{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:46:00Z","timestamp":1792788360250,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]],"date-time":"2021-11-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635897600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]],"date-time":"2021-11-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635897600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Endosc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>From January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC\u2009+\u2009LCBDE\u2009+\u2009T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP\u2009+\u2009subsequent LC (ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009275), LC\u2009+\u2009LCBDE\u2009+\u2009intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD)\u2009+\u2009primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009479) and LC\u2009+\u2009laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>There was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16\u2009\u00b1\u20093.88\u00a0days vs 6.92\u2009\u00b1\u20091.71\u00a0days vs 10.74\u2009\u00b1\u20095.30\u00a0days, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08\u2009\u00b1\u200942.79\u00a0min vs 92.31\u2009\u00b1\u200910.26\u00a0min, 99.09\u2009\u00b1\u20098.46\u00a0min, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Compared to ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72\u00a0months. Four patients in ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>All the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP\u2009+\u2009LC. LC\u2009+\u2009LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC\u2009+\u2009LCBDE\u2009+\u2009T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]],"date-time":"2021-11-03T14:02:41Z","timestamp":1635948161000},"page":"4903-4911","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years\u2019 experience of a single institution"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Tong","family":"Guo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peng","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhiwei","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaorui","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1562-3812","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yahong","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"8843_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD003327","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub4","volume":"12","author":"BV Dasari","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS et al (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD003327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub4","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"8843_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1596","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2017.247","volume":"112","author":"BJ Elmunzer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Elmunzer BJ, Noureldin M, Morgan KA et al (2017) The impact of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for complicated gallstone disease. Am J Gastroenterol 112(10):1596\u20131602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ajg.2017.247","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"5","key":"8843_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2016-312317","volume":"66","author":"E Williams","year":"2017","unstructured":"Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G et al (2017) Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 66(5):765\u2013782. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gutjnl-2016-312317","journal-title":"Gut"},{"issue":"41","key":"8843_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15144","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i41.15144","volume":"20","author":"AA ElGeidie","year":"2014","unstructured":"ElGeidie AA (2014) Single-session minimally invasive management of common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 20(41):15144\u201315152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v20.i41.15144","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"8843_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Cd005640","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858","volume":"6","author":"KS Gurusamy","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:Cd005640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"8843_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/s0016-5107(98)70121-x","volume":"48","author":"S Loperfido","year":"1998","unstructured":"Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48(1):1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0016-5107(98)70121-x","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"8843_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1975","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4424-2","volume":"30","author":"N Estelles Vidagany","year":"2016","unstructured":"Estelles Vidagany N, Domingo Del Pozo C, Peris Tomas N et al (2016) Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30(5):1975\u20131982. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-015-4424-2","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"8843_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2014.03.055","volume":"189","author":"ZT Dong","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dong ZT, Wu GZ, Luo KL et al (2014) Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube. J Surg Res 189(2):249\u2013254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2014.03.055","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"8843_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1102","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2020.0081","volume":"30","author":"C Fang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fang C, Dong Y, Liu S et al (2020) Laparoscopy for hepatolithiasis: biliary duct exploration with primary closure versus T-tube drainage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 30(10):1102\u20131105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2020.0081","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"1","key":"8843_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/s1091-255x(01)80016-0","volume":"5","author":"RD Fanelli","year":"2001","unstructured":"Fanelli RD, Gersin KS (2001) Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting: a simplified approach to the management of occult common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 5(1):74\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1091-255x(01)80016-0","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"8843_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2017.0433","volume":"28","author":"P Parra-Membrives","year":"2018","unstructured":"Parra-Membrives P, Mart\u00ednez-Baena D, Lorente-Herce J et al (2018) Comparative study of three bile duct closure methods following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(2):145\u2013151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2017.0433","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"issue":"12","key":"8843_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Cd003327","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub4","volume":"2013","author":"BV Dasari","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS et al (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(12):Cd003327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub4","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"8843_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1053\/crad.1999.0426","volume":"55","author":"DR Lindsell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lindsell DR (2000) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 55(7):579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/crad.1999.0426","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"8843_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2020.10.033","author":"A Chandran","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chandran A, Rashtak S, Patil P et al (2020) Comparing diagnostic accuracy of current practice guidelines in predicting choledocholithiasis: outcomes from a large healthcare system comprising both academic and community settings. Gastrointest Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2020.10.033","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"8843_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0425-x","volume":"20","author":"A Nickkholgh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20(6):868\u2013874. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-005-0425-x","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"8843_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhep.2016.03.005","volume":"65","author":"European Association for the Study of the Liver","year":"2016","unstructured":"European Association for the Study of the Liver (2016) Electronic address EEE: EASL clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol 65(1):146\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhep.2016.03.005","journal-title":"J Hepatol"},{"issue":"14","key":"8843_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.4253\/wjge.v7.i14.1135","volume":"7","author":"A Vezakis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(14):1135\u20131141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4253\/wjge.v7.i14.1135","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"8843_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1962.tb25850.x","volume":"49","author":"D Leslie","year":"1962","unstructured":"Leslie D (1962) The use of the choledochoscope; or, leaving no stone unturned. Med J Aust 49(1):235\u2013236. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1962.tb25850.x","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"4","key":"8843_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Cd010507","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010507.pub2","volume":"4","author":"N Vettoretto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vettoretto N, Arezzo A, Famiglietti F et al (2018) Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):Cd010507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD010507.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"8843_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3763","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6170-8","volume":"32","author":"AN Singh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Singh AN, Kilambi R (2018) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc 32(9):3763\u20133776. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6170-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"5","key":"8843_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3766-5","volume":"29","author":"A Vindal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vindal A, Chander J, Lal P et al (2015) Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 29(5):1030\u20131038. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-014-3766-5","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"9","key":"8843_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2004.03415.x","volume":"19","author":"R Kumar","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kumar R, Sharma BC, Singh J et al (2004) Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis in biliary obstruction as a result of malignant and benign diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(9):994\u2013997. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2004.03415.x","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8843_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v23.i4.622","volume":"23","author":"SH Sohn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sohn SH, Park JH, Kim KH et al (2017) Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stents. World J Gastroenterol 23(4):622\u2013628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v23.i4.622","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"4","key":"8843_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2016.08.018","volume":"85","author":"DG Adler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Adler DG, Papachristou GI, Taylor LJ et al (2017) Clinical outcomes in patients with bile leaks treated via ERCP with regard to the timing of ERCP: a large multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 85(4):766\u2013772. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2016.08.018","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"8","key":"8843_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3219","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5348-1","volume":"31","author":"P Yin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yin P, Wang M, Qin R et al (2017) Intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage over primary closure of the common bile duct for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis: a cohort study of 211 cases. Surg Endosc 31(8):3219\u20133226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-016-5348-1","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"9","key":"8843_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1848","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4029-x","volume":"23","author":"ME Czerwonko","year":"2019","unstructured":"Czerwonko ME, Pekolj J, Uad P et al (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in the emergency is as effective and safe as in elective setting. J Gastrointest Surg 23(9):1848\u20131855. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-018-4029-x","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"8843_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4742","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6195-z","volume":"32","author":"L Fang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fang L, Wang J, Dai WC et al (2018) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: surgical indications and procedure strategies. Surg Endosc 32(12):4742\u20134748. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6195-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"4","key":"8843_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.05.020","volume":"215","author":"HT Xia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xia HT, Liu Y, Jiang H et al (2018) A novel laparoscopic transcystic approach using an ultrathin choledochoscope and holmium laser lithotripsy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: An appraisal of their safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 215(4):631\u2013635. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.05.020","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"8843_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1080\/17474124.2016.1250623","volume":"10","author":"HT Xia","year":"2016","unstructured":"Xia HT, Liang B, Liu Y et al (2016) Ultrathin choledochoscope improves outcomes in the treatment of gallstones and suspected choledocholithiasis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(12):1409\u20131413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17474124.2016.1250623","journal-title":"Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"13","key":"8843_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1691","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9922","volume":"102","author":"JG Zhu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhu JG, Han W, Guo W et al (2015) Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 102(13):1691\u20131697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.9922","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"8843_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-012-0962-4","volume":"397","author":"X Wu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wu X, Yang Y, Dong P et al (2012) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(6):909\u2013916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-012-0962-4","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"8843_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1485","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-008-9475-2","volume":"32","author":"I Ahmed","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ahmed I, Pradhan C, Beckingham IJ et al (2008) Is a T-tube necessary after common bile duct exploration? World J Surg 32(7):1485\u20131488. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-008-9475-2","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"8843_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD005640","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005640.pub2","volume":"1","author":"KS Gurusamy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD005640.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Surgical Endoscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T13:08:10Z","timestamp":1654088890000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["8843"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08843-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0930-2794","1432-2218"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0930-2794","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2218","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 May 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 October 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 November 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Tong Guo, Lu Wang, Peng Xie, Zhiwei Zhang, Xiaorui Huang and Yahong Yu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosure"}}]}}