{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,18]],"date-time":"2026-01-18T14:25:50Z","timestamp":1768746350998,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]],"date-time":"2024-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]],"date-time":"2024-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704240000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004350","name":"Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004350","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008769","name":"Julius-Maximilians-Universit\u00e4t W\u00fcrzburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008769","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychological Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The self-prioritization effect suggests that self-relevant information has a processing advantage over information that is not directly associated with the self. In consequence, reaction times are faster and accuracy rates higher when reacting to self-associated stimuli rather than to other-related stimuli (Sui et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38:1105\u20131117, 2012). This spurs the assumption that self-associated action\u2013effects should also be perceived earlier than other-related outcomes. One way to measure this is temporal binding. Previous research indeed showed that the perceived temporal interval between actions and self-associated outcomes was reduced compared to friend- and other-associated outcomes. However, the employed method (interval estimations) and several experimental design choices make it impossible to discern whether the perceived shortening of the interval between a keypress and a self-relevant outcome is due to a perceptual shift of the action or of the action\u2013effect or both. Thus, we conducted four experiments to assess whether temporal binding can indeed be modulated by self-relevance and if so where this perceptual bias is located. The results did not support stronger temporal binding for self- vs other-related action\u2013effects. We discuss these results against the backdrop of the attentional basis of self-prioritization and propose directions for future research.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]],"date-time":"2024-01-03T12:02:14Z","timestamp":1704283334000},"page":"1007-1022","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["You do you: susceptibility of temporal binding to self-relevance"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"88","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9706-8578","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Felicitas V.","family":"Muth","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sophia","family":"Ebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6256-8011","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wilfried","family":"Kunde","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"1906_CR1","unstructured":"Bartlett,\u00a0J. (2017). An introduction to JASP: A free and user-friendly statistics package. https:\/\/osf.io\/p2hzg."},{"key":"1906_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.02.002","volume":"162","author":"B Beck","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beck, B., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency. Cognition, 162, 54\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.02.002","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191117740625","volume":"26","author":"J Brailovskaia","year":"2019","unstructured":"Brailovskaia, J., Bierhoff, H.-W., & Margraf, J. (2019). How to identify narcissism with 13 items? Validation of the German Narcissistic Personality Inventory\u201313 (G-NPI-13). Assessment, 26(4), 630\u2013644.","journal-title":"Assessment"},{"issue":"12","key":"1906_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797612444612","volume":"23","author":"MJ Buehner","year":"2012","unstructured":"Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1490\u20131497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797612444612","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"issue":"10","key":"1906_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x","volume":"20","author":"MJ Buehner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Buehner, M. J., & Humphreys, G. R. (2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1221\u20131228.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"issue":"9","key":"1906_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0204027","volume":"13","author":"EA Caspar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Caspar, E. A., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2018). Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands. PLoS ONE, 13(9), e0204027. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0204027","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-019-01283-2","volume":"85","author":"S Caughey","year":"2021","unstructured":"Caughey, S., Falb\u00e9n, J. K., Tsamadi, D., Persson, L. M., Golubickis, M., & Neil Macrae, C. (2021). Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 85(2), 503\u2013508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-019-01283-2","journal-title":"Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung"},{"issue":"10","key":"1906_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2411","DOI":"10.1007\/s12671-020-01457-9","volume":"11","author":"SG Chiarella","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chiarella, S. G., Makwana, M., Simione, L., Hartkamp, M., Calabrese, L., Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2020). Mindfulness meditation weakens attachment to self: Evidence from a self vs other binding task. Mindfulness, 11(10), 2411\u20132422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12671-020-01457-9","journal-title":"Mindfulness"},{"key":"1906_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2016.02.016","volume":"43","author":"JF Christensen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Christensen, J. F., Yoshie, M., Di Costa, S., & Haggard, P. (2016). Emotional valence, sense of agency and responsibility: A study using intentional binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2016.02.016","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2011.02.007","volume":"119","author":"MD Constable","year":"2011","unstructured":"Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2011.02.007","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1177\/1747021818762010","volume":"72","author":"MD Constable","year":"2019","unstructured":"Constable, M. D., Welsh, T. N., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2019). I before U: Temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 589\u2013598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1747021818762010","journal-title":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2007.04.003","volume":"17","author":"SJ Cunningham","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Neil Macrae, C. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 312\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2007.04.003","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0029557","volume":"7","author":"A Desantis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Desantis, A., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2012). Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0029557","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"6","key":"1906_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2656","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-021-02295-0","volume":"83","author":"C Desebrock","year":"2021","unstructured":"Desebrock, C., & Spence, C. (2021). The self-prioritization effect: Self-referential processing in movement highlights modulation at multiple stages. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(6), 2656\u20132674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-021-02295-0","journal-title":"Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics"},{"key":"1906_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.009","volume":"190","author":"C Desebrock","year":"2018","unstructured":"Desebrock, C., Sui, J., & Spence, C. (2018). Self-reference in action: Arm-movement responses are enhanced in perceptual matching. Acta Psychologica, 190, 258\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.009","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"key":"1906_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00781","volume":"5","author":"Z Dienes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00781","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245919876960","volume":"2","author":"Z Dienes","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dienes, Z. (2019). How do I know what my theory predicts? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 364\u2013377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245919876960","journal-title":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2006.09.010","volume":"16","author":"K Engbert","year":"2007","unstructured":"Engbert, K., & Wohlschl\u00e4ger, A. (2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 255\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2006.09.010","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1080\/13506285.2019.1583708","volume":"27","author":"JK Falb\u00e9n","year":"2019","unstructured":"Falb\u00e9n, J. K., Golubickis, M., Balseryte, R., Persson, L. M., Tsamadi, D., Caughey, S., & Neil Macrae, C. (2019). How prioritized is self-prioritization during stimulus processing? Visual Cognition, 27(1), 46\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13506285.2019.1583708","journal-title":"Visual Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.41.4.1149","volume":"41","author":"F Faul","year":"2009","unstructured":"Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149\u20131160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BRM.41.4.1149","journal-title":"Behavior Research Methods"},{"issue":"5","key":"1906_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1737","DOI":"10.1037\/a0037376","volume":"40","author":"C Frings","year":"2014","unstructured":"Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2014). Self-priorization processes in action and perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1737\u20131740. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0037376","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"7","key":"1906_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-017-0722-3","volume":"45","author":"M Golubickis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Golubickis, M., Falb\u00e9n, J. K., Sahraie, A., Visokomogilski, A., Cunningham, W. A., Sui, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2017). Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1223\u20131239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-017-0722-3","journal-title":"Memory & Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-019-01235-w","volume":"85","author":"M Golubickis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Golubickis, M., Ho, N. S. P., Falb\u00e9n, J. K., Schwertel, C. L., Maiuri, A., Dublas, D., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2021). Valence and ownership: Object desirability influences self-prioritization. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 85(1), 91\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-019-01235-w","journal-title":"Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung"},{"key":"1906_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2021.103350","volume":"218","author":"M Golubickis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2021a). Judging me and you: Task design modulates self-prioritization. Acta Psychologica, 218, 103350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2021.103350","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"issue":"6","key":"1906_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1915","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-021-01964-3","volume":"28","author":"M Golubickis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2021b). That\u2019s me in the spotlight: Self-relevance modulates attentional breadth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(6), 1915\u20131922. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-021-01964-3","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1026\/0012-1924.50.4.171","volume":"50","author":"K Gr\u00e4fe","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gr\u00e4fe, K., Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., & L\u00f6we, B. (2004). Screening psychischer St\u00f6rungen mit dem \u201cGesundheitsfragebogen f\u00fcr Patienten (PHQ-D).\u201d Diagnostica, 50(4), 171\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1026\/0012-1924.50.4.171","journal-title":"Diagnostica"},{"key":"1906_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2014.07.015","volume":"152","author":"C Haering","year":"2014","unstructured":"Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2014). Intentional binding is independent of the validity of the action effect\u2019s identity. Acta Psychologica, 152, 109\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2014.07.015","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1016\/S1053-8100(03)00052-7","volume":"12","author":"P Haggard","year":"2003","unstructured":"Haggard, P., & Clark, S. (2003). Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 695\u2013707. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1053-8100(03)00052-7","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1038\/nn827","volume":"5","author":"P Haggard","year":"2002","unstructured":"Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nn827","journal-title":"Nature Neuroscience"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x","volume":"18","author":"P Haggard","year":"2009","unstructured":"Haggard, P., & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 242\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x","journal-title":"Current Directions in Psychological Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"1906_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-022-06345-3","volume":"240","author":"E Hemed","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hemed, E., Karsh, N., Mark-Tavger, I., & Eitam, B. (2022). Motivation (s) from control: Response-effect contingency and confirmation of sensorimotor predictions reinforce different levels of selection. Experimental Brain Research, 240(5), 1471\u20131497.","journal-title":"Experimental Brain Research"},{"issue":"5","key":"1906_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12843","volume":"44","author":"C Hoerl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hoerl, C., Lorimer, S., McCormack, T., Lagnado, D. A., Blakey, E., Tecwyn, E. C., & Buehner, M. J. (2020). Temporal binding, causation, and agency: Developing a new theoretical framework. Cognitive Science, 44(5), e12843. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cogs.12843","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"issue":"9","key":"1906_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2084","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218221132762","volume":"76","author":"N Hon","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hon, N. (2023). Attention and expectation likely underlie temporal binding measured using the Libet clock. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(9), 2084\u20132093.","journal-title":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"issue":"1\u20134","key":"1906_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1080\/17588928.2015.1044427","volume":"7","author":"GW Humphreys","year":"2016","unstructured":"Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1\u20134), 5\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17588928.2015.1044427","journal-title":"Cognitive Neuroscience"},{"key":"1906_CR35","unstructured":"JASP Team. (2018). JASP [Computer software] (Version 0.8. 5.1) [Computer software]. https:\/\/jasp-stats.org\/."},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1257\/jep.5.1.193","volume":"5","author":"D Kahneman","year":"1991","unstructured":"Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1257\/jep.5.1.193","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Perspectives"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3405","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-60385-9","volume":"10","author":"N Karsh","year":"2020","unstructured":"Karsh, N., Hemed, E., Nafcha, O., Elkayam, S. B., Custers, R., & Eitam, B. (2020). The differential impact of a response\u2019s effectiveness and its monetary value on response-selection. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 3405.","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000612","volume":"45","author":"W Kirsch","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kirsch, W., Kunde, W., & Herbort, O. (2019). Intentional binding is unrelated to action intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(3), 378\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0000612","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"8","key":"1906_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3135","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-021-02314-0","volume":"83","author":"AL Klaffehn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Klaffehn, A. L., Sellmann, F. B., Kirsch, W., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2021). Temporal binding as multisensory integration: Manipulating perceptual certainty of actions and their effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(8), 3135\u20133145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-021-02314-0","journal-title":"Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.27.2.387","volume":"27","author":"W Kunde","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-1523.27.2.387","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-017-1316-6","volume":"25","author":"W Kunde","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kunde, W., Weller, L., & Pfister, R. (2018). Sociomotor action control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 917\u2013931. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-017-1316-6","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"9","key":"1906_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1206","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000661","volume":"45","author":"P Lush","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lush, P., Roseboom, W., Cleeremans, A., Scott, R. B., Seth, A. K., & Dienes, Z. (2019). Intentional binding as Bayesian cue combination: Testing predictions with trait individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0000661","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"11","key":"1906_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000687","volume":"45","author":"M Makwana","year":"2019","unstructured":"Makwana, M., & Srinivasan, N. (2019). Self-associated stimuli produce stronger intentional binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(11), 1436\u20131442. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0000687","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2006.12.004","volume":"17","author":"JW Moore","year":"2008","unstructured":"Moore, J. W., & Haggard, P. (2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 136\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2006.12.004","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2011.12.002","volume":"21","author":"JW Moore","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546\u2013561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2011.12.002","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"key":"1906_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2016.12.008","volume":"49","author":"J Moreton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moreton, J., Callan, M. J., & Hughes, G. (2017). How much does emotional valence of action outcomes affect temporal binding? Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 25\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2016.12.008","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2011.08.014","volume":"20","author":"G Moretto","year":"2011","unstructured":"Moretto, G., Walsh, E., & Haggard, P. (2011). Experience of agency and sense of responsibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1847\u20131854. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2011.08.014","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2012.05.003","volume":"21","author":"S Nolden","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nolden, S., Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Assessing intentional binding with the method of constant stimuli. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1176\u20131185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2012.05.003","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2010.08.006","volume":"135","author":"R Pfister","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 316\u2013322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2010.08.006","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"key":"1906_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.3389\/fnhum.2014.00667","volume":"8","author":"R Pfister","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pfister, R., Obhi, S. S., Rieger, M., & Wenke, D. (2014). Action and perception in social contexts: Intentional binding for social action effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 667. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnhum.2014.00667","journal-title":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience"},{"key":"1906_CR51","unstructured":"Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2020). E-Prime Go 1.0 [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA. https:\/\/support.pstnet.com\/."},{"issue":"1","key":"1906_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10339-021-01066-x","volume":"23","author":"NN Reddy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Reddy, N. N. (2022). The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect. Cognitive Processing, 23(1), 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10339-021-01066-x","journal-title":"Cognitive Processing"},{"issue":"4","key":"1906_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-017-1292-y","volume":"79","author":"M Ruess","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ruess, M., Thomaschke, R., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The time course of intentional binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(4), 1123\u20131131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-017-1292-y","journal-title":"Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-017-1479-2","volume":"80","author":"M Ruess","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ruess, M., Thomaschke, R., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Intentional binding of visual effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(3), 713\u2013722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-017-1479-2","journal-title":"Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000979","volume":"48","author":"M Schaaf","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schaaf, M., Kunde, W., & Wirth, R. (2022). Evidence for initially independent monitoring of responses and response effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(2), 128\u2013138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0000979","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"6","key":"1906_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1027\/1618-3169\/a000307","volume":"62","author":"S Sch\u00e4fer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer, S., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2015). Self-prioritization beyond perception. Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 415\u2013425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1618-3169\/a000307","journal-title":"Experimental Psychology"},{"issue":"7","key":"1906_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3750","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-020-02070-7","volume":"82","author":"S Sch\u00e4fer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer, S., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2020). Creating a network of importance: The particular effects of self-relevance on stimulus processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(7), 3750\u20133766. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-020-02070-7","journal-title":"Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1111\/bjop.12483","volume":"112","author":"S Sch\u00e4fer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer, S., Wesslein, A.-K., Spence, C., & Frings, C. (2021). When self-prioritization crosses the senses: Crossmodal self-prioritization demonstrated between vision and touch. British Journal of Psychology (london, England), 112(3), 573\u2013584. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjop.12483","journal-title":"British Journal of Psychology (london, England)"},{"issue":"8","key":"1906_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2141","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-016-4616-6","volume":"234","author":"S Sch\u00e4fer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer, S., Wesslein, A.-K., Spence, C., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2016). Self-prioritization in vision, audition, and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 234(8), 2141\u20132150. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00221-016-4616-6","journal-title":"Experimental Brain Research"},{"key":"1906_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2022.103287","volume":"99","author":"M Siebertz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Siebertz, M., & Jansen, P. (2022). Diverging implicit measurement of sense of agency using interval estimation and Libet clock. Consciousness and Cognition, 99, 103287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2022.103287","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-020-01845-1","volume":"28","author":"CA Silver","year":"2021","unstructured":"Silver, C. A., Tatler, B. W., Chakravarthi, R., & Timmermans, B. (2021). Social agency as a continuum. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(2), 434\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-020-01845-1","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"},{"issue":"5","key":"1906_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1037\/a0029792","volume":"38","author":"J Sui","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105\u20131117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0029792","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance"},{"issue":"10","key":"1906_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1952","DOI":"10.1080\/17470218.2015.1023207","volume":"68","author":"J Sui","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The interaction between self-bias and reward: Evidence for common and distinct processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(10), 1952\u20131964. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17470218.2015.1023207","journal-title":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"issue":"19","key":"1906_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7607","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1221862110","volume":"110","author":"J Sui","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(19), 7607\u20137612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1221862110","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America"},{"issue":"12","key":"1906_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0053421","volume":"7","author":"K Takahata","year":"2012","unstructured":"Takahata, K., Takahashi, H., Maeda, T., Umeda, S., Suhara, T., Mimura, M., & Kato, M. (2012). It\u2019s not my fault: Postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e53421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0053421","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1906_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.001","volume":"190","author":"V Thanopoulos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Thanopoulos, V., Psarou, E., & Vatakis, A. (2018). Robust intentional binding for causally-linked sequences of naturalistic events but not for abstract event sequences. Acta Psychologica, 190, 159\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2018.08.001","journal-title":"Acta Psychologica"},{"key":"1906_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2021.103219","volume":"96","author":"S Tonn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tonn, S., Pfister, R., Klaffehn, A. L., Weller, L., & Schwarz, K. A. (2021). Two faces of temporal binding: Action-and effect-binding are not correlated. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103219.","journal-title":"Consciousness and Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1080\/02643290442000158","volume":"22","author":"M Tsakiris","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 387\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02643290442000158","journal-title":"Cognitive Neuropsychology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1906_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1080\/713932672","volume":"51","author":"JH Wearden","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wearden, J. H., Edwards, H., Fakhri, M., & Percival, A. (1998). Why \u201csounds are judged longer than lights\u201d: Application of a model of the internal clock in humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 51(2), 97\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/713932672","journal-title":"The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B"},{"key":"1906_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/3650.001.0001","volume-title":"The Illusion of Conscious Will","author":"DM Wegner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wegner, D. M. (2002). The Illusion of Conscious Will (New). MIT Press.","edition":"New"},{"issue":"3","key":"1906_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-013-3419-2","volume":"229","author":"N Wolpe","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wolpe, N., Haggard, P., Siebner, H. R., & Rowe, J. B. (2013). Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 467\u2013474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00221-013-3419-2","journal-title":"Experimental Brain Research"},{"key":"1906_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-021-01584-5","author":"M Wo\u017aniak","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wo\u017aniak, M., & Knoblich, G. (2021). Self-prioritization depends on assumed task-relevance of self-association. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-021-01584-5. Advance online publication.","journal-title":"Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung"},{"key":"1906_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2020.104423","volume":"205","author":"K Yamamoto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yamamoto, K. (2020). Cue integration as a common mechanism for action and outcome bindings. Cognition, 205, 104423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2020.104423","journal-title":"Cognition"}],"container-title":["Psychological Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]],"date-time":"2024-03-26T13:06:26Z","timestamp":1711458386000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["1906"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-023-01906-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0340-0727","1430-2772"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0340-0727","type":"print"},{"value":"1430-2772","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 November 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 November 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the ethics committee of the psychology department of the Julius-Maximilians-University of W\u00fcrzburg (GZEK 2021-63).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"All participants were na\u00efve to the study purpose and provided informed consent prior to the study. They received monetary compensation for their voluntary participation.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"As part of the informed consent, participants consented that their anonymized data may be used for publication in a scientific journal.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}