{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T06:09:58Z","timestamp":1792649398536,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]],"date-time":"2022-06-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]],"date-time":"2022-06-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009367","name":"Mansoura University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009367","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>to compare hearing outcomes between endoscopic transcanal rebridging with bone cement and endoscopic transcanal incus interposition in patients with incus long process defects secondary to chronic suppurative otitis media (inactive mucosal type).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This retrospective study was performed on 83 ears of 83 consecutive patients with incus long process defects secondary to chronic suppurative otitis media (inactive mucosal type). According to the extent of incus long process erosion and subsequent ossiculoplasty technique, patients were divided into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 had erosion involving up to two thirds of the length of the incus long process and underwent endoscopic transcanal rebridging with bone cement. Patients in group 2 had erosion involving more than two thirds of the length of the incus long process and underwent endoscopic transcanal incus interposition.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Hearing gain (mean\u2009\u00b1\u2009standard deviation) was 21.39\u2009\u00b1\u20092.15\u00a0dB in group 1 and 19.71\u2009\u00b1\u20096.12\u00a0dB in group 2. A significantly greater hearing gain was achieved in bone cement group than in incus interposition group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> value\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Successful hearing outcome (post-operative air bone gap closure within 20\u00a0dB) was achieved in 81.6% and 71.1% of patients of group 1 and group 2 respectively.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Endoscopic transcanal rebridging with bone cement offers greater hearing gain than endoscopic transcanal incus interposition. The two techniques remain reliable and cost-effective techniques in management of patients with incus long process defects. The main limitation of this study was the short follow-up period. Further studies with relatively long-term follow-up are strongly recommended.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]],"date-time":"2022-06-18T12:04:16Z","timestamp":1655553856000},"page":"557-563","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Endoscopic transcanal management of incus long process defects: rebridging with bone cement versus incus interposition"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"280","author":[{"given":"Waleed","family":"Moneir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammed Abdelbadie","family":"Salem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4694-4878","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ahmed","family":"Hemdan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"7489_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjoto.2021.103002","volume":"42","author":"K Mantsopoulos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mantsopoulos K, Thimsen V, Wohlleben F, Taha L, Sievert M, M\u00fcller SK, Goncalves M, Iro H, Hornung J (2021) Hydroxyapatite bone cement in the reconstruction of defects of the long process of the incus: personal experience and literature review. Am J Otolaryngol 42:1\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjoto.2021.103002","journal-title":"Am J Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1749-4486.2008.01657.x","volume":"33","author":"G R\u00e1th","year":"2008","unstructured":"R\u00e1th G, Bauer M, Pytel J, V\u00f3na I, Szanyi I, Lujber L (2008) Ionomer cement for reconstruction of the long process of the incus: the P\u00e9cs experience. Clin Otolaryngol 33:116\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1749-4486.2008.01657.x","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.24897","volume":"125","author":"I Wegner","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wegner I, van den Berg JW, Smit AL, Grolman W (2015) Systematic review of the use of bone cement in ossicular chain reconstruction and revision stapes surgery. Laryngoscope 125:227\u2013233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.24897","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"7489_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2273.2003.00791.x","volume":"29","author":"MA Siddiq","year":"2004","unstructured":"Siddiq MA, East DM (2004) Long-term hearing results of incus transposition. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29:115\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-2273.2003.00791.x","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci"},{"key":"7489_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-011-1758-9","volume":"269","author":"T Somers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Somers T, Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Salembier L, van Dinther J, Andrzej Z, Offeciers E (2012) Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1095\u20131101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-011-1758-9","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1177\/0145561319856325","volume":"100","author":"I Guler","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guler I, Kum RO (2019) Management of incus defects in children: comparison of incus transposition versus glass ionomer cement. Ear Nose Throat J 100:97\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0145561319856325","journal-title":"Ear Nose Throat J"},{"key":"7489_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215113001928","volume":"127","author":"F Celenk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Celenk F, Baglam T, Baysal E, Durucu C, Karatas ZA, Mumbuc S, Kanlikama M (2013) Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement. J Laryngol Otol 127:842\u2013847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0022215113001928","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol"},{"key":"7489_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-012-2120-6","volume":"270","author":"H Uzunkulao\u011flu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Uzunkulao\u011flu H, Emir HK, K\u0131z\u0131lkaya Z, Do\u011fan S, Samim E (2013) Comparison of incus interpositioning technique versus glass ionomer cement application in type 2 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1593\u20131596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-012-2120-6","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-010-1454-1","volume":"268","author":"H Dere","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dere H, Ozdogan F, Ozcan KM, Selcuk A, Ozcan I, Gokturk G (2011) Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long process defects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1565\u20131568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-010-1454-1","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.16899\/ctd.58426","volume":"4","author":"R Kum","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kum R, \u00d6zcan M, G\u00fclseven T, Kum NY, Y\u0131lmaz Y, Titiz A, \u00dcnal A (2014) Comparison of the ionomeric bone cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of ossicular chain. \u00c7a\u011fda\u015f T\u0131p Dergisi 4:151\u2013156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.16899\/ctd.58426","journal-title":"\u00c7a\u011fda\u015f T\u0131p Dergisi"},{"key":"7489_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.5152\/tao.2017.2267","volume":"55","author":"S Bul\u011furcu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bul\u011furcu S, Dikilita\u015f B, \u00c7ukurova \u0130 (2017) Comparison of hydroxyapatite prosthesis and incus interposition in incus defects. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 55:69\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/tao.2017.2267","journal-title":"Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599812458401","volume":"147","author":"RK Gurgel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gurgel RK, Jackler RK, Dobie RA, Popelka GR (2012) A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:803\u2013807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0194599812458401","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"7489_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1186","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3181b287f2","volume":"30","author":"KB Huttenbrink","year":"2009","unstructured":"Huttenbrink KB, Luers JC, Beutner D (2009) Titanium angular clip: a new prosthesis for reconstruction of the long process of the incus. Otol Neurotol 30:1186\u20131190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0b013e3181b287f2","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1749-4486.2009.01929.x","volume":"34","author":"TP Martin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Martin TP, Weller MD, Kim DS, Smith MC (2009) Results of primary ossiculoplasty in ears with an intact stapes superstructure and malleus handle: inflammation in the middle ear at the time of surgery does not affect hearing outcomes. Clin Otolaryngol 34:218\u2013224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1749-4486.2009.01929.x","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000185054.92265.b7","volume":"26","author":"RC O'Reilly","year":"2005","unstructured":"O\u2019Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP (2005) Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 26:853\u2013858. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.mao.0000185054.92265.b7","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0709(98)90111-9","volume":"19","author":"S Albu","year":"1998","unstructured":"Albu S, Babighian G, Trabalzini F (1998) Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 19:136\u2013140 (PMID: 9520047)","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"key":"7489_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.22038\/IJORL.2017.8267","volume":"29","author":"M Faramarzi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Faramarzi M, Roosta S, Dianat M (2017) Outcome of incus interposition after preservation in soft tissue. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 29:83\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22038\/IJORL.2017.8267","journal-title":"Iran J Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.3109\/00016489.2016.1172255","volume":"136","author":"V Gungor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gungor V, Atay G, Bajin MD, Yarali M, Sarac S, Sennaroglu L (2016) Comparison of various rebridging with bone cement techniques and functional results. Acta Otolaryngol 136:883\u2013887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016489.2016.1172255","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000169781.92211.76","volume":"26","author":"YA Bayazit","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bayazit YA, Ozer E, Kanlikama M, Durmaz T, Yilmaz M (2005) Rebridging with bone cement: incus to stapes versus malleus to stapes cement bridge. Otol Neurotol 26:364\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.mao.0000169781.92211.76","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otohns.2009.03.025","volume":"141","author":"T Baglam","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baglam T, Karatas E, Durucu C, Kilic A, Ozer E, Mumbuc S et al (2009) Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:243\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2009.03.025","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"7489_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200403000-00003","volume":"25","author":"S Babu","year":"2004","unstructured":"Babu S, Seidman MD (2004) Ossicular reconstruction using bone cement. Otol Neurotol 25:98\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00129492-200403000-00003","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-199904000-00010","volume":"109","author":"T Brask","year":"1999","unstructured":"Brask T (1999) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain in the middle ear with glass ionomer cement. Laryngoscope 109:573\u2013576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005537-199904000-00010","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"7489_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200209000-00006","volume":"23","author":"E Ozer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ozer E, Bayazit YA, Kanlikama M, Mumbuc S, Ozen Z (2002) Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otol Neurotol 23:643\u2013546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00129492-200209000-00006","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-020-06182-6","volume":"278","author":"N Tsetsos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tsetsos N, Vlachtsis K, Stavrakas M, Fyrmpas G (2021) Endoscopic versus microscopic ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:917\u2013923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-020-06182-6","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjoto.2019.07.004","volume":"40","author":"G Iannella","year":"2019","unstructured":"Iannella G, De Vincentiis M, Greco A, Vicini C, De Vito A, Meccariello G, Cammaroto G, Pelucchi S, Magliulo G (2019) Endoscopic approach in second stage ossicular chain reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol 40:735\u2013742. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjoto.2019.07.004","journal-title":"Am J Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wjorl.2017.08.004","volume":"3","author":"B Aldosari","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aldosari B, Thomassin JM (2017) Audiological results of endoscopic surgical repair of the long process of incus. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3:148\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wjorl.2017.08.004","journal-title":"World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"7489_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1097\/MOO.0000000000000297","volume":"24","author":"JB Hunter","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hunter JB, O\u2019Connell BP, Rivas A (2016) Endoscopic techniques in tympanoplasty and stapes surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:388\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MOO.0000000000000297","journal-title":"Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"7489_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otc.2016.05.008","volume":"49","author":"R Kiringoda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kiringoda R, Kozin ED, Lee DJ (2016) Outcomes in endoscopic ear surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 49:1271\u20131290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otc.2016.05.008","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Clin N Am"},{"key":"7489_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-015-3614-9","volume":"273","author":"A Daneshi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Daneshi A, Jahandideh H (2016) Totally endoscopic stapes surgery without packing: novel technique bringing most comfort to the patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:631\u2013634. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-015-3614-9","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"7489_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000988","volume":"37","author":"ML Bennett","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bennett ML, Zhang D, Labadie RF, Noble JH (2016) Comparison of middle ear visualization with endoscopy and microscopy. Otol Neurotol 37:362\u2013366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000000988","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001186","volume":"37","author":"G Iannella","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iannella G, Magliulo G (2016) Endoscopic versus microscopic approach in stapes surgery: are operative times and learning curve important for making the choice? Otol Neurotol 37:1350\u20131357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001186","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"7489_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1571205","volume":"77","author":"G Iannella","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iannella G, Savastano E, Pasquariello B, Re M, Magliulo G (2016) Giant petrous bone cholesteatoma: combined microscopic surgery and an adjuvant endoscopic approach. J Neurol Surg Rep 77:46\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1571205","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Rep"},{"key":"7489_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlg.0000184509.01049.06","volume":"116","author":"MW Yung","year":"2006","unstructured":"Yung MW, Oates J, Vowler SL (2006) The learning curve in stapes surgery and its implication to training. Laryngoscope 116:67\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.mlg.0000184509.01049.06","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"}],"container-title":["European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,18]],"date-time":"2023-01-18T07:03:45Z","timestamp":1674025425000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]}},"alternative-id":["7489"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-022-07489-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-4477","1434-4726"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-4477","type":"print"},{"value":"1434-4726","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 February 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 June 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 June 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"No conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}