{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T19:19:19Z","timestamp":1792783159774,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]],"date-time":"2021-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617840000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]],"date-time":"2021-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617840000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Cochlear Research and Development Limited"},{"name":"Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen","id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/04mz5ra38","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Medizinische Fakult\u00e4t Mannheim der Universit\u00e4t Heidelberg","id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02m1z0a87","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85\u00a0dB and\/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60\u00a0dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200917), while all others belonged to the noRH group (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200930). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We compared 17 RH\u201330 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v\/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A\u00a7E\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]],"date-time":"2021-04-08T02:02:50Z","timestamp":1617847370000},"page":"1233-1242","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"279","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9751-323X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sonja","family":"Ludwig","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Niklas","family":"Riemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Hans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Florian","family":"Christov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johannes Maximilian","family":"Ludwig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judith","family":"Saxe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diana","family":"Arweiler-Harbeck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"6755_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1967","DOI":"10.1002\/ar.22580","volume":"295","author":"AA Eshraghi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Rajguru SM, Truy E, Gupta C (2012) The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 295(11):1967\u20131980. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ar.22580","journal-title":"Anat Rec (Hoboken)"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR2","first-page":"179","volume":"18","author":"AV Hodges","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T (1997) Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 18(2):179\u2013183","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6755_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1080\/00016480410016432","volume":"124","author":"W Gstoettner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O (2004) Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 124(4):348\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016480410016432","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6755_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2","volume":"115","author":"BJ Gantz","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW (2005) Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 115(5):796\u2013802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"8","key":"6755_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1440","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000440","volume":"35","author":"P Giordano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Giordano P, Hatzopoulos S, Giarbini N, Prosser S, Petruccelli J, Simoni E, Faccioli C, Astolfi L, Martini A (2014) A soft-surgery approach to minimize hearing damage caused by the insertion of a cochlear implant electrode: a guinea pig animal model. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1440\u20131445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000440","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"12","key":"6755_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4141","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-017-4774-6","volume":"274","author":"D Cuda","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cuda D, Murri A (2017) Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(12):4141\u20134148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-017-4774-6","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"6755_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1159\/000485544","volume":"81","author":"IA Bruce","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bruce IA, Todt I (2018) Hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 81:66\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000485544","journal-title":"Adv Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"6755_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107825","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2019.107825","volume":"384","author":"N Ahmadi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ahmadi N, Gausterer JC, Honeder C, Motz M, Schopper H, Zhu C, Saidov N, Gabor F, Arnoldner C (2019) Long-term effects and potential limits of intratympanic dexamethasone-loaded hydrogels combined with dexamethasone-eluting cochlear electrodes in a low-insertion trauma Guinea pig model. Hear Res 384:107825. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2019.107825","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"6755_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e326","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002127","volume":"40","author":"T Lenarz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lenarz T, Timm ME, Salcher R, Buchner A (2019) Individual hearing preservation cochlear implantation using the concept of partial insertion. Otol Neurotol 40(3):e326\u2013e335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002127","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"12","key":"6755_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2947","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-018-5159-1","volume":"275","author":"S Hugl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hugl S, Rulander K, Lenarz T, Majdani O, Rau TS (2018) Investigation of ultra-low insertion speeds in an inelastic artificial cochlear model using custom-made cochlear implant electrodes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(12):2947\u20132956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-018-5159-1","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002083","volume":"40","author":"C Snels","year":"2019","unstructured":"Snels C, IntHout J, Mylanus E, Huinck W, Dhooge I (2019) Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery: a meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 40(2):145\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002083","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6755_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002627","volume":"41","author":"GM Sprinzl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Edlinger SH, Magele A (2020) Long-term hearing preservation in electric acoustic cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol 41(6):750\u2013757. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002627","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6755_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1080\/00016480510026197","volume":"125","author":"C James","year":"2005","unstructured":"James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S, Deggouj N, Deguine O, Dillier N, Gersdorff M, Laszig R, Lenarz T, Rodriguez MM, Mondain M, Offeciers E, Macias AR, Ramsden R, Sterkers O, Von Wallenberg E, Weber B, Fraysse B (2005) Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 125(5):481\u2013491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016480510026197","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1177\/1084713810375249","volume":"14","author":"JA Bierer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bierer JA (2010) Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends Amplif 14(2):84\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1084713810375249","journal-title":"Trends Amplif"},{"issue":"3","key":"6755_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7","volume":"34","author":"LK Holden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34(3):342\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6755_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anorl.2016.04.015","volume":"133","author":"F Christov","year":"2016","unstructured":"Christov F, Munder P, Berg L, Bagus H, Lang S, Arweiler-Harbeck D (2016) ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient\u2019s age and electrode-design. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(Suppl 1):S1-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.anorl.2016.04.015","journal-title":"Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"6755_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1","volume":"28","author":"B van Dijk","year":"2007","unstructured":"van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer RD, Begall K, Dillier N, Hey M, Lai WK, Lenarz T, Laszig R, Morsnowski A, Muller-Deile J, Psarros C, Shallop J, Weber B, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Offeciers E (2007) Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear Hear 28(4):558\u2013570. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"5","key":"6755_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02105664","volume":"162","author":"KH Hahlbrock","year":"1953","unstructured":"Hahlbrock KH (1953) Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 162(5):394\u2013431","journal-title":"Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd"},{"issue":"9","key":"6755_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-011-1505-2","volume":"268","author":"D Arweiler-Harbeck","year":"2011","unstructured":"Arweiler-Harbeck D, Janeschik S, Lang S, Bagus H (2011) Suitability of auditory speech sound evaluation (A section signE(R)) in German cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(9):1259\u20131266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-011-1505-2","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6755_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599817707167","volume":"157","author":"LJ Mady","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mady LJ, Sukato DC, Fruit J, Palmer C, Raz Y, Hirsch BE, McCall AA (2017) Hearing Preservation: Does Electrode Choice Matter? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 157(5):837\u2013847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0194599817707167","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"5S Suppl 1","key":"6755_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S29","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002212","volume":"40","author":"A Ramos-Macias","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ramos-Macias A, O\u2019Leary S, Ramos-deMiguel A, Bester C, Falcon-Gonzalez JC (2019) Intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography and residual hearing preservation outcomes when using two types of slim electrode arrays in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 40(5S Suppl 1):S29\u2013S37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002212","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6755_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002366","volume":"40","author":"JT Holder","year":"2019","unstructured":"Holder JT, Yawn RJ, Nassiri AM, Dwyer RT, Rivas A, Labadie RF, Gifford RH (2019) Matched cohort comparison indicates superiority of precurved electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 40(9):1160\u20131166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002366","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x","volume":"277","author":"M Iso-Mustajarvi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Iso-Mustajarvi M, Sipari S, Lopponen H, Dietz A (2020) Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(2):367\u2013375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-019-05708-x","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6755_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e304","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002129","volume":"40","author":"DR Friedmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Friedmann DR, Kamen E, Choudhury B, Roland JT Jr (2019) Surgical experience and early outcomes with a slim perimodiolar electrode. Otol Neurotol 40(3):e304\u2013e310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002129","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"6755_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14670100.2019.1680168","author":"CWM Snels","year":"2019","unstructured":"Snels CWM, Huinck WJ, Swinnen FKR, Dhooge I, Mylanus EAM (2019) Short and long term preservation of hearing thresholds corrected for natural hearing loss in cochlear implant recipients using a straight electrode. Cochlear Implants Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14670100.2019.1680168","journal-title":"Cochlear Implants Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"6755_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000726","volume":"36","author":"F Hassepass","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hassepass F, Aschendorff A, Bulla S, Arndt S, Maier W, Laszig R, Beck R (2015) Radiologic results and hearing preservation with a straight narrow electrode via round window versus cochleostomy approach at initial activation. Otol Neurotol 36(6):993\u20131000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000726","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6755_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002773","volume":"41","author":"S O'Leary","year":"2020","unstructured":"O\u2019Leary S, Briggs R, Gerard JM, Iseli C, Wei BPC, Tari S, Rousset A, Bester C (2020) Intraoperative observational real-time electrocochleography as a predictor of hearing loss after cochlear implantation: 3 and 12 month outcomes. Otol Neurotol 41(9):1222\u20131229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002773","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"6755_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arweiler-Harbeck D, D\u00b4heygere V, Meyer M, Hans S, Waschkies L, Lang S, Anton K, Hessel H, Schneider A, Heiler T, H\u00f6ing B (2021) Digital Live Imaging of intraoperative Electrocochleography - first description of feasibility and hearing preservation during Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol (quiz 487-448)","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1727690"},{"issue":"1","key":"6755_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000896","volume":"37","author":"TJ Davis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Davis TJ, Zhang D, Gifford RH, Dawant BM, Labadie RF, Noble JH (2016) Relationship between electrode-to-modiolus distance and current levels for adults with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 37(1):31\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000896","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"6755_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002751","author":"CV Degen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Degen CV, Buchner A, Kludt E, Lenarz T (2020) Effect of electrode to modiolus distance on electrophysiological and psychophysical parameters in CI patients with perimodiolar and lateral electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000002751","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6755_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1080\/00016489.2018.1533993","volume":"139","author":"F Christov","year":"2019","unstructured":"Christov F, Gluth MB, Hans S, Lang S, Arweiler-Harbeck D (2019) Impact of cochlear tonotopy on electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). Acta Otolaryngol 139(1):22\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016489.2018.1533993","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6755_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1080\/14670100.2019.1597461","volume":"20","author":"M Gomez Serrano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gomez Serrano M, Patel S, Harris R, Selvadurai D (2019) Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK. Cochlear Implants Int 20(4):207\u2013216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14670100.2019.1597461","journal-title":"Cochlear Implants Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001283","volume":"38","author":"MG Zuniga","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zuniga MG, Rivas A, Hedley-Williams A, Gifford RH, Dwyer R, Dawant BM, Sunderhaus LW, Hovis KL, Wanna GB, Noble JH, Labadie RF (2017) Tip fold-over in cochlear implantation: case series. Otol Neurotol 38(2):199\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001283","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6755_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.20942","volume":"120","author":"D Basta","year":"2010","unstructured":"Basta D, Todt I, Ernst A (2010) Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees. Laryngoscope 120(7):1391\u20131396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.20942","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"5","key":"6755_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otohns.2005.01.046","volume":"132","author":"I Todt","year":"2005","unstructured":"Todt I, Basta D, Eisenschenk A, Ernst A (2005) The \u201cpull-back\u201d technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(5):751\u2013754. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2005.01.046","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6755_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1080\/14670100.2018.1544684","volume":"20","author":"M Hey","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hey M, Wesarg T, Mewes A, Helbig S, Hornung J, Lenarz T, Briggs R, Marx M, Ramos A, Stover T, Escude B, James CJ, Aschendorff A (2019) Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode. Cochlear Implants Int 20(2):80\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14670100.2018.1544684","journal-title":"Cochlear Implants Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"6755_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-004-5024-3","volume":"6","author":"QJ Fu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fu QJ, Nogaki G (2005) Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6(1):19\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-004-5024-3","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"8","key":"6755_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.24.8.8","volume":"24","author":"J Wolfe","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E, Mills E, Mulder HE, Goldbeck F, Marquis F, John A, Hudson M, Peters BR, Lianos L (2013) Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system. J Am Acad Audiol 24(8):714\u2013724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3766\/jaaa.24.8.8","journal-title":"J Am Acad Audiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6755_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.21.7.3","volume":"21","author":"RH Gifford","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gifford RH, Revit LJ (2010) Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol 21(7):441\u2013451. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3766\/jaaa.21.7.3 (quiz 487-448)","journal-title":"J Am Acad Audiol"}],"container-title":["European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,4]],"date-time":"2022-03-04T22:03:35Z","timestamp":1646431415000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["6755"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-021-06755-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-4477","1434-4726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-4477","type":"print"},{"value":"1434-4726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 January 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 April 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interests regarding research, authorship and\/or publishing of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest\/Competing interests"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Duisburg-Essen (16\u20137312-BO) and was conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"All study participants gave written informed consent prior to study inclusion.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors have approved the submitted version of the manuscript.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}