{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:03:00Z","timestamp":1787065380875,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]],"date-time":"2022-05-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1652400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]],"date-time":"2022-05-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1652400000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006095","name":"Helse S\u00f8r-\u00d8st RHF","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006095","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005366","name":"University of Oslo","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005366","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Treatment success can be defined by asking a patient how they perceive their condition compared to prior to treatment, but it can also be defined by establishing success criteria in advance. We evaluated treatment outcome expectations in patients undergoing surgery or non-operative treatment for cervical radiculopathy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The first 100 consecutive patients from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (NCT03674619) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy were included. Patient-reported outcome measures and expected outcome and improvement were obtained before treatment. We compared these with previously published cut-off values for success. Arm pain, neck pain and headache were measured by a numeric rating scale. Neck disability index (NDI) was used to record pain-related disability. We applied Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the expected outcome scores for the two treatments.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patients reported mean NDI of 42.2 (95% CI 39.6\u201344.7) at baseline. The expected mean NDI one year after the treatment was 4 (95% CI 3.0\u20135.1). The expected mean reduction in NDI was 38.3 (95% CI 35.8\u201340.8). Calculated as a percentage change score, the patients expected a mean reduction of 91.2% (95% CI 89.2\u201393.2). Patient expectations were higher regarding surgical treatment for arm pain, neck pain and working ability,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001, but not for headache.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The expected improvement after treatment of cervical radiculopathy was much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success. Patients with cervical radiculopathy had higher expectations to surgical treatment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]],"date-time":"2022-05-13T11:12:56Z","timestamp":1652440376000},"page":"2761-2768","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7486-451X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mirad","family":"Taso","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon H\u00e5vard","family":"Sommernes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Siri","family":"Bjorland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John Anker","family":"Zwart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kaia Beck","family":"Engebretsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jarle","family":"Sundseth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Are Hugo","family":"Pripp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frode","family":"Kolstad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jens Ivar","family":"Brox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"7234_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61729-2","volume":"380","author":"T Vos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M et al (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990\u20132010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2163\u20132196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61729-2","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"7234_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001466.pub3","author":"I Nikolaidis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF (2010) Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD001466.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7234_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2553-z","volume":"22","author":"M van Middelkoop","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R, van Tulder MW, Peul W, Koes BW et al (2013) Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 22:87\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-012-2553-z","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-016-9349-4","volume":"9","author":"S Iyer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Iyer S, Kim HJ (2016) Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:272\u2013280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-016-9349-4","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"},{"key":"7234_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1080\/09593980601147843","volume":"23","author":"CJ Barron","year":"2007","unstructured":"Barron CJ, Moffett JA, Potter M (2007) Patient expectations of physiotherapy: definitions, concepts, and theories. Physiother Theory Pract 23:37\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09593980601147843","journal-title":"Physiother Theory Pract"},{"key":"7234_CR6","first-page":"174","volume":"165","author":"MV Mondloch","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW (2001) Does how you do depend on how you think you\u2019ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients\u2019 recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 165:174\u2013179","journal-title":"CMAJ Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"7234_CR7","first-page":"1273","volume":"29","author":"NN Mahomed","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH et al (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29:1273\u20131279","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"7234_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1080\/17453670902805007","volume":"80","author":"AK Nilsdotter","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM (2009) Knee arthroplasty: are patients\u2019 expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 80:55\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453670902805007","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"7234_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1590","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52","volume":"34","author":"AF Mannion","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1590\u20131599. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7234_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.013","volume":"10","author":"EJ Carragee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carragee EJ (2010) The rise and fall of the \u201cminimum clinically important difference.\u201d Spine J 10:283\u2013284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.019","volume":"10","author":"RJ Gatchel","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG (2010) Testing minimal clinically important difference: additional comments and scientific reality testing. Spine J 10:330\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.019","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","volume":"10","author":"R Jaeschke","year":"1989","unstructured":"Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407\u2013415. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"7234_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6773.2005.00374.x","volume":"40","author":"HJ Sch\u00fcnemann","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sch\u00fcnemann HJ, Guyatt GH (2005) Commentary\u2013goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res 40:593\u2013597. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-6773.2005.00374.x","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"7234_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m1714","volume":"369","author":"T Devji","year":"2020","unstructured":"Devji T, Carrasco-Labra A, Qasim A, Phillips M, Johnston BC, Devasenapathy N et al (2020) Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study. BMJ 369:m1714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.m1714","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7234_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007","volume":"10","author":"LYMDM Carreon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carreon LYMDM, Glassman SDMD, Campbell MJMD, Anderson PAMD (2010) Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 10:469\u2013474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2013.786634","volume":"84","author":"T Solberg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Solberg T, Johnsen LG, Nygaard OP, Grotle M (2013) Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? Estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures. Acta Orthop 84:196\u2013201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2013.786634","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"7234_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.01095","volume":"90","author":"SD Glassman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY (2008) Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1839\u20131847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.G.01095","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"7234_CR18","unstructured":"Wikipedia tfe (2021) Wikipedia. https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Success_(concept). Accessed 14 April 2021"},{"key":"7234_CR19","unstructured":"Press CU (2021) Cambridge Dictionary. https:\/\/dictionary.cambridge.org\/dictionary\/english\/success. Accessed 14 April 2021"},{"key":"7234_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.05.549","volume":"20","author":"C Mjaset","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mjaset C, Zwart JA, Goedmakers CMW, Smith TR, Solberg TK, Grotle M (2020) Criteria for success after surgery for cervical radiculopathy-estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures. Spine J 20:1413\u20131421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.05.549","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008","volume":"61","author":"E von Elm","year":"2008","unstructured":"von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, G\u00f8tzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"7234_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-020-3188-6","volume":"21","author":"M Taso","year":"2020","unstructured":"Taso M, Sommernes JH, Kolstad F, Sundseth J, Bjorland S, Pripp AH et al (2020) A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-020-3188-6","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"7234_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827fc3e9","volume":"38","author":"JB Johansen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Johansen JB, Andelic N, Bakke E, Holter EB, Mengshoel AM, Roe C (2013) Measurement properties of the norwegian version of the neck disability index in chronic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:851\u2013856. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827fc3e9","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7234_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-015-2534-1","volume":"157","author":"J Sundseth","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sundseth J, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Nygaard OP, Andresen H et al (2015) The neck disability index (NDI) and its correlation with quality of life and mental health measures among patients with single-level cervical disc disease scheduled for surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157:1807\u20131812. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-015-2534-1","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"7234_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.37.4.378","volume":"37","author":"WW Downie","year":"1978","unstructured":"Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ard.37.4.378","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"7234_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.12.001","volume":"67","author":"L Grovle","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grovle L, Haugen AJ, Hasvik E, Natvig B, Brox JI, Grotle M (2014) Patients\u2019 ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status. J Clin Epidemiol 67:508\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.12.001","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"7234_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(93)90127-B","volume":"52","author":"G Waddell","year":"1993","unstructured":"Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ (1993) A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and diasability. Pain 52:157\u2013168","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"7234_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1002\/pri.1545","volume":"18","author":"A Dedering","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dedering A, Borjesson T (2013) Assessing fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Physiother Res Int 18:193\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pri.1545","journal-title":"Physiother Res Int"},{"key":"7234_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2004.09.020","volume":"112","author":"M Grotle","year":"2004","unstructured":"Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Veierod MB, Brox JI (2004) Fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in relation to disability in acute and chronic low back pain. Pain 112:343\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pain.2004.09.020","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"7234_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1080\/08039480310000932","volume":"57","author":"BH Strand","year":"2003","unstructured":"Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M (2003) Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry 57:113\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08039480310000932","journal-title":"Nord J Psychiatry"},{"key":"7234_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2009.2930","volume":"39","author":"JC MacDermid","year":"2009","unstructured":"MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C et al (2009) Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39:400\u2013417. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2519\/jospt.2009.2930","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"7234_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4922-5","volume":"26","author":"J Sundseth","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Andresen H et al (2017) The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Eur Spine J 26:1225\u20131235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-016-4922-5","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"7234_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b3883","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b3883","volume":"339","author":"B Kuijper","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kuijper B, Tans JT, Beelen A, Nollet F, de Visser M (2009) Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial. BMJ 339:b3883. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.b3883","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7234_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.06.008","volume":"99","author":"A Dedering","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dedering A, Peolsson A, Cleland JA, Halvorsen M, Svensson MA, Kierkegaard M (2018) The effects of neck-specific training versus prescribed physical activity on pain and disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:2447\u20132456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.06.008","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"7234_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1715","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829ff095","volume":"38","author":"M Engquist","year":"2013","unstructured":"Engquist M, L\u00f6fgren H, \u00d6berg B, Holtz A, Peolsson A, S\u00f6derlund A et al (2013) Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective, randomized study comparing surgery plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1715\u20131722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829ff095","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7234_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2407-5","volume":"20","author":"E Hermansen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hermansen E, Myklebust TA, Austevoll IM, Rekeland F, Solberg T, Storheim K et al (2019) Clinical outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with insignificant lower extremity pain. A prospective cohort study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:36. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-019-2407-5","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"7234_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-018-2386-y","volume":"20","author":"IM Austevoll","year":"2019","unstructured":"Austevoll IM, Gjestad R, Grotle M, Solberg T, Brox JI, Hermansen E et al (2019) Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-018-2386-y","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"7234_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00159","volume":"6","author":"AG Copay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Copay AG, Chung AS, Eyberg B, Olmscheid N, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part I. JBJS Rev 6:e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00159","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"key":"7234_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00160","volume":"6","author":"AG Copay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, Zurcher KS, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part II. JBJS Rev 6:e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00160","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"key":"7234_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)60456-4","volume":"375","author":"L The","year":"2010","unstructured":"The L (2010) CONSORT 2010. The Lancet 375:1136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)60456-4","journal-title":"The Lancet"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]],"date-time":"2022-10-05T06:07:18Z","timestamp":1664950038000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["7234"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07234-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 October 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 March 2022","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 April 2022","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 May 2022","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The trial was approved by the Norwegian ethics committee, REK 2017\/2125.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all participants.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}