2","key":"8118_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.02.002","volume":"223","author":"D Di Mascio","year":"2020","unstructured":"Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Bellussi F, Al-Kouatly HB, Brunelli R, Benedetti Panici P et al (2020) Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol agosto de 223(2):189\u2013203","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol agosto de"},{"key":"8118_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB (2017) Pushing\/bearing down methods for the second stage of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD009124.pub3","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009124.pub3"},{"key":"8118_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Menez-Orieux C, Linet T, Philippe HJ, Boog G. [Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor for nulliparous parturients with epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). septiembre de 2005;34(5):440\u20137.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82851-0"},{"issue":"12","key":"8118_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00282.x","volume":"111","author":"CL Roberts","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, Olive E (2004) Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG diciembre de 111(12):1333\u20131340","journal-title":"BJOG diciembre de"},{"key":"8118_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Szu LT, Chou PY, Lin PH, Chen C, Lin WL, Chen KH. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. febrero de 2021 [citado 16 de febrero de 2022];303(2):481\u201399. Disponible en: https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05814-w","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05814-w"},{"key":"8118_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tuuli MG, Frey HA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet & Gynecol [Internet]. septiembre de 2012 [citado 16 de febrero de 2022];120(3):660\u20138. Disponible en: http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00006250-201209000-00026","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182639fae"},{"key":"8118_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.10.002","volume":"93","author":"KI Bougioukas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bougioukas KI, Liakos A, Tsapas A, Ntzani E, Haidich AB (2018) Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms. J Clin Epidemiol enero de 93:9\u201324","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol enero de"},{"key":"8118_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2024.104693","volume":"152","author":"P Deusa-L\u00f3pez","year":"2024","unstructured":"Deusa-L\u00f3pez P, Cuenca-Mart\u00ednez F, S\u00e1nchez-Mart\u00ednez V, Sempere-Rubio N (2024) Maternal outcomes using delayed pushing versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labour: an umbrella review. Int J Nurs Stud abril de 152:104693","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud abril de"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1053\/apnr.2002.34181","volume":"15","author":"PW Stone","year":"2002","unstructured":"Stone PW (2002) Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res agosto de 15(3):197\u2013198","journal-title":"Appl Nurs Res agosto de"},{"key":"8118_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et\u00a0al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 22 de agosto de 1998;352(9128):609\u201313.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)01085-X"},{"issue":"9","key":"8118_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2008.2861","volume":"38","author":"CJ Barton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Barton CJ, Webster KE, Menz HB (2008) Evaluation of the scope and quality of systematic reviews on nonpharmacological conservative treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38(9):529\u2013541","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"8118_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","volume":"69","author":"P Whiting","year":"2016","unstructured":"Whiting P, Savovi\u0107 J, Higgins JPT, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B et al (2016) Robis: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 69:225\u2013234","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"8118_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Torres A, Tennant B, Ribeiro-Lucas I, Vaux-Bjerke A, Piercy K, Bloodgood B. Umbrella and systematic review methodology to support the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee. J Phys Act Health. 1 de noviembre de 2018;15(11):805\u201310","DOI":"10.1123\/jpah.2018-0372"},{"key":"8118_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suurmond R, van Rhee H, Hak T. Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: a free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 1 de diciembre de 2017;8(4):537\u201353","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1260"},{"key":"8118_CR41","first-page":"119","volume":"29","author":"L Hedges","year":"1982","unstructured":"Hedges L (1982) Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychol Bull 29:119\u2013127","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"8118_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. enero de 2009;41(1):3\u201313","DOI":"10.1249\/MSS.0b013e31818cb278"},{"issue":"2","key":"8118_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.11.2.193","volume":"11","author":"TB Huedo-Medina","year":"2006","unstructured":"Huedo-Medina TB, S\u00e1nchez-Meca J, Mar\u00edn-Mart\u00ednez F, Botella J (2006) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychol Methods junio de 11(2):193\u2013206","journal-title":"Psychol Methods junio de"},{"issue":"8","key":"8118_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.3109\/01443618809012295","volume":"1988","author":"Buxton","year":"1988","unstructured":"Buxton et al (1988) Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural in labour-does it increase the incidence of spontaneous delivery?. J Obstet Gynaecol 1988(8):258\u2013261","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"8118_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1983.tb09278.x","volume":"90","author":"M Maresh","year":"1983","unstructured":"Maresh M, Choong KH, Beard RW (1983) Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol julio de 90(7):623\u2013627","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol julio de"},{"issue":"1","key":"8118_CR46","first-page":"109","volume":"102","author":"BA Plunkett","year":"2003","unstructured":"Plunkett BA, Lin A, Wong CA, Grobman WA, Peaceman AM (2003) Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol julio de 102(1):109\u2013114","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol julio de"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1097\/00006199-200505000-00002","volume":"54","author":"KR Simpson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Simpson KR, James DC (2005) Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being: a randomized clinical trial. Nurs Res 54(3):149\u2013157","journal-title":"Nurs Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"8118_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10050.x","volume":"105","author":"S Vause","year":"1998","unstructured":"Vause S, Congdon HM, Thornton JG (1998) Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(2):186\u2013188","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8118_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olofsson P. Umbilical cord pH, blood gases, and lactate at\u00a0birth:\u00a0normal values, interpretation, and clinical\u00a0utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1 de mayo de 2023 [citado 15 de mayo de 2023];228(5, Supplement):S1222\u201340. Disponible en: https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0002937822005373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.001"},{"key":"8118_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malin GL, Morris RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 13 de mayo de 2010;340:c1471.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c1471"},{"issue":"3","key":"8118_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2003-40975","volume":"207","author":"G Heller","year":"2003","unstructured":"Heller G, Schnell RR, Misselwitz B, Schmidt S (2003) Umbilical blood pH, apgar scores, and early neonatal mortality. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 207(3):84\u201389","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol"},{"issue":"7","key":"8118_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03335.x","volume":"119","author":"P Yeh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L (2012) The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG junio de 119(7):824\u2013831","journal-title":"BJOG junio de"},{"issue":"2","key":"8118_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-06965-2","volume":"309","author":"N Gonen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gonen N, Cohen I, Gluck O, Jhucha D, Shmueli A, Barda G et al (2024) Umbilical cord blood gases sampling in low-risk vaginal deliveries as a predictor of adverse neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet febrero de 309(2):523\u2013531","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet febrero de"},{"key":"8118_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. septiembre de 2004 [citado 21 de febrero de 2022];191(3):933\u20138. Disponible en: https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937804005289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044"},{"key":"8118_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, de Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. The evolution of birth medicalisation: A systematic review. Midwifery [Internet]. 1 de noviembre de 2018 [citado 1 de abril de 2024];66:161\u20137. Disponible en: https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0266613818302377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.08.003"},{"key":"8118_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Romano AM, Lothian JA. Promoting, Protecting, and Supporting Normal Birth: A Look at the Evidence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2008 [citado 27 de octubre de 2023];37(1):94\u2013105. Disponible en: https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0884217515337126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2007.00210.x"},{"issue":"9275","key":"8118_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)05251-X","volume":"358","author":"Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK","year":"2001","unstructured":"Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK (2001) Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358(9275):19\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)05251-X","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,5]],"date-time":"2025-11-05T07:29:48Z","timestamp":1762327788000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["8118"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08118-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 July 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 August 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}}]}}