{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T05:37:02Z","timestamp":1780378622983,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,17]],"date-time":"2015-07-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437091200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]],"date-time":"2015-07-16T11:04:03Z","timestamp":1437044643000},"page":"2244-2263","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Gijsbert","family":"Overdevest","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carmen","family":"Vleggeert-Lankamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wilco","family":"Jacobs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudius","family":"Thom\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Gunzburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wilco","family":"Peul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"4098_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibson JN, Waddell G (2005) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (4):CD001352. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD001352.pub3","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001352.pub3"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181a3d889","volume":"23","author":"SE Celik","year":"2010","unstructured":"Celik SE, Celik S, Goksu K, Kara A, Ince I (2010) Microdecompressive laminotomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(4):229\u2013235. doi: 10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181a3d889","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.75B3.8496205","volume":"75","author":"F Postacchini","year":"1993","unstructured":"Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, Gumina S (1993) The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British 75(3):386\u2013392","journal-title":"The Journal of bone and joint surgery British"},{"issue":"2","key":"4098_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.3.2.0129","volume":"3","author":"C Thome","year":"2005","unstructured":"Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, Schmiedek P (2005) Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3(2):129\u2013141. doi: 10.3171\/spi.2005.3.2.0129","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"4098_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173060-00003","volume":"73","author":"JN Katz","year":"1991","unstructured":"Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, McInnes JM, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(6):809\u2013816","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"4098_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delank KS, Eysel P, Zollner J, Drees P, Nafe B, Rompe JD (2002) Undercutting decompression versus laminectomy. Clinical and radiological results of a prospective controlled trial. Der Orthopade 31 (11):1048\u20131056. doi: 10.1007\/s00132-002-0369-y (discussion 1057)","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-002-0369-y"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"4098_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/s101430050040","volume":"22","author":"JD Rompe","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rompe JD, Eysel P, Zollner J, Nafe B, Heine J (1999) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion. Neurosurg Rev 22(2\u20133):102\u2013106","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"key":"4098_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198802000-00018","volume":"227","author":"E Hopp","year":"1988","unstructured":"Hopp E, Tsou PM (1988) Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:143\u2013151","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198901000-00006","volume":"14","author":"TG Mayer","year":"1989","unstructured":"Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 14(1):33\u201336","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199304000-00009","volume":"18","author":"T Sihvonen","year":"1993","unstructured":"Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18(5):575\u2013581","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318191438b","volume":"34","author":"L Bresnahan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34(1):17\u201323. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318191438b","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"4098_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198603000-00001","volume":"11","author":"KE Johnsson","year":"1986","unstructured":"Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K (1986) Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 11(2):107\u2013110","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200202150-00021","volume":"27","author":"BH Guiot","year":"2002","unstructured":"Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27(4):432\u2013438","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01808872","volume":"139","author":"U Spetzger","year":"1997","unstructured":"Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Naujokat C, von Keyserlingk DG, Gilsbach JM (1997) Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: anatomical and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(5):392\u2013396","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198304000-00017","volume":"8","author":"MA Adams","year":"1983","unstructured":"Adams MA, Hutton WC (1983) The mechanical function of the lumbar apophyseal joints. Spine 8(3):327\u2013330","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198005000-00007","volume":"5","author":"MA Adams","year":"1980","unstructured":"Adams MA, Hutton WC, Stott JR (1980) The resistance to flexion of the lumbar intervertebral joint. Spine 5(3):245\u2013253","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/0141-5425(90)90010-K","volume":"12","author":"RJ Hindle","year":"1990","unstructured":"Hindle RJ, Pearcy MJ, Cross A (1990) Mechanical function of the human lumbar interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. J Biomed Eng 12(4):340\u2013344","journal-title":"J Biomed Eng"},{"key":"4098_CR18","unstructured":"Higgins JPT AD, Sterne JAC (2011) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT GS (ed) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http:\/\/www.cochrane-handbook.org"},{"key":"4098_CR19","unstructured":"The Nordic Cochrane Centre TCC (2011) Review Manager (RevMan) vol Version 5.1. Copenhagen"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","volume":"33","author":"RW Ostelo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33(1):90\u201394. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4098_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O\u2019Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schunemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW, Jr. Zaza S, Group GW (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj 328 (7454):1490. doi: 10.1136\/bmj.328.7454.1490","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7454.1490"},{"issue":"18","key":"4098_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1929","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f","volume":"34","author":"AD Furlan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M, Editorial Board CBRG (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 34(18):1929\u20131941. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e004651","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-004651","volume":"4","author":"US Nerland","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lonne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM, Nygaard OP, Gulati S (2014) Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study. BMJ open 4(3):e004651. doi: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-004651","journal-title":"BMJ open"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR24","first-page":"744","volume":"29","author":"MBC Gurelik","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gurelik MBC, Kars Z, Karadag O, Ozum U, Bayrakli F (2012) Unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar stenosis is effective and safe: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Neurol Sci 29(4):744\u2013753","journal-title":"J Neurol Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.1.SPINE08288","volume":"10","author":"M Yagi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yagi M, Okada E, Ninomiya K, Kihara M (2009) Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 10(4):293\u2013299. doi: 10.3171\/2009.1.SPINE08288","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181657dde","volume":"33","author":"YS Fu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG (2008) Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 33(5):514\u2013518. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181657dde","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.229","volume":"6","author":"DY Cho","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cho DY, Lin HL, Lee WY, Lee HC (2007) Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):229\u2013239. doi: 10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.229","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"12","key":"4098_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E732","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828fc84c","volume":"38","author":"X Liu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Liu X, Yuan S, Tian Y (2013) Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note. Spine 38(12):E732\u2013E737. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828fc84c","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"20","key":"4098_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1737","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1","volume":"38","author":"S Rajasekaran","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rajasekaran S, Thomas A, Kanna RM, Prasad Shetty A (2013) Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients. Spine 38(20):1737\u20131743. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.9.SPINE09933","volume":"14","author":"K Watanabe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Watanabe K, Matsumoto M, Ikegami T, Nishiwaki Y, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Ogawa Y, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K (2011) Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 14(1):51\u201358. doi: 10.3171\/2010.9.SPINE09933","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5 Suppl","key":"4098_CR31","first-page":"S146","volume":"51","author":"LT Khoo","year":"2002","unstructured":"Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S146\u2013S154","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.10.SPINE09708","volume":"14","author":"MH Morgalla","year":"2011","unstructured":"Morgalla MH, Noak N, Merkle M, Tatagiba MS (2011) Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression? J Neurosurg Spine 14(3):305\u2013312. doi: 10.3171\/2010.10.SPINE09708","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR33","first-page":"489","volume":"23","author":"TMC Osman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Osman TMC, Kelleher M, McEvoy L, Bolger C (2009) Intersegmental decompression versus laminectomy in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Neurosurg 23(5):489\u2013490","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"4098_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B, Mimran RI, Jacob RP (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the \u201cclassic\u201d open approach. Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN 51 (2):100\u2013105. doi: 10.1055\/s-2007-1022542","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1022542"},{"issue":"10","key":"4098_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2011.02.022","volume":"18","author":"P Shih","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shih P, Wong AP, Smith TR, Lee AI, Fessler RG (2011) Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression. J Clin Neurosci 18(10):1360\u20131364. doi: 10.1016\/j.jocn.2011.02.022","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"4098_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomas NW, Rea GL, Pikul BK, Mervis LJ, Irsik R, McGregor JM (1997) Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 41 (3):567\u2013574 (discussion 574\u2013565)","DOI":"10.1227\/00006123-199709000-00011"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.3.5.0405","volume":"3","author":"K Watanabe","year":"2005","unstructured":"Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2005) Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 3(5):405\u2013408. doi: 10.3171\/spi.2005.3.5.0405","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"4098_CR38","unstructured":"Krut\u2019ko AV (2012) Results of decompressive-stabilizing procedures via unilateral approach in lumbar spinal stenosis. Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N\u00a0N Burdenko 76 (2):33\u201340 (discussion 40\u201331)"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR39","first-page":"378","volume":"33","author":"CS Yu","year":"1992","unstructured":"Yu CS, Tay BK (1992) Wide versus selective decompression in the operative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Singapore Med J 33(4):378\u2013379","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"4098_CR40","unstructured":"Usman M, Ali M, Khanzada K, Ishaq M, Naeem ul H, Aman R, Ali M (2013) Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 23(12):852\u2013856. doi:12.2013\/JCPSP.852856"},{"issue":"6","key":"4098_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1824","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3411-y","volume":"472","author":"IS Aleem","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aleem IS, Rampersaud YR (2014) Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(6):1824\u20131830. doi: 10.1007\/s11999-013-3411-y","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000136","volume":"39","author":"Y Arai","year":"2014","unstructured":"Arai Y, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Sakai K, Kato T, Enomoto M, Matsumoto R, Yamada T, Kawabata S, Shinomiya K, Okawa A (2014) A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Spine 39(4):332\u2013340. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000136","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"12","key":"4098_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2133","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0471-2","volume":"16","author":"H Cavusoglu","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, Aydin Y (2007) Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J 16(12):2133\u20132142. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-007-0471-2","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"4098_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dalgic A, Uckun O, Ergungor MF, Okay O, Daglioglu E, Hatipoglu G, Pasaoglu L, Caglar YS (2010) Comparison of unilateral hemilaminotomy and bilateral hemilaminotomy according to dural sac area in lumbar spinal stenosis. Minimally invasive neurosurgery :MIN 53(2):60\u201364. doi: 10.1055\/s-0029-1246147","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1246147"},{"key":"4098_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M (2008) Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol 69(2):109\u2013113. doi: 10.1016\/j.surneu.2007.04.021 (discussion 113)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2007.04.021"},{"issue":"3","key":"4098_CR46","first-page":"195","volume":"42","author":"SWJC Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim SWJC, Kim CG, Lee SM, Shin H (2007) Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression: a comparative study between bilateral laminotomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42(3):195\u2013199","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"issue":"5","key":"4098_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.3171\/2008.7.17634","volume":"10","author":"S Ruetten","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2009) Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 10(5):476\u2013485. doi: 10.3171\/2008.7.17634","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2964-5","volume":"23","author":"AD Jones","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jones AD, Wafai AM, Easterbrook AL (2014) Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients. European Spine J 23(1):135\u2013141. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-013-2964-5","journal-title":"European Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"4098_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3349-0","volume":"24","author":"E Munting","year":"2015","unstructured":"Munting E, Roder C, Sobottke R, Dietrich D, Aghayev E, Spine Tango C (2015) Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry. European Spine J 24(2):358\u2013368. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-014-3349-0","journal-title":"European Spine J"},{"issue":"9","key":"4098_CR50","first-page":"816","volume":"51","author":"C Zhang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhang C, Zhou HX, Feng SQ, Ning GZ, Wu Q, Li FY, Zheng YF, Wang P (2013) The efficacy analysis of selective decompression of lumbar root canal of elderly lumbar spinal stenosis. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi (Chin J Surg) 51(9):816\u2013820","journal-title":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi (Chin J Surg)"},{"issue":"8","key":"4098_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31824a03eb","volume":"26","author":"MA Leonardi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Leonardi MA, Zanetti M, Min K (2013) Extent of decompression and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma among different techniques of spinal decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(8):407\u2013414. doi: 10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31824a03eb","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"11","key":"4098_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1186","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199011010-00018","volume":"15","author":"Y Iida","year":"1990","unstructured":"Iida Y, Kataoka O, Sho T, Sumi M, Hirose T, Bessho Y, Kobayashi D (1990) Postoperative lumbar spinal instability occurring or progressing secondary to laminectomy. Spine 15(11):1186\u20131189","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"24 Suppl","key":"4098_CR53","first-page":"143S","volume":"20","author":"EN Hanley Jr","year":"1995","unstructured":"Hanley EN Jr (1995) The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without instrumentation. Spine 20(24 Suppl):143S\u2013153S","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"24 Suppl","key":"4098_CR54","first-page":"138S","volume":"20","author":"VK Sonntag","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sonntag VK, Marciano FF (1995) Is fusion indicated for lumbar spinal disorders? Spine 20(24 Suppl):138S\u2013142S","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2451051359","volume":"245","author":"A Leone","year":"2007","unstructured":"Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L (2007) Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 245(1):62\u201377. doi: 10.1148\/radiol.2451051359","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"4098_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: a prospective 10-year study. Spine 25 (11):1424-1435 (discussion 1435\u20131426)","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006010-00016"},{"issue":"1","key":"4098_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","volume":"32","author":"A Malmivaara","year":"2007","unstructured":"Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimaki T, Ronty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Harkanen T, Hurri H, Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research G (2007) Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32(1):1\u20138. doi: 10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"4098_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E469","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828935ac","volume":"38","author":"EI Schepper de","year":"2013","unstructured":"de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P, Peul WC, Oei EH, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Luijsterburg PA (2013) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine 38(8):E469\u2013E481. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828935ac","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"4098_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181bdafb9","volume":"35","author":"DK Park","year":"2010","unstructured":"Park DK, An HS, Lurie JD, Zhao W, Tosteson A, Tosteson TD, Herkowitz H, Errico T, Weinstein JN (2010) Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study. Spine 35(4):439\u2013446. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181bdafb9","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4098_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 302(2):149\u2013158. doi: 10.1001\/jama.2009.972","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.972"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,18]],"date-time":"2022-05-18T05:23:32Z","timestamp":1652851412000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,17]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4098"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4098-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,17]]}}}