{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T13:46:51Z","timestamp":1787320011993,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,24]],"date-time":"2013-04-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1366761600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Gastroenterol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]],"date-time":"2013-05-01T05:59:44Z","timestamp":1367387984000},"page":"343-355","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":196,"title":["Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Takero","family":"Mazaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazunari","family":"Mado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hideki","family":"Masuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Motomi","family":"Shiono","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"806_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-23629","volume":"34","author":"EL Fogel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy. 2002;34:280\u20135.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"806_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2008.10.039","volume":"70","author":"PB Cotton","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12\u00a0years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80\u20138.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(98)70121-X","volume":"48","author":"S Loperfido","year":"1998","unstructured":"Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1\u201310.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x","volume":"96","author":"E Masci","year":"2001","unstructured":"Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:417\u201323.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"806_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1001308","volume":"30","author":"SN Mehta","year":"1998","unstructured":"Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun JS, Bouchard S, Barkun AN. Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy. 1998;30:457\u201363.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"806_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(02)70112-0","volume":"56","author":"J Vandervoort","year":"2002","unstructured":"Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RCK, Ferrari AP, Montes H, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652\u20136.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2008.03756.x","volume":"28","author":"Y Bai","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bai Y, Gao J, Zhang W, Zou D, Li Z. Meta-analysis: allopurinol in the prevention of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:557\u201364.","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"806_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-230X-7-6","volume":"7","author":"M Zheng","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zheng M, Bai J, Yuan B, Lin F, You J, Lu M, et al. Meta-analysis of prophylactic corticosteroid use in post-ERCP pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007;7:6. doi: 10.1186\/1471-230X-8-6","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol"},{"key":"806_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2006.10.030","volume":"65","author":"A Andriulli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Andriulli A, Leandro G, Federici T, Ippolito A, Forlano R, Iacobellis A, et al. Prophylactic administration of somatostatin or gabexate does not prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: an updated meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:624\u201332.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2008.10.046","volume":"69","author":"CW Choi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim GH, Eum JS, Lee SM, Song GA, et al. Nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:e11\u20138. doi: 10.1016\/j.gie.2008.10.046","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2009.03991.x","volume":"29","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Chen QB, Gao ZY, Xie WF. Meta-analysis: octreotide prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only at sufficient doses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:1155\u201364.","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"806_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2007.04928.x","volume":"22","author":"D Rudin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rudin D, Kiss A, Wetz RV, Sottile VM. Somatostatin and gabexate for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prevention: meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:977\u201383.","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"806_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1414","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1111103","volume":"366","author":"BJ Elmunzer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PDR, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1414\u201322.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"806_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1067\/mge.2003.124","volume":"57","author":"A Fazel","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, Meyerson SM, Geenen JE. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:291\u20134.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2005.04.020","volume":"62","author":"GC Harewood","year":"2005","unstructured":"Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled study of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:367\u201370.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR16","first-page":"AB80","volume":"49","author":"R Patel","year":"1999","unstructured":"Patel R, Tarnasky PR, Hennessy WS, Hawes RH, Payne KM, Nelles SE, et al. Does stenting after pancreatic sphincterotomy reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy?: Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:AB80.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR17","first-page":"241","volume":"90","author":"S Sherman","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sherman S, Bucksot EL, Esber E, Pezzi J, Gottlieb K, Lehman G. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis? Randomized prospective study (abstract). Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:241.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"806_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(93)70217-5","volume":"39","author":"A Smithline","year":"1993","unstructured":"Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D, Nisi R, Wiersema M, Jamidar P, et al. Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:652\u20137.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2007.07.008","volume":"5","author":"A Sofuni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T, Katanuma A, Hisai H, Niido T, et al. Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1339\u201346.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol."},{"key":"806_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1518","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5085(98)70031-9","volume":"115","author":"PR Tarnasky","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT, Mauldin PD, Cotton PB, Hawes RH. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1518\u201324.","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"806_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-006-1147-8","volume":"14","author":"T Tsuchiya","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Ishii K, et al. Temporary pancreatic stent to prevent post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a preliminary, single-center, randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:302\u20137.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg"},{"key":"806_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00535-010-0268-7","volume":"45","author":"K Ito","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Obana T, Horaguchi J, et al. Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1183\u201391.","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"806_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1007\/s12013-011-9230-4","volume":"61","author":"XP Pan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pan XP, Dang T, Meng XM, Xue KC, Chang ZH, Zhang YP. Clinical study on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis by pancreatic duct stenting. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;61:473\u20139.","journal-title":"Cell Biochem Biophys"},{"key":"806_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2011.06.033","volume":"9","author":"A Sofuni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Mukai T, Kawakami H, Irisawa A, Kubota K, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic duct stents reduce the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:851\u20138.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"806_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1635","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v18.i14.1635","volume":"18","author":"Y Kawaguchi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kawaguchi Y, Ogawa M, Omata F, Ito H, Shimosegawa T, Mine T. Randomized controlled trial of pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1635\u201341.","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"806_CR26","author":"SW Cha","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cha SW, Leung WD, Lehman GA, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Fogel EL, et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. doi: 10.1016\/j.gie.2012.08.022 .","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2012.05.001","volume":"76","author":"TH Lee","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi HJ, Han SH, Cheon YK, Cho YD, et al. Prophylactic temporary 3F pancreatic duct stent to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with a difficult biliary cannulation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:578\u201385.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1159\/000106774","volume":"75","author":"A Andriulli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Andriulli A, Forlano R, Napolitano G, Conoscitore P, Caruso N, Pilotto A, et al. Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks. Digestion. 2007;75:156\u201363.","journal-title":"Digestion"},{"key":"806_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.10.039","volume":"73","author":"A Choudhary","year":"2011","unstructured":"Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M, Szary NM, Puli SR, Othman MO, et al. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:275\u201382.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(04)02013-9","volume":"60","author":"P Singh","year":"2004","unstructured":"Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RCK, Sivak MV, Agrawal D, et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:544\u201350.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1255781","volume":"42","author":"T Mazaki","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mazaki T, Masuda H, Takayama T. Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2010;42:842\u201352.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"806_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(91)70740-2","volume":"37","author":"PB Cotton","year":"1991","unstructured":"Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383\u201393.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2012-302779","volume":"62","author":"PA Banks","year":"2013","unstructured":"Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis\u20142012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102\u201311.","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"806_CR34","unstructured":"Egger M. Meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books."},{"key":"806_CR35","volume-title":"Methods for meta-analysis in medical research","author":"AJ Sutton","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sutton AJ. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. West Sussex: Wiley; 2002."},{"key":"806_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","volume":"7","author":"R DerSimonian","year":"1986","unstructured":"DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical studies. Control Clin Stud. 1986;7:177\u201388.","journal-title":"Control Clin Stud"},{"key":"806_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003;327:557\u201360.","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"806_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.060410","volume":"176","author":"JP Ioannidis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Can Med Assoc J. 2007;176:1091\u20136.","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"806_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2003-42614","volume":"35","author":"E Masci","year":"2003","unstructured":"Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2003;35:830\u20134.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"806_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2006.07.031","volume":"65","author":"A Das","year":"2007","unstructured":"Das A, Singh P, Sivak MV, Chak A. Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:960\u20138.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"806_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2007.09.007","volume":"5","author":"ML Freeman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Freeman ML. Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1354\u201365.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"806_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)01085-X","volume":"352","author":"D Moher","year":"1998","unstructured":"Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised studies affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352:609\u201313.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"806_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.11.1054","volume":"282","author":"P J\u00fcni","year":"1999","unstructured":"J\u00fcni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical studies for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:1054\u201360.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"806_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1995.03520290060030","volume":"273","author":"KF Schulz","year":"1995","unstructured":"Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled studies. JAMA. 1995;273:408\u201312.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"806_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1215317","volume":"41","author":"YG Bakman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bakman YG, Safdar K, Freemen ML. Significant clinical implication of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in previously normal pancreatic ducts. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1095\u20138.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"806_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2008.12.051","volume":"70","author":"LH Price","year":"2009","unstructured":"Price LH, Brandabur JJ, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, Traverso WL, Irani S. Good stents gone bad: endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:174\u20139.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"}],"container-title":["Journal of Gastroenterology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T22:38:07Z","timestamp":1559083087000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,24]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}},"alternative-id":["806"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00535-013-0806-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0944-1174","1435-5922"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0944-1174","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-5922","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,24]]}}}