{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T16:26:33Z","timestamp":1791044793954,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,18]],"date-time":"2015-07-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437177600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"Institute for Evaluative Research in Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,17]],"date-time":"2015-07-17T06:22:51Z","timestamp":1437114171000},"page":"2228-2235","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"C","family":"R\u00f6der","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Baumg\u00e4rtner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"U.","family":"Berlemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Aghayev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"4124_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcp0708097","volume":"358","author":"JN Katz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Katz JN, Harris MB (2008) Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. New Engl J Med 358(8):818\u2013825. doi: 10.1056\/NEJMcp0708097","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"4124_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E609","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318240d57d","volume":"37","author":"C Ammendolia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ammendolia C, Stuber K, de Bruin LK, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA, Rampersaud YR, Steenstra IA, Pennick V (2012) Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review. Spine 37(10):E609\u2013616. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318240d57d","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4124_CR3","author":"SCB Costandi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Costandi SCB, Mekhail M, Dews T, Mekhail N (2014) Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review. Pain Pract. doi: 10.1111\/papr.12188","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"issue":"14","key":"4124_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d","volume":"35","author":"JN Weinstein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 35(14):1329\u20131338. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"11","key":"4124_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1424","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006010-00016","volume":"25","author":"T Amundsen","year":"2000","unstructured":"Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25(11):1424\u20131435 (discussion 1435\u20131426)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4124_CR6","author":"E Munting","year":"2014","unstructured":"Munting E, Roder C, Sobottke R, Dietrich D, Aghayev E, Spine Tango Contributors (2014) Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-014-3349-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"4124_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d77c21","volume":"36","author":"A Pearson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pearson A, Blood E, Lurie J, Abdu W, Sengupta D, Frymoyer JW, Weinstein J (2011) Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 36(3):219\u2013229. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d77c21","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"11","key":"4124_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819fcf35","volume":"34","author":"FS Kleinstuck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kleinstuck FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, O\u2019Riordan D, Mannion AF (2009) The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine 34(11):1198\u20131203. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819fcf35","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4124_CR9","first-page":"355","volume-title":"Spinal restabilization procedures","author":"DL Kaech","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kaech DL, Fernandez C, Lombardi-Weber D (2002) The Interspinous \u2018U\u2019: a new restabilization device for the lumbar spine. In: Kaech DL, Jinkins JR (eds) Spinal restabilization procedures. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 355\u2013362"},{"issue":"8","key":"4124_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0657-2","volume":"17","author":"HJ Wilke","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, Mack C, Steudel WI, Kettler A (2008) Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J 17(8):1049\u20131056. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-008-0657-2","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"4124_CR11","first-page":"167","volume":"15","author":"KJ Tsai","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tsai KJ, Murakami H, Lowery GL, Hutton WC (2006) A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine. J Surg Orthop Adv 15(3):167\u2013172","journal-title":"J Surg Orthop Adv"},{"issue":"6","key":"4124_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-0934-8","volume":"18","author":"E Schluessmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Moulin P, Roder C, Group SWR (2009) SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses. Eur Spine J 18(6):851\u2013861. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-009-0934-8","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"4124_CR13","volume-title":"Anatomie","author":"G Aum\u00fcller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aum\u00fcller G, Aust G, Engele J (2014) Anatomie, 3rd edn. Georg Thieme Publishers, Stuttgart. doi: 10.1055\/b-002-99154","edition":"3"},{"issue":"18","key":"4124_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1529","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829a6d0a","volume":"38","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Errico TJ, Bae H, Auerbach JD (2013) Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Spine 38(18):1529\u20131539. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829a6d0a","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"10","key":"4124_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-0911-9","volume":"14","author":"AF Mannion","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J Off Pub Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 14(10):1014\u20131026. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-005-0911-9","journal-title":"Eur Spine J Off Pub Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"4124_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","volume":"33","author":"RW Ostelo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33(1):90\u201394. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4124_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/70.1.41","volume":"70","author":"PR Rosenbaum","year":"1983","unstructured":"Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for casual effects. Biometrika 70:41\u201355","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"4124_CR18","unstructured":"Parsons LS (2015) Performing a 1:N case-control match on propensity score. http:\/\/www2.sas.com\/proceedings\/sugi29\/165-29.pdf . Accessed 1 July 2015"},{"issue":"2","key":"4124_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.2.330","volume":"22","author":"DS Kong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W (2007) One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability. J Korean Med Sci 22(2):330\u2013335","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"4124_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-009-1589-1","volume":"39","author":"D Adelt","year":"2010","unstructured":"Adelt D (2010) The interspinous U implant (now Coflex): long-term outcome, study overview and differential indication. Orthopade 39(6):595\u2013601. doi: 10.1007\/s00132-009-1589-1","journal-title":"Orthopade"},{"issue":"1","key":"4124_CR21","first-page":"50","volume":"22","author":"H Celik","year":"2012","unstructured":"Celik H, Derincek A, Koksal I (2012) Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height? Turk Neurosurg 22(1):50\u201354. doi: 10.5137\/1019-5149.JTN.4681-11.2","journal-title":"Turk Neurosurg"},{"key":"4124_CR22","author":"A Richter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Richter A, Halm HF, Hauck M, Quante M (2012) 2-Year follow-up After decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi: 10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31825f7203","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"4","key":"4124_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2009.46.4.292","volume":"46","author":"SC Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park SC, Yoon SH, Hong YP, Kim KJ, Chung SK, Kim HJ (2009) Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous U (coflex). J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46(4):292\u2013299. doi: 10.3340\/jkns.2009.46.4.292","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"issue":"2","key":"4124_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2014.8.2.161","volume":"8","author":"N Kumar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kumar N, Shah SM, Ng YH, Pannierselvam VK, Dasde S, Shen L (2014) Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J 8(2):161\u2013169. doi: 10.4184\/asj.2014.8.2.161","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"4124_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f6415","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f6415","volume":"347","author":"WA Moojen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, van Zwet EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (2013) Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 347:f6415. doi: 10.1136\/bmj.f6415","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4124_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S59194","volume":"6","author":"JK Schmier","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schmier JK, Halevi M, Maislin G, Ong K (2014) Comparative cost effectiveness of Coflex(R) interlaminar stabilization versus instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res CEOR 6:125\u2013131. doi: 10.2147\/CEOR.S59194","journal-title":"Clinicoecon Outcomes Res CEOR"},{"issue":"24","key":"4124_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318235457b","volume":"36","author":"AN Tosteson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Abdu W, Herkowitz H, Andersson G, Albert T, Bridwell K, Zhao W, Grove MR, Weinstein MC, Weinstein JN (2011) Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 36(24):2061\u20132068. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318235457b","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"4124_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e97142","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0097142","volume":"9","author":"AM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu AM, Zhou Y, Li QL, Wu XL, Jin YL, Luo P, Chi YL, Wang XY (2014) Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(5):e97142. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0097142","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"17","key":"4124_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ba413","volume":"38","author":"BH Stromqvist","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stromqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, Moller A, Sahlstrand T, Soliman A, Tullberg T (2013) X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 38(17):1436\u20131442. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ba413","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"4124_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2015","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2790-9","volume":"22","author":"F Beyer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Beyer F, Yagdiran A, Neu P, Kaulhausen T, Eysel P, Sobottke R (2013) Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J Off Pub Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22(9):2015\u20132021. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-013-2790-9","journal-title":"Eur Spine J Off Pub Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"4124_CR31","first-page":"E7","volume":"22","author":"KA Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JH, Khoueir P, Wang MY (2007) Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E7","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"13","key":"4124_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2517","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130304","volume":"126","author":"L Zang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zang L, Du P, Hai Y, Su QJ, Lu SB, Liu T (2013) Device related complications of the Coflex interspinous process implant for the lumbar spine. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(13):2517\u20132522","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"issue":"11","key":"4124_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2199","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-013-2006-2","volume":"37","author":"C Xu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xu C, Ni WF, Tian NF, Hu XQ, Li F, Xu HZ (2013) Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex). Int Orthop 37(11):2199\u20132204. doi: 10.1007\/s00264-013-2006-2","journal-title":"Int Orthop"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,10]],"date-time":"2024-06-10T01:18:22Z","timestamp":1717982302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,18]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4124"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4124-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,18]]}}}