{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:56:44Z","timestamp":1781639804937,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773014400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773100800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100018935","name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Erlangen","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100018935","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Langenbecks Arch Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most frequent and clinically significant complication following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and represents the leading cause of postoperative mortality. Prevention, early recognition and adequate treatment are crucial for improving outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A nationwide survey was conducted in October and November 2024, targeting 112 German hospitals routinely performing pancreatoduodenectomies. The questionnaire assessed surgical volumes, preferred anastomotic techniques, prophylactic and therapeutic strategies for POPF and postoperative monitoring practices. Data were collected via paper-based forms and QR code-assisted online formats.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 77 hospitals, with an average annual volume of 45 PDs, participated in the survey (69% response rate). The pancreas was most commonly anastomosed with the jejunum (88%), with duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) being the most frequently employed technique (39%). Abdominal drainage was routinely used in 91% of centers, with significantly higher rates observed in non-university and low-volume hospitals. Most participants estimated that 20\u201330% of cases involved high-risk anastomoses, primarily based on pancreatic texture and duct diameter. Only 18% of hospitals reported modifying their anastomotic technique in high-risk situations. As prophylactic measures, the use of somatostatin analogs (65%) and pancreatic duct stenting (36%) were the most common strategies, while prophylactic pancreatectomy was rarely performed (\u2264\u20095% in 83% of centers). Therapeutic management of POPF primarily involved antibiotics (57%) and somatostatin analogs (54%), with interventional drainage \u2013 preferably CT-guided (82%) \u2013 required in 0\u201320% of cases, according to 96% of responses. Therapeutic pancreatectomy was reported to be mainly needed in 1\u20135% of cases. Neither prophylactic nor therapeutic management of POPF differed significantly by hospital type or volume.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The survey reveals substantial variability in anastomotic techniques and in prophylactic and therapeutic strategies for POPF among German surgical centers, reflecting the current lack of high-level evidence in many areas. While minimally invasive management is widely adopted, the findings underscore the need for standardized protocols, improved risk stratification and further clinical trials to strengthen evidence-based practice in pancreatic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T01:53:22Z","timestamp":1773021202000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Current German practices in the prevention and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a nationwide survey"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"411","author":[{"given":"Irem","family":"Tacyildiz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anke","family":"Mittelst\u00e4dt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2537-5824","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christian","family":"Krautz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Georg F.","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2559-0476","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Gr\u00fctzmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9615-321X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maximilian","family":"Brunner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"4012_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"28","key":"4012_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3722","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","volume":"25","author":"H Kawaida","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 25(28):3722\u20133737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004","volume":"197","author":"D Fuks","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, Tavernier M, Zerbib P, Michot F, Scotte M, Triboulet JP, Mariette C, Chiche L, Salame E, Segol P, Pruvot FR, Mauvais F, Roman H, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau JM (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197(6):702\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"4012_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006174","volume":"281","author":"RT Theijse","year":"2023","unstructured":"Theijse RT, Stoop TF, Hendriks TE, Suurmeijer JA, Smits FJ, Bonsing BA, Lips DJ, Manusama E, van der Harst E, Patijn GA, Wijsman JH, Meerdink M, den Dulk M, van Dam R, Stommel MWJ, van Laarhoven K, de Wil RF, Festen S, Draaisma WA, Bosscha K, van Eijck CHJ, Busch OR, Molenaar IQ, Groot Koerkamp B, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2023) Nationwide outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients at very high risk (ISGPS-D) for postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 281(2):322\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006174","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0252727","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0252727","volume":"16","author":"SA Dhayat","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dhayat SA, Tamim ANJ, Jacob M, Ebeling G, Kerschke L, Kabar I, Senninger N (2021) Postoperative pancreatic fistula affects recurrence-free survival of pancreatic cancer patients. PLoS ONE 16(6):e0252727. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0252727PMID: 34086792; PMCID: PMC8177431","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"4012_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.04.005","volume":"57","author":"W Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang W, Zhang Z, Gu C, Liu Q, Liang Z, He W, Chen J, Lai J (2018) The optimal choice for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Surg 57:111\u2013116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.04.005","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4012_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1528-7927","volume":"147","author":"M Brunner","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brunner M, Krautz C, Maak M, Weber GF, Gr\u00fctzmann R (2022) Pyloruserhaltende partielle Pankreatoduodenektomie mit segmentaler Pfortaderresektion [Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with Segmental Portal Vein Resection]. Zentralbl Chir 147(3):233\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1528-7927","journal-title":"Zentralbl Chir"},{"issue":"5","key":"4012_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.021","volume":"161","author":"SV Shrikhande","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-delCastillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, B\u00fcchler MW (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161(5):1221\u20131234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.021. (Epub 2016 Dec 24. PMID: 28027816)","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"4012_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1637","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2020.01637","volume":"10","author":"Z Cao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cao Z, Luo W, Qiu J, Liu Y, Zheng L, Zhang T (2020) Is Invagination Anastomosis More Effective in Reducing Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula for Soft Pancreas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Under Novel Fistula Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 10:1637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2020.01637PMID: 32974203; PMCID: PMC7471255","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"4012_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2022","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.12250","volume":"48","author":"M Zizzo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zizzo M, Morini A, Zanelli M, Tumiati D, Fabozzi M (2024) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg 48(8):2022\u20132023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wjs.12250","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4012_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e597","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004855","volume":"277","author":"F Schuh","year":"2023","unstructured":"Schuh F, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Trudeau MT, M\u00fcller PC, Marchegiani G, Besselink MG, Uzunoglu F, Izbicki JR, Falconi M, Castillo CF, Adham M, Z\u2019graggen K, Friess H, Werner J, Weitz J, Strobel O, Hackert T, Radenkovic D, Kelemen D, Wolfgang C, Miao YI, Shrikhande SV, Lillemoe KD, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Neoptolemos JP, Diener MK, Vollmer CM Jr, B\u00fcchler MW (2023) A simple classification of pancreatic duct size and texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula: a classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg 277(3):e597\u2013e608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004855","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"4012_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1097\/XCS.0000000000000142","volume":"234","author":"M Brunner","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brunner M, Kovacevic J, Krautz C, Merkel S, Hartmann A, Gr\u00fctzmann R, Haller F, Weber GF (2022) Analysis of intraoperative frozen pancreatic resection margin and prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula risk during pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 234(5):928\u2013937. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/XCS.0000000000000142","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"4012_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-015-0011-7","volume":"15","author":"SJ Fu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fu SJ, Shen SL, Li SQ, Hu WJ, Hua YP, Kuang M, Liang LJ, Peng BG (2015) Risk factors and outcomes of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatico-duodenectomy: an audit of 532 consecutive cases. BMC Surg 15:34. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-015-0011-7PMID: 25887526; PMCID: PMC4377181","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"35","key":"4012_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12151","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000012151","volume":"97","author":"Z Ke","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ke Z, Cui J, Hu N, Yang Z, Chen H, Hu J, Wang C, Wu H, Nie X, Xiong J (2018) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 170 consecutive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the updated ISGPS classification and grading system. Med (Baltim) 97(35):e12151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000012151PMID: 30170457; PMCID: PMC6392812","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10505","volume":"104","author":"FJ H\u00fcttner","year":"2017","unstructured":"H\u00fcttner FJ, Probst P, Knebel P, Strobel O, Hackert T, Ulrich A, B\u00fcchler MW, Diener MK (2017) Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 104(6):660\u2013668. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.10505","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"4012_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ricci C, Pecorelli N, Esposito A, Capretti G, Partelli S, Butturini G, Boggi U, Cucchetti A, Zerbi A, Salvia R, Falconi M (2024) Pan-Drain study group. Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey. Updates Surg. ;76(3):923\u2013932. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-024-01836-0. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Erratum in: Updates Surg. 2024;76(6):2501. doi: 10.1007\/s13304-024-01967-4. PMID: 38662308; PMCID: PMC11130052","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-024-01836-0"},{"issue":"7","key":"4012_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2801","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-022-02599-1","volume":"407","author":"M Mazzola","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mazzola M, Calcagno P, Giani A, Maspero M, Bertoglio CL, De Martini P, Magistro C, Sgrazzutti C, Vanzulli A, Ferrari G (2022) Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(7):2801\u20132810. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-022-02599-1","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"10338","key":"4012_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)00182-9","volume":"399","author":"FJ Smits","year":"2022","unstructured":"Smits FJ, Henry AC, Besselink MG, Busch OR, van Eijck CH, Arntz M, Bollen TL, van Delden OM, van den Heuvel D, van der Leij C, van Lienden KP, Moelker A, Bonsing BA, Borel Rinkes IH, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, Derksen WJM, den Dulk M, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, de Haas RJ, Hagendoorn J, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Kazemier G, van der Kolk M, Liem M, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, de Meijer VE, Mieog JS, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Patijn GA, Te Riele WW, Roos D, Schreinemakers JM, Stommel MWJ, Wit F, Zonderhuis BA, Daamen LA, van Werkhoven CH, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2022) Algorithm-based care versus usual care for the early recognition and management of complications after pancreatic resection in the Netherlands: an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 399(10338):1867\u20131875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)00182-9","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"4012_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1770","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2020.10.043","volume":"20","author":"S Schorn","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schorn S, Vogel T, Demir IE, Demir E, Safak O, Friess H, Ceyhan GO (2020) Do somatostatin-analogues have the same impact on postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy? - A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Pancreatology 20(8):1770\u20131778. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pan.2020.10.043","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"issue":"29","key":"4012_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e7500","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000007500","volume":"96","author":"C Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang C, Zhao X, You S (2017) Efficacy of the prophylactic use of octreotide for the prevention of complications after pancreatic resection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med (Baltim) 96(29):e7500 PMID: 28723761; PMCID: PMC5521901","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"key":"4012_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2024.04.002","volume":"234","author":"Y Sun","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sun Y, Li Y, Liu Z, Peng T, Wang C, Wu H, Gou S (2024) Stent placement for the prevention of clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticojejunostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 234:122\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2024.04.002","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"4012_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e702","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005895","volume":"278","author":"TF Stoop","year":"2023","unstructured":"Stoop TF, Bergquist E, Theijse RT, Hempel S, van Dieren S, Sparrelid E, Distler M, Hackert T, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M, Ghorbani P, Collaborators (2023) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of total pancreatectomy as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula: is it a justifiable indication? Ann Surg 278(4):e702\u2013e711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005895","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e905","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004840","volume":"276","author":"G Marchegiani","year":"2022","unstructured":"Marchegiani G, Perri G, Burelli A, Zoccatelli F, Andrianello S, Luchini C, Donadello K, Bassi C, Salvia R (2022) High-risk pancreatic anastomosis versus total pancreatectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: postoperative outcomes and quality of life analysis. Ann Surg 276(6):e905\u2013e913. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004840","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"4012_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.21037\/gs-20-670","volume":"10","author":"AM Luu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Luu AM, Olchanetski B, Herzog T, Tannapfel A, Uhl W, Belyaev O (2021) Is primary total pancreatectomy in patients with high-risk pancreatic remnant justified and preferable to pancreaticoduodenectomy? -a matched-pairs analysis of 200 patients. Gland Surg 10(2):618\u2013628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/gs-20-670","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8709","volume":"99","author":"SL Gans","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gans SL, van Westreenen HL, Kiewiet JJ, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99(6):754\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.8709","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4012_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jviscsurg.2023.01.002","volume":"160","author":"B Malgras","year":"2023","unstructured":"Malgras B, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Pocard M, Sauvanet A (2023) Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Visc Surg 160(1):39\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jviscsurg.2023.01.002","journal-title":"J Visc Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"4012_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.5708","volume":"152","author":"FJ Smits","year":"2017","unstructured":"Smits FJ, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Batenburg MCT, Slooff RAE, Boerma D, Busch OR, Coene PPLO, van Dam RM, van Dijk DPJ, van Eijck CHJ, Festen S, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, de Jong KP, Tol JAMG, Borel Rinkes IHM, Molenaar IQ, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2017) Management of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 152(6):540\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.5708","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"}],"container-title":["Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:35:28Z","timestamp":1781638528000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04012-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1435-2451"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1435-2451","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 March 2026","order":6,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":7,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The original online version of this article was revised: The Acknowledgements section was missing from this article and should have read 'The present work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree \"Dr. med.\" for Irem Tacyildiz.'.","order":8,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"94"}}