{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T21:15:24Z","timestamp":1778620524641,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778544000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":41,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Langenbecks Arch Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T07:07:15Z","timestamp":1775027235000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Development of novel criteria for drain removal after pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis and validation study at a single institution"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"411","author":[{"given":"Hisashi","family":"Murakami","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Satoshi","family":"Okubo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takuma","family":"Okada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masaru","family":"Matsumura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Junichi","family":"Shindoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masaji","family":"Hashimoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"4040_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205\u2013213","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12462","volume":"5","author":"S Marubashi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Marubashi S, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y et al (2021) Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: Report of the National Clinical Database 2011\u20132019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5:639\u2013658","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR3","first-page":"584","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11. Years After Surg 161:584\u2013591","journal-title":"Years After Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7797","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i34.7797","volume":"22","author":"BY Hu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ et al (2016) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 22:7797\u20137805","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"4040_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000218077.14035.a6","volume":"244","author":"M Kawai","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1\u20137","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1467","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.12173","volume":"48","author":"MA Salman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Salman MA, Elewa A, Elsherbiny M et al (2024) Postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatic resection, a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 48:1467\u20131480","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.905","volume":"29","author":"Y Nagakawa","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nagakawa Y, Watanabe Y, Kozono S et al (2022) Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:114\u2013123","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"4040_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1159\/000445014","volume":"33","author":"A Nakao","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nakao A (2016) The mesenteric approach in pancreatoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 33:308\u2013313","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2007.05.005","volume":"142","author":"MN Wente","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761\u2013768","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"4040_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.02.025","volume":"76","author":"I Mintziras","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mintziras I, Maurer E, Kanngiesser V et al (2020) C-reactive protein and drain amylase accurately predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 76:53\u201358","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23561","volume":"109","author":"K Uemura","year":"2014","unstructured":"Uemura K, Murakami Y, Sudo T et al (2014) Indicators for proper management of surgical drains following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 109:702\u2013707","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"4040_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.17399","volume":"92","author":"S Yuan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yuan S, Kim JH, Li GY et al (2022) The value of drain fluid amylase as a predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticogastrostomy. ANZ J Surg 92:419\u2013425","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR13","first-page":"718637","volume":"2012","author":"DK Bartsch","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bartsch DK, Langer P, Kanngie\u00dfer V et al (2012) A simple and safe anastomosis for pancreatogastrostomy using one binding purse-string and two transfixing mattress sutures. Int J Surg Oncol 2012:718637","journal-title":"Int J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"4040_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.14701\/ahbps.24-172","volume":"29","author":"Z Czarnecka","year":"2025","unstructured":"Czarnecka Z, Verhoeff K, Bigam D et al (2025) Impact of soft pancreas on pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes and the development of the preoperative soft pancreas risk score. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 29:62\u201371","journal-title":"Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1405","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-013-1998-5","volume":"37","author":"A El Nakeeb","year":"2013","unstructured":"El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A et al (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37:1405\u20131418","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1482","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-016-3171-6","volume":"20","author":"A Giardino","year":"2016","unstructured":"Giardino A, Spolverato G, Regi P et al (2016) C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of postoperative inflammatory complications after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1482\u20131492","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"4040_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2014.03.011","volume":"208","author":"S Partelli","year":"2014","unstructured":"Partelli S, Tamburrino D, Crippa S et al (2014) Evaluation of a predictive model for pancreatic fistula based on amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 208:634\u2013639","journal-title":"Am J Surg"}],"container-title":["Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T20:29:30Z","timestamp":1778617770000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4040"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04040-3","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-8325851\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1435-2451"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1435-2451","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 December 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 April 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Toranomon Hospital (No.1919).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}],"article-number":"134"}}