{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T17:51:42Z","timestamp":1791827502012,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791763200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiat Environ Biophys"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T17:30:48Z","timestamp":1791826248000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Effects of different CBCT acquisition protocols on radiation dose and observer agreement in the assessment of impacted mandibular third molars"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8578-1528","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Serhat","family":"Efeoglu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9006-6836","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hakan","family":"Eren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0281-6981","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rana","family":"Nalcaci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cxom.2011.12.008","volume":"20","author":"C Angelopoulos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2012) A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 20(1):1\u201317","journal-title":"Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am"},{"key":"1257_CR2","unstructured":"CAMOSCI NewTom 7G WIDE.VISION \u2013 Adaptive Low Dose CBCT. CAMOSCI Srl. Available from: https:\/\/www.camosci.eu\/pdf\/camosci-newtom-7g-en.pdf"},{"key":"1257_CR3","unstructured":"CAMOSCI, NewTom GO COMPLETE.VISION \u2013 2D\/3D CEPH Entegre G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleme. CAMOSCI Srl. Available from: https:\/\/www.camosci.eu\/pdf\/camosci-newtom-go2d-ceph-en.pdf"},{"issue":"6","key":"1257_CR4","first-page":"449","volume":"81","author":"J Cederhag","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cederhag J, Al-Sultani H, Maysam S, Al-Musaedi A, Hell\u00e9n-Halme K, Nilsson M (2023) Visibility of anatomical landmarks in the region of the mandibular third molar, a comparison between a low-dose and default protocol of CBCT. Acta Odontol Scand 81(6):449\u2013455","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joen.2020.09.003","volume":"47","author":"TA Davis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Davis TA, Gocke D, Roberts HW, Wright JM, Ahlers J, Rouse CA et al (2021) Quantitative Performance Characterization of Radiation Dose for the Carestream CS9600 Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Machine. J Endod 47(1):78\u201387","journal-title":"J Endod"},{"issue":"8","key":"1257_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20200039","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20200039","volume":"49","author":"SL De-Azevedo-Vaz","year":"2020","unstructured":"De-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Coelho-Silva F, Martins LAC, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML et al (2020) Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: A cone-beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 49(8):20200039. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20200039","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1257_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2009.06.007","volume":"38","author":"H Ghaeminia","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Sanderink GCH, Berge SJ (2009) Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(9):964\u2013971. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijom.2009.06.007","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"1066","key":"1257_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20151052","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20151052","volume":"89","author":"C Granlund","year":"2016","unstructured":"Granlund C, Thilander-Klang A, Ydreborg B, Lofthag-Hansen S, Ekestubbe A (2016) Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations. Br J Radiol 89(1066):20151052","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1080\/00016357.2023.2258981","volume":"82","author":"AM Ilo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ilo AM, Brandt J, Peltola J, Suomalainen A (2024) The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars. Acta Odontol Scand 82(1):66\u201373","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"1257_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.5624\/isd.2015.45.4.263","volume":"45","author":"PP Jaju","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jaju PP, Jaju SP (2015) Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Sci Dent 45(4):263\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5624\/isd.2015.45.4.263","journal-title":"Imaging Sci Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","volume":"33","author":"JR Landis","year":"1977","unstructured":"Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159\u2013174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2529310","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1257_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.5624\/isd.2013.43.2.63","volume":"43","author":"G Li","year":"2013","unstructured":"Li G (2013) Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 43(2):63\u201369","journal-title":"Imaging Sci Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"1257_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/14340323","volume":"35","author":"JB Ludlow","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G, and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35(4):219\u2013226","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20140189","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140189","volume":"44","author":"LH Matzen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Matzen LH, Wenzel A (2015) Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: A review\u2014based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44(1):20140189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20140189","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"1\u20134","key":"1257_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncv057","volume":"165","author":"R Pauwels","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pauwels R (2015) Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 165(1\u20134):156\u2013161","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosimetry"},{"issue":"2","key":"1257_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2010.11.028","volume":"81","author":"R Pauwels","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A et al (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81(2):267\u2013271","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1257_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radphyschem.2018.06.038","volume":"155","author":"MR Soares","year":"2019","unstructured":"Soares MR, Batista WO, de Oliveira ML, Campos PSF, Pontual ML, Silveira MF et al (2019) Dose estimate for cone beam CT equipment protocols using Monte Carlo simulation in computational adult anthropomorphic phantoms. Radiat Phys Chem 155:252\u2013259","journal-title":"Radiat Phys Chem"},{"issue":"2","key":"1257_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2009.10.021","volume":"109","author":"A Suomalainen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Suomalainen A, Vent\u00e4 I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS (2010) Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(2):276\u2013284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tripleo.2009.10.021","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod"},{"issue":"2","key":"1257_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2006.06.060","volume":"103","author":"W Tantanapornkul","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N et al (2007) A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103(2):253\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tripleo.2006.06.060","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod"},{"issue":"1","key":"1257_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s11282-023-00705-7","volume":"40","author":"S Terashima","year":"2024","unstructured":"Terashima S, Kato H, Oda M, Yamaguchi I, Higuchi N, Sakamoto M et al (2024) Monte Carlo simulations of organ and effective doses and dose-length product for dental cone-beam CT. Oral Radiol 40(1):37\u201348","journal-title":"Oral Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1257_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-016-1888-y","volume":"21","author":"D Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang D, He X, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhu Y, Sun C et al (2017) External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 21(4):1335\u20131342","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"}],"container-title":["Radiation and Environmental Biophysics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T17:30:49Z","timestamp":1791826249000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["1257"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00411-026-01257-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-634X","1432-2099"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-634X","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2099","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 December 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 October 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This retrospective study aimed to assess how different CBCT devices, FOV sizes, and exposure parameters influence radiation dose and diagnostic evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars. Ethical approval was granted by the Ankara University Research Ethics Committee (Approval No: 36290600; Date: 26.02.2024), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. As this was a retrospective analysis of previously acquired diagnostic images, the requirement for individual informed consent was waived by the ethics committee due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of anonymized imaging data.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Study Design and Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}