{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T02:24:29Z","timestamp":1783650269820,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]],"date-time":"2025-12-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765152000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]],"date-time":"2025-12-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765152000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Endosc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]],"date-time":"2025-12-08T15:33:54Z","timestamp":1765208034000},"page":"78-90","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Does robotic pancreatoduodenectomy reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula? A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8818-7409","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tiziana","family":"Marchese","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valentina","family":"Valle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcello Giuseppe","family":"Spampinato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norma","family":"Depalma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annarita","family":"Libia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William","family":"Sergi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benedetto","family":"Ielpo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"12438_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.138.7.777","volume":"138","author":"PC Giulianotti","year":"2003","unstructured":"Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777\u2013784. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archsurg.138.7.777","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"12438_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Conroy PC, Calthorpe L, Lin JA, Mohamedaly S, Kim A, Hirose K, Nakakura E, Corvera C, Sosa JA, Sarin A, Kirkwood KS, Alseidi A, Adam MA. (2022) Determining hospital volume threshold for safety of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a contemporary cutpoint analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 29(3) 1566-74. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-021-10984-1","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-10984-1"},{"issue":"7","key":"12438_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4249","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000001390","volume":"110","author":"J Kwon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kwon J, Kang CM, Jang JY, Yoon YS, Kwon HJ, Choi IS, Kim HJ, Shin SH, Kang SH, Moon HH, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Korean Study Group on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (K-MIPS) (2024) Perioperative textbook outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis in a Korean minimally invasive pancreatic surgery registry. Int J Surg 110(7):4249\u20134258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000001390","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4753","volume":"152","author":"MA Adam","year":"2017","unstructured":"Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2017) Defining a hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 152(4):336\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4753","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"12438_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.11.005","volume":"22","author":"AL Moekotte","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moekotte AL, Rawashdeh A, Asbun HJ, Coimbra FJ, Edil BH, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Kendrick ML, Pessaux P, Zeh HJ, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, Hogg ME, International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) (2020) Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 22(5):637\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.11.005","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496920911815","volume":"109","author":"LR Jones","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jones LR, Zwart MJW, Molenaar IQ, Koerkamp BG, Hogg ME, Hilal MA, Besselink MG (2020) Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: patient selection, volume criteria, and training programs. Scand J Surg 109(1):29\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1457496920911815","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"12438_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dittrich L, Biebl M, Malinka T, Knoop M, Pratsche J. (2021) Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery \u2013 will robotic surgery be the future? Eur Surg 53:158\u2013165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10353-020-00689-2"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003590","volume":"271","author":"HJ Asbun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, D\u2019Angelica MI, Balduzzi A, Bassi C, Bj\u00f6rnsson B, Boggi U, Callery MP, Del Chiaro M, Coimbra FJ, Conrad C, Cook A, Coppola A, Dervenis C, Dokmak S, Edil BH, Edwin B, Giulianotti PC, Han HS, Hansen PD, van der Heijde N, van Hilst J, Hester CA, Hogg ME, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Keck T, Kim SC, Khatkov IE, Kokudo N, Kooby DA, Korrel M, de Leon FJ, Lluis N, Lof S, Machado MA, Demartines N, Martinie JB, Merchant NB, Molenaar IQ, Moravek C, Mou YP, Nakamura M, Nealon WH, Palanivelu C, Pessaux P, Pitt HA, Polanco PM, Primrose JN, Rawashdeh A, Sanford DE, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Stauffer JA, Takaori K, Talamonti MS, Tang CN, Vollmer CM, Wakabayashi G, Walsh RM, Wang SE, Zinner MJ, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Zwart MJ, Conlon KC, Kendrick ML, Zeh HJ, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery (I-MIPS) (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 271(1):1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003590","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"12438_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Graaf N, Zwart MJW, van Hilst J, van den Broek B, Bonsing BA, Busch OR, et al. (2024) Early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: nationwide propensity-score-matched analysis. Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znae043","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znae043"},{"key":"12438_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"12438_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-7-16","volume":"7","author":"C Schardt","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007) Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7:16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-7-16","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2005.05.001","volume":"138","author":"C Bassi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2005.05.001","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr MG, Hilal MA, Adham M et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015","volume":"64","author":"H Balshem","year":"2011","unstructured":"Balshem H, Helfand M, Sch\u00fcnemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):401\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"12438_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1016\/S2468-1253(24)00005-0","volume":"9","author":"Q Liu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Liu Q, Li M, Gao Y, Jiang T, Han B, Zhao G et al (2024) Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 9(5):428\u2013437","journal-title":"The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology"},{"key":"12438_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lanepe.2024.100864.","volume":"39","author":"R Klotz","year":"2024","unstructured":"Klotz R, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y, Sander A, Klose C, Behnisch R et al (2024) Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 39:100864. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lanepe.2024.100864.","journal-title":"Lancet Reg Health Eur"},{"issue":"5","key":"12438_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-019-04274-1","volume":"24","author":"J Cai","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, Al Abbas A, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2020) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas: a propensity-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 24(5):1111\u20131118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-019-04274-1","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-018-0529-1","volume":"71","author":"B Ielpo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ielpo B, Caruso R, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Malav\u00e9 L, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2019) Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison. Updates Surg 71(1):137\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-018-0529-1","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.07.004","volume":"23","author":"CC Vining","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vining CC, Kuchta K, Berger Y, Paterakos P, Schuitevoerder D, Roggin KK, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME (2021) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB (Oxford) 23(3):367\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.07.004","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","volume":"216","author":"MP Callery","year":"2013","unstructured":"Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"12438_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1007\/s005340050156","volume":"6","author":"S Pedrazzoli","year":"1999","unstructured":"Pedrazzoli S (1999) Pancreatic fistula: definitions and classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 6(6):553\u2013559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s005340050156","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v8.i3.191","volume":"8","author":"L Morelli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S et al (2016) Robotic pancreatic surgery: a technical review. World J Gastrointest Surg 8(3):191\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4240\/wjgs.v8.i3.191","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"12438_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2636","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-020-04684-9","volume":"24","author":"KE Poruk","year":"2020","unstructured":"Poruk KE, Lin J, Fino NF et al (2020) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 24(11):2636\u20132644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-020-04684-9","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2364","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-11550-6","volume":"39","author":"C Gonzalez-Abos","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gonzalez-Abos C, Landi F, Lorenzo C, Rey S, Salgado F, Ausania F (2025) Is robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy non-inferior to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with high PD-ROBOSCORE? Surg Endosc 39(4):2364\u20132369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-11550-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2020.12.019","volume":"21","author":"F Ausania","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ausania F, Mart\u00ednez-P\u00e9rez A, Senra Del Rio P, Borin A, Melendez R, Casal-Nu\u00f1ez JE (2021) Multifactorial mitigation strategy to reduce clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in high-risk pancreatojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreatology 21(2):466\u2013472. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pan.2020.12.019","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"issue":"8","key":"12438_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5717","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-025-17402-w","volume":"32","author":"F Marcucci","year":"2025","unstructured":"Marcucci F, Carillo G, S\u00e1nchez-Vel\u00e1zquez P, Garcia-Picazo A, Burdio F, Ielpo B (2025) Practical approaches to high-risk anastomoses in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 32(8):5717\u20135719. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-025-17402-w","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"12438_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2022.106626","volume":"101","author":"M Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li M, Zhang J, Wu X et al (2022) Robotic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 101:106626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2022.106626","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002652","volume":"269","author":"AH Zureikat","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS et al (2019) 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of experience at a high-volume center. Ann Surg 269(4):723\u2013731. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002652","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001869","volume":"264","author":"AH Zureikat","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, Gillespie TW, Weber SM, Abbott DE, Ahmad SA, Maithel SK, Hogg ME, Zenati M, Cho CS, Salem A, Xia B, Steve J, Nguyen TK, Keshava HB, Chalikonda S, Walsh RM, Talamonti MS, Stocker SJ, Bentrem DJ, Lumpkin S, Kim HJ, Zeh HJ 3rd, Kooby DA (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264(4):640\u2013649. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001869. (PMID: 27433907)","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"12438_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2390","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07460-4","volume":"34","author":"M Podda","year":"2020","unstructured":"Podda M, Gerardi C, Di Saverio S, Marino MV, Davies RJ, Pellino G, Pisanu A (2020) Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(6):2390\u20132409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07460-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-017-4180-7","volume":"42","author":"C Ricci","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Ricciardiello M, Minni F (2018) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: what is the best \u201cchoice\u201d? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies. World J Surg 42(3):788\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-017-4180-7","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"12438_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3085","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5371-2","volume":"31","author":"L Peng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, Xiao W (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31(8):3085\u20133097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-016-5371-2","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.5412","volume":"160","author":"CL Bruna","year":"2025","unstructured":"Bruna CL, Emmen AMLH, Wei K, Sutcliffe RP, Shen B, Fusai GK, Shyr YM, Khatkov I, White S, Jones LR, Manzoni A, Kerem M, Groot Koerkamp B, Ferrari C, Saint-Marc O, Molenaar IQ, Bn\u00e0 C, Dokmak S, Boggi U, Liu R, Jang JY, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M (2025) Effects of pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive and open pancreatoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 160(2):190\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2024.5412","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05939-6","volume":"22","author":"J Jin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, Qian J, Qin K, Wang Z, Chen W, Jin W, Lu F, Li Z, Wu Z, Jian L, Han B, Liang X, Sun C, Wu Z, Mou Y, Yin X, Huang H, Chen H, Gemenetzis G, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B (2021) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 22(1):954. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-021-05939-6","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-023-07657-7","volume":"24","author":"N de Graaf","year":"2023","unstructured":"de Graaf N, Emmen AMLH, Ramera M, Bj\u00f6rnsson B, Boggi U, Bruna CL, Busch OR, Daams F, Ferrari G, Festen S, van Hilst J, D\u2019Hondt M, Ielpo B, Keck T, Khatkov IE, Koerkamp BG, Lips DJ, Luyer MDP, Mieog JSD, Morelli L, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Sprangers MAG, Ferrari C, Berkhof J, Maisonneuve P, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG (2023) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Trials 24(1):665. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-023-07657-7","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"6","key":"12438_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3921","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-11768-4","volume":"39","author":"T Wakabayashi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wakabayashi T, Gaudenzi F, Nie Y, Mishima K, Fujiyama Y, Igarashi K et al (2025) Reduced pancreatic fistula rates and comprehensive cost analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 39(6):3921\u20133929. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-11768-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1159\/000543737","volume":"42","author":"T Fuji","year":"2025","unstructured":"Fuji T, Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yasui K, Yamada M, Nagai Y et al (2025) Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative pancreatic fistula for high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 42(2):49\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000543737","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-024-11423-4","volume":"39","author":"VK Varshney","year":"2025","unstructured":"Varshney VK, Rathore KS, Selvakumar B, Soni S, Varshney P, Agarwal L et al (2025) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasm: a propensity matched analysis of peri-operative and oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 39(2):922\u2013931. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-024-11423-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"12438_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2024.10.004","volume":"27","author":"AA Abreu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Abreu AA, Al Abbas AI, Meier J, Nunez-Rocha RE, Farah E, Ethun CG et al (2025) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a comparative propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 27(1):37\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2024.10.004","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005981","volume":"279","author":"F Nickel","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nickel F, Wise PA, M\u00fcller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Salg GA et al (2024) Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg 279(4):665\u2013670. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005981","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.10.076","volume":"47","author":"BS Shyr","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shyr BS, Wang SE, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Shyr BU (2024) Survival and surgical outcomes of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer: a propensity score-matching comparison. Asian J Surg 47(2):899\u2013904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.10.076","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"key":"12438_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Takagi K, Umeda Y, Fuji T, et al. (2024) Role of robotic surgery as an element of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 28(3):220\u2013225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gassur.2023.12.017"},{"issue":"14","key":"12438_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15141","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.6186","volume":"12","author":"J Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li J, Qian L, Shi Y, Shen B, Peng C (2023) Short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with high body mass index: a propensity score matched study. Cancer Med 12(14):15141\u201315148","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e864","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005160","volume":"277","author":"Q Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Wang W, Han B, Chen X et al (2023) Perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in low-risk surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg 277(4):e864\u2013e871. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005160","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09638-4","volume":"37","author":"T Meyyappan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME, Lee KK, Zureikat AH et al (2023) Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc 37(2):1181\u20131187","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"12438_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.837","volume":"29","author":"H Kim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kim H, Park SY, Park Y, Kwon J, Lee W, Song KB, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Lee JH (2022) Assessment of learning curve and oncologic feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score-based comparison with open approach. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29(6):649\u2013658. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.837","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"11","key":"12438_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8237","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09271-1","volume":"36","author":"S Xu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xu S, Zhang XP, Zhao GD, Zou WB, Zhao ZM, Hu MG, Gao YX, Tan XL, Liu Q, Liu R (2022) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 36(11):8237\u20138248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-022-09271-1","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"12438_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1507","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08437-7","volume":"36","author":"BU Shyr","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2022) Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 36(2):1507\u20131514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08437-7","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"12438_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2021.03.010","author":"DY Ryoo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ryoo DY, Eskander MF, Hamad A et al (2021) Mitigation of the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy learning curve through comprehensive training. HPB (Oxford). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2021.03.010","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"12438_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2020.12.009","volume":"37","author":"C Paolini","year":"2021","unstructured":"Paolini C, Bencini L, Gabellini L, Urciuoli I, Pacciani S, Tribuzi A, Moraldi L, Calistri M, Coratti A (2021) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is there any difference for frail patients? Surg Oncol 37:101515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.suronc.2020.12.009","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"12438_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weng Y, Jiang Y, Fu N, Jin J, Shi Y, Huo Z, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B. (2021) Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 35(7):3437\u20133448","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07791-2"},{"key":"12438_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bencini L, Tofani F, Paolini C, Vaccaro C, Checcacci P, Annecchiarico M, Moraldi L, Farsi M, Polvani S, Coratti A, (2020) Single-centre comparison of robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 34(12): 5402\u20135412","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07335-3"},{"issue":"8","key":"12438_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3644","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07564-x","volume":"34","author":"M Baimas-George","year":"2020","unstructured":"Baimas-George M, Watson M, Murphy KJ, Iannitti D, Baker E, Ocuin L, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2020) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study. Surg Endosc 34(8):3644\u20133649. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07564-x","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-01018-w","volume":"14","author":"MV Marino","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marino MV, Podda M, Gomez Ruiz M, Fernandez CC, Guarrasi D, Gomez Fleitas M (2020) Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison. J Robot Surg 14(3):493\u2013502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-019-01018-w","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"12438_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0021.PMID:32129815;PMCID:PMC7057168","volume":"155","author":"Y Shi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shi Y, Jin J, Qiu W, Weng Y, Wang J, Zhao S, Huo Z, Qin K, Wang Y, Chen H, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B (2020) Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy after the learning curve. JAMA Surg 155(5):389\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2020.0021.PMID:32129815;PMCID:PMC7057168","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"12438_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, et al (2021) Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25(7):1795\u20131804","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-020-04869-z"},{"issue":"3","key":"12438_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5798-0","volume":"32","author":"N Napoli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Costa F, Iacopi S, Amorese G, Giorgi S, Baggiani A, Boggi U (2018) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surg Endosc 32(3):1234\u20131247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5798-0","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4755.PMID:28030724;PMCID:PMC5470429","volume":"152","author":"MT McMillan","year":"2017","unstructured":"McMillan MT, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Kowalsky SJ, Zeh HJ, Sprys MH, Vollmer CM Jr (2017) A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on incidence of pancreatic fistula. JAMA Surg 152(4):327\u2013335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4755.PMID:28030724;PMCID:PMC5470429","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"12438_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2410-3","volume":"18","author":"PQ Bao","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):682\u2013689. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-013-2410-3","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"}],"container-title":["Surgical Endoscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,21]],"date-time":"2026-01-21T19:32:52Z","timestamp":1769023972000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["12438"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-025-12438-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0930-2794","1432-2218"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0930-2794","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2218","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Dr. Tiziana Marchese, Dr. Valentina Valle, Dr. Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato, Dr. Norma Depalma, Dr. Annarita Libia, Dr. William Sergi, and Professor Benedetto Ielpo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosures"}}]}}