{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T21:43:55Z","timestamp":1757627035535,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]],"date-time":"2025-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753142400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]],"date-time":"2025-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1753142400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100012940","name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum T\u00fcbingen","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100012940","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study examines whether the perinatal mortality rates (up to 7 days postpartum) of successful vaginal breech birth (VBB) align with those of vaginal cephalic birth (VCB) under the current practice of risk stratification and promotion of VBB in Germany. This study excludes births that did not result in vaginal breech birth, i.e., cases where a vaginal birth was attempted but discontinued.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A retrospective cohort analysis of the 2021 German population dataset compared 1435 VBBs to 422,019 VCBs. Maternal and neonatal short-term outcomes were analyzed using Chi-squared and Mann\u2013Whitney <jats:italic>U<\/jats:italic> tests.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>\n              <jats:italic>Main outcome:<\/jats:italic> No significant difference in perinatal mortality rates between VBB and VCB. <jats:italic>Other neonatal outcomes<\/jats:italic>: Mean arterial blood gas levels and mean APGAR levels were lower in the breech group. The need for resuscitation measures and transfers to the pediatric hospital were increased. <jats:italic>Maternal outcomes<\/jats:italic>: Births in the breech group received labor augmentation more frequently and had higher rates of episiotomies. They had lower rates of perineal tears and postpartum complications. The rates of hysterectomies and increased postpartum hemorrhage did not differ significantly.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>With thorough risk stratification and interdisciplinary expert management, perinatal mortality rates (up to 7 days postpartum) of VBBs align with VCBs. However, higher neonatal intervention rates in VBB highlight the need to ensure adequate resources and preparedness for postnatal support.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]],"date-time":"2025-07-22T16:33:41Z","timestamp":1753202021000},"page":"1237-1245","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes in cases of vaginal breech births versus cases of vaginal cephalic births: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"312","author":[{"given":"Hanna","family":"Kriegs","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joachim","family":"Graf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Harald","family":"Abele","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"Plappert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stiefel A, Brendel K, Bauer NH, Harder U. Hebammenkunde Lehrbuch f\u00fcr Schwangerschaft, Geburt, Wochenbett und Beruf. 6., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage ed. Stuttgart New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2020.","key":"8126_CR1","DOI":"10.1055\/b-006-163368"},{"issue":"9239","key":"8126_CR2","first-page":"1375","volume":"356","author":"ME Hannah","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Lancet 356(9239):1375\u20131383","journal-title":"Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR3","first-page":"126","volume":"83","author":"LL H\u00e5heim","year":"2004","unstructured":"H\u00e5heim LL, Albrechtsen S, Berge LN, B\u00f8rdahl PE, Egeland T, Henriksen T et al (2004) Breech birth at term: vaginal delivery or elective cesarean section? A systematic review of the literature by a Norwegian review team. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):126\u2013130","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"8126_CR4","first-page":"CD000166","volume":"7","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA (2015) 2015 Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD000166","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"8126_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","volume":"194","author":"F Goffinet","year":"2006","unstructured":"Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002\u20131011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"8126_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011","volume":"35","author":"S Morris","year":"2022","unstructured":"Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D (2022) Breech presentation management: a critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines. Women and Birth 35(3):E233\u2013E242","journal-title":"Women and Birth"},{"unstructured":"Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Gyn\u00e4kologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG). AWMF-Leitlinie Sectio caesarea: AWMF; 2020 [29.05.2023]. Available from: https:\/\/register.awmf.org\/assets\/guidelines\/015-084l_S3_Sectio-caesarea_2020-06_1_02.pdf.","key":"8126_CR7"},{"unstructured":"Institut f\u00fcr Qualit\u00e4tssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIG). Bundesauswertung Geburtshilfe \u2013 Erfassungsjahr 2021. Berlin: IQTIG; 2022 [14.05.2025]. Available from: https:\/\/iqtig.org\/downloads\/auswertung\/2021\/pmgebh\/DeQS_PM-GEBH_2021_BUAW_V01_2022-06-30.pdf","key":"8126_CR8"},{"issue":"3","key":"8126_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12361","volume":"45","author":"HP Kennedy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kennedy HP, Cheyney M, Dahlen HG, Downe S, Foureur MJ, Homer CSE et al (2018) Asking different questions: a call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child. Birth 45(3):222\u2013231","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"9948","key":"8126_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60789-3","volume":"384","author":"MJ Renfrew","year":"2014","unstructured":"Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF et al (2014) Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 384(9948):1129\u20131145","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"unstructured":"IQTIG \u2013 Institut f\u00fcr Qualit\u00e4tssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen. Methodische Grundlagen. Version 2.0 Berlin 2022 [20.08.2022]. Available from: https:\/\/iqtig.org\/downloads\/berichte-2\/meg\/IQTIG_Methodische-Grundlagen_Version-2.0_2022-04-27_barrierefrei.pdf.","key":"8126_CR11"},{"issue":"11","key":"8126_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-017198","volume":"7","author":"JS Dohbit","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dohbit JS, Foumane P, Tochie JN, Mamoudou F, Temgoua MN, Tankeu R et al (2017) Maternal and neonatal outcomes of vaginal breech delivery for singleton term pregnancies in a carefully selected Cameroonian population: a cohort study. BMJ Open 7(11):e017198","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1378328","volume":"32","author":"C Ekeus","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ekeus C, Norman M, Aberg K, Winberg S, Stolt K, Aronsson A (2019) Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality - a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32(2):265\u2013270","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"8126_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-014979","volume":"7","author":"S Bjellmo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Martinussen MP, Romundstad PR, Hjelle S, Moster D et al (2017) Is vaginal breech delivery associated with higher risk for perinatal death and cerebral palsy compared with vaginal cephalic birth? Registry-based cohort study in Norway. BMJ Open 7(4):e014979","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"8126_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2464-7","volume":"19","author":"S Bjellmo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bjellmo S, Hjelle S, Krebs L, Magnussen E, Vik T (2019) Adherence to guidelines and suboptimal practice in term breech delivery with perinatal death- a population-based case-control study in Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1):330","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"unstructured":"Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Gyn\u00e4kologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG), Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Hebammenwissenschaft (DGHWi). Vaginale Geburt am Termin (S3-Leitlinie): AWMF; 2020 [29.05.2023]. Available from: https:\/\/register.awmf.org\/de\/leitlinien\/detail\/015-083.","key":"8126_CR16"},{"issue":"5s","key":"8126_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.001","volume":"228","author":"P Olofsson","year":"2023","unstructured":"Olofsson P (2023) Umbilical cord pH, blood gases, and lactate at birth: normal values, interpretation, and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 228(5s):S1222\u2013S1240","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline NG235 Intrapartum Care 2023 [13.10.2023]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng235.","key":"8126_CR18"},{"unstructured":"Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Kinder-Richtlinie 2023 [20.10.2023]. Available from: https:\/\/www.g-ba.de\/richtlinien\/15\/.","key":"8126_CR19"},{"issue":"6","key":"8126_CR20","first-page":"1103","volume":"78","author":"KG Goldaber","year":"1991","unstructured":"Goldaber KG, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Leveno KJ, Dax JS, McIntire DD (1991) Pathologic fetal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol 78(6):1103\u20131107","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8126_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2033-5","volume":"18","author":"SJ Fischbein","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fischbein SJ, Freeze R (2018) Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18(1):397","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"7","key":"8126_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1344","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1754789","volume":"35","author":"HY Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen HY, Blackwell SC, Chauhan SP (2022) Association between apgar score at 5 minutes and adverse outcomes among Low-Risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 35(7):1344\u20131351","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"25","key":"8126_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7109","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1943659","volume":"35","author":"HY Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen HY, Chauhan SP (2022) Apgar score at 10 minutes and adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 35(25):7109\u20137118","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348809004182","volume":"67","author":"BI Nesheim","year":"1988","unstructured":"Nesheim BI (1988) Duration of labor. An analysis of influencing factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67(2):121\u2013124","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR25","first-page":"56","volume":"200","author":"FM Perl","year":"1996","unstructured":"Perl FM, Friederichs-Vieten W, Kl\u00f6ck FK (1996) Progress of labor and neonatal morbidity in primiparity with breech presentation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 200(2):56\u201360","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol"},{"unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labor. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK258875\/.","key":"8126_CR26"},{"issue":"1","key":"8126_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05595-5","volume":"23","author":"P Leborne","year":"2023","unstructured":"Leborne P, de Tayrac R, Zemmache Z, Serrand C, Fabbro-Peray P, Allegre L et al (2023) Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23(1):317","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"8126_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0048","volume":"43","author":"G Bogner","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bogner G, Strobl M, Schausberger C, Fischer T, Reisenberger K, Jacobs VR (2015) Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance. J Perinat Med 43(6):707\u2013713","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12033","volume":"136","author":"F Louwen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Louwen F, Daviss BA, Johnson KC, Reitter A (2017) Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 136(2):151\u2013161","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"8126_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.09.003","volume":"43","author":"S Walker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Walker S, Scamell M, Parker P (2016) Principles of physiological breech birth practice: a Delphi study. Midwifery 43:1\u20136","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"3","key":"8126_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00822-6","volume":"189","author":"M Su","year":"2003","unstructured":"Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, Willan A, Hannah WJ, Hutton E et al (2003) Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(3):740\u2013745","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8126_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12562","volume":"48","author":"S Mattiolo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mattiolo S, Spillane E, Walker S (2021) Physiological breech birth training: an evaluation of clinical practice changes after a one-day training program. Birth 48(4):558\u2013565","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"2","key":"8126_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12326","volume":"45","author":"S Walker","year":"2018","unstructured":"Walker S, Parker P, Scamell M (2018) Expertise in physiological breech birth: A mixed-methods study. Birth 45(2):202\u2013209","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"8126_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2017.09.008","volume":"31","author":"S Walker","year":"2018","unstructured":"Walker S, Scamell M, Parker P (2018) Deliberate acquisition of competence in physiological breech birth: a grounded theory study. Women Birth 31(3):e170\u2013e177","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"8126_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01206.x","volume":"114","author":"N Nassar","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nassar N, Roberts C, Raynes-Greenow C, Barratt A, Peat B (2007) Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598]. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114(3):325\u2013333","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schneider H, Husslein P, Schneider K-TM. Die Geburtshilfe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016. Available from: http:\/\/nbn-resolving.org\/urn:nbn:de:bsz:31-epflicht-1512096.","key":"8126_CR36","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-45064-2"},{"issue":"11","key":"8126_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08150.x","volume":"106","author":"LH Kean","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kean LH, Suwanrath C, Gargari SS, Sahota DS, James DK (1999) A comparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalic presentations at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(11):1209\u20131213","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8126_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.06.021","volume":"263","author":"S Walker","year":"2021","unstructured":"Walker S, Dasgupta T, Halliday A, Reitter A (2021) Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness studies of breech birth at term (Breech-COS): a systematic review on variations in outcome reporting. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 263:117\u2013126","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8126_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1027\/0044-3409.217.1.1","volume":"217","author":"P Sedlmeier","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sedlmeier P (2009) Beyond the significance test ritual. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie \/ Journal of Psychology 217(1):1\u20135","journal-title":"Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie \/ Journal of Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"8126_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155","volume":"112","author":"J Cohen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155\u2013159","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T00:20:02Z","timestamp":1757463602000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]}},"alternative-id":["8126"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08126-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 July 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The data collection and analysis were carried out by the IQTIG. Through the proven practices, ethical standards and data confidentiality principles were adhered to.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}