{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]],"date-time":"2026-01-30T19:05:52Z","timestamp":1769799952231,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]],"date-time":"2024-10-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1728345600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]],"date-time":"2024-10-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1728345600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007653","name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Jena","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007653","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Schmerz"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Zusammenfassung<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Hintergrund<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Die Dom\u00e4nen\n                      <jats:italic>Schmerzintensit\u00e4t, schmerzbedingte Beeintr\u00e4chtigung, Nebenwirkungen, Aufkl\u00e4rung, Partizipation<\/jats:italic>\n                      und\n                      <jats:italic>pers\u00f6nlicher Umgang<\/jats:italic>\n                      wurden bereits als relevant im Bereich perioperativer Schmerzen herausgestellt. Offen ist bisher, welche dieser Dom\u00e4nen besonders ausschlaggebend f\u00fcr die subjektiv empfundene Gesamtqualit\u00e4t der postoperativen Schmerztherapie sind.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Ziel<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In dieser Querschnittsstudie wurde mithilfe eines neu entwickelten Befragungsinstruments die Relevanz dieser Dom\u00e4nen f\u00fcr Patient*innen sowie vergleichend f\u00fcr Behandelnde erfasst.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methoden<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Die Befragung der Patient*innen (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u200940) erfolgte am ersten postoperativen Tag am Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Jena. Vergleichend wurden Angaben von 63\u00a0Behandelnden (Fachdisziplinen:\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u200915 An\u00e4sthesiologie,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u200917 Chirurgie,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u200931 Pflege) erhoben. Das Befragungsinstrument umfasste prim\u00e4r alle paarweisen Vergleiche zwischen den Dom\u00e4nen im Hinblick auf die Gesamtqualit\u00e4t der postoperativen Schmerztherapie. Die daraus resultierenden Summenwerte f\u00fcr jede Dom\u00e4ne waren die prim\u00e4re Zielgr\u00f6\u00dfe, die mittels\n                      <jats:italic>verallgemeinerter Sch\u00e4tzgleichungen<\/jats:italic>\n                      analysiert wurde.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Ergebnisse<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Innerhalb der Patient*innen zeigten sich signifikante Unterschiede in der Relevanz der Dom\u00e4nen, wobei\n                      <jats:italic>pers\u00f6nlicher Umgang<\/jats:italic>\n                      gefolgt von\n                      <jats:italic>Schmerzintensit\u00e4t<\/jats:italic>\n                      und\n                      <jats:italic>-beeintr\u00e4chtigung<\/jats:italic>\n                      priorisiert wurde. Zudem ergaben sich innerhalb der Dom\u00e4nen signifikante Unterschiede zwischen Patient*innen und den befragten Fachdisziplinen sowie zwischen den Fachdisziplinen selbst.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Schlussfolgerung<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patient*innen empfinden die Dom\u00e4nen\n                      <jats:italic>pers\u00f6nlicher Umgang<\/jats:italic>\n                      sowie Reduktion der\n                      <jats:italic>Schmerzintensit\u00e4t<\/jats:italic>\n                      und -\n                      <jats:italic>beeintr\u00e4chtigung<\/jats:italic>\n                      entscheidend f\u00fcr die Gesamtqualit\u00e4t. Ob sich eine Harmonisierung der Sichtweisen von Patient*innen und Behandelnden positiv auf die Patient*innenzufriedenheit auswirkt, sollte weiter untersucht werden.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Graphic abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]],"date-time":"2024-10-08T02:04:04Z","timestamp":1728353044000},"page":"37-45","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Was ist ausschlaggebend f\u00fcr die Gesamtqualit\u00e4t\u00a0der\u00a0postoperativen Schmerztherapie? Eine\u00a0Frage\u00a0der\u00a0Perspektive","What determines the overall quality of postoperative pain management? A\u00a0question of perspective"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Paula","family":"Thomas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Winfried","family":"Meissner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7815-6924","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Philipp","family":"Baumbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"839_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S69","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-012-0049-7","volume":"166","author":"D Bain","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bain\u00a0D (2013) What makes pains unpleasant? Philos Studies 166:S69\u2013S89","journal-title":"Philos Studies"},{"key":"839_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2019.12.005","volume":"23","author":"HL Benz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Benz\u00a0HL, Saha\u00a0A, Tarver\u00a0ME (2020) Integrating the Voice of the Patient Into the Medical Device Regulatory Process Using Patient Preference Information. Value Health 23:294\u2013297","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"839_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1111\/mila.12227","volume":"35","author":"E Borg","year":"2020","unstructured":"Borg\u00a0E, Harrison\u00a0R, Stazicker\u00a0J et\u00a0al (2020) Is the folk concept of pain polyeidic? Mind Lang 35:29\u201347","journal-title":"Mind Lang"},{"key":"839_CR4","unstructured":"Bundesministerium des Innern und f\u00fcr Heimat (BMI) (2012) 6.5.2 Qualitative Bewertungsmethoden. In: Handbuch f\u00fcr Organisationsuntersuchungen und Personalbedarfsermittlung. https:\/\/www.orghandbuch.de\/OHB\/DE\/Organisationshandbuch\/6_MethodenTechniken\/65_Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung\/652_Qualitative\/qualitative-node.html#doc4393222bodyText5. Zugegriffen: 20.\u00a0Dez. 2023"},{"key":"839_CR5","volume-title":"Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study","author":"RC Coghill","year":"2005","unstructured":"Coghill\u00a0RC (2005) Pain: Making the private experience public. In: Aydede\u00a0M (Hrsg) Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Bradford Book\/Mit Press,"},{"key":"839_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155","volume":"112","author":"J Cohen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Cohen\u00a0J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155\u2013159","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"839_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2011.01783.x","volume":"19","author":"RE Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis\u00a0RE, Vincent\u00a0C, Henley\u00a0A et\u00a0al (2013) Exploring the care experience of patients undergoing spinal surgery: a\u00a0qualitative study. J\u00a0Eval Clin Pract 19:132\u2013138","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"key":"839_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-012-2077-6","volume":"27","author":"G Elwyn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elwyn\u00a0G, Frosch\u00a0D, Thomson\u00a0R et\u00a0al (2012) Shared decision making: a\u00a0model for clinical practice. J\u00a0Gen Intern Med 27:1361\u20131367","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"key":"839_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2010.02.012","volume":"11","author":"DB Gordon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gordon\u00a0DB, Polomano\u00a0RC, Pellino\u00a0TA et\u00a0al (2010) Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation. J\u00a0Pain 11:1172\u20131186","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"839_CR10","unstructured":"Johnston\u00a0BC, Patrick\u00a0DL, Devji\u00a0T et\u00a0al (2023) Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgins\u00a0JPT, Thomas\u00a0J, Chandler\u00a0J, Cumpston\u00a0M, Li\u00a0T, Page\u00a0MJ, Welch\u00a0VA (Hrsg) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version\u00a06.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane"},{"key":"839_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-04665-9","volume":"21","author":"U Kaiser","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kaiser\u00a0U, Liedgens\u00a0H, Meissner\u00a0W et\u00a0al (2020) Developing consensus on core outcome domains and measurement instruments for assessing effectiveness in perioperative pain management after sternotomy, breast cancer surgery, total knee arthroplasty, and surgery related to endometriosis: The IMI-PainCare PROMPT protocol for achieving a\u00a0consensus on core outcome domains. Trials 21:773","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"839_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1007\/s00482-017-0217-y","volume":"31","author":"R Likar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Likar\u00a0R, Jaksch\u00a0W, Aigmuller\u00a0T et\u00a0al (2017) Interdisciplinary position paper \u201cPerioperative pain management\u201d. Schmerz 31:463\u2013482","journal-title":"Schmerz"},{"key":"839_CR13","first-page":"865","volume":"105","author":"W Meissner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Meissner\u00a0W, Mescha\u00a0S, Rothaug\u00a0J et\u00a0al (2008) Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project. Dtsch \u00c4rztebl Int 105:865\u2013870","journal-title":"Dtsch \u00c4rztebl Int"},{"key":"839_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2717","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000002254","volume":"162","author":"EM Pogatzki-Zahn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pogatzki-Zahn\u00a0EM, Liedgens\u00a0H, Hummelshoj\u00a0L et\u00a0al (2021) Developing consensus on core outcome domains for assessing effectiveness in perioperative pain management: results of the PROMPT\/IMI-PainCare Delphi Meeting. Pain 162:2717\u20132736","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"839_CR15","volume-title":"R: A\u00a0language and environment for statistical computing","author":"R core team","year":"2021","unstructured":"R core team (2021) R: A\u00a0language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria"},{"key":"839_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1976","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000001939","volume":"161","author":"SN Raja","year":"2020","unstructured":"Raja\u00a0SN, Carr\u00a0DB, Cohen\u00a0M et\u00a0al (2020) The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 161:1976\u20131982","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"839_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2020.12.004","volume":"126","author":"GP Roberts","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roberts\u00a0GP, Levy\u00a0N, Lobo\u00a0DN (2021) Patient-centric goal-oriented perioperative care. Br J Anaesth 126:559\u2013564","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"839_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2013.05.016","volume":"14","author":"J Rothaug","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rothaug\u00a0J, Zaslansky\u00a0R, Schwenkglenks\u00a0M et\u00a0al (2013) Patients\u2019 perception of postoperative pain management: validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire. J\u00a0Pain 14:1361\u20131370","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"839_CR19","volume-title":"RStudio: Integrated Development for R","author":"Rstudio Team","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rstudio Team (2021) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA"},{"key":"839_CR20","first-page":"1","volume":"57","author":"R Schwarzer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Schwarzer\u00a0R (2008) Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to Predict and Modify the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors. Appl Psychol 57:1\u201329","journal-title":"Appl Psychol"},{"key":"839_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2014.04.021","volume":"155","author":"M Schwenkglenks","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schwenkglenks\u00a0M, Gerbershagen\u00a0HJ, Taylor\u00a0RS et\u00a0al (2014) Correlates of satisfaction with pain treatment in the acute postoperative period: results from the international PAIN OUT registry. Pain 155:1401\u20131411","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"839_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-79","volume":"4","author":"U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Fda Center for Drug Evaluation and Research","year":"2006","unstructured":"U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Fda Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U. S. Department of Health Human Services Fda Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Department of Health Human Services Fda Center for Devices Radiological Health (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:79","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"839_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.2307\/2531248","volume":"42","author":"SL Zeger","year":"1986","unstructured":"Zeger\u00a0SL, Liang\u00a0KY (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42:121\u2013130","journal-title":"Biometrics"}],"container-title":["Der Schmerz"],"original-title":[],"language":"de","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]],"date-time":"2026-01-30T07:37:59Z","timestamp":1769758679000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["839"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00482-024-00839-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-433X","1432-2129"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-433X","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-2129","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 September 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 October 2024","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien"}},{"value":"W.\u00a0Meissner erhielt Honorare f\u00fcr Vortr\u00e4ge oder Beratungen von Mundipharma, Gr\u00fcnenthal, Ethypharm, Spectrum Therapeutics, Septodont und Northern Swan. Seine Institution erhielt Forschungsunterst\u00fctzung von Pfizer, Mundipharma und Gr\u00fcnenthal. P.\u00a0Thomas, T.\u00a0Weiss und P.\u00a0Baumbach geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Interessenkonflikt"}},{"value":"Alle Befragten haben der wissenschaftlichen Verwendung der Daten zugestimmt. Das Studienvorhaben wurde von der Ethikkommission der Friedrich-Schiller-Universit\u00e4t Jena an der Medizinischen Fakult\u00e4t positiv votiert (Anzeige zum Ursprungsantrag Reg.-Nr. 2722-12\/09).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Interessenkonflikt"}}]}}