{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T18:46:17Z","timestamp":1789757177695,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641945600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641945600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>According to published meta-analyses, cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) seems to be superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in most clinical parameters. Despite short-term clinical success of CTDR, there are concerns regarding long-term durability of these prostheses.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This prospective study involved 382 patients who received standalone CTDR or a hybrid procedure (ACDF\/CTDR). A retrospective comparison between different CTDR devices was conducted regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), failure scenarios, and revision surgeries. The M6-C\u2122 Artificial Cervical Disc (Orthofix, Lewisville, Texas) cohort was compared to the other CTDR devices clinically. Etiological reasons for revision, and the surgical technique of the revision was investigated.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Fifty-three patients received M6-C CTDR. Eighteen patients (34%) were revised at an average of 67\u00a0months postoperatively for wear-induced osteolysis. There were three additional cases of pending revision. The PROMs of the two groups were similar, indicating that the failure mode (wear-induced osteolysis) is often asymptomatic. The demographics of the two groups were also similar, with more women undergoing revision surgery than men. There were three one-level CTDR, four two-level hybrids, seven three-level hybrids, and three four-level hybrids revised anteriorly. Sixteen patients underwent removal of the prosthesis and were treated according to the extent of osteolysis. There were four vertebrectomies, six revisions to ACDF, and six revisions to another CTDR. One patient underwent supplemental fixation using a posterior approach. The other CTDR cohort had an incidence of 3.3% at the equivalent time, and none of these were due to osteolysis or wear-related events.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>There is a concerning midterm failure rate related to ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene wear-induced osteolysis in the M6-C. Patients implanted with the M6-C prosthesis should be contacted, informed, and clinically and radiologically assessed.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T07:07:27Z","timestamp":1641971247000},"page":"1273-1282","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C\u2122 cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6162-3709","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew","family":"Scott-Young","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evelyne","family":"Rathbone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Grierson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"7094_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002324","volume":"43","author":"G Gutman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gutman G, Rosenzweig D, Golan J (2017) The surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:365\u2013372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002324","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769","volume":"15","author":"D Coric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348\u2013358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esas.2010.09.001","volume":"4","author":"RB Delamarter","year":"2010","unstructured":"Delamarter RB, Murrey D, Janssen ME et al (2010) Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter Investigational device exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients. SAS J 4:122\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esas.2010.09.001","journal-title":"SAS J"},{"key":"7094_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589","volume":"23","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME et al (2015) Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 23:558\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263","volume":"34","author":"JG Heller","year":"2009","unstructured":"Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:101\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14444\/1007","author":"MS Hisey","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R et al (2014) Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing mobi-C cervical artificial disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/1007","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"7094_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006","volume":"9","author":"D Murrey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervi. Spine J 9:275\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","volume":"38","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2013","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Lee JYB, Geisler FH et al (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:907\u2013918. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2227","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031","volume":"38","author":"A Vaccaro","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W et al (2013) Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2227\u20132239","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA","volume":"28","author":"J Goffin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, Van Loon J et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2673\u20132678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527","volume":"19","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS et al (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinica. J Neurosurg Spine 19:532\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR12","unstructured":"FDA Device Advice - Comprehensive regulatory assistance. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/medical-devices\/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance. Accessed 18 May 2021"},{"key":"7094_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000033.pub3","author":"A Lundh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B et al (2017) Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Feb. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.MR000033.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev Feb"},{"key":"7094_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31823da169","volume":"37","author":"PC McAfee","year":"2012","unstructured":"McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K et al (2012) A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:943\u2013952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31823da169","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76S","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568216688195","volume":"7","author":"PA Anderson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Nassr A, Currier BL et al (2017) Evaluation of adverse events in total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of FDA summary of safety and effectiveness data. Glob Spine J 7:76S-83S","journal-title":"Glob Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15824","volume":"25","author":"K Radcliff","year":"2016","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T (2016) Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption. J Neurosurg Spine 25:213\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15824","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.11.SPINE16746","volume":"27","author":"TH Lanman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG et al (2017) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 27:7\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2016.11.SPINE16746","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002907","volume":"44","author":"WF Lavelle","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE (2019) Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:601\u2013608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002907","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2017.09.010","volume":"21","author":"TP Holsgrove","year":"2018","unstructured":"Holsgrove TP, Amin DB, Pascual SR et al (2018) The equivalence of multi-axis spine systems: recommended stiffness limits using a standardized testing protocol. J Biomech 21:59\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2017.09.010","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"key":"7094_CR20","volume-title":"F2346\u201305 (Reapproved 2011) - Standard test methods for static and dynamic characterization of spinal artificial discs","author":"ASTM International","year":"2005","unstructured":"ASTM International (2005) F2346\u201305 (Reapproved 2011) - Standard test methods for static and dynamic characterization of spinal artificial discs. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA"},{"key":"7094_CR21","volume-title":"F2423\u201311 - Standard guide for functional, kinematic, and wear assessment of total disc prostheses","author":"ASTM International","year":"2011","unstructured":"ASTM International (2011) F2423\u201311 - Standard guide for functional, kinematic, and wear assessment of total disc prostheses. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA"},{"key":"7094_CR22","volume-title":"Implants for surgery. Wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses. Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test","author":"BS ISO 18192-1","year":"2011","unstructured":"BS ISO 18192-1 (2011) Implants for surgery. Wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses. Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test. British Standards Institution, London"},{"key":"7094_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2004.1.2.0202","volume":"1","author":"PA Anderson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Toth JM, Riew KD (2004) A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses. J Neurosurg Spine 1:202\u2013210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/spi.2004.1.2.0202","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1298606","volume":"3","author":"R Lehman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lehman R, Bevevino A, Brewer D et al (2012) A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability. Evid Based Spine Care J 3:31\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0031-1298606","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J"},{"key":"7094_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.08.264","volume":"11","author":"K Pettine","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pettine K (2011) Clinical significance of hypermobility in cervical artificial disc replacements. Spine J 11:S106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.08.264","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.04.013","volume":"6","author":"RC Huang","year":"2006","unstructured":"Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T et al (2006) Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 6:242\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.04.013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/lubricants3020346","author":"J Reeks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Reeks J, Liang H (2015) Materials and their failure mechanisms in total disc replacement. Lubricants. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/lubricants3020346","journal-title":"Lubricants"},{"key":"7094_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.01363","volume":"88","author":"VK Goel","year":"2006","unstructured":"Goel VK, Panjabi MM, Patwardhan AG et al (2006) Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 88:103\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.E.01363","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A"},{"key":"7094_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S618","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1575-7","volume":"21","author":"AG Patwardhan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Patwardhan AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Tsitsopoulos PP et al (2012) Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis. Eur Spine J 21:S618\u2013S629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-010-1575-7","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1911","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.08.007","volume":"20","author":"CAM Jacobs","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jacobs CAM, Siepe CJ, Ito K (2020) Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: design concepts. Spine J 20:1911\u20131924. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.08.007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.10.014","volume":"21","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2021","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Coric D, Sasso R et al (2021) Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investiga. Spine J 21:239\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.10.014","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1544","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.03.013","volume":"20","author":"PJ Rao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rao PJ, Maharaj M, Chau C et al (2020) Degenerate-disc infection study with contaminant control (DISC): a multicenter prospective case-control trial. Spine J 20:1544\u20131553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.03.013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ruggiero A, Zhang H (2020) Editorial biotribology and biotribocorrosion properties of implantable biomaterials. Front Mech Eng April. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmech.2020.00017","DOI":"10.3389\/fmech.2020.00017"},{"key":"7094_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2018.12.1.178","volume":"12","author":"CK Park","year":"2018","unstructured":"Park CK, Ryu KS (2018) Are controversial issues in cervical total disc replacement resolved or unresolved?: A review of literature and recent updates. Asian Spine J 12:178\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4184\/asj.2018.12.1.178","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579","volume":"83","author":"PD Nunley","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nunley PD, Coric D, Frank KA, Stone MB (2018) Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application. Clin Neurosurg 83:1087\u20131106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579","journal-title":"Clin Neurosurg"},{"key":"7094_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-009-1431-9","volume":"38","author":"C Kaddick","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kaddick C, Catelas I, Pennekamp PH, Wimmer MA (2009) Implant wear and aseptic loosening: an overview. Implant Wear Aseptic Loos Overv 38:690\u2013697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00132-009-1431-9","journal-title":"Implant Wear Aseptic Loos Overv"},{"key":"7094_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.3390\/ma12030495","volume":"12","author":"M Merola","year":"2019","unstructured":"Merola M, Affatato S (2019) Materials for hip prostheses: a review of wear and loading considerations. Materials (Basel) 12:495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma12030495","journal-title":"Materials (Basel)"},{"key":"7094_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e751","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00522","volume":"95","author":"RM Baxter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Baxter RM, MacDonald DW, Kurtz SM, Steinbeck MJ (2013) Severe impingement of lumbar disc replacements increases the functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 95:e751-759. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.K.00522","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A"},{"key":"7094_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3759","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3751-2","volume":"472","author":"SY Veruva","year":"2014","unstructured":"Veruva SY, Steinbeck MJ, Toth J et al (2014) Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3759\u20133769. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-014-3751-2","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"7094_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E973","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181fd863b","volume":"36","author":"LM Tumial\u00e1n","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tumial\u00e1n LM, Gluf WM (2011) Progressive vertebral body osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E973-978. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181fd863b","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06","volume":"5","author":"M-AM Xia","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xia M-AM, Winder MJ (2019) M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection. J Spine Surg 5:584\u2013588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"7094_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.CC.19.00644","volume":"10","author":"NJ Clark","year":"2020","unstructured":"Clark NJ, Francois EL, Freedman BA, Currier B (2020) Early implant failure of a 2-level M6-cervical total disc replacement: a case report. JBJS Case Connect 10:e1900644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.CC.19.00644","journal-title":"JBJS Case Connect"},{"key":"7094_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.9.SPINE19900","volume":"32","author":"L Harris","year":"2020","unstructured":"Harris L, Dyson E, Elliot M et al (2020) Delayed periprosthetic collection after cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 32:584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.9.SPINE19900","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"7094_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217720681","volume":"8","author":"JC Xu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xu JC, Goel C, Shriver MF et al (2018) Adverse events following cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Glob Spine J 8:178\u2013189","journal-title":"Glob Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR45","unstructured":"Blumenthal SL, Kiridly D, Guyer RD et al (2021) Late failure of cervical disc arthroplasty due to osteolysis. In: [paper presentation] ISASS 2021; 21st annual conference. Miami, Florida"},{"key":"7094_CR46","unstructured":"OrthoFix (2021) M6-C Cervical disc website. https:\/\/m6disc.com\/. Accessed 9 Jul 2021"},{"key":"7094_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.09.005","volume":"21","author":"S Virk","year":"2021","unstructured":"Virk S, Phillips F, Khan S, Qureshi S (2021) A cross-sectional analysis of 1347 complications for cervical disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and drug administration. Spine J 21:265\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.09.005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esas.2010.01.002","volume":"4","author":"A Reyes-Sanchez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Reyes-Sanchez A, Miramontes V, Olivarez LMR et al (2010) Initial clinical experience with a next-generation artificial disc for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative cervical radiculopathy. SAS J 4:9\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esas.2010.01.002","journal-title":"SAS J"},{"key":"7094_CR49","first-page":"215","volume":"84","author":"H Serhan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Serhan H, Ross R, Lowery G, Fraser R (2002) Biomechanical characterization of a new lumbar disc prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 84:215","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg [Br]"},{"key":"7094_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2088","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200210010-00003","volume":"27","author":"RJ Moore","year":"2002","unstructured":"Moore RJ, Fraser RD, Vernon-Roberts B et al (2002) The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2088\u20132094. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200210010-00003","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7094_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.020","author":"RD Fraser","year":"2004","unstructured":"Fraser RD, Ross ER, Lowery GL, Freeman BJ, Dolan M (2004) AcroFlex design and results. Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR52","unstructured":"Spinal Kinetics Inc (2009) Mechanical characterization of M6-C artificial cervical disc"},{"key":"7094_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.020","volume":"4","author":"RD Fraser","year":"2004","unstructured":"Fraser RD, Ross ER, Lowery GL et al (2004) AcroFlex design and results. Spine J 4:S245\u2013S251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR54","unstructured":"IMPLANTS for surgery \u2014 Wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses \u2014 Part 1: Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test (2011) International standard ISO 18192\u20131:2011"},{"key":"7094_CR55","unstructured":"Standard guide for functional, kinematic, and wear assessment of total disc prostheses (2020) Annual Book of ASTM Standards ASTM F2423 - 11"},{"key":"7094_CR56","unstructured":"Standard practice for characterization of particles (2016) Annual Book of ASTM Standards ASTM 1877\u20131"},{"key":"7094_CR57","unstructured":"Sientra, Inc. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) (2012) Santa Barbara, California, USA, Sientra"},{"key":"7094_CR58","unstructured":"Nechtow W, Hintner M, Bushelow M, Kaddick C (2006) Intervertebral disc replacement mechanical performance depends strongly on input parameters. 52nd Orthopaedic Research Society, Chicago, Abstract 0118"},{"key":"7094_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0840-5","volume":"18","author":"TM Grupp","year":"2009","unstructured":"Grupp TM, Yue JJ, Garcia R et al (2009) Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation. Eur Spine J 18:98\u2013108. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-008-0840-5","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"7094_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2007.09.005","volume":"41","author":"L Kang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kang L, Galvin AL, Brown TD et al (2008) Quantification of the effect of cross-shear on the wear of conventional and highly cross-linked UHMWPE. J Biomech 41:340\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2007.09.005","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"key":"7094_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/S0043-1648(00)00522-6","volume":"248","author":"A Wang","year":"2001","unstructured":"Wang A (2001) A unified theory of wear for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multi-directional sliding. Wear 248:38\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0043-1648(00)00522-6","journal-title":"Wear"},{"key":"7094_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wear.2011.01.039","volume":"271","author":"LA Korduba","year":"2011","unstructured":"Korduba LA, Wang A (2011) The effect of cross-shear on the wear of virgin and highly-crosslinked polyethylene. Wear 271:1220\u20131223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wear.2011.01.039","journal-title":"Wear"},{"key":"7094_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jsp2.1047","author":"JF DeLucca","year":"2019","unstructured":"DeLucca JF, Amin D, Peloquin JM et al (2019) Off-axis response due to mechanical coupling across all six degrees of freedom in the human disc. JOR SPINE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jsp2.1047","journal-title":"JOR SPINE"},{"key":"7094_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4","author":"AG Patwardhan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Patwardhan AG, Havey RM (2020) Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,18]],"date-time":"2022-05-18T13:04:28Z","timestamp":1652879068000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"references-count":64,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]}},"alternative-id":["7094"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07094-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 August 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Bond University\u2019s Human Research Ethics Committee (BUHREC) approval number: 0000015881.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}