{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T01:17:09Z","timestamp":1792804629352,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]],"date-time":"2020-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599004800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]],"date-time":"2020-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599004800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004528","name":"Maastricht University Medical Center","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004528","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Support Care Cancer"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In current cancer care, there is a growing debate about the value of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in daily clinical follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the evidence of the effectiveness of the routine use of PROMs in daily cancer care in terms of patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators and to identify the effect of giving feedback about PROM findings to patients and\/or health care professionals (HCPs).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A systematic search was performed. Studies were eligible for inclusion when they (1) used a PROM as an intervention, with or without feedback to patients and\/or HCPs, compared with not using a PROM, and (2) used a PROM as an intervention with feedback to patients and\/or HCPs, compared with using a PROM without giving feedback to patients and\/or HCPs.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>After screening of 8341 references, 22 original studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies found a positive effect on survival, symptoms, HRQoL and patient satisfaction. In general, using feedback to patient and\/or HCPs about the PROM results led to better symptom control, HRQoL, patient satisfaction and patient-doctor communication. The majority of included studies had insufficient power to detect significant differences in the outcomes assessed.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This review shows that predominantly positive findings were found in the use of a PROM in daily cancer care. Additionally, more positive effects were seen when feedback is provided to patient and\/or health care professionals, and it is thus highly recommended that this is always done.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T23:06:57Z","timestamp":1599001617000},"page":"573-593","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":139,"title":["Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0528-5581","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Caitlin","family":"Graupner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Merel L.","family":"Kimman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Mul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annerika H. M.","family":"Slok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Danny","family":"Claessens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jos","family":"Kleijnen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carmen D.","family":"Dirksen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"St\u00e9phanie O.","family":"Breukink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"5695_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jemal A, et al (2017) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2014, Featuring Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(9)","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djx030"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.12968\/bjcn.2011.16.3.146","volume":"16","author":"KA Meadows","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meadows KA (2011) Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. Br J Commun Nurs 16(3):146\u2013151","journal-title":"Br J Commun Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"5695_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.21873\/invivo.11433","volume":"33","author":"F Fiteni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fiteni F et al (2019) Clinical relevance of routine monitoring of patient-reported outcomes versus clinician-reported outcomes in oncology. In Vivo 33(1):17\u201321","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1183\/13993003.02049-2015","volume":"48","author":"KS Mak","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mak KS et al (2016) Defining a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for lung cancer. Eur Respir J 48(3):852\u2013860","journal-title":"Eur Respir J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5695_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2016.4851","volume":"3","author":"WL Ong","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ong WL et al (2017) A standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer: the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative. JAMA Oncol 3(5):677\u2013685","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5695_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2017.0417","volume":"3","author":"JA Zerillo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zerillo JA et al (2017) An international collaborative standardizing a comprehensive patient-centered outcomes measurement set for colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 3(5):686\u2013694","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5695_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-012-1688-0","volume":"21","author":"CM Reilly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Reilly CM et al (2013) A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer 21(6):1525\u20131550","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"7","key":"5695_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-007-0380-2","volume":"16","author":"DH Henry","year":"2008","unstructured":"Henry DH et al (2008) Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer 16(7):791\u2013801","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR9","first-page":"41","volume":"29","author":"AW Smith","year":"2008","unstructured":"Smith AW et al (2008) Cancer, comorbidities, and health-related quality of life of older adults. Health Care Financ Rev 29(4):41\u201356","journal-title":"Health Care Financ Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"5695_CR10","first-page":"3047","volume":"24","author":"F Trautmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Trautmann F et al (2016) Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care-first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Cancer 24(7):3047\u20133056","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"9","key":"5695_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1846","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdv181","volume":"26","author":"D Howell","year":"2015","unstructured":"Howell D et al (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 26(9):1846\u20131858","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"key":"5695_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-13-211","volume":"13","author":"J Chen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ (2013) A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 13:211","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"7297","key":"5695_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1297","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7297.1297","volume":"322","author":"IJ Higginson","year":"2001","unstructured":"Higginson IJ, Carr AJ (2001) Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 322(7297):1297\u20131300","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5695_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g7818","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7818","volume":"350","author":"EC Nelson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nelson EC et al (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in practice. Bmj 350:g7818","journal-title":"Bmj"},{"issue":"32","key":"5695_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5133","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.12.4644","volume":"25","author":"J Lipscomb","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lipscomb J et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5133\u20135140","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"23","key":"5695_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3027","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.23.3027","volume":"288","author":"SB Detmar","year":"2002","unstructured":"Detmar SB et al (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(23):3027\u20133034","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"5695_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2354.2005.00633.x","volume":"15","author":"A Boyes","year":"2006","unstructured":"Boyes A et al (2006) Does routine assessment and real-time feedback improve cancer patients' psychosocial well-being? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 15(2):163\u2013171","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)"},{"issue":"14","key":"5695_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1480","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2013.53.5948","volume":"32","author":"G Kotronoulas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kotronoulas G et al (2014) What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 32(14):1480\u20131501","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-2016-z","volume":"28","author":"S Ishaque","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ishaque S et al (2019) A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res 28(3):567\u2013592","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"5695_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2019.04.1927","volume":"22","author":"LSE van Egdom","year":"2019","unstructured":"van Egdom LSE et al (2019) Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical breast cancer care: a systematic review. Value Health 22(10):1197\u20131226","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"5695_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s12998-018-0208-9","volume":"26","author":"N Clohesy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Clohesy N, Schneiders A (2018) A preliminary investigation examining patient reported outcome measures for low back pain and utilisation amongst chiropractors in Australia: facilitators and barriers to clinical implementation. Chiropr Man Therap 26:38","journal-title":"Chiropr Man Therap"},{"issue":"6","key":"5695_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjy280","volume":"39","author":"M Kaur","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kaur M et al (2019) Implementing electronic patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient cosmetic surgery clinics: an exploratory qualitative study. Aesthet Surg J 39(6):687\u2013695","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"5695_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0072-3","volume":"2","author":"A Foster","year":"2018","unstructured":"Foster A et al (2018) The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:46","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","volume":"151","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264\u2013269 w64","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"5695_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","volume":"343","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JP et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5695_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","volume":"34","author":"E Basch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Basch E et al (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. [Erratum appears in J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2198; PMID: 27281229]. J Clin Oncol 34(6):557\u2013565","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5695_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e136","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.4190","volume":"17","author":"DL Berry","year":"2015","unstructured":"Berry DL et al (2015) Exposure to a patient-centered, Web-based intervention for managing cancer symptom and quality of life issues: impact on symptom distress. J Med Internet Res 17(6):e136","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"5695_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.29.8315","volume":"29","author":"CS Cleeland","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cleeland CS et al (2011) Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 29(8):994\u20131000","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.12788\/j.suponc.0013","volume":"11","author":"KM Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis KM et al (2013) Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. J Support Oncol 11(4):174\u2013182","journal-title":"J Support Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.23623","volume":"113","author":"DL Hilarius","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hilarius DL et al (2008) Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: a community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer 113(3):628\u2013637","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"5695_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.014","volume":"31","author":"J Hoekstra","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hoekstra J et al (2006) Using the symptom monitor in a randomized controlled trial: the effect on symptom prevalence and severity. J Pain Symptom Manag 31(1):22\u201330","journal-title":"J Pain Symptom Manag"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-008-0515-0","volume":"17","author":"N Kearney","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kearney N et al (2009) Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Support Care Cancer 17(4):437\u2013444","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"5695_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2008.17.5687","volume":"27","author":"ME Mills","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mills ME et al (2009) Does a patient-held quality-of-life diary benefit patients with inoperable lung cancer? J Clin Oncol 27(1):70\u201377","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5695_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-014-2216-1","volume":"22","author":"KH Mooney","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mooney KH et al (2014) Automated monitoring of symptoms during ambulatory chemotherapy and oncology providers' use of the information: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 22(9):2343\u20132350","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"5695_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-012-1496-6","volume":"21","author":"M Nicklasson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nicklasson M et al (2013) The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study. Support Care Cancer 21(1):87\u201395","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"12","key":"5695_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.1184","volume":"16","author":"SK Rosenbloom","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rosenbloom SK et al (2007) Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice. Psycho-Oncology 16(12):1069\u20131079","journal-title":"Psycho-Oncology"},{"issue":"2","key":"5695_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdv576","volume":"27","author":"F Strasser","year":"2016","unstructured":"Strasser F et al (2016) The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E-MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95\/06). Ann Oncol 27(2):324\u2013332","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-1611(200005\/06)9:3<203::AID-PON453>3.0.CO;2-Y","volume":"9","author":"P Taenzer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Taenzer P et al (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 9(3):203\u2013213","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"issue":"21","key":"5695_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2910","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.32.2453","volume":"29","author":"EE Takeuchi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Takeuchi EE et al (2011) Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: a longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. J Clin Oncol 29(21):2910\u20132917","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2004.06.078","volume":"22","author":"G Velikova","year":"2004","unstructured":"Velikova G et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22(4):714\u2013724","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"13","key":"5695_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.04.030","volume":"46","author":"G Velikova","year":"2010","unstructured":"Velikova G et al (2010) Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 46(13):2381\u20132388","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0b013e3182595406","volume":"36","author":"PD Williams","year":"2013","unstructured":"Williams PD et al (2013) Therapy-related symptom checklist use during treatments at a cancer center. Cancer Nurs 36(3):245\u2013254","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"issue":"9","key":"5695_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2795","DOI":"10.31557\/APJCP.2019.20.9.2795","volume":"20","author":"A Matsuda","year":"2019","unstructured":"Matsuda A et al (2019) Effectiveness of a self-monitoring quality of life intervention for patients with cancer receiving palliative care: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev: APJCP 20(9):2795\u20132802","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Cancer Prev: APJCP"},{"issue":"2","key":"5695_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0b013e3181f70aee","volume":"34","author":"SC McMillan","year":"2011","unstructured":"McMillan SC, Small BJ, Haley WE (2011) Improving hospice outcomes through systematic assessment: a clinical trial. Cancer Nurs 34(2):89\u201397","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1136\/jamia.2010.005660","volume":"17","author":"CM Ruland","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ruland CM et al (2010) Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17(4):403\u2013410","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"5","key":"5695_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.85.5.909","volume":"85","author":"SC Segerstrom","year":"2003","unstructured":"Segerstrom SC et al (2003) A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what's on your mind, and how, and how much? J Pers Soc Psychol 85(5):909\u2013921","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5695_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2006.10.004","volume":"11","author":"JD Webster-Gandy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Webster-Gandy JD, How C, Harrold K (2007) Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE): a literature review with commentary on experience in a cancer centre. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11(3):238\u2013246","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"issue":"4","key":"5695_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01593882","volume":"4","author":"CA McHorney","year":"1995","unstructured":"McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4(4):293\u2013307","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"5695_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-010-9655-z","volume":"19","author":"CF Snyder","year":"2010","unstructured":"Snyder CF et al (2010) Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: putting doctors and patients on the same page. Qual Life Res 19(7):1045\u20131055","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"}],"container-title":["Supportive Care in Cancer"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,2]],"date-time":"2021-09-02T00:19:34Z","timestamp":1630541974000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5695"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-4355","1433-7339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-4355","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-7339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 September 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}