{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T03:14:16Z","timestamp":1784258056667,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]],"date-time":"2021-08-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1628467200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]],"date-time":"2021-08-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1628467200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002957","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Dresden","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002957","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Langenbecks Arch Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication of pancreatic surgery and can be fatal. Better stratification of patients into risk groups may help to select those who might benefit from strategies to prevent complications. The aim of this study was to validate ten prognostic scores in patients who underwent pancreatic head surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 364 patients were included in this study between September 2012 and August 2017. Ten risk scores were applied to this cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed considering all risk factors in the scores. Furthermore, the stratification of patients into risk categories was statistically tested.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Nine of the scores (Ansorge et al., Braga et al., Callery et al., Graham et al., Kantor et al., Mungroop et al., Roberts et al., Yamamoto et al. and Wellner et al.) showed strong prognostic stratification for developing POPF (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). There was no significant prognostic value for the Fujiwara et al. risk score. Histology, pancreatic duct diameter, intraabdominal fat thickness in computed tomography findings, body mass index, and C-reactive protein were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Most risk scores tend to stratify patients correctly according to risk for POPF. Nevertheless, except for the fistula risk score (Callery et al.) and its alternative version (Mungroop et al.), many of the published risk scores are obscure even for the dedicated pancreatic surgeon in terms of their clinical practicability. There is a need for future studies to provide strategies for preventing POPF and managing patients with high-risk stigmata.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]],"date-time":"2021-08-09T08:03:21Z","timestamp":1628496201000},"page":"175-188","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic head resections: which score fits all?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"407","author":[{"given":"Mariam","family":"Adamu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Verena","family":"Plodeck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"Adam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Roehnert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thilo","family":"Welsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juergen","family":"Weitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3164-5755","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marius","family":"Distler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"19","key":"2290_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000006858","volume":"96","author":"S Pedrazzoli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pedrazzoli S (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(19):e6858. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000006858","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"6","key":"2290_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1550","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-015-2969-9","volume":"39","author":"MF Nentwich","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nentwich MF, El Gammal AT, Lemcke T, Ghadban T, Bellon E, Melling N, Bachmann K, Reeh M, Uzunoglu FG, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M (2015) Salvage completion pancreatectomies as damage control for post-pancreatic surgery complications: a single-center retrospective analysis. World J Surg 39(6):1550\u20131556. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-015-2969-9","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2290_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-011-0811-x","volume":"396","author":"T Welsch","year":"2011","unstructured":"Welsch T, Eisele H, Zschabitz S, Hinz U, Buchler MW, Wente MN (2011) Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(6):783\u2013791. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-011-0811-x","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2290_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2011.09.039","volume":"151","author":"R Grutzmann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Grutzmann R, Ruckert F, Hippe-Davies N, Distler M, Saeger HD (2012) Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in a high-volume center. Surgery 151(4):612\u2013620. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2011.09.039","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"2290_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2017.10.006","volume":"17","author":"S Wolk","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wolk S, Grutzmann R, Rahbari NN, Hoffmann RT, Plodeck V, Weitz J, Welsch T, Distler M (2017) Management of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) over two decades - a comparative study of 1 450 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Pancreatology 17(6):943\u2013950. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pan.2017.10.006","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"issue":"7","key":"2290_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"963","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2018.0329","volume":"4","author":"JE Murphy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, Jiang W, Yeap BY, Drapek LC, Blaszkowsky LS, Kwak EL, Allen JN, Clark JW, Faris JE, Zhu AX, Goyal L, Lillemoe KD, DeLaney TF, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Ferrone CR, Hong TS (2018) Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by individualized chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4(7):963\u2013969. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaoncol.2018.0329","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2290_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1159\/000354992","volume":"1","author":"W Hartwig","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hartwig W, Buchler MW (2013) Pancreatic cancer: current options for diagnosis, staging and therapeutic management. Gastrointest Tumors 1(1):41\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000354992","journal-title":"Gastrointest Tumors"},{"issue":"1","key":"2290_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2013.05.035","volume":"155","author":"JC Harnoss","year":"2014","unstructured":"Harnoss JC, Ulrich AB, Harnoss JM, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Welsch T (2014) Use and results of consensus definitions in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 155(1):47\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2013.05.035","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-017-1595-4","volume":"402","author":"S Hempel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hempel S, Wolk S, Kahlert C, Kersting S, Weitz J, Welsch T, Distler M (2017) Outpatient drain management of patients with clinically relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF). Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(5):821\u2013829. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-017-1595-4","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.6035","author":"S Andrianello","year":"2020","unstructured":"Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Masini G, Balduzzi A, Paiella S, Esposito A, Landoni L, Casetti L, Tuveri M, Salvia R, Bassi C (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.6035","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2290_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic S","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic S (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"8","key":"2290_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8784","volume":"99","author":"C Ansorge","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ansorge C, Strommer L, Andren-Sandberg A, Lundell L, Herrington MK, Segersvard R (2012) Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Brit J Surg 99(8):1076\u20131082. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.8784","journal-title":"Brit J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31823598fb","volume":"254","author":"M Braga","year":"2011","unstructured":"Braga M, Capretti G, Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Doglioni C, Ariotti R, Di Carlo V (2011) A prognostic score to predict major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 254(5):702\u2013708. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31823598fb","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2290_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","volume":"216","author":"MP Callery","year":"2013","unstructured":"Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 216(1):1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surgeons"},{"issue":"11","key":"2290_CR15","first-page":"5005","volume":"33","author":"Y Fujiwara","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fujiwara Y, Misawa T, Shiba H, Shirai Y, Iwase R, Haruki K, Furukawa K, Futagawa Y, Yanaga K (2013) A novel postoperative inflammatory score predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic resection. Anticancer Res 33(11):5005\u20135010","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2290_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23362","volume":"108","author":"JA Graham","year":"2013","unstructured":"Graham JA, Kayser R, Smirniotopoulos J, Nusbaum JD, Johnson LB (2013) Probability prediction of a postoperative pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy allows for more transparency with patients and can facilitate management of expectations. J Surg Oncol 108(2):137\u2013138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.23362","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.054","volume":"224","author":"O Kantor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Pitt HA, Vollmer CM, Riall TS, Hall BL, Wang CH, Baker MS (2017) Using the NSQIP pancreatic demonstration project to derive a modified fistula risk score for preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 224(5):816\u2013825. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.054","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surgeons"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002620","volume":"269","author":"TH Mungroop","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D, Smits FJ, van Woerden V, Linnemann RJ, de Pastena M, Klompmaker S, Marchegiani G, Ecker BL, van Dieren S, Bonsing B, Busch OR, van Dam RM, Erdmann J, van Eijck CH, Gerhards MF, van Goor H, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, de Jong KP, Kazemier G, Luyer M, Shamali A, Barbaro S, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Hamady Z, Klaase J, Lips DJ, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Rupert C, van Santvoort HC, Scheepers JJ, van der Schelling GP, Bassi C, Vollmer CM, Steyerberg EW, Abu Hilal M, Groot Koerkamp B, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2019) Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg 269(5):937\u2013943. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002620","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2290_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1111\/hpb.12186","volume":"16","author":"KJ Roberts","year":"2014","unstructured":"Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Mehrzad H, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Bramhall SR, Mirza DF (2014) A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 16(7):620\u2013628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hpb.12186","journal-title":"HPB"},{"issue":"10","key":"2290_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x","volume":"12","author":"UF Wellner","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, Sick O, Makowiec F, Hoppner J, Hopt UT, Keck T (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB 12(10):696\u2013702. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x","journal-title":"HPB"},{"issue":"12","key":"2290_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2747","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-011-1253-x","volume":"35","author":"Y Yamamoto","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Shimada K, Kosuge T (2011) A preoperative predictive scoring system for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 35(12):2747\u20132755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-011-1253-x","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR22","unstructured":"R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria."},{"issue":"1","key":"2290_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.04.007","volume":"219","author":"R Shahbazov","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shahbazov R, Naziruddin B, Salam O, Saracino G, Levy MF, Beecherl E, Onaca N (2020) The impact of surgical complications on the outcome of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation. Am J Surg 219(1):99\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.04.007","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"28","key":"2290_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3722","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","volume":"25","author":"H Kawaida","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 25(28):3722\u20133737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2290_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.010014","volume":"58","author":"J Grendar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grendar J, Ouellet JF, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Ball CG, Dixon E (2015) In search of the best reconstructive technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. Can J Surg 58(3):154\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cjs.010014","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2017.07.003","volume":"17","author":"C Ricci","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Beltrami D, Minni F (2017) Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pancreatology 17(5):805\u2013813. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pan.2017.07.003","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2290_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-016-1418-z","volume":"401","author":"S Crippa","year":"2016","unstructured":"Crippa S, Cirocchi R, Randolph J, Partelli S, Belfiori G, Piccioli A, Parisi A, Falconi M (2016) Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(4):427\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-016-1418-z","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2290_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1111\/hpb.12299","volume":"17","author":"J Hallet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hallet J, Zih FS, Deobald RG, Scheer AS, Law CH, Coburn NG, Karanicolas PJ (2015) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 17(2):113\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hpb.12299","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"2290_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7526494","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/7526494","volume":"2017","author":"K Perivoliotis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Perivoliotis K, Sioka E, Tatsioni A, Stefanidis I, Zintzaras E, Zacharoulis D (2017) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs. Int J Surg Oncol 2017:7526494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/7526494","journal-title":"Int J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"2290_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1111\/hpb.12210","volume":"16","author":"A El Nakeeb","year":"2014","unstructured":"El Nakeeb A, Hamdy E, Sultan AM, Salah T, Askr W, Ezzat H, Said M, Zeied MA, Abdallah T (2014) Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study. HPB (Oxford) 16(8):713\u2013722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hpb.12210","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"2","key":"2290_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/MPA.0b013e31818e1772","volume":"38","author":"Y Tomimaru","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tomimaru Y, Takeda Y, Kobayashi S, Marubashi S, Lee CM, Tanemura M, Nagano H, Kitagawa T, Dono K, Umeshita K, Wakasa K, Monden M (2009) Comparison of postoperative morphological changes in remnant pancreas between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 38(2):203\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MPA.0b013e31818e1772","journal-title":"Pancreas"},{"issue":"3","key":"2290_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001859","volume":"264","author":"H Witzigmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkotter S, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Barbel W, Pridohl O, Radulova-Mauersberger O, Lauer H, Knebel P, Ulrich A, Strobel O, Hackert T, Buchler MW (2016) No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707). Ann Surg 264(3):528\u2013537. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001859","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van Buren G, 2nd, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, Winter J, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ, Vollmer C, Velanovich V, Riall T, Muscarella P, Trevino J, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Behrns K, Ellison EC, Barakat O, Perry KA, Drebin J, House M, Abdel-Misih S, Silberfein EJ, Goldin S, Brown K, Mohammed S, Hodges SE, McElhany A, Issazadeh M, Jo E, Mo Q, Fisher WE (2014) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259 (4):605-612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000460","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000460"},{"issue":"4","key":"2290_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8654","volume":"99","author":"F Motoi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, Katayose Y, Unno M (2012) Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br J Surg 99(4):524\u2013531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.8654","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31821219af","volume":"253","author":"P Pessaux","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Paye F, Muscari F, Cunha AS, Sastre B, Arnaud JP, de Recherche F, en C, (2011) External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 253(5):879\u2013885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31821219af","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2290_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-009-1149-3","volume":"14","author":"T Ochiai","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ochiai T, Sonoyama T, Soga K, Inoue K, Ikoma H, Shiozaki A, Kuriu Y, Kubota T, Nakanishi M, Kikuchi S, Ichikawa D, Fujiwara H, Sakakura C, Okamoto K, Kokuba Y, Otsuji E (2010) Application of polyethylene glycolic acid felt with fibrin sealant to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 14(5):884\u2013890. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-009-1149-3","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gong J, He S, Cheng Y, Cheng N, Gong J, Zeng Z (2018) Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD009621. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD009621.pub3","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009621.pub3"},{"issue":"8","key":"2290_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1111\/hpb.12018","volume":"15","author":"I Martin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Martin I, Au K (2013) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of anastomotic leak after a pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. HPB (Oxford) 15(8):561\u2013566. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hpb.12018","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"2290_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman JA, Yeo CJ (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8 (7):766\u2013772; discussion 772\u2013764. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gassur.2004.06.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gassur.2004.06.011"},{"issue":"12","key":"2290_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12491","volume":"84","author":"JM Ramia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ramia JM, de la Plaza R, Adel F, Ramiro C, Arteaga V, Garcia-Parreno J (2014) Wrapping in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg 84(12):921\u2013924. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.12491","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.08.087","volume":"207","author":"B Mussle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mussle B, Wierick A, Distler M, Weitz J, Welsch T (2017) Falciform ligament wrap for prevention of gastroduodenal artery bleed after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 207:215\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.08.087","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"3 Suppl","key":"2290_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.35.3_suppl.s1","volume":"35","author":"AG Harris","year":"1994","unstructured":"Harris AG (1994) Somatostatin and somatostatin analogues: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects. Gut 35(3 Suppl):S1-4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gut.35.3_suppl.s1","journal-title":"Gut"},{"issue":"3","key":"2290_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-2574.2010.00157.x","volume":"12","author":"RS Koti","year":"2010","unstructured":"Koti RS, Gurusamy KS, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review. HPB (Oxford) 12(3):155\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1477-2574.2010.00157.x","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"6","key":"2290_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-003-6693-5","volume":"27","author":"YS Shan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Shan YS, Sy ED, Lin PW (2003) Role of somatostatin in the prevention of pancreatic stump-related morbidity following elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in high-risk patients and elimination of surgeon-related factors: prospective, randomized, controlled trial. World J Surg 27(6):709\u2013714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-003-6693-5","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"2290_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0007-1323.2001.01906.x","volume":"88","author":"C Gouillat","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gouillat C, Chipponi J, Baulieux J, Partensky C, Saric J, Gayet B (2001) Randomized controlled multicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 88(11):1456\u20131462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.0007-1323.2001.01906.x","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2290_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.6019","author":"T Tarvainen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tarvainen T, Siren J, Kokkola A, Sallinen V (2020) Effect of hydrocortisone vs pasireotide on pancreatic surgery complications in patients with high risk of pancreatic fistula: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.6019","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"2290_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.06.004","volume":"21","author":"K Soreide","year":"2019","unstructured":"Soreide K, Healey AJ, Mole DJ, Parks RW (2019) Pre-, peri- and post-operative factors for the development of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 21(12):1621\u20131631. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.06.004","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"7","key":"2290_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2017.03.001","volume":"19","author":"S Partelli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Partelli S, Pecorelli N, Muffatti F, Belfiori G, Crippa S, Piazzai F, Castoldi R, Marmorale C, Balzano G, Falconi M (2017) Early postoperative prediction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: usefulness of C-reactive protein. HPB (Oxford) 19(7):580\u2013586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2017.03.001","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"1","key":"2290_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2007.06.010","volume":"143","author":"T Welsch","year":"2008","unstructured":"Welsch T, Frommhold K, Hinz U, Weigand MA, Kleeff J, Friess H, Buchler MW, Schmidt J (2008) Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications. Surgery 143(1):20\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2007.06.010","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"2290_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-011-0462-x","volume":"19","author":"R Warschkow","year":"2012","unstructured":"Warschkow R, Ukegjini K, Tarantino I, Steffen T, Muller SA, Schmied BM, Marti L (2012) Diagnostic study and meta-analysis of C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative inflammatory complications after pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19(4):492\u2013500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00534-011-0462-x","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"}],"container-title":["Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,16]],"date-time":"2022-02-16T04:38:13Z","timestamp":1644986293000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]}},"alternative-id":["2290"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-021-02290-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1435-2443","1435-2451"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1435-2443","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-2451","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 November 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 August 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Technical University of Dresden (BO-EK-62022020) and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Consent to participate was not applicable due to the retrospective nature of the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Consent for publication was not applicable due to the retrospective nature of the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}