{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,28]],"date-time":"2026-10-28T14:03:22Z","timestamp":1793196202676,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]],"date-time":"2019-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1570838400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]],"date-time":"2019-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1570838400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004543","name":"China Scholarship Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1200 euro"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1200 euro"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004543","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005039","name":"Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["700 euro"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["700 euro"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005039","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Cervical spine surgery may affect sagittal alignment parameters and induce accelerated degeneration of the cervical spine. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters of surgical patients will be correlated with radiological adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and with clinical outcome parameters.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Patients were analysed from two randomized, double-blinded trials comparing anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA), with intervertebral cage (ACDF) and without intervertebral cage (ACD). C2\u2013C7 lordosis, T1 slope, C2\u2013C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and the occipito-cervical angle (OCI) were determined as cervical sagittal alignment parameters. Radiological ASD was scored by the combination of decrease in disc height and anterior osteophyte formation. Neck disability index (NDI), SF-36 PCS and MCS were evaluated as clinical outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The cervical sagittal alignment parameters were comparable between the three treatment groups, both at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Irrespective of surgical method, C2\u2013C7 lordosis was found to increase from 11\u00b0 to 13\u00b0, but the other parameters remained stable during follow-up. Only the OCI was demonstrated to be associated with the presence and positive progression of radiological ASD, both at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. NDI, SF-36 PCS and MCS were demonstrated not to be correlated with cervical sagittal alignment. Likewise, a correlation with the value or change of the OCI was absent.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>OCI, an important factor to maintain horizontal gaze, was demonstrated to be associated with radiological ASD, suggesting that the occipito-cervical angle influences accelerated cervical degeneration. Since OCI did not change after surgery, degeneration of the cervical spine may be predicted by the value of OCI.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>NECK trial<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Dutch Trial Register Number NTR1289.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>PROCON trial<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Trial Register Number ISRCTN41681847.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Graphic abstract<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]],"date-time":"2019-10-12T13:03:47Z","timestamp":1570885427000},"page":"2655-2664","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"ntr1289","registry":"10.18810\/dutch-trial-register"},{"clinical-trial-number":"isrctn41681847","registry":"10.18810\/isrctn"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9055-1230","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xiaoyu","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ronald H. M. A.","family":"Bartels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roland","family":"Donk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark P.","family":"Arts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caroline M. W.","family":"Goedmakers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carmen L. A.","family":"Vleggeert-Lankamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"6157_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.spine12838","volume":"19","author":"JK Scheer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Deviren V, Lafage V, Schwab F, Ames CP (2013) Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 19:141\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.4.spine12838","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S149","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449","volume":"38","author":"CP Ames","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, Patel AA, Traynelis VC, Kim HJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Lafage V (2013) Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine 38:S149\u2013S160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e548","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.02.088","volume":"113","author":"SI Jeon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jeon SI, Hyun SJ, Han S, Lee BH, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2018) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and patient outcomes after anterior cervical fusion surgery involving 3 or more levels. World Neurosurg 113:e548\u2013e554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.02.088","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"6157_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E396","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000001264","volume":"41","author":"SJ Hyun","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2016) Relationship between T1 slope and cervical alignment following multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery: impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Spine 41:E396\u2013E402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000001264","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.08.031","volume":"10","author":"PT Knott","year":"2010","unstructured":"Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10:994\u2013998. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.08.031","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5161-0","volume":"26","author":"SD Yoon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yoon SD, Lee CH, Lee J, Choi JY, Min WK (2017) Occipitocervical inclination: new radiographic parameter of neutral occipitocervical position. Eur Spine J 26:2297\u20132302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5161-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195840030-00009","volume":"40-a","author":"GW Smith","year":"1958","unstructured":"Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-a:607\u2013624","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"6157_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.7.Spine17182","volume":"28","author":"R Bartels","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bartels R, Goffin J (2018) Albert Dereymaeker and Joseph Cyriel Mulier\u2019s description of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in 1955. J Neurosurg Spine 28:395\u2013400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.7.Spine17182","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.9.Spine09129","volume":"12","author":"J Goffin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B (2010) A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:261\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2009.9.Spine09129","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0854-z","volume":"18","author":"SW Kim","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS (2009) Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18:218\u2013231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-008-0854-z","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2359","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-017-3312-z","volume":"159","author":"RD Donk","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donk RD, Arnts H, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Verbeek A, Bartels R (2017) Cervical sagittal alignment after different anterior discectomy procedures for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: randomized controlled trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:2359\u20132365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-017-3312-z","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"6157_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182076d70","volume":"36","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Hipp JA, Wharton ND, Anderson PA (2011) Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Spine 36:991\u2013996. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182076d70","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-11-122","volume":"11","author":"MP Arts","year":"2010","unstructured":"Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker E, Koes BW, Peul WC (2010) The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2474-11-122","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"6157_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.12.013","author":"CLA Vleggeert-Lankamp","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA, Janssen TMH, van Zwet E, Goedmakers CMW, Bosscher L, Peul W, Arts MP (2018) The NECK trial: effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.12.013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-7-85","volume":"7","author":"RH Bartels","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bartels RH, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, Grotenhuis JA, Venderink D (2006) Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi-center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:85. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2474-7-85","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"6157_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0183603","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","volume":"12","author":"RD Donk","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels R (2017) What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 12:e0183603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"6157_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002371","volume":"43","author":"K Tamai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tamai K, Buser Z, Paholpak P, Sessumpun K, Nakamura H, Wang JC (2018) Can C7 slope substitute the T1 slope?: an analysis using cervical radiographs and kinematic MRIs. Spine 43:520\u2013525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002371","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200404000-00001","volume":"17","author":"J Goffin","year":"2004","unstructured":"Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79\u201385","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"6157_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1729","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-006-0119-7","volume":"15","author":"CJ Vos","year":"2006","unstructured":"Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729\u20131736. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-006-0119-7","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-2929-6","volume":"138","author":"X Wu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wu X, Qi Y, Tan M, Yi P, Yang F, Tang X, Hao Q (2018) Incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration following occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability in non-rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:921\u2013927. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-018-2929-6","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"6157_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4830-8","volume":"27","author":"C Amabile","year":"2018","unstructured":"Amabile C, Le Huec J-C, Skalli W (2018) Invariance of head-pelvis alignment and compensatory mechanisms for asymptomatic adults older than 49 years. Eur Spine J 27:458\u2013466. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-016-4830-8","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"6157_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2070","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000000641","volume":"39","author":"M Roguski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Roguski M, Benzel EC, Curran JN, Magge SN, Bisson EF, Krishnaney AA, Steinmetz MP, Butler WE, Heary RF, Ghogawala Z (2014) Postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance negatively affects outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 39:2070\u20132077. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000000641","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6157_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S14","DOI":"10.1227\/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b","volume":"76","author":"JA Tang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Ames CP (2015) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S14\u2013S21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b(discussion S21)","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"6157_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1859","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002250","volume":"42","author":"SJ Hyun","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2017) Clinical impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery: a minimum 2-year follow up data. Spine 42:1859\u20131864. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002250","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000001776","volume":"42","author":"WK Kwon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kwon WK, Kim PS, Ahn SY, Song JY, Kim JH, Park YK, Kwon TH, Moon HJ (2017) Analysis of associating factors with C2\u20137 sagittal vertical axis after two-level anterior cervical fusion: comparison between plate augmentation and stand-alone cages. Spine 42:318\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000001776","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.5.spine10769","volume":"15","author":"D Coric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348\u2013358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2011.5.spine10769","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000000869","volume":"40","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC (2015) Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 40:674\u2013683. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000000869","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.14444\/3010","volume":"10","author":"MS Hisey","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, Nunley PD, Bae HW, Kim KD, Ohnmeiss DD (2016) Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 10:10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/3010","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"6157_CR29","first-page":"3939","volume":"125","author":"Y Sun","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sun Y, Zhao YB, Pan SF, Zhou FF, Chen ZQ, Liu ZJ (2012) Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration five years after single level cervical fusion and cervical arthroplasty: a retrospective controlled study. Chin Med J 125:3939\u20133941","journal-title":"Chin Med J"},{"key":"6157_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.spine13953","volume":"22","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Jackson RJ, Bae HW, Hoffman GA, Gaede SE, Danielson GO 3rd, Gordon C, Stone MB (2015) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22:15\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.7.spine13953","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"6157_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.021","volume":"18","author":"X Yang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yang X, Janssen T, Arts MP, Peul WC, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2018) Radiological follow-up after implanting cervical disc prosthesis in anterior discectomy: a systematic review. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 18:1678\u20131693. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.021","journal-title":"The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society"},{"key":"6157_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.9.Spine18659","volume":"30","author":"A MacDowall","year":"2019","unstructured":"MacDowall A, Canto Moreira N, Marques C, Skeppholm M, Lindhagen L, Robinson Y, Lofgren H, Michaelsson K, Olerud C (2019) Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 30:323\u2013331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2018.9.Spine18659","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,10]],"date-time":"2021-08-10T14:28:42Z","timestamp":1628605722000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}},"alternative-id":["6157"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 September 2019","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 September 2019","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 October 2019","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"There is no conflict of interest for the current study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}