{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,19]],"date-time":"2026-03-19T22:38:56Z","timestamp":1773959936771,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]],"date-time":"2024-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1715644800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]],"date-time":"2024-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1715644800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002839","name":"Charit\u00e9 - Universit\u00e4tsmedizin Berlin","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002839","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Support Care Cancer"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) assess patients\u2019 health status and quality of life, improving patient care and treatment effects, yet little is known about their use and adherence in routine patient care.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We evaluated the adherence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients to ePROs follow-up and whether specific patient characteristics are related to longitudinal non-adherence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Since November 2016, the Breast Center at Charit\u00e9 \u2013 Universit\u00e4tsmedizin Berlin has implemented an ongoing prospective <jats:italic>PRO routine<\/jats:italic> program, requiring patients to complete ePROs assessments and consent to email-based follow-up in the first 12\u00a0months after therapy starts. Frequencies and summary statistics are presented. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to determine an association between patient characteristics and non-adherence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Out of 578 patients, 239 patients (41.3%, 95%CI: 37.3\u201345.5%) completed baseline assessment and all five ePROs follow-up during the first 12\u00a0months after therapy. On average, above 70% of those patients responded to the ePROs follow-up assessment. Adherence to the ePROs follow-up was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the time periods before (47.4% (111\/234) vs. 33.6% (71\/211)). Factors associated with longitudinal non-adherence were younger age, a higher number of comorbidities, no chemotherapy, and a low physical functioning score in the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The study reveals moderate adherence to 12-month ePROs follow-up assessments in invasive early breast cancer and DCIS patients, with response rates ranging from 60 to 80%. Emphasizing the benefits for young patients and those with high disease burdens might further increase adherence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]],"date-time":"2024-05-14T00:02:02Z","timestamp":1715644922000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Longitudinal assessment of real-world patient adherence: a 12-month electronic patient-reported outcomes follow-up of women with early breast cancer undergoing treatment"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5946-7137","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pimrapat","family":"Gebert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1612-8052","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna Maria","family":"Hage","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7969-250X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jens-Uwe","family":"Blohmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8130-6524","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Roehle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7587-7550","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Margarete","family":"Karsten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"8547_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Singh K, Landman AB (2017) Chapter 13 - mobile health. In: Sheikh A, Cresswell KM, Wright A, et al (eds). Key advances in clinical informatics. Academic Press, pp 183-196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-809523-2.00013-3","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-809523-2.00013-3"},{"key":"8547_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","volume":"34","author":"E Basch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P et al (2016) Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21150","volume":"62","author":"AV Bennett","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bennett AV, Jensen RE, Basch E (2012) Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin 62:337\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21150","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"8547_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e215","DOI":"10.1200\/JOP.2013.001067","volume":"10","author":"RE Jensen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, Basch E, Potosky AL, Roberts AC et al (2014) Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract 10:e215-222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JOP.2013.001067","journal-title":"J Oncol Pract"},{"key":"8547_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lungcan.2021.09.020","volume":"162","author":"GN Mody","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mody GN, Stover AM, Wang M, King-Kallimanis BL, Jansen J, Henson S et al (2021) Electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring during lung cancer chemotherapy: A nested cohort within the PRO-TECT pragmatic trial (AFT-39). Lung Cancer 162:1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lungcan.2021.09.020","journal-title":"Lung Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soncn.2021.151145","volume":"37","author":"KE Perez-Alfonso","year":"2021","unstructured":"Perez-Alfonso KE, Sanchez-Martinez V (2021) Electronic patient-reported outcome measures evaluating cancer symptoms: a systematic review. Semin Oncol Nurs 37:151145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.soncn.2021.151145","journal-title":"Semin Oncol Nurs"},{"key":"8547_CR7","unstructured":"US Food and Drug Administration (2009) Guidance for industry - patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/77832\/download.\u00a0Accessed 15 Apr 2024"},{"key":"8547_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","volume":"85","author":"NK Aaronson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"8547_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2413","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.9265","volume":"327","author":"E Basch","year":"2022","unstructured":"Basch E, Schrag D, Henson S, Jansen J, Ginos B, Stover AM et al (2022) Effect of electronic symptom monitoring on patient-reported outcomes among patients with metastatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327:2413\u20132422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2022.9265","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"8547_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1097\/COC.0000000000000189","volume":"40","author":"F Denis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Denis F, Yossi S, Septans AL, Charron A, Voog E, Dupuis O et al (2017) Improving survival in patients treated for a lung cancer using self-evaluated symptoms reported through a web application. Am J Clin Oncol 40:464\u2013469. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/COC.0000000000000189","journal-title":"Am J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2004.06.078","volume":"22","author":"G Velikova","year":"2004","unstructured":"Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714\u2013724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2004.06.078","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.20.02015","volume":"39","author":"K Absolom","year":"2021","unstructured":"Absolom K, Warrington L, Hudson E, Hewison J, Morris C, Holch P et al (2021) Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 39:734\u2013747. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.20.02015","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1177\/1740774516655101","volume":"13","author":"PJ Atherton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Atherton PJ, Burger KN, Pederson LD, Kaggal S, Sloan JA (2016) Patient-reported outcomes questionnaire compliance in Cancer Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance N0992). Clin Trials 13:612\u2013620. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1740774516655101","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"key":"8547_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clbc.2020.10.004","volume":"21","author":"L Takala","year":"2021","unstructured":"Takala L, Kuusinen TE, Skytta T, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Barlund M (2021) Electronic patient-reported outcomes during breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer 21:e252\u2013e270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clbc.2020.10.004","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.20.00081","volume":"4","author":"E Basch","year":"2020","unstructured":"Basch E, Stover AM, Schrag D, Chung A, Jansen J, Henson S et al (2020) Clinical utility and user perceptions of a digital system for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring during routine cancer care: findings from the PRO-TECT Trial. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 4:947\u2013957. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/CCI.20.00081","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"key":"8547_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1940","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.06.016","volume":"33","author":"EC Makhni","year":"2017","unstructured":"Makhni EC, Higgins JD, Hamamoto JT, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Verma NN (2017) Patient compliance with electronic patient reported outcomes following shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 33:1940\u20131946. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.06.016","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"8547_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.21.00063","volume":"5","author":"D Patt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Patt D, Wilfong L, Hudson KE, Patel A, Books H, Pearson B et al (2021) Implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring in a large multisite community oncology practice: Dancing the texas two-step through a pandemic. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 5:615\u2013621. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/CCI.21.00063","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"key":"8547_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11373","DOI":"10.2196\/11373","volume":"4","author":"MM Karsten","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karsten MM, Speiser D, Hartmann C, Zeuschner N, Lippold K, Kiver V et al (2018) Web-Based patient-reported outcomes using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Dataset in a Major German University Hospital: Observational Study. JMIR Cancer 4:e11373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/11373","journal-title":"JMIR Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.2196\/cancer.6996","volume":"3","author":"AD Hartkopf","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hartkopf AD, Graf J, Simoes E, Keilmann L, Sickenberger N, Gass P et al (2017) Electronic-based patient-reported outcomes: willingness, needs, and barriers in adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients. JMIR Cancer 3:e11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/cancer.6996","journal-title":"JMIR Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wiegel J, Seppen B, van der Leeden M, van der Esch M, de Vries R and Bos W (2021) Adherence to telemonitoring by electronic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(19):10161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph181910161","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph181910161"},{"key":"8547_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK and Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, 2011","DOI":"10.1002\/9780471420194.tnmc26"},{"key":"8547_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128\u2013139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2021.12.020","volume":"163","author":"MM Karsten","year":"2022","unstructured":"Karsten MM, Roehle R, Albers S, Pross T, Hage AM, Weiler K et al (2022) Real-world reference scores for EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 in early breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 163:128\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejca.2021.12.020","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-022-09817-5","volume":"22","author":"F Kennedy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kennedy F, Shearsmith L, Holmes M, Rogers Z, Carter R, Hofmann U et al (2022) Electronic patient-reported monitoring of symptoms during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 22:726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12885-022-09817-5","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-020-01480-3","volume":"18","author":"GA Taarnhoj","year":"2020","unstructured":"Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Dohn LH, Omland LH, Hjollund NH, Johansen C et al (2020) Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18:225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-020-01480-3","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"8547_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05642-6","volume":"22","author":"MM Karsten","year":"2021","unstructured":"Karsten MM, Kuhn F, Pross T, Blohmer JU, Hage AM, Fischer F et al (2021) PRO B: evaluating the effect of an alarm-based patient-reported outcome monitoring compared with usual care in metastatic breast cancer patients-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 22:666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-021-05642-6","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"8547_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-021-01419-2","volume":"21","author":"OM Neve","year":"2021","unstructured":"Neve OM, van Benthem PPG, Stiggelbout AM, Hensen EF (2021) Response rate of patient reported outcomes: the delivery method matters. BMC Med Res Methodol 21:220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-021-01419-2","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"8547_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1007\/s11552-014-9618-x","volume":"9","author":"SP Nota","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nota SP, Strooker JA, Ring D (2014) Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research. Hand (N Y) 9:504\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11552-014-9618-x","journal-title":"Hand (N Y)"},{"key":"8547_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-021-06473-6","volume":"30","author":"M Lee","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lee M, Kang D, Kim S, Lim J, Yoon J, Kim Y et al (2022) Who is more likely to adopt and comply with the electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) mobile application? A real-world study with cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Support Care Cancer 30:659\u2013668. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-021-06473-6","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"8547_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-105872","volume":"76","author":"J Graf","year":"2016","unstructured":"Graf J, Simoes E, Wi\u00dflicen K, Rava L, Walter CB, Hartkopf A et al (2016) Willingness of Patients with Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting to Use Electronic Surveys (ePRO) Depends on Sociodemographic Factors, Health-related Quality of Life, Disease Status and Computer Skills. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde 76:535\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0042-105872","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde"},{"issue":"3","key":"8547_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1159\/000520755","volume":"107","author":"B Gr\u00fcne","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gr\u00fcne B, Menold H, Lenhart M, Muhlbauer J, Walach MT, Waldbillig F et al (2023) Patient compliance in assessing electronic patient-reported outcome measures after urologic surgery. Urol Int 107(3):280\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000520755","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"8547_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1038\/s41523-022-00414-0","volume":"8","author":"KL Smith","year":"2022","unstructured":"Smith KL, Verma N, Blackford AL, Lehman J, Westbrook K, Lim D et al (2022) Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation. NPJ Breast Cancer 8(1):53. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41523-022-00414-0","journal-title":"NPJ Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"8547_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-021-01259-0","volume":"21","author":"P Gebert","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gebert P, Schindel D, Frick J, Schenk L, Grittner U (2021) Characteristics and patient-reported outcomes associated with dropout in severely affected oncological patients: an exploratory study. BMC Med Res Methodol 21(1):77. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-021-01259-0","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"8547_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19-25","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2017.1403042","volume":"57","author":"P Christiansen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Christiansen P, Carstensen SL, Ejlertsen B, Kroman N, Offersen B, Bodilsen A et al (2018) Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Acta Oncol 57:19\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0284186X.2017.1403042","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2499-2506","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2016.69.9561","volume":"35","author":"AL Pusic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, Buchel E, Gordillo GM, Hamill JB et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol 35:2499\u20132506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2016.69.9561","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"8547_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485-496","DOI":"10.1007\/s11764-020-00942-3","volume":"15","author":"CL Riis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Riis CL, Stie M, Bechmann T, Jensen PT, Coulter A, Moller S et al (2021) ePRO-based individual follow-up care for women treated for early breast cancer: impact on service use and workflows. J Cancer Surviv 15:485\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11764-020-00942-3","journal-title":"J Cancer Surviv"},{"key":"8547_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1454","DOI":"10.1200\/OP.21.00855","volume":"18","author":"SU Takvorian","year":"2022","unstructured":"Takvorian SU, Anderson RT, Gabriel PE, Poznyak D, Lee S, Simon S et al (2022) Real-world adherence to patient-reported outcome monitoring as a cancer care quality metric. JCO Oncol Pract 18:e1454\u2013e1465. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/OP.21.00855","journal-title":"JCO Oncol Pract"},{"key":"8547_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1023\/b:ejep.0000036568.02655.f8","volume":"19","author":"V Kristman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P (2004) Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol 19:751\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/b:ejep.0000036568.02655.f8","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"8547_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690680","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.690680","volume":"8","author":"R de Koning","year":"2021","unstructured":"de Koning R, Egiz A, Kotecha J, Ciuculete AC, Ooi SZY, Bankole NDA et al (2021) Survey fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of neurosurgery survey response rates. Front Surg 8:690680. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2021.690680","journal-title":"Front Surg"}],"container-title":["Supportive Care in Cancer"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]],"date-time":"2024-06-17T12:06:53Z","timestamp":1718626013000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]}},"alternative-id":["8547"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-024-08547-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-4355","1433-7339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-4355","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-7339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 January 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 May 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 May 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Charit\u00e9 \u2013 Universit\u00e4tsmedizin Berlin (EA 4\/127\/16).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"All patients provided written informed consent for the collection of questionnaires and patient-reported outcomes.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"344"}}