{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T17:13:33Z","timestamp":1782321213151,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768003200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768003200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T01:52:17Z","timestamp":1768009937000},"page":"1853-1861","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Usefulness of a simplified self-checking tool (Quattro Checker\u00ae) for visual field defects in glaucoma patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"264","author":[{"given":"Marika","family":"Ishibashi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chota","family":"Matsumoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroki","family":"Nomoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fumi","family":"Tanabe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sachiko","family":"Okuyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shunji","family":"Kusaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"7102_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e144","DOI":"10.1016\/s2214-109x(20)30489-7","volume":"9","author":"JD Adelson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Adelson JD, Bourne RRA, Briant PS et al (2019) Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health 9(2):e144\u2013e160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s2214-109x(20)30489-7","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"issue":"12","key":"7102_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1221","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(17)30393-5","volume":"5","author":"SR Flaxman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S et al (2017) Global cause of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990\u20132020:a systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet Glob Health 5(12):e1221\u2013e1234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2214-109X(17)30393-5","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"7102_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2081","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.05.013","volume":"121","author":"YC Tham","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY (2014) Global preverence of glaucoma and projections of burden through 2040: a systemtic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121(11):2081\u20132090. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.05.013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"3","key":"7102_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2008.01716.x","volume":"36","author":"NC Deva","year":"2008","unstructured":"Deva NC, Insull E, Gamble G, Danesh-Meyer HV (2008) Risk factors for first presentation of glaucoma with significant visual field loss. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 36(3):217\u2013221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2008.01716.x","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7102_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-13006","volume":"55","author":"LJ Saunders","year":"2014","unstructured":"Saunders LJ, Russell RA, Kirwan JF, McNaught AI, Crabb DP (2014) Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(1):102\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.13-13006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"9","key":"7102_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2004.03.029","volume":"111","author":"A Iwase","year":"2004","unstructured":"Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M et al (2004) The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 111(9):1641\u20131648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2004.03.029","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"10","key":"7102_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.05.012","volume":"112","author":"T Yamamoto","year":"2005","unstructured":"Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M et al (2005) The Tajimi study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology 112(10):1661\u20131669. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.05.012","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"7102_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.11.043","volume":"120","author":"DP Crabb","year":"2013","unstructured":"Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF (2013) How does glaucoma look? Patient perception of visual field loss. Ophthalmology 120(6):1120\u20131126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.11.043","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"7102_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1990.88","volume":"4","author":"BE Damato","year":"1990","unstructured":"Damato BE, Chyla J, McClure E, Allan D (1990) A hand-held OKP chart for screening of glaucoma: preliminary evaluation. Eye(Lond) 4:632\u2013637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/eye.1990.88","journal-title":"Eye(Lond)"},{"issue":"3","key":"7102_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-014-0368-7","volume":"59","author":"C Matsumoto","year":"2015","unstructured":"Matsumoto C, Eura M, Okuyama S et al (2015) CLOCK CHART(\u00ae): a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener. Jpn J Ophthalmol 59(3):187\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-014-0368-7","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"11","key":"7102_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2018-312845","volume":"103","author":"M Ishibashi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ishibashi M, Matsumoto C, Hashimoto S et al (2019) Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 103(11):1672\u20131676. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2018-312845","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7102_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-006-0329-x","volume":"50","author":"H Murai","year":"2006","unstructured":"Murai H, Kiyosawa M, Mochizuki M, Suzuki T (2006) Sensitivity and specificity of new eye check chart for neuro-ophthalmological diseases. Jpn J Ophthalmol 50(4):383\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-006-0329-x","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7102_CR13","first-page":"273","volume":"35","author":"S Shirato","year":"1991","unstructured":"Shirato S, Adachi M, Hara T (1991) Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set. Jpn J Ophthalmol 35(3):273\u2013281","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7102_CR14","first-page":"392","volume":"38","author":"M Adachi","year":"1994","unstructured":"Adachi M, Shirato S (1994) The usefulness of the noise-field test as a screening method for visual field defects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 38(4):392\u2013399","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"7102_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-021-01541-x","volume":"36","author":"J Ding","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ding J, Tecson IC, Ang BCH, Chiew W, Chua C, Yip LFL (2022) The performance of iPad-based-noise-field perimeter versus humphrey field analyser in detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Eye(Lond) 36:800\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41433-021-01541-x","journal-title":"Eye(Lond)"},{"issue":"5","key":"7102_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0303849","volume":"19","author":"A Inoue","year":"2024","unstructured":"Inoue A, Koike E, Maeda N, Matsumoto C (2024) Subjective perception of visual field defects using random noise-moving images in patients with glaucoma: a comparison of computer graphics and analog noises. PLoS One 19(5):e0303849. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0303849","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"7102_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.4.3","volume":"5","author":"AJ Vingrys","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vingrys AJ, Healey JK, Leiw S, Saharinen V, Tran M, Wu W, Kong GY (2016) Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Transl Vis Sci Technol 5(4):3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.5.4.3","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"issue":"6","key":"7102_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.6.2","volume":"5","author":"YX Kong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kong YX, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ (2016) A comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 5(6):2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.5.6.2","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7102_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.8.1.17","volume":"8","author":"PR Jones","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jones PR, Smith ND, Bi W, Crabb DP (2019) Portable perimetry using eye-tracking on a tablet computer-a feasibility assessment. Transl Vis Sci Technol 8(1):17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.8.1.17","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7102_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1959.00940090757012","volume":"61","author":"DO Harrington","year":"1959","unstructured":"Harrington DO, Flocks M (1959) The multiple-pattern method of visual field examination; a five-year evaluation of its effectiveness as a visual field screening technique. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 61(5):755\u2013765","journal-title":"AMA Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"7102_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00173113","volume":"36","author":"EL Greve","year":"1973","unstructured":"Greve EL (1973) Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma; the two phases of perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol 36:1\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00173113","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"7102_CR22","first-page":"2212","volume":"41","author":"JM Nelson-Quigg","year":"2000","unstructured":"Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(8):2212\u20132221","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"7102_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-12-77","volume":"12","author":"X Robin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J, M\u00fcller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77","journal-title":"BMC Bioinformatics"},{"issue":"9774","key":"7102_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)61423-7","volume":"377","author":"HA Quigley","year":"2011","unstructured":"Quigley HA (2011) Glaucoma. Lancet 377(9774):1367\u20131377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)61423-7","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9975","key":"7102_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62111-5","volume":"385","author":"DF Garway-Heath","year":"2015","unstructured":"Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP, Bunce C (2015) Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 385(9975):1295\u20131304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62111-5","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"12","key":"7102_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.05.013","volume":"118","author":"B Sleath","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sleath B, Blalock S, Covert D, Stone JL, Skinner AC, Muir K, Robin AL (2011) The relationship between glaucoma medication adherence, eye drop technique, and visual field defect severity. Ophthalmology 118(12):2398\u20132402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.05.013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"8","key":"7102_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.11.023","volume":"115","author":"DS Friedman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Friedman DS, Hahn SR, Gelb L et al (2008) Doctor-patient communication, health-related beliefs, and adherence in glaucoma results from the glaucoma adherence and persistency study. Ophthalmology 115(8):1320\u20131327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.11.023","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"7102_CR28","first-page":"2741","volume":"35","author":"BJ Lachenmayr","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lachenmayr BJ, Kojetinsky S, Ostermaier N, Angstwurm K, Vivell PM, Schaumberger M (1994) The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35(6):2741\u20132748","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"7102_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(63)90385-4","volume":"55","author":"M Simonson","year":"1963","unstructured":"Simonson M, Wohlarabe RG (1963) The flicker fusion frequency in different testing arrangements, of healthy older persons, of patients cataracts and patients with retinal disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 55:1023\u20131032","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7102_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2006.093401","volume":"91","author":"WA Douthwaite","year":"2007","unstructured":"Douthwaite WA, Vianya-Estop\u00e0 M, Elliott DB (2007) Predictions of post operative visual otcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study. Br J Ophthalmol 91(5):638\u2013643. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2006.093401","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7102_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-198202000-00010","volume":"59","author":"IF Gutteridge","year":"1982","unstructured":"Gutteridge IF (1982) A clinical comparison of the Friedman visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59(2):184\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00006324-198202000-00010","journal-title":"Am J Optom Physiol Opt"},{"issue":"1","key":"7102_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.1983.tb00578.x","volume":"3","author":"IF Gutteridge","year":"1983","unstructured":"Gutteridge IF (1983) The working threshold approach to Friedmann visual filed analyser screening. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 3(1):41\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-1313.1983.tb00578.x","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"issue":"11","key":"7102_CR33","first-page":"2270","volume":"38","author":"KK Yoshiyama","year":"1997","unstructured":"Yoshiyama KK, Johnson CA (1997) Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(11):2270\u20132277","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"12","key":"7102_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1759","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2010.133","volume":"24","author":"A van Gestel","year":"2010","unstructured":"van Gestel A, Webers CA, Beckers HJ et al (2010) The relationship between visual field loss in glaucoma and health-related quality-of-life. Eye(Lond) 24(12):1759\u20131769. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/eye.2010.133","journal-title":"Eye(Lond)"},{"issue":"1","key":"7102_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-84465-2","volume":"15","author":"S Kunimatsu-Sanuki","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kunimatsu-Sanuki S, Fukuchi T, Takahashi M, Mizota A, Inoue K (2025) Discrepancy and agreement between subjective symptoms and visual field impairment in glaucoma patients at a driving assessment clinic. Sci Rep 15(1):423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-84465-2","journal-title":"Sci Rep"}],"container-title":["Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T05:49:06Z","timestamp":1779428946000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["7102"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00417-025-07102-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0721-832X","1435-702X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0721-832X","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-702X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 December 2025","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 December 2025","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 January 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University (No.02\u2013280).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participants"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}