{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T12:17:15Z","timestamp":1781871435207,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]],"date-time":"2020-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580256000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]],"date-time":"2020-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580256000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>To compare the long-term clinical results and complications of two revision strategies for patients with failed total disc replacements (TDRs).\n<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In 19 patients, the TDR was removed and the intervertebral defect was filled with a femoral head bone strut graft. In addition, instrumented posterolateral fusion was performed (removal group). In 36 patients, only a posterolateral instrumented fusion was performed (fusion group). Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were completed pre- and post-revision surgery. Intra- and post-operative complications of both revision strategies were assessed.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The median follow-up was 12.3\u00a0years (range 5.3\u201324.3). In both the removal and fusion group, a similar (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.515 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090419, respectively) but significant decrease in VAS- (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001, respectively) and ODI-score (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.033 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.013, respectively) at post-revision surgery compared to pre-revision surgery was seen. A clinically relevant improvement in VAS- and ODI-score was found in 62.5% and 43.8% in the removal group and in 43.5% and 39.1% in the fusion group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.242 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.773, respectively). Removal of the TDR was associated with substantial intra-operative complications such as major vessel bleeding and ureter lesion. The percentage of late reoperations for complications such as pseudarthrosis was comparable for both revision strategies.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Revision of a failed TDR is clinically beneficial in about half of the patients. No clear benefits for additional TDR removal as compared to posterolateral instrumented fusion alone could be identified. Particularly, when considering the substantial risks and complications, great caution is warranted with removal of the TDR.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Graphic abstract<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]],"date-time":"2020-01-29T04:46:02Z","timestamp":1580273162000},"page":"1527-1535","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Long-term clinical outcome of the Charit\u00e9 III total lumbar disc replacement"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0417-8052","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Kitzen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. G. M.","family":"Schotanus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S. M. J.","family":"van Kuijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E. M. C.","family":"Jutten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N. P.","family":"Kort","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L. W.","family":"van Rhijn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P. C.","family":"Willems","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"6308_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.08.007","volume":"9","author":"RD Guyer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Guyer RD et al (2009) Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9(5):374\u2013386","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6308_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.9.SPINE11717","volume":"17","author":"JE Zigler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Glenn J, Delamarter RB (2012) Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 17(6):504\u2013511","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"10","key":"6308_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2288","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2926-y","volume":"22","author":"C Skold","year":"2013","unstructured":"Skold C, Tropp H, Berg S (2013) Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 22(10):2288\u20132295","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"6308_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318170fd35","volume":"33","author":"KY Ha","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW (2008) Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(11):1192\u20131198","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"6308_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860000207","volume":"10","author":"MN Kumar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10(4):309\u2013313","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6308_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198803000-00029","volume":"13","author":"CK Lee","year":"1988","unstructured":"Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(3):375\u2013377","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"6308_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.02.007","volume":"11","author":"Y Park","year":"2011","unstructured":"Park Y et al (2011) Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J 11(4):295\u2013302","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6308_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1445-3","volume":"19","author":"KD van den Eerenbeemt","year":"2010","unstructured":"van den Eerenbeemt KD et al (2010) Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 19(8):1262\u20131280","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"9","key":"6308_CR9","first-page":"CD008326","volume":"2012","author":"W Jacobs","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jacobs W et al (2012) Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(9):CD008326","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"22","key":"6308_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1991","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d6f878","volume":"35","author":"CJ Siepe","year":"2010","unstructured":"Siepe CJ et al (2010) The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):1991\u20132003","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"6308_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000257554.67505.45","volume":"32","author":"T David","year":"2007","unstructured":"David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(6):661\u2013666","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"6308_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000172361.07479.6b","volume":"18","author":"JP Lemaire","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lemaire JP et al (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):353\u2013359","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"9","key":"6308_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2056","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3939-5","volume":"24","author":"SB Lu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lu SB et al (2015) An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 24(9):2056\u20132064","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"6308_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-1022-3","volume":"15","author":"M Putzier","year":"2006","unstructured":"Putzier M et al (2006) Charite total disc replacement\u2013clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15(2):183\u2013195","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"6308_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.028","volume":"14","author":"CJ Siepe","year":"2014","unstructured":"Siepe CJ et al (2014) Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J 14(8):1417\u20131431","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"21","key":"6308_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1657","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002174","volume":"42","author":"LA Laugesen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Laugesen LA et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes and revision rates at a mean follow-up of 10 years after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(21):1657\u20131663","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"11","key":"6308_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001527","volume":"41","author":"SJ Park","year":"2016","unstructured":"Park SJ et al (2016) Long-term outcomes following lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-II: average 10-year follow-up at a single institute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(11):971\u2013977","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"6308_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4714-y","volume":"26","author":"F Ding","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ding F et al (2017) Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Eur Spine J 26(3):806\u2013815","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"6308_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200503000-00002","volume":"87","author":"P Tropiano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tropiano P et al (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):490\u2013496","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"6308_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46","volume":"32","author":"BI Martin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Martin BI et al (2007) Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(3):382\u2013387","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"6308_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.4.1","volume":"6","author":"N Patel","year":"2007","unstructured":"Patel N et al (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6(4):291\u2013297","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"6308_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.1100180106","volume":"18","author":"CD McClung","year":"2000","unstructured":"McClung CD et al (2000) Relationship between body mass index and activity in hip or knee arthroplasty patients. J Orthop Res 18(1):35\u201339","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6308_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-0982-0","volume":"18","author":"M Di Silvestre","year":"2009","unstructured":"Di Silvestre M et al (2009) Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):64\u201370","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6308_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000259071.64027.04","volume":"32","author":"CJ Siepe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Siepe CJ et al (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(7):782\u2013790","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6308_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-0992-y","volume":"18","author":"R Sinigaglia","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sinigaglia R et al (2009) Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):52\u201363","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]],"date-time":"2021-01-28T00:04:14Z","timestamp":1611792254000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["6308"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06308-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 May 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 November 2019","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 January 2020","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 January 2020","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}