{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T00:02:46Z","timestamp":1784851366639,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779840000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784851200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":58,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T12:46:08Z","timestamp":1779885968000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Cervical ripening with mechanical method vs oral misoprostol in pregnancies with elevated BMI: a cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"313","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8418-7110","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Castoldi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3530-6328","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Florent","family":"Fuchs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4273-6553","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Philippe","family":"Deruelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6929-4858","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giulia Maria","family":"Scotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2129-2626","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Massimo","family":"Candiani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8097-366X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paolo Ivo","family":"Cavoretto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"#cr-split#-8458_CR1.1","unstructured":"NMPA Project Team. National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Clinical Report 2022. Based on births in NHS maternity services in England and Wales between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019. London: RCOG"},{"key":"#cr-split#-8458_CR1.2","unstructured":"2022 Accessed the 17th January 2026 at: https:\/\/maternityaudit.org.uk\/filesUploaded\/Ref%20336%20NMPA%20Clinical%20Report_2022.pdf"},{"key":"8458_CR2","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.\u00a0Inducing labour. NICE guideline [NG207];\u00a02021. Available from:\u00a0https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng207\/evidence"},{"key":"8458_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eurox.2023.100185","volume":"18","author":"K M\u00e4kel\u00e4","year":"2023","unstructured":"M\u00e4kel\u00e4 K, Palom\u00e4ki O, Korpiharju H, Helminen M, Uotila J (2023) Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain relief and birth experience among induced and spontaneous-onset labours ending in vaginal birth: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 18:100185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eurox.2023.100185","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"8458_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17951","volume":"132","author":"C Winsloe","year":"2025","unstructured":"Winsloe C, Elhindi J, Vieira MC, Relph S, Arcus CG, Alagna A, Briley A, Johnson M, Page LM, Shennan A, Thilaganathan B, Marlow N, Lees C, Lawlor DA, Khalil A, Sandall J, Copas A, Pasupathy D, DESiGN Trial team (2025) Differences in factors associated with preterm and term stillbirth: A secondary cohort analysis of the DESiGN trial. BJOG 132:89\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17951","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1536","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.2269","volume":"311","author":"D Aune","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S (2014) Maternal body mass index and the risk of foetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 311:1536\u20131546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.2269","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"8458_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"984","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15661","volume":"126","author":"S Santos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Santos S, Voerman E, Amiano P et al (2019) Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications: an individual participant data meta-analysis of European, North American and Australian cohorts. BJOG 126:984\u2013995. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.15661","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","volume":"123","author":"W Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK et al (2016) A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG 123:346\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orcp.2021.09.001","volume":"15","author":"RB Helmig","year":"2021","unstructured":"Helmig RB, Brogaard L, Hvidman L (2021) Women\u2019s body mass index and oral administration of misoprostol for induction of labor \u2013 a retrospective cohort study. Obes Res Clin Pract 15:509\u2013511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.orcp.2021.09.001","journal-title":"Obes Res Clin Pract"},{"key":"8458_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3000","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1112371","volume":"29","author":"JR Lassiter","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lassiter JR, Holliday N, Lewis DF, Mulekar M, Abshire J, Brocato B (2016) Induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix: how does BMI affect success? (\u2021). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:3000\u20133002. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2015.1112371","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"8458_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub4","volume":"3","author":"MD de Vaan","year":"2023","unstructured":"de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M (2023) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub4","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"8458_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1462","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13981","volume":"123","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, Jones LV, Caldwell DM (2016) Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. BJOG 123:1462\u20131470. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13981","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e61","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","volume":"129","author":"AD Weeks","year":"2022","unstructured":"Weeks AD, Lightly K, Mol BW, Frohlich J, Pontefract S, Williams MJ, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2022) Evaluating misoprostol and mechanical methods for induction of labour. BJOG 129:e61\u2013e65. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102404","volume":"91","author":"N Aleker","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aleker N, Lim BH (2023) Intrapartum care and management of complications in women with obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 91:102404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102404","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"8458_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","volume":"370","author":"E von Elm","year":"2007","unstructured":"von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, G\u00f8tzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemioLogy (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453\u20131457. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"8458_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.02.289","volume":"231","author":"EF Hamilton","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hamilton EF, Zhoroev T, Warrick PA, Tarca AL, Garite TJ, Caughey AB, Melillo J, Prasad M, Neilson D, Singson P, McKay K, Romero R (2024) New labor curves of dilation and station to improve the accuracy of predicting labor progress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 231:1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.02.289","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3s","key":"8458_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S769","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.103","volume":"230","author":"NK Ayala","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ayala NK, Rouse DJ. Failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(3S):S769-S774. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.06.103","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8458_CR17","unstructured":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG): Clinical guideline on care in labour in the absence of pregnancy complications, interim update. https:\/\/ranzcog.edu.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/Care-Labour-Absence-Pregnancy-Complications.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2026"},{"issue":"1","key":"8458_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","volume":"131","author":"D Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E (2015) FIGO Intrapartum fetal monitoring expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 131(1):13\u201324","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"8458_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000445580.65983.d2","volume":"123","author":"D Schendel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schendel D (2014) Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, Second Edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 123:896\u2013901. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000445580.65983.d2","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8458_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orcp.2021.10.005","volume":"15","author":"H Vats","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vats H, Saxena R, Sachdeva MP, Walia GK, Gupta V (2021) Impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes in the worldwide populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract 15:536\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.orcp.2021.10.005","journal-title":"Obes Res Clin Pract"},{"key":"8458_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13353","volume":"97","author":"CN Schoen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S et al (2018) Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labour and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97:1051\u20131060. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13353","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"8458_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3804","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1586877","volume":"33","author":"MA Sarumi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sarumi MA, Gherman RB, Bell TD, Jairath P, Johnson MJ, Burgess AL (2020) A comparison of cervical ripening modalities among overweight and obese nulliparous gravidas. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33:3804\u20133808. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2019.1586877","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"8458_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","volume":"387","author":"ML Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M et al (2016) Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet 387:1619\u20131628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"8458_CR24","first-page":"S695","volume":"228","author":"M Toscano","year":"2023","unstructured":"Toscano M et al (2023) Pharmacokinetics of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in pregnancies complicated by obesity. J AJOG 228(1):S695\u2013S696","journal-title":"J AJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1642","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14657","volume":"124","author":"AD Weeks","year":"2017","unstructured":"Weeks AD, Navaratnam K, Alfirevic Z (2017) Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour. BJOG 124:1642\u20131645. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14657","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.02.004","volume":"230","author":"AM Saucedo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Saucedo AM, Alvarez M, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Harper LM (2024) Optimal misoprostol dosing among patients with a body mass index greater than 30: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 230:565.e1-565.e16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.02.004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8458_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD014484","author":"RS Kerr","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ et al (2021) Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD014484","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"8458_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12032","volume":"136","author":"Y Borghesi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Borghesi Y, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Pigeyre M, Deruelle P (2017) Risk of cesarean delivery among pregnant women with class III obesity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 136:168\u2013174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12032","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"8458_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2022.100109","volume":"2","author":"R Drummond","year":"2022","unstructured":"Drummond R, Patel M, Myers M et al (2022) Class III obesity is an independent risk factor for unsuccessful induction of labor. AJOG Glob Rep 2:100109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xagr.2022.100109","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"key":"8458_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13794","volume":"99","author":"Y Kerbage","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kerbage Y, Senat MV, Drumez E, Subtil D, Vayssiere C, Deruelle P (2020) Risk factors for failed induction of labor among pregnant women with class III obesity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:637\u2013643. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13794","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"8458_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14737","volume":"103","author":"DMR Croll","year":"2024","unstructured":"Croll DMR, De Vaan MDT, Moes SL et al (2024) Methods of induction of labour in women with obesity: a secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 103:470\u2013478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14737","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"8458_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15552","volume":"167","author":"MC Nace","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nace MC, Delotte J, Gauci PA (2024) Comparative study of second-line labor induction methods in patients with unfavorable cervix after first-line low-dose oral misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 167:313\u2013321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.15552","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"8458_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-058282","volume":"13","author":"M De Berti","year":"2023","unstructured":"De Berti M, Le Gouge A, Monmousseau F et al (2023) Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open 13:e058282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-058282","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"8458_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2020.10266","volume":"84","author":"C Dupont","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dupont C, Blanc-Petitjean P, Cortet M et al (2020) Dissatisfaction of women with induction of labour according to parity: results of a population-based cohort study. Midwifery 84:102663. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2020.10266","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"8458_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17794","volume":"131","author":"M Patabendige","year":"2024","unstructured":"Patabendige M, Chan F, Vayssiere C, Ehlinger V, Van Gemund N, le Cessie S, Prager M, Marions L, Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Young DC, Le Roux PA, Gregson S, Waterstone M, Rolnik DL, Mol BW, Li W (2024) Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG 131:1167\u20131180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17794","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"8458_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.04.042","volume":"233","author":"PI Cavoretto","year":"2025","unstructured":"Cavoretto PI, Farina A, Syngelaki A, Solonos F, Nicolaides KH (2025) The risk for preeclampsia at 36 weeks and at 12 weeks predicts intrapartum fetal compromise and spontaneous onset of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 233:e56\u2013e67. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.04.042","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8458_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.12.025","volume":"233","author":"A Farina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Farina A, Cavoretto PI, Syngelaki A, Morano D, Adjahou S, Nicolaides KH (2025) The 36-week preeclampsia risk by the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm is associated with fetal compromise following induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 233:57.e1-57.e12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.12.025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8458_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"392.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.08.025","volume":"232","author":"A Farina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Farina A, Cavoretto PI, Syngelaki A, Adjahou S, Nicolaides KH (2025) Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1\/placental growth factor ratio at 36 weeks\u2019 gestation: association with spontaneous onset of labor and intrapartum fetal compromise in low-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 232:392.e1-392.e14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.08.025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T23:47:07Z","timestamp":1784850427000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["8458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08458-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethical committee approval was given from Montpellier University Hospital Centre\u2019s Ethical Committee\n                      eDOL\u2014Entrep\u00f4t de donn\u00e9es de sante\u0301 du Languedoc\n                      on the 21.10.2024 (N dossier 2024\u201409\u2014133).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"233"}}