{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T05:53:34Z","timestamp":1791266014652,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791244800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Langenbecks Arch Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) for rectal cancer is increasingly adopted. However, a recent systematic review highlighted a significant gap in the literature regarding quality of life (QOL) after different total mesorectal excision (TME) techniques, with open TME being particularly underrepresented. This study aimed to compare QOL and anorectal function between robotic-assisted and open low anterior rectal resection with TME.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection with TME and primary anastomosis between 2006 and 2021 at a single tertiary centre were identified. Propensity score matching was performed based on sex, age, BMI, UICC stage and tumour height. After excluding patients without QOL follow-up or with a persistent diverting stoma, 40 patients per group were available. QOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS score.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In the matched cohort, baseline characteristics were well balanced except for tumour height (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .002), with more lower-third tumours in the open group. No significant differences were observed in any EORTC QLQ-C30 domain, including global health status (66.5 vs. 71.7,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .197). QLQ-CR29 showed comparable outcomes for most domains; however, sexual interest was significantly lower in the RAS group for women (88.1 vs. 55.6,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .008). LARS scores were similar between groups (24.4 vs. 25.6,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .765). Perioperative outcomes including morbidity (10.0% vs. 22.5%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .130) and anastomotic leakage (2.5% vs. 5.0%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .526) did not differ significantly.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Robotic-assisted and open low anterior rectal resection with TME resulted in comparable QOL and anorectal function across all assessed domains. Notably, approximately one third of patients in both groups reported major LARS, underscoring the persistent functional burden irrespective of surgical approach. By providing direct comparative data on open TME \u2013 an approach underrepresented in the literature \u2013 these findings contribute to closing an important evidence gap.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T13:33:25Z","timestamp":1791207205000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Quality of life and functional outcomes after low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision: a propensity score-matched comparison of robotic-assisted versus open surgery"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"411","author":[{"given":"Frederick","family":"Br\u00f6cker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susanne","family":"Merkel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Jacobsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Klaus","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Axel","family":"Denz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2559-0476","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Gr\u00fctzmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1175-4505","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Georg F.","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9615-321X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maximilian","family":"Brunner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2537-5824","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christian","family":"Krautz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"4314_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2550","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-016-3543-9","volume":"40","author":"T Leal Ghezzi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O (2016) 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. World J Surg 40:2550\u20132557","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7219","volume":"318","author":"D Jayne","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H et al (2017) Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 318:1569\u20131580","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4314_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.13696","volume":"318","author":"JD Wright","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wright JD (2017) Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Balancing Evidence and Implementation. JAMA 318:1545","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4314_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000385","volume":"58","author":"A Pai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pai A, Marecik SJ, Park JJ et al (2015) Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58:659\u2013667","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"4314_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6276-z","author":"M Veltcamp Helbach","year":"2018","unstructured":"Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ et al (2018) Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6276-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4314_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11817","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000011817","volume":"97","author":"S Sheng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sheng S, Zhao T, Wang X (2018) Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Med (Baltim) 97:e11817","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"key":"4314_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-4833-x","author":"A Pontallier","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pontallier A, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B et al (2016) Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-016-4833-x","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4314_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2025.10021","author":"Q Feng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T et al (2025) Robotic vs Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: The REAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2025.10021","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4314_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4431","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-024-10934-4","volume":"38","author":"RTJ Geitenbeek","year":"2024","unstructured":"Geitenbeek RTJ, Burghgraef TA, Moes CA et al (2024) Functional outcomes and quality of life following open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 38:4431\u20134444","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4314_CR10","first-page":"199","volume":"270","author":"K Phan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Phan K, Kahlaee HR, Kim SH et al (2019) Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 270:199\u2013212","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR11","volume-title":"UICC: TNM Supplement. A Commentary on Uniform Use","year":"2003","unstructured":"Wittekind C, Greene FL, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH (eds) (2003) UICC: TNM Supplement. A Commentary on Uniform Use, 3rd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York","edition":"3"},{"key":"4314_CR12","volume-title":"EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual","author":"PM Fayers","year":"2001","unstructured":"Fayers PM, Aaronson N, Bjordal K et al (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. EORTC, Brussels","edition":"3"},{"key":"4314_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3661","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-016-3270-7","volume":"24","author":"V Ganesh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ganesh V, Agarwal A, Popvic M et al (2016) Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer 24:3661\u20133668","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"4314_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31828fac0b","volume":"259","author":"T Juul","year":"2014","unstructured":"Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S et al (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259:728\u2013734","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.1998.16.1.139","volume":"16","author":"D Osoba","year":"1998","unstructured":"Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139\u2013144","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"4314_CR16","first-page":"821","volume":"119","author":"C Kowalski","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kowalski C, Sibert NT, Breidenbach C et al (2022) Outcome quality after colorectal cancer resection in certified colorectal cancer centers \u2013 patient-reported and short-term clinical outcomes. Dtsch Arztebl Int 119:821\u2013828","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"4314_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.133.8.894","volume":"133","author":"RJ Heald","year":"1998","unstructured":"Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD et al (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978\u20131997. Arch Surg 133:894\u2013899","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133185.23514.32","volume":"240","author":"WL Law","year":"2004","unstructured":"Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 240:260\u2013268","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"O216","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13605","volume":"19","author":"SR Benz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Benz SR, Iesalnieks I, Kienle P et al (2017) Is it time to rethink the rule of total mesorectal excision? A prospective radiological and pathological study in 49 consecutive patients with mid-rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 19:O216\u2013O222","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"4314_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1007\/s00104-008-1467-0","volume":"79","author":"T Junginger","year":"2008","unstructured":"Junginger T, Hermanek P (2008) Problems in the treatment of upper rectal carcinoma. Chirurg 79:327\u2013339","journal-title":"Chirurg"},{"key":"4314_CR21","first-page":"106","volume":"14","author":"TYT Chen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chen TYT, Wiltink LM, Nout RA et al (2014) Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Canc 14:106\u2013114","journal-title":"Clin Colorectal Canc"},{"key":"4314_CR22","first-page":"22","volume":"35","author":"L Bordeianou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bordeianou L, Bhama AR (2022) Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 35:22\u201330","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"key":"4314_CR23","first-page":"351","volume":"40","author":"IJ Park","year":"2024","unstructured":"Park IJ, Kim HR, Yu CS et al (2024) Partial mesorectal excision can be a primary option for middle rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. Ann Coloproctol 40:351\u2013362","journal-title":"Ann Coloproctol"},{"key":"4314_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107078","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2023.107078","volume":"49","author":"C Foppa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Foppa C, Giannini G, Engel F et al (2023) Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 49:107078","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T05:15:21Z","timestamp":1791263721000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4314"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-026-04314-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1435-2451"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1435-2451","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Artificial intelligence (Claude, Anthropic) was used for language editing and literature search assistance. All scientific content, data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Use of artificial intelligence","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"263"}}