{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T13:09:44Z","timestamp":1765804184310,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]],"date-time":"2025-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760659200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]],"date-time":"2025-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760659200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered the gold standard for the correction of middle compartment (apical) prolapse. The extent to which simultaneous correction of the anterior compartment is necessary remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the anatomical and functional outcomes of the SCP on the anterior compartment with respect to the correction of central and lateral defects as well as stress urinary incontinence (SUI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This was a retrospective clinical follow-up with records of recurrences and complications as well as effects on SUI after laparoscopic SCP with and without simultaneous vaginal correction at Elisabeth Hospital, Essen, Germany, from 2014\u20132020 in 65 of 86 patients, with an average follow-up of 3.3\u00a0years.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Without simultaneous vaginal correction of the anterior compartment, recurrence was more common in women with central defect POP-Q Ba\u2009&gt;\u2009\u2212\u00a02.0 [4 of 8 patients without correction (50% recurrence) vs. 1 of 23 patients with correction (4% recurrence)]. The OR for recurrence with surgery was 0.05 (95% CI 0.01; 0.52,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090,001). In women with lateral defects of the anterior compartment with a POP-Q Ba\u2009&gt;\u2009\u2212\u00a02.0, simultaneous vaginal correction was not necessary, with a low recurrence rate (1 of 18 recurrences, 6%). Preexisting SUI grade\u2009\u2265\u20091 could be corrected in 27 of 36 patients. (75%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090,001) according to the SCP.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>Mesh erosion with reoperation (Clavien\u2013Dindo IIIb) occurred in three patients (4.6%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Overall, this study suggests that patients with a central defect of the anterior vaginal wall can benefit from additional vaginal correction as part of the SCP. Furthermore, existing incontinence improves with the correction of prolapse.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]],"date-time":"2025-10-17T16:56:43Z","timestamp":1760720203000},"page":"2233-2240","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Positive effects of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on anterior lateral defects and stress urinary incontinence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"312","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8110-1211","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Norbert","family":"Nosal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1627-1871","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sebastian","family":"Ludwig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4906-7751","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Markus","family":"Huebner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"8214_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311","volume":"300","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nygaard I et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311\u20131316","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6","key":"8214_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1326-1","volume":"16","author":"G Tegerstedt","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tegerstedt G et al (2005) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):497\u2013503","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"2","key":"8214_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-05018-z","volume":"33","author":"HW Brown","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brown HW et al (2022) International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int Urogynecol J 33(2):173\u2013187","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"8214_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1726-y","volume":"23","author":"P Toozs-Hobson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Toozs-Hobson P et al (2012) An international urogynecological association (IUGA)\/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):527\u2013535","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"8214_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70440-0","volume":"181","author":"MD Barber","year":"1999","unstructured":"Barber MD et al (1999) Accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(1):87\u201390","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"24","key":"8214_CR6","first-page":"420","volume":"107","author":"C Dannecker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dannecker C et al (2010) Urinary incontinence in women: part 1 of a series of articles on incontinence. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(24):420\u2013426","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"issue":"2676","key":"8214_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.2676.817","volume":"1","author":"WE Fothergill","year":"1912","unstructured":"Fothergill WE (1912) A Clinical Lecture on the precise relationship of cystocele, prolapse and rectocele, and the operations for their relief: Delivered in the Post-graduate Course at the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Br Med J 1(2676):817\u2013818","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"61","key":"8214_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1717","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91562-O","volume":"166","author":"JO DeLancey","year":"1992","unstructured":"DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(61):1717\u20131724","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"8214_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-119648","volume":"76","author":"K Baessler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baessler K et al (2016) Diagnosis and therapy of female pelvic organ prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-level, AWMF registry number 015\/006, April 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(12):1287\u20131301","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"11","key":"8214_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1815","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2172-1","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1815\u20131833","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000079","volume":"26","author":"M Rosati","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rosati M, Bramante S, Conti F (2014) A review on the role of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 26(4):281\u2013289","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.07.006","volume":"53","author":"CK Liu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Liu CK et al (2014) A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 53(4):552\u2013558","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR13","first-page":"301","volume":"17","author":"CM Chan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chan CM et al (2011) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical and functional outcomes. Hong Kong Med J 17(4):301\u2013305","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"issue":"6","key":"8214_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.12.006","volume":"27","author":"L Labanca","year":"2020","unstructured":"Labanca L et al (2020) Sacrohysteropexy: a way to spare the uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(6):1254\u20131255","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001652","volume":"128","author":"L Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen L et al (2016) Structural failure sites in anterior vaginal wall prolapse: identification of a collinear triad. Obstet Gynecol 128(4):853\u2013862","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8214_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10\u201317","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8214_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.1990.tb08028.x","volume":"153","author":"PE Petros","year":"1990","unstructured":"Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) Pinch test for diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 153:33\u201335","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl"},{"issue":"11","key":"8214_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0474","volume":"32","author":"S Rexhepi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rexhepi S et al (2018) Laparoscopic bilateral cervicosacropexy and vaginosacropexy: new surgical treatment option in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. J Endourol 32(11):1058\u20131064","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8214_CR19","first-page":"75","volume":"4","author":"C Persu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Persu C et al (2011) Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life 4(1):75\u201381","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"issue":"11","key":"8214_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3336-1","volume":"28","author":"SS Boyd","year":"2017","unstructured":"Boyd SS, O\u2019Sullivan D, Tulikangas P (2017) Use of the pelvic organ quantification system (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals. Int Urogynecol J 28(11):1719\u20131723","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20041","volume":"23","author":"K Avery","year":"2004","unstructured":"Avery K et al (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23(4):322\u2013330","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"8214_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","volume":"250","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187\u2013196","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"8214_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2234-4","volume":"25","author":"Z Chen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chen Z et al (2014) Nine-year objective and subjective follow-up of the ultra-lateral anterior repair for cystocele. Int Urogynecol J 25(3):387\u2013392","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"8214_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1038","DOI":"10.1007\/s00120-009-2080-7","volume":"48","author":"H Loertzer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Loertzer H et al (2009) Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not? Urologe A 48(9):1038\u20131043","journal-title":"Urologe A"},{"issue":"2","key":"8214_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2015.6595","volume":"176","author":"A Sedrakyan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sedrakyan A, Chughtai B, Mao J (2016) Regulatory warnings and use of surgical mesh in pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA Intern Med 176(2):275\u2013277","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"8214_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.10.004","volume":"279","author":"AS Page","year":"2022","unstructured":"Page AS, Page G, Deprest J (2022) Cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy for urinary incontinence and apical prolapse: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 279:60\u201371","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"8214_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1949","DOI":"10.21873\/invivo.11690","volume":"33","author":"S Ludwig","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ludwig S et al (2019) Comparison of solifenacin and bilateral apical fixation in the treatment of mixed and urgency urinary incontinence in women: URGE 1 study, a randomized clinical trial. In Vivo 33(6):1949\u20131957","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"key":"8214_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14061880","author":"S Ludwig","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ludwig S et al (2025) Comparison of open abdominal and laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament replacement: a one-year follow-up study. J Clin Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14061880","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"8214_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.1990.tb08027.x","volume":"153","author":"PE Petros","year":"1990","unstructured":"Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 153(Suppl):7\u201331","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"8214_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000446","volume":"24","author":"R Haj Yahya","year":"2018","unstructured":"Haj Yahya R et al (2018) Anatomical outcome and patient satisfaction after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for anterior and apical prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24(5):352\u2013355","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"8214_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/9934486","volume":"2021","author":"GK Noe","year":"2021","unstructured":"Noe GK et al (2021) Current role of hysterectomy in pelvic floor surgery: time for reappraisal? A review of current literature and expert discussion. Biomed Res Int 2021:9934486","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"10","key":"8214_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2069","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04260-1","volume":"31","author":"E Illiano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Costantini E (2020) Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 31(10):2069\u20132074","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"8214_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3257-4","volume":"28","author":"H Jefferis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jefferis H, Price N, Jackson S (2017) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10 years\u2019 experience. Int Urogynecol J 28(8):1241\u20131248","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8214_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-104288","volume":"76","author":"KJ Neis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Neis KJ et al (2016) Indications and route of hysterectomy for benign diseases. Guideline of the DGGG OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015\/070, April 2015). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(4):350\u2013364","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"1","key":"8214_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05630-1","volume":"35","author":"A Hegde","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hegde A et al (2024) Impact of childbirth on pelvic floor dysfunction in women who have undergone previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 35(1):3\u201317","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"8214_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s10397-017-1017-1","volume":"14","author":"H Jefferis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jefferis H, Price N, Jackson S (2017) Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy-a case series. Gynecol Surg 14(1):16","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T13:07:10Z","timestamp":1765804030000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["8214"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08214-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 August 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 October 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}