{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T23:14:49Z","timestamp":1788304489515,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]],"date-time":"2026-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782000000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788307200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":73,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]],"date-time":"2026-06-21T08:46:31Z","timestamp":1782031591000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Computerized CTG self-monitoring versus standard Doppler assessment in late-onset fetal growth restriction (cosmos): a pilot randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"313","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct05034861","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8220-969X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Urszula","family":"Nowacka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3647-3550","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tadeusz","family":"Issat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5779-8517","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karolina","family":"Krajewska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-1016-5662","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Agnieszka","family":"Norwa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6970-5303","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Natalia","family":"Mazanowska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3997-1872","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joanna","family":"Kowalczyk-Buss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5492-0676","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Szymon","family":"Kozlowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9056-7040","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marta","family":"Kuchcinska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8955-8198","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Piotr","family":"Lauda\u0144ski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7373-7690","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Artur","family":"Jakimiuk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8071-0368","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Agata","family":"Majewska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"8493_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","volume":"56","author":"CC Lees","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva CF, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F et al (2020) ISUOG practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 56(2):298\u2013312","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"8493_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20282","volume":"55","author":"E Nohuz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nohuz E, Riviere O, Coste K, Vendittelli F (2020) Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55(5):621\u2013628","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23523","volume":"57","author":"I Papastefanou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Papastefanou I, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Souretis K, Chrysanthopoulou E, Nicolaides KH (2021) Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11\u201313\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57(1):52\u201361","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8493_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph18042016","author":"U Nowacka","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nowacka U, Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Krajewski P, Saletra-Bielinska A, Walasik I, Szymusik I (2021) Predictive accuracy of singleton versus customized twin growth chart for adverse perinatal outcome: a cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph18042016","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"8493_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1159\/000359969","volume":"36","author":"W Mifsud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mifsud W, Sebire NJ (2014) Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 36(2):117\u2013128","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"5","key":"8493_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.227","volume":"220","author":"A Ciobanu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ciobanu A, Rouvali A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH (2019) Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry, and biomarkers at 35-37 weeks\u2019 gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220(5):e1\u2013e11","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"8493_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4412","volume":"34","author":"F Figueras","year":"2014","unstructured":"Figueras F, Gratacos E (2014) Stage-based approach to the management of fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 34(7):655\u2013659","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"3","key":"8493_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","volume":"48","author":"SJ Gordijn","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN et al (2016) Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48(3):333\u2013339","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20854","volume":"56","author":"LCG Molina","year":"2020","unstructured":"Molina LCG, Odibo L, Zientara S, Obican SG, Rodriguez A, Stout M et al (2020) Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 56(1):61\u201366","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8493_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009","volume":"49","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baschat AA (2018) Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 49:53\u201365","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9983","key":"8493_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","volume":"385","author":"CC Lees","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C et al (2015) 2\u00a0year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 385(9983):2162\u20132172","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","volume":"110","author":"Group GS","year":"2003","unstructured":"Group GS (2003) A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 110(1):27\u201332","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9433","key":"8493_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16809-8","volume":"364","author":"JG Thornton","year":"2004","unstructured":"Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M, group Gs, (2004) Infant wellbeing at 2\u00a0years of age in the growth restriction intervention trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364(9433):513\u2013520","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"8493_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18815","volume":"50","author":"CM Bilardo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bilardo CM, Hecher K, Visser GHA, Papageorghiou AT, Marlow N, Thilaganathan B et al (2017) Severe fetal growth restriction at 26\u201332\u00a0weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 50(3):285\u2013290","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"8493_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1159\/000355525","volume":"36","author":"S Savchev","year":"2014","unstructured":"Savchev S, Figueras F, Sanz-Cortes M, Cruz-Lemini M, Triunfo S, Botet F et al (2014) Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 36(2):99\u2013105","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"10426","key":"8493_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02228-6","volume":"403","author":"M Rial-Crestelo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rial-Crestelo M, Lubusky M, Parra-Cordero M, Krofta L, Kajdy A, Zohav E et al (2024) Term planned delivery based on fetal growth assessment with or without the cerebroplacental ratio in low-risk pregnancies (RATIO37): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 403(10426):545\u2013553","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"8493_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022","volume":"211","author":"S Crimmins","year":"2014","unstructured":"Crimmins S, Desai A, Block-Abraham D, Berg C, Gembruch U, Baschat AA (2014) A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(6):e1-10","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8493_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.01.020","volume":"226","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2022","unstructured":"Baschat AA, Galan HL, Lee W, DeVore GR, Mari G, Hobbins J et al (2022) The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 226(4):475\u2013486","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8493_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","volume":"341","author":"KE Boers","year":"2010","unstructured":"Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, van der Post JA, Bekedam DJ, Kwee A et al (2010) Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 341:c7087","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"8493_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.2020.0158","volume":"91","author":"S Kwiatkowski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kwiatkowski S, Torbe A, Borowski D, Breborowicz G, Czajkowski K, Huras H et al (2020) Polish Society of gynecologists and obstetricians recommendations on diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Ginekol Pol 91(10):634\u2013643","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17215","volume":"50","author":"H Wolf","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wolf H, Arabin B, Lees CC, Oepkes D, Prefumo F, Thilaganathan B et al (2017) Longitudinal study of computerized cardiotocography in early fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 50(1):71\u201378","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"8493_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.04.042","volume":"233","author":"PI Cavoretto","year":"2025","unstructured":"Cavoretto PI, Farina A, Syngelaki A, Solonos F, Nicolaides KH (2025) The risk for preeclampsia at 36\u00a0weeks and at 12\u00a0weeks predicts intrapartum fetal compromise and spontaneous onset of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 233(2):e56\u2013e67","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8493_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4521e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.01.008","volume":"231","author":"PI Cavoretto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cavoretto PI, Farina A, Salmeri N, Syngelaki A, Tan MY, Nicolaides KH (2024) First trimester risk of preeclampsia and rate of spontaneous birth in patients without preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 231(4):4521e1-e7","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.12.025","volume":"233","author":"A Farina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Farina A, Cavoretto PI, Syngelaki A, Morano D, Adjahou S, Nicolaides KH (2025) The 36\u00a0week preeclampsia risk by the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm is associated with fetal compromise following induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 233(1):e1\u2013e12","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8493_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph18147221","author":"U Nowacka","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nowacka U, Kozlowski S, Januszewski M, Sierdzinski J, Jakimiuk A, Issat T (2021) COVID-19 pandemic-related anxiety in pregnant women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph18147221","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"8493_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100601","volume":"4","author":"K Holliman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Holliman K, Pluym ID, Grechukhina O, Blumenfeld YJ, Platt LD, Copel JA et al (2022) Maternal-fetal medicine fellows\u2019 perception and comfort with obstetrical ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 4(3):100601","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"3","key":"8493_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e116","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(22)00231-X","volume":"5","author":"MN Bekker","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bekker MN, Koster MPH, Keusters WR, Ganzevoort W, de Haan-Jebbink JM, Deurloo KL et al (2023) Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL). Lancet Digit Health 5(3):e116\u2013e124","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"8493_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.18097","volume":"132","author":"A Lovers","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lovers A, Daumer M, Frasch MG, Ugwumadu A, Warrick P, Vullings R et al (2025) Advancements in fetal heart rate monitoring: a report on opportunities and strategic initiatives for better intrapartum care. BJOG 132(7):853\u2013866","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14294","volume":"101","author":"AR Zizzo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zizzo AR, Hvidman L, Salvig JD, Holst L, Kyng M, Petersen OB (2022) Home management by remote self-monitoring in intermediate- and high-risk pregnancies: a retrospective study of 400 consecutive women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 101(1):135\u2013144","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"8493_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26190","volume":"62","author":"R Peasley","year":"2023","unstructured":"Peasley R, Rangel LAA, Casagrandi D, Donadono V, Willinger M, Conti G et al (2023) Management of late-onset fetal growth restriction: pragmatic approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 62(1):106\u2013114","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T22:27:12Z","timestamp":1788301632000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["8493"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-026-08493-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Institute of Mother and Child, on June 24, 2021, under decision number 50\/2021. The device provider had no involvement in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or manuscript preparation. The devices were provided free of charge; however, this support was limited strictly to equipment provision, with no influence on any scientific or organizational aspects of the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"262"}}