{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T08:06:11Z","timestamp":1787731571507,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]],"date-time":"2020-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601942400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]],"date-time":"2020-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601942400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007514","name":"Universit\u00e0 di Pisa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007514","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Endosc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The treatment of the pancreatic stump is a critical step of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) can facilitate minimally invasive challenging abdominal procedures, including pancreatojejunostomy. However, one of the major limitations of RAS stems from its lack of tactile feedback that can lead to pancreatic parenchyma laceration during knot tying or during traction on the suture. Moreover, a Wirsung-jejunostomy is not always easy to execute, especially in cases with small diameter duct. Herein, we describe and video-report the technical details of a robotic modified end-to-side invaginated robotic pancreatojejunostomy (RmPJ) with the use of barbed suture instead of the \u201cclassical\u201d Wirsung-jejunostomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The RmPJ technique consists of a double layer of absorbable monofilament running barbed suture (3\u20130\u00a0V-Loc), the outer layer is used to invaginate the pancreatic stump. Thereafter, a small enterotomy is made in the jejunum exactly opposite to the location of the pancreatic duct for stent insertion (usually 5 Fr) inside the duct. The internal layer provides a second barbed running suture placed between the pancreatic capsule\/parenchyma and the jejunal seromuscular layer.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 14 patients underwent robotic PD with RmPJ at our Institution. The mean console time was (281.36\u2009\u00b1\u200931.50\u00a0min), while the mean operative time for fashioning the RmPJ was 37.31\u2009\u00b1\u20097.80\u00a0min. Ten out of 14 patients were discharged within postoperative day 8. No clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas were encountered, while two patients developed biochemical leaks.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>RmPJ is feasible and reproducible irrespective of pancreatic duct size and parenchyma, and can enhance the surgical workflow of this operation. Specifically, the use of barbed sutures allows the exploitation of the potential advantages of the RAS, while minimizing the negative effect caused by the main disadvantage of the robotic approach, its absence of tactile feedback, by ensuring uniform tension on the continuous suture lines used, especially during the reconstructive phase of the operation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]],"date-time":"2020-10-06T16:02:51Z","timestamp":1602000171000},"page":"955-961","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Use of barbed suture without fashioning the \u201cclassical\u201d Wirsung-jejunostomy in a modified end-to-side robotic pancreatojejunostomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7742-9556","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luca","family":"Morelli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Niccol\u00f2","family":"Furbetta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Desir\u00e9e","family":"Gianardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Simone","family":"Guadagni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gregorio","family":"Di Franco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Bianchini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Palmeri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caterina","family":"Masoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giulio","family":"Di Candio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alfred","family":"Cuschieri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"7991_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-193510000-00023","volume":"102","author":"AO Whipple","year":"1935","unstructured":"Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102:763\u2013779. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000658-193510000-00023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.020","volume":"210","author":"SR Grobmyer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN (2010) Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 210:54\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.020","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00311562","volume":"26","author":"A Kakita","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kakita A, Takahashi T, Yoshida M, Furuta K (1996) A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:532\u2013535. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00311562","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"7991_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001240","volume":"263","author":"T Keck","year":"2016","unstructured":"Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, Klein F, Sick O, Niedergethmann M, Wilhelm TJ, Farkas SA, Borner T, Bruns C, Kleespies A, Kleeff J, Mihaljevic AL, Uhl W, Chromik A, Fendrich V, Heeger K, Padberg W, Hecker A, Neumann UP, Junge K, Kalff JC, Glowka TR, Werner J, Knebel P, Piso P, Mayr M, Izbicki J, Vashist Y, Bronsert P, Bruckner T, Limprecht R, Diener MK, Rossion I, Wegener I, Hopt UT (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for reconstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263:440\u2013449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001240","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1572","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6446-z","volume":"33","author":"Y Cai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cai Y, Luo H, Li Y, Gao P, Peng B (2019) A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 33:1572\u20131577. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6446-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7991_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2837","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5294-y","volume":"31","author":"I Poves","year":"2017","unstructured":"Poves I, Morat\u00f3 O, Burd\u00edo F, Grande L (2017) Laparoscopic-adapted Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31:2837\u20132845. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-016-5294-y","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7991_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2169","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5916-z","volume":"32","author":"PC Giulianotti","year":"2018","unstructured":"Giulianotti PC, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Esposito S, Masrur M, Gangemi A, Bianco FM (2018) Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pylorus-preserving robotic Whipple: a proposal for a standardized technique. Surg Endosc 32:2169\u20132174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5916-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7991_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1159\/000489777","volume":"5","author":"R Gonzalez-Heredia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gonzalez-Heredia R, Durgam S, Masrur M, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Gangemi A, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC (2018) Comparison of different techniques of pancreatic stump management in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Tumors 5:68\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000489777","journal-title":"Gastrointest Tumors"},{"key":"7991_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2018.06.031","volume":"164","author":"SE Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang SE, Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM (2018) Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score\u2013matched study. Surg (United States) 164:1162\u20131167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2018.06.031","journal-title":"Surg (United States)"},{"key":"7991_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-020-01855-6","volume":"405","author":"M Olakowski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Olakowski M, Grudzi\u0144ska E, Mrowiec S (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy\u2014a review of modern techniques. Langenbeck\u2019s Arch Surg 405:13\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-020-01855-6","journal-title":"Langenbeck\u2019s Arch Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3722","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","volume":"25","author":"H Kawaida","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 25:3722\u20133737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"7991_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4382","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5523-z","volume":"31","author":"M Kornaropoulos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW, Makris MC, Mitrousias A, Petrou A, Felekouras E, Michalinos A, Vailas M, Schizas D, Papalampros A (2017) Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 31:4382\u20134392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5523-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7991_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1089\/1092642041255441","volume":"14","author":"BT Bethea","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, Fitton TP, Cattaneo SM, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA, Yuh DD (2004) Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:191\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/1092642041255441","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"7991_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2090","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-017-3587-7","volume":"21","author":"L Morelli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Del Chiaro M, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2017) Technical details and results of a modified end-to-side technique of pancreatojejunostomy: a personal series of 100 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 21:2090\u20132099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-017-3587-7","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"7991_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","volume":"216","author":"MP Callery","year":"2013","unstructured":"Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2337-8","volume":"18","author":"BC Miller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM (2014) A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 18:172\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-013-2337-8","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-015-0541-0","volume":"10","author":"G Meccariello","year":"2016","unstructured":"Meccariello G, Faedi F, AlGhamdi S, Montevecchi F, Firinu E, Zanotti C, Cavaliere D, Gunelli R, Taurchini M, Amadori A, Vicini C (2016) An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback? J Robot Surg 10:57\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-015-0541-0","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-018-0435-3","author":"Y Lin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lin Y, Liao B, Lai S, Huang J, Du L, Wang K, Li H (2019) The application of barbed suture during the partial nephrectomy may modify perioperative results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-018-0435-3","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"7991_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1515\/med-2019-0055","volume":"14","author":"M Manigrasso","year":"2019","unstructured":"Manigrasso M, Velotti N, Calculli F, Aprea G, Di Lauro K, Araimo E, Elmore U, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, Musella M, Milone M, Maria Sosa Fernandez L, Milone F, Domenico De Palma G (2019) Barbed suture and gastrointestinal surgery. A retrospective analysis. Open Med 14:503\u2013508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/med-2019-0055","journal-title":"Open Med"},{"key":"7991_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsann.2019.0106","volume":"102","author":"T Wiggins","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wiggins T, Majid MS, Markar SR, Loy J, Agrawal S, Koak Y (2020) Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102:153\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1308\/rcsann.2019.0106","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"7991_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-015-3053-3","volume":"20","author":"EY Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim EY, Hong TH (2016) Laparoscopic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy using barbed sutures: an efficient and secure solution for pancreatic duct obstructions in patients with chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:861\u2013866. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-015-3053-3","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"7991_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.3791\/60301","volume":"2019","author":"A Balduzzi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Balduzzi A, Zwart MJW, Kempeneers RMA, Boermeester MA, Busch OR, Besselink MG (2019) Robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis. J Vis Exp 2019:154. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3791\/60301","journal-title":"J Vis Exp"},{"key":"7991_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.3791\/56819","volume":"2018","author":"M De Pastena","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Pastena M, van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Busch OR, Gerhards MF, Festen S, Besselink MG (2018) Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy. J Vis Exp 2018:136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3791\/56819","journal-title":"J Vis Exp"},{"key":"7991_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2014.0053","volume":"24","author":"BH Edil","year":"2014","unstructured":"Edil BH, Cooper MA, Makary MA (2014) Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy using a barbed suture: a novel technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 24:887\u2013891. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2014.0053","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"7991_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.03.336","volume":"21","author":"AA Guzowski","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guzowski AA, Gabra J, Ali NS (2019) Updated barbed suture for pancreatic anastomosis during pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases incidence of clinically significant pancreatic fistula; our first 50 patients. Hpb 21:S182\u2013S183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.03.336","journal-title":"Hpb"},{"key":"7991_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2018.06.1795","volume":"21","author":"YC Shin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shin YC, Jang JY, Chang YR, Jung W, Kwon W, Kim H, Kim E, Kim SW (2019) Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled study. Hpb 21:51\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2018.06.1795","journal-title":"Hpb"},{"key":"7991_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2013.08.003","volume":"22","author":"R Cirocchi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Trastulli S, Coratti A, Parisi A, Falconi M (2013) A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Oncol 22:238\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.suronc.2013.08.003","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["Surgical Endoscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,6]],"date-time":"2021-10-06T01:16:17Z","timestamp":1633482977000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["7991"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07991-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0930-2794","1432-2218"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0930-2794","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2218","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 October 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Prof Luca Morelli, Dr Niccol\u00f2 Furbetta, Dr Desir\u00e9e Gianardi, Dr Simone Guadagni, Dr Gregorio Di Franco, Dr Matteo Bianchini, Dr Matteo Palmeri, Prof Giulio Di Candio, and Prof Alfred Cuschieri have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosures"}}]}}