{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T07:00:35Z","timestamp":1792652435254,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]],"date-time":"2019-10-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1572480000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]],"date-time":"2019-10-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1572480000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005878","name":"Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005878","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004092","name":"Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004092","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005432","name":"Pohjois-Savon Rahasto","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005432","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the insertion results and hearing preservation of a novel slim modiolar electrode (SME) in patients with residual hearing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We retrospectively collected the data from the medical files of 17 patients (18 ears) implanted with a SME. All patients had functional low frequency hearing (PTA\n                      <jats:sub>(0.125\u20130.5\u00a0kHz)<\/jats:sub>\n                      \u2009\u2264\u200980\u00a0dB HL). The insertion results were re-examined from the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Postoperative thresholds were obtained at the time of switch-on of the sound processors (mean 43\u00a0days) and at latest follow-up (mean 582\u00a0days). The speech recognition in noise was measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test preoperatively and at follow-up.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 395\u00b0. Neither scala dislocations nor tip fold over were detected. There were no total hearing losses. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 15\/18 (83%) ears at switch-on and in 14\/17 (82%) ears at follow-up. According to HEARRING classification, 55% (10\/18) had complete HP at switch-on and 41% (7\/17) still at follow-up. Thirteen patients (14 ears) were initially fitted with electric\u2013acoustic stimulation and seven patients (8 ears) continued to use it after follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The preliminary hearing preservation results with the SME were more favorable than reported for other perimodiolar electrodes. The results show that the array may also be feasible for electro-acoustic stimulation; it is beneficial in that it provides adequate cochlear coverage for pure electrical stimulation in the event of postoperative or progressive hearing loss.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]],"date-time":"2019-10-31T14:11:44Z","timestamp":1572531104000},"page":"367-375","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"277","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3871-8504","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matti","family":"Iso-Mustaj\u00e4rvi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2642-9369","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sini","family":"Sipari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2002-5358","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heikki","family":"L\u00f6pp\u00f6nen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6076-1037","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aarno","family":"Dietz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2 Suppl","key":"5708_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75S","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e318031542e","volume":"28","author":"A Aschendorff","year":"2007","unstructured":"Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):75S\u201379S","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"7","key":"5708_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318184f492","volume":"29","author":"CC Finley","year":"2008","unstructured":"Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK et al (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29(7):920\u2013928. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318184f492","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5708_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7","volume":"34","author":"LK Holden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB et al (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34(3):342\u2013360. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"8","key":"5708_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001125","volume":"37","author":"BP O\u2019Connell","year":"2016","unstructured":"O\u2019Connell BP, Cakir A, Hunter JB et al (2016) Electrode location and angular insertion depth are predictors of audiologic outcomes in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1016\u20131023. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001125","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182204526","volume":"32","author":"ML Carlson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carlson ML, Driscoll CLW, Gifford RH et al (2011) Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):962\u2013968. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182204526","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1159\/000027695","volume":"61","author":"C von Ilberg","year":"1999","unstructured":"von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Pfenningdorff T, Hartmann R, St\u00fcrzebecher E, Klinke R (1999) Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 61(6):334\u2013340","journal-title":"ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec"},{"issue":"10","key":"5708_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1726","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200310000-00012","volume":"113","author":"BJ Gantz","year":"2003","unstructured":"Gantz BJ, Turner CW (2003) Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 113(10):1726\u20131730","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"5","key":"5708_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2","volume":"115","author":"BJ Gantz","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW (2005) Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 115(5):796\u2013802","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"4","key":"5708_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31827e8163","volume":"34","author":"RH Gifford","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H et al (2013) Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear 34(4):413\u2013425. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31827e8163","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"12","key":"5708_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.3109\/14992027.2013.802032","volume":"52","author":"T Lenarz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D et al (2013) European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Int J Audiol 52(12):838\u2013848. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14992027.2013.802032\n\n(Epub 2013 Sep 2)","journal-title":"Int J Audiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5708_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.25451","volume":"126","author":"JT Roland","year":"2016","unstructured":"Roland JT, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJ, Multicenter Clinical Trial Group (2016) United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system. Laryngoscope 126(1):175\u2013181. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.25451","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"2","key":"5708_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2012.723824","volume":"133","author":"Y Nguyen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nguyen Y, Mosnier I, Borel S et al (2013) Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 133(2):116\u2013122. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016489.2012.723824","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5708_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001110","volume":"37","author":"M Suhling","year":"2016","unstructured":"Suhling M, Majdani O, Salcher R, Leifholz M, B\u00fcchner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T (2016) The impact of electrode array length on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1006\u20131015. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001110","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5708_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1159\/000360601","volume":"19","author":"M Jurawitz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jurawitz M, B\u00fcchner A, Harpel T, Sch\u00fcssler M, Majdani O, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T (2014) Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: nucleus\u00ae Hybrid\u2122-L24 and Nucleus Freedom\u2122 CI422. Audiol Neurootol 19(5):293\u2013309. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000360601","journal-title":"Audiol Neurootol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5708_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000541","volume":"35","author":"CA Buchman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Buchman CA, Dillon MT, King ER, Adunka MC, Adunka OF, Pillsbury HC (2014) Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol 35(10):1773\u20131779. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000541","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5708_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000829","volume":"36","author":"GB Wanna","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wanna GB, Noble JH, Gifford RH et al (2015) Impact of intrascalar electrode location, electrode type, and angular insertion depth on residual hearing in cochlear implant patients: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol 36(8):1343\u20131348. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000829","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5708_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000614","volume":"36","author":"S Helbig","year":"2015","unstructured":"Helbig S, Helbig M, Leinung M, St\u00f6ver T, Baumann U, Rader T (2015) Hearing preservation and improved speech perception with a flexible 28-mm electrode. Otol Neurotol 36(1):34\u201342. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000614","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31822558c4","volume":"32","author":"S Helbig","year":"2016","unstructured":"Helbig S, Adel Y, Rader T, St\u00f6ver T, Baumann U (2016) Long-term hearing preservation outcomes after cochlear implantation for electric-acoustic stimulation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):973\u2013979. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31822558c4","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5708_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.14639\/0392-100X-1579","volume":"38","author":"H Skarzynski","year":"2018","unstructured":"Skarzynski H, Matusiak M, Furmanek M, Pilka A, Wlodarczyk E, Oldak M, Skarzynski PH (2018) Radiologic measurement of cochlea and hearing preservation rate using slim straight electrode (CI422) and round window approach. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 38(5):468\u2013475. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.14639\/0392-100X-1579","journal-title":"Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31822558c4","volume":"32","author":"S Helbig","year":"2011","unstructured":"Helbig S, Baumann U, Hey C, Helbig M (2011) Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier. Otol Neurotol 32(6):973\u2013979. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e31822558c4","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5708_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000226289.04048.0f","volume":"27","author":"B Fraysse","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fraysse B, Mac\u00edas AR, Sterkers O et al (2006) Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 27(5):624\u2013633","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1002\/lio2.42","volume":"1","author":"BP O\u2019Connell","year":"2016","unstructured":"O\u2019Connell BP, Hunter JB, Wanna GB (2016) The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 1(6):169\u2013174. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lio2.42","journal-title":"Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5708_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182009f52","volume":"32","author":"MA Souter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Souter MA, Briggs RJS, Wright CG, Roland PS (2011) Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it? Otol Neurotol 32(1):58\u201363. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182009f52","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"5708_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2005.11.005","volume":"212","author":"LT Cohen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cohen LT, Saunders E, Knight MR, Cowan RSC (2006) Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with contour and straight nucleus electrode arrays. Hear Res 212(1\u20132):160\u2013175","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"5708_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-013-0437-5","volume":"15","author":"CJ Long","year":"2014","unstructured":"Long CJ, Holden TA, McClelland GH, Parkinson WS, Shelton C, Kelsall DC, Smith ZM (2014) Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(2):293\u2013304. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-013-0437-5","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5708_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200405000-00015","volume":"25","author":"MS Marrinan","year":"2004","unstructured":"Marrinan MS, Roland JT, Reitzen SD, Waltzman SB, Cohen LT, Cohen NL (2004) Degree of modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 25(3):290\u2013294","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5708_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599818764329","volume":"159","author":"OF Adunka","year":"2018","unstructured":"Adunka OF, Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Gurgel RK, Buchman CA (2018) Minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 159(2):215\u2013219. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0194599818764329","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"5708_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2014.898185","volume":"134","author":"A Dietz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dietz A, Buscherm\u00f6hle M, Aarnisalo AA et al (2014) The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment. Acta Otolaryngol 134(7):728\u2013737. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016489.2014.898185","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"5708_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.3109\/14992027.2015.1070309","volume":"54","author":"A Dietz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dietz A, Buscherm\u00f6hle M, Sivonen V, Willberg T, Aarnisalo AA, Lenarz T, Kollmeier B (2015) Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 54(Suppl 2):80\u201387. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14992027.2015.1070309","journal-title":"Int J Audiol"},{"issue":"564","key":"5708_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2013.869059","volume":"1","author":"H Skarzynski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S et al (2013) Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1(564):3\u201313. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016489.2013.869059","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol Suppl"},{"issue":"9","key":"5708_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e327","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001542","volume":"38","author":"M Iso-Mustaj\u00e4rvi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Iso-Mustaj\u00e4rvi M, Matikka H, Risi F et al (2017) a new slim modiolar electrode array for cochlear implantation: a radiological and histological study. Otol Neurotol 38(9):e327\u2013e334. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001542","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5708_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1159\/000480345","volume":"22","author":"A Aschendorff","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aschendorff A, Briggs R, Brademann G et al (2017) Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode. Audiol Neurootol 22(3):169\u2013179. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000480345","journal-title":"Audiol Neurootol"},{"issue":"12","key":"5708_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4141","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-017-4774-6","volume":"274","author":"D Cuda","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cuda D, Murri A (2017) Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(12):4141\u20134148. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-017-4774-6","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5708_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1179\/1754762811Y0000000007","volume":"12","author":"RJS Briggs","year":"2011","unstructured":"Briggs RJS, Tykocinski M, Lazsig R et al (2011) Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array\u2013multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones. Cochlear Implants Int 12(3):129\u2013139. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1179\/1754762811Y0000000007","journal-title":"Cochlear Implants Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"5708_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e28","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001652","volume":"39","author":"JL McJunkin","year":"2018","unstructured":"McJunkin JL, Durakovic N, Herzog J, Buchman CA (2018) Early outcomes with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Otol Neurotol 39(1):e28\u2013e33. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001652","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5708_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e304","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002129","volume":"40","author":"DR Friedmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Friedmann DR, Kamen E, Choudhury B, Roland JT (2019) Surgical experience and early outcomes with a slim perimodiolar electrode. Otol Neurotol 40(3):e304\u2013e310. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002129","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5708_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1080\/14670100.2019.1597461","volume":"20","author":"M Gomez Serrano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gomez Serrano M, Patel S, Harris R, Selvadurai D (2019) Initial surgical and clinical experience with the nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK. Cochlear Implants Int 20(4):207\u2013216. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14670100.2019.1597461","journal-title":"Cochlear Implants Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5708_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182423175","volume":"33","author":"MK Cosetti","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cosetti MK, Troob SH, Latzman JM, Shapiro WH, Roland JT, Waltzman SB (2012) An evidence-based algorithm for intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 33(2):169\u2013176. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3182423175","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5708_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001283","volume":"38","author":"MG Zuniga","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zuniga MG, Rivas A, Hedley-Williams A et al (2017) Tip fold-over in cochlear implantation: case series. Otol Neurotol 38(2):199\u2013206. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001283","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"Suppl 6","key":"5708_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.24728","volume":"124","author":"GB Wanna","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML et al (2014) Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope 124(Suppl 6):S1\u2013S7. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.24728","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"10","key":"5708_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1019","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002045","volume":"39","author":"S Sipari","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sipari S, Iso-Mustaj\u00e4rvi M, L\u00f6pp\u00f6nen H, Dietz A (2018) The insertion results of a mid-scala electrode assessed by mri and cbct image fusion. Otol Neurotol 39(10):e1019\u2013e1025. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002045","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5708_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/00016489.2016.1208367","volume":"137","author":"A Benghalem","year":"2017","unstructured":"Benghalem A, Gazibegovic D, Saadi F, Tazi-Chaoui Z (2017) Use of a mid-scala and a lateral wall electrode in children: insertion depth and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol 137(1):1\u20137","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1159\/000486409","volume":"22","author":"A Ramos-Mac\u00edas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ramos-Mac\u00edas A, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Falc\u00f3n-Gonz\u00e1lez JC, Ramos-de Miguel A (2017) Hearing preservation with the slim modiolar electrode nucleus ci532\u00ae cochlear implant: a preliminary experience. Audiol Neurootol 22(6):317\u2013325. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000486409","journal-title":"Audiol Neurootol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5708_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1939","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.27073","volume":"128","author":"JT Roland","year":"2018","unstructured":"Roland JT, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJ (2018) Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. Laryngoscope 128(8):1939\u20131945. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.27073","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"9","key":"5708_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001917","volume":"39","author":"JG Manjaly","year":"2018","unstructured":"Manjaly JG, Nash R, Ellis W et al (2018) Hearing preservation with standard length electrodes in pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 39(9):1109\u20131114. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001917","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5708_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e373","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002170","volume":"40","author":"C Sierra","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sierra C, Calder\u00f3n M, B\u00e1rcena E, Tisaire A, Raboso E (2019) Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with deep insertion electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 40(4):e373\u2013e380. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002170","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5708_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.14639\/0392-100X-619","volume":"35","author":"D Zanetti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zanetti D, Nassif N, Redaelli de Zinis LO (2015) Factors affecting residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica 35(6):433\u2013441. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.14639\/0392-100X-619","journal-title":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica"},{"issue":"7","key":"5708_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000753","volume":"36","author":"A Causon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Causon A, Verschuur C, Newman T (2015) A retrospective analysis of the contribution of reported factors in cochlear implantation on hearing preservation outcomes. Otol Neurotol 36(7):1137\u20131145. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000753","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"}],"container-title":["European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]],"date-time":"2020-10-29T20:26:28Z","timestamp":1604003188000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5708"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-4477","1434-4726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-4477","type":"print"},{"value":"1434-4726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 June 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 October 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 October 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors report of no conflicts of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study had institutional approval (No. 5551850).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"This was retrospective study, thus no informed consent was needed.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}