{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:03:24Z","timestamp":1740107004189,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]],"date-time":"2021-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615507200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]],"date-time":"2021-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615507200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Hospital Library of County Zala Saint Rafael"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Langenbecks Arch Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Based on recent scientific evidence, bariatric surgery is more effective in the management of morbid obesity and related comorbidities than conservative therapy. Pylorus preserving surgical procedures (PPBS) such as laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodeno-jejunal or duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are modified duodenal switch (DS) surgical techniques. The duodeno-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a novel surgical method in the inventory of metabolism focused manual interventions that excludes duodeno-jejunal mucosa from digestion, mimicking DS procedures without the risk of surgical intervention. The aim of this article is to summarize and compare differences between safety-related features and weight loss outcomes of DJBL and PPBS.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database. Records of DJBL-related adverse events (AEs), occurrence of PPBS-related complications and reintervention rates were collected. Mean weight, mean body mass index (BMI), percent of excess of weight loss (EWL%), percent of total weight loss (TWL%) and BMI value alterations were recorded for weight loss outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 11 publications on DJBL and 6 publications on PPBS were included, involving 800 and 1462 patients, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the patients were matched. Comparison of DJBL-related AEs and PPBS-related severe complications showed an almost equal risk (risk difference (RD): \u22120.03 and confidence interval (CI): \u22120.27 to 0.21), despite higher rates among patients having received endoscopic treatment. Overall AE and complication rates classified by Clavien-Dindo showed that PPBS was superior to DJBL due to an excess risk level of 25% (RD: 0.25, CI: 0.01\u20130.49). Reintervention rates were more favourable in the PPBS group, without significant differences in risk (RD: \u22120.03, CI: \u22120.27 to 0.20). However, PPBS seemed more efficient regarding weight loss outcomes at 1-year follow-up according to raw data, while meta-analysis did not reveal any significant difference (odds ratio (OR): 1.08, CI: 0.74\u20131.59 for BMI changes).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Only limited conclusions can be made based on our findings. PPBS was superior to DJBL with regard to safety outcomes (GRADE IIB), which failed to support the authors\u2019 hypothesis. Surgical procedures showed lower complication rates than the incidence of DJBL-related AEs, although it should be emphasized that the low number of PPBS-related mild to moderate complications reported could be the result of incomplete data recording from the analysed publications. Weight loss outcomes favoured bariatric surgery (GRADE IIB). As the DJBL is implanted into the upper gastrointestinal tract for 6 to 12 months, it seems a promising additional method in the inventory of metabolic interventions.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]],"date-time":"2021-03-12T23:02:12Z","timestamp":1615590132000},"page":"1363-1377","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Is duodeno-jejunal bypass liner superior to pylorus preserving bariatric surgery in terms of complications and efficacy?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"406","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2066-861X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Istvan Bence","family":"Balint","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ferenc","family":"Csaszar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Krisztian","family":"Somodi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laszlo","family":"Ternyik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adrienn","family":"Biro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zsolt","family":"Kaposztas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"13","key":"2131_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029617","volume":"137","author":"IJ Neeland","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neeland IJ, Poirier P, Despr\u00e9s JP (2018) Cardiovascular and metabolic heterogeneity of obesity: clinical challenges and implications for management. Circulation 137(13):1391\u20131406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029617","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"2131_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"pii: F1000 Facu","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.11192.1","volume":"6","author":"P Aschner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aschner P (2017) Recent advances in understanding\/managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. F1000Res 6:pii: F1000 Faculty Rev-1922. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.11192.1","journal-title":"F1000Res"},{"key":"2131_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK (2014) Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):Art. No.: CD003641. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003641.pub4","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003641.pub4"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.7555\/JBR.28.20140120","volume":"29","author":"WJ Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee WJ, Almulaifi A (2015) Recent advances in bariatric\/metabolic surgery: appraisal of clinical evidence. J Biomed Res 29(2):98\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7555\/JBR.28.20140120","journal-title":"J Biomed Res"},{"issue":"46","key":"2131_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e8632","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000008632","volume":"96","author":"JH Kang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kang JH, Le QA (2017) Effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(46):e8632. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000008632","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"3","key":"2131_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.7861\/clinmedicine.19-3-205","volume":"19","author":"A Ruban","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ruban A, Stoenchev K, Ashrafian H, Teare J (2019) Current treatments for obesity. Clin Med (Lond) 19(3):205\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7861\/clinmedicine.19-3-205","journal-title":"Clin Med (Lond)"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1429","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04312-6","volume":"30","author":"A Surve","year":"2020","unstructured":"Surve A, Rao R, Cottam D, Rao A, Ide L, Cottam S, Horsley B (2020) Early outcomes of primary SADI-S: an Australian experience. Obes Surg 30(4):1429\u20131436. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-019-04312-6","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2131_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2018.01.020","volume":"14","author":"A Surve","year":"2018","unstructured":"Surve A, Cottam D, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Torres A, Roller J, Kwon Y, Mourot J, Schniederjan B, Neichoy B, Enochs P, Tyner M, Bruce J, Bovard S, Roslin M, Jawad M, Teixeira A, Srikanth M, Free J, Zaveri H, Pilati D, Bull J, Belnap L, Richards C, Medlin W, Moon R, Cottam A, Sabrudin S, Cottam S, Dhorepatil A (2018) The incidence of complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a multicenter experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(5):594\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2018.01.020","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"10","key":"2131_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3062","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3358-x","volume":"28","author":"H Zaveri","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, Cottam A, Medlin W, Richards C, Belnap L, Cottam S, Horsley B (2018) Mid-term 4-year outcomes with single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy surgery at a single US center. Obes Surg 28(10):3062\u20133072. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-018-3358-x","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2131_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-3066-y","volume":"28","author":"RC Moon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moon RC, Gaskins L, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2018) Safety and effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: 2-year result from a single US institution. Obes Surg 28(6):1571\u20131577. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-017-3066-y","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2131_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1092","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2015.01.024","volume":"11","author":"A S\u00e1nchez-Pernaute","year":"2015","unstructured":"S\u00e1nchez-Pernaute A, Rubio M\u00c1, Cabrerizo L, Ramos-Levi A, P\u00e9rez-Aguirre E, Torres A (2015) Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(5):1092\u20131098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2015.01.024","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"3","key":"2131_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-011-0507-x","volume":"22","author":"P Praveen Raj","year":"2012","unstructured":"Praveen Raj P, Kumaravel R, Chandramaliteeswaran C, Rajpandian S, Palanivelu C (2012) Is laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve an effective alternative to Roux en Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: preliminary results of a randomized trial. Obes Surg 22(3):422\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-011-0507-x","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1200","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04324-2","volume":"30","author":"N Roehlen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Roehlen N, Laubner K, Bettinger D, Schwacha H, Hilger H, Koenig C, Grueninger D, Krebs A, Seufert J (2020) Duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) improves cardiovascular risk biomarkers and predicted 4-year risk of major CV events in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Obes Surg 30(4):1200\u20131210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-019-04324-2","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2131_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04279-4","volume":"30","author":"M Homan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Homan M, Kova\u010d J, Orel R, Battelino T, Kotnik P (2020) Relevant weight reduction and reversed metabolic co-morbidities can be achieved by duodenojejunal bypass liner in adolescents with morbid obesity. Obes Surg 30(3):1001\u20131010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-019-04279-4","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"2131_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2018.07.022","volume":"14","author":"L Deutsch","year":"2018","unstructured":"Deutsch L, Ben Haim L, Sofer Y, Gluck N, Santo E, Fishman S (2018) Long-term effects of proximal small bowel exclusion by duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on weight reduction and glycemic control in diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(10):1561\u20131569. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2018.07.022","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"8","key":"2131_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1868","DOI":"10.1111\/dom.13300","volume":"20","author":"K Laubner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Laubner K, Riedel N, Fink K, Holl RW, Welp R, Kempe HP, Lautenbach A, Schlensak M, Stengel R, Eberl T, Dederichs F, Schwacha H, Seufert J, Aberle J (2018) Comparative efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case control study. Diabetes Obes Metab 20(8):1868\u20131877. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/dom.13300","journal-title":"Diabetes Obes Metab"},{"issue":"7","key":"2131_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1980","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3123-1","volume":"28","author":"N Patel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Patel N, Mohanaruban A, Ashrafian H, Le Roux C, Byrne J, Mason J, Hopkins J, Kelly J, Teare J (2018) EndoBarrier\u00ae: a safe and effective novel treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes? Obes Surg 28(7):1980\u20131989. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-018-3123-1","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2131_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2018.02.029","volume":"14","author":"N Riedel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Riedel N, Laubner K, Lautenbach A, Sch\u00f6n G, Schlensak M, Stengel R, Eberl T, Dederichs F, Aberle J, Seufert J (2018) Longitudinal evaluation of efficacy, safety and nutritional status during one-year treatment with the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(6):769\u2013779. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soard.2018.02.029","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"2131_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5672-0","volume":"32","author":"N Quezada","year":"2018","unstructured":"Quezada N, Mu\u00f1oz R, Morelli C, Turiel D, Hern\u00e1ndez J, Pimentel F, Escalona A (2018) Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years. Surg Endosc 32(1):260\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5672-0","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"2131_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3306","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2939-4","volume":"27","author":"PM Forner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Forner PM, Ramacciotti T, Farey JE, Lord RV (2017) Safety and effectiveness of an endoscopically placed duodenal-jejunal bypass device (EndoBarrier\u00ae): outcomes in 114 patients. Obes Surg 27(12):3306\u20133313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-017-2939-4","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"2131_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-115175","volume":"48","author":"B Stratmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stratmann B, Krepak Y, Schiffer E, Jarick I, Hauber M, Lee-Barkey YH, Fischer M, Tschoepe D (2016) Beneficial metabolic effects of duodenal jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of adipose patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: analysis of responders and non-responders. Horm Metab Res 48(10):630\u2013637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0042-115175","journal-title":"Horm Metab Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3283-y","volume":"28","author":"R Mu\u00f1oz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mu\u00f1oz R, Dominguez A, Mu\u00f1oz F, Mu\u00f1oz C, Slako M, Turiel D, Pimentel F, Sharp A, Escalona A (2014) Baseline glycated hemoglobin levels are associated with duodenal-jejunal bypass liner-induced weight loss in obese patients. Surg Endosc 28(4):1056\u20131062. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-013-3283-y","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1089\/dia.2011.0152","volume":"14","author":"EG de Moura","year":"2012","unstructured":"de Moura EG, Martins BC, Lopes GS, Orso IR, de Oliveira SL, Galv\u00e3o Neto MP, Santo MA, Sakai P, Ramos AC, Garrido J\u00fanior AB, Mancini MC, Halpern A, Cecconello I (2012) Metabolic improvements in obese type 2 diabetes subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopically deployed duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Diabetes Technol Ther 14(2):183\u2013189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/dia.2011.0152","journal-title":"Diabetes Technol Ther"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000141","volume":"16","author":"L Furuya-Kanamori","year":"2018","unstructured":"Furuya-Kanamori L, Barendregt JJ, Doi SAR (2018) A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthcare 16(4):195\u2013203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000141","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthcare"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000125","volume":"15","author":"SAR Doi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Doi SAR, Furuya-Kanamori L, Thalib L, Barendregt JJ (2017) Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: a paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue. Int J Evid Based Healthc 15(4):152\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000125","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthc"},{"issue":"Pt A","key":"2131_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2015.05.009","volume":"45","author":"SA Doi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM (2015) Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt A):130\u2013138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cct.2015.05.009","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials"},{"issue":"Pt A","key":"2131_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2015.05.010","volume":"45","author":"SA Doi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM (2015) Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt A):123\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cct.2015.05.010","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials"},{"issue":"5","key":"2131_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2014.05.003","volume":"17","author":"SA Doi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Rao C (2014) An updated method for risk adjustment in outcomes research. Value Health 17(5):629\u2013633. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2014.05.003","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","volume":"250","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santiba\u00f1es E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.4103\/njs.NJS_24_17","volume":"24","author":"P Sethi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sethi P, Thillai M, Nain PS, Ahuja A, Aulakh N, Khurana P (2018) Role of hunger hormone \u201cghrelin\u201d in long-term weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Niger J Surg 24(2):121\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/njs.NJS_24_17","journal-title":"Niger J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1381\/096089203322190781","volume":"13","author":"L Ockander","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ockander L, Hedenbro JL, Rehfeld JF, Sj\u00f6lund K (2003) Jejunoileal bypass changes the duodenal cholecystokinin and somatostatin cell density. Obes Surg 13(4):584\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1381\/096089203322190781","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2131_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1152\/physrev.00031.2014","volume":"97","author":"RE Steinert","year":"2017","unstructured":"Steinert RE, Feinle-Bisset C, Asarian L, Horowitz M, Beglinger C, Geary N (2017) Ghrelin, CCK, GLP-1, and PYY(3-36): Secretory controls and physiological roles in eating and glycemia in health, obesity, and after RYGB. Physiol Rev 97(1):411\u2013463. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1152\/physrev.00031.2014","journal-title":"Physiol Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.6061\/clinics\/2012(04)01","volume":"67","author":"S Santoro","year":"2012","unstructured":"Santoro S (2012) Stomachs: does the size matter? Aspects of intestinal satiety, gastric satiety, hunger and gluttony. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67(4):301\u2013303","journal-title":"Clinics (Sao Paulo)"},{"key":"2131_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7823182","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/7823182","volume":"2018","author":"A Ruban","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ruban A, Ashrafian H, Teare JP (2018) The EndoBarrier: duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for diabetes and weight loss. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:7823182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2018\/7823182 eCollection 2018 Review","journal-title":"Gastroenterol Res Pract"},{"issue":"5","key":"2131_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2016.10.021","volume":"15","author":"P Jirapinyo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC (2017) Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies: surgical analogues and mechanisms of action. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(5):619\u2013630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cgh.2016.10.021 Epub 2016 Oct 28. Review","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"9","key":"2131_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.12567","volume":"324","author":"DE Arterburn","year":"2020","unstructured":"Arterburn DE, Telem DA, Kushner RF, Courcoulas AP (2020) Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: a review. JAMA 324(9):879\u2013887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.12567","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"2131_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-020-00695-x","volume":"20","author":"L Gu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gu L, Huang X, Li S, Mao D, Shen Z, Khadaroo PA, Ng DM, Chen P (2020) A meta-analysis of the medium- and long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. BMC Surg 20(1):30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-020-00695-x","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2131_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04235-2","volume":"30","author":"AJ Sharples","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sharples AJ, Mahawar K (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 30(2):664\u2013672. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-019-04235-2","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"2131_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.02.035","volume":"76","author":"Y Han","year":"2020","unstructured":"Han Y, Jia Y, Wang H, Cao L, Zhao Y (2020) Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies. Int J Surg 76:101\u2013110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.02.035 Epub 2020 Mar 6","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2131_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee Y, Doumouras AG, Yu J, Aditya I, Gmora S, Anvari M, Hong D (2019) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and biochemical outcomes from randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003671 Online ahead of print","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003671"},{"issue":"4","key":"2131_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04288-3","volume":"30","author":"D Jia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jia D, Tan H, Faramand A, Fang F (2020) One anastomosis gastric bypass versus roux-en-y gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obes Surg 30(4):1211\u20131218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11695-019-04288-3","journal-title":"Obes Surg"}],"container-title":["Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,18]],"date-time":"2021-08-18T04:41:15Z","timestamp":1629261675000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["2131"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02131-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1435-2443","1435-2451"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1435-2443"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1435-2451"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 February 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethical approval was not necessary for this study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"No signed informed consent was needed for this study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}