{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T00:18:01Z","timestamp":1790036281918,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771200000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771200000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T14:20:38Z","timestamp":1771251638000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the biometric measurements in pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"313","author":[{"given":"Tania","family":"Elger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristina","family":"Bettecken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalia","family":"Prodan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiri","family":"Sonek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Hoopmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1497-5143","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karl Oliver","family":"Kagan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"8351_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24888","volume":"59","author":"LJ Salomon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V et al (2022) ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 59:840\u2013856. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.24888","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2665","volume":"27","author":"LJ Salomon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M et al (2006) Feasibility and reproducibility of an image\u2010scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:34\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.2665","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(14)61490-2","volume":"384","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG et al (2014) International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet 384:869\u2013879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(14)61490-2","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"8351_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10082","volume":"39","author":"I Sarris","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sarris I, Ioannou C, Chamberlain P et al (2012) Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:266\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.10082","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13306","volume":"44","author":"RG Axell","year":"2014","unstructured":"Axell RG, Gillett A, Pasupathy D et al (2014) Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipment used and its calibration. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:31\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.13306","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07924-1","author":"T Elger","year":"2025","unstructured":"Elger T, Prodan N, Bettecken K et al (2025) Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07924-1","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8351_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21909","volume":"55","author":"D Wright","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wright D, Wright A, Smith E, Nicolaides KH (2020) Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55:170\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.21909","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","volume":"151","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS et al (1985) Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2014a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:333\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","volume":"213","author":"GMB Louis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Louis GMB, Grewal J, Albert PS et al (2015) Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:449.e1-449.e41. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","volume":"49","author":"J Stirnemann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stirnemann J, Villar J, Salomon LJ et al (2017) International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH\u201021st project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49:478\u2013486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17347","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1097\/ruq.0000000000000275","volume":"33","author":"E Karahanoglu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Karahanoglu E, Altinboga O, Akpinar F et al (2017) The effect of the amniotic fluid index on the accuracy of ultrasonographic-estimated fetal weight. Ultrasound Q 33:148\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ruq.0000000000000275","journal-title":"Ultrasound Q"},{"key":"8351_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1556","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12755","volume":"41","author":"H Aksoy","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aksoy H, Aksoy \u00dc, Karada\u011f \u00d6\u0130 et al (2015) Influence of maternal body mass index on sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41:1556\u20131561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12755","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"8351_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1177\/1742271x17732807","volume":"26","author":"J Milner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Milner J, Arezina J (2017) The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: a systematic review. Ultrasound 26:32\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1742271x17732807","journal-title":"Ultrasound"},{"key":"8351_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1751","volume":"25","author":"NJ Dudley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:80\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.1751","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2555-4146","volume":"46","author":"L Sch\u00e4ffer","year":"2025","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4ffer L, Burkhardt T (2025) Fetal biometry in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters \u2013 simple or actually complicated? Ultraschall Med - Eur J Ultrasound 46:220\u2013223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2555-4146","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med - Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"8351_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10094","volume":"39","author":"S Kehl","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S et al (2012) What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:543\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.10094","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8351_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08172-7","volume":"312","author":"D Emam","year":"2025","unstructured":"Emam D, Corbella G, Poziello C et al (2025) Usefulness and timing of the third-trimester ultrasound scan: a review of guidelines and underlying evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 312:1445\u20131459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-025-08172-7","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T14:20:39Z","timestamp":1771251639000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["8351"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08351-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors have agreed to publish this manuscript in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University T\u00fcbingen (572\/2025).","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}}],"article-number":"98"}}