{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,4]],"date-time":"2026-10-04T02:40:39Z","timestamp":1791081639289,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]],"date-time":"2023-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1702252800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]],"date-time":"2023-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1702252800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012446","name":"Akershus University Hospital","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012446","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Anterior (ALIF) and transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion have shown similar clinical outcomes at short- and medium-term follow-ups. Possible advantages of ALIF in the long run could be better disc height and lumbar lordosis and reduced risk of adjacent segment disease. We aimed to study if ALIF could be associated with superior clinical outcomes than TLIF at long-term follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We analysed 535 patients treated with ALIF or TLIF of the L5-S1 spinal segment between 2007 and 2017 who completed long-term follow-up in a national spine registry database (NORspine). We defined treatment success after surgery as at least 30% improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at long-term follow-up. Patients treated with ALIF and TLIF and who responded at long term were balanced by propensity score matching. The proportions of successfully treated patients within each group were compared by numbers and percentages with corresponding relative risk.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The mean (95%CI) age of the total study population was 50 (49\u201351) years, and 264 (49%) were females. The mean (95%CI) preoperative ODI score was 40 (39\u201342), and 174 (33%) had previous spine surgery. Propensity score matching left 120 patients in each treatment group. At a median (95%CI) of 92 (88\u201397) months after surgery, we found no difference in proportions successfully treated patients with ALIF versus TLIF (68 (58%) versus 77 (65%), RR (95%CI)\u2009=\u20090.88 (0.72 to1.08); <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.237).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This propensity score-matched national spine register study of patients treated with ALIF versus TLIF of the lumbosacral junction found no differences in proportions of successfully treated patients at long-term follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Level of Evidence I<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]],"date-time":"2023-12-11T07:02:16Z","timestamp":1702278136000},"page":"1109-1119","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Long-term comparison of anterior (ALIF) versus transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched register-based study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0839-9031","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ole Kristian","family":"Alhaug","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Filip C.","family":"Dolatowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-8034-8697","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anette Moltu","family":"Thyrhaug","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sverre","family":"Mj\u00f8nes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joao Andr\u00e9 Barroso Pereira Roque","family":"Dos Reis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ivar","family":"Austevoll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"8060_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2007.087296","volume":"68","author":"S Muraki","year":"2009","unstructured":"Muraki S, Oka H, Akune T, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, Saika A, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Ishibashi H, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Yoshimura N (2009) Prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis and its association with low back pain in elderly subjects of population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Ann Rheum Dis 68(9):1401\u20131406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ard.2007.087296","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"issue":"10137","key":"8060_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2302","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)30725-6","volume":"391","author":"S Clark","year":"2018","unstructured":"Clark S, Horton R (2018) Low back pain: a major global challenge. The Lancet 391(10137):2302\u20132302","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","volume":"1","author":"RJ Mobbs","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1(1):2\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"8060_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.3109\/02688697.2015.1036838","volume":"29","author":"K Phan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ (2015) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion\u2013systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 29(5):705\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/02688697.2015.1036838","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"8060_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.12.019","volume":"15","author":"PJ Rao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rao PJ, Maharaj MM, Phan K, Abeygunasekara ML, Mobbs RJ (2015) Indirect foraminal decompression after anteriorlumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique. Spine J 15(5):817\u2013824","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8060_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI-07\/10\/379","volume":"7","author":"PC Hsieh","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O\u2019Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 7(4):379\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/SPI-07\/10\/379","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine SPI"},{"issue":"12","key":"8060_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2019.07.014","volume":"19","author":"SN Divi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Divi SN, Schroeder GD, Goyal DK, Radcliff KE, Galetta MS, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Kurd MF, Rihn JA, Kaye ID, Woods BR, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK (2019) Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease. Spine J 19(12):1960\u20131968","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"8060_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169bff5","volume":"22","author":"JS Kim","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, Jung B, Choi YG, Jeon SH, Lee HY (2009) Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Techn 22(2):114\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169bff5","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Techn"},{"key":"8060_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2017.06.013","volume":"44","author":"I Teng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R (2017) A meta-analysis comparing ALIF PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 44:11\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2017.06.013","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"8060_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"s159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.07.402","volume":"13","author":"P Thompsom","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thompsom P, Adogwa O, Knott KT, Toche U, Huang K, Cheng JS, Isaacs RE (2013) Outcomes after ALIF versus TLIF for treatment of symptomatic L5\u2013S1 Spondylolisthesis: a prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study. Spine J 13:s159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.07.402","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI-07\/07\/021","volume":"7","author":"J Min","year":"2007","unstructured":"Min J, Jang J, Lee S (2007) Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 2007 7(1):21\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/SPI-07\/07\/021","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine SPI 2007"},{"key":"8060_CR12","unstructured":"Norwegian registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) Annual report 2017 Tore K Solberg, Lena Ringstad olsen Universtitetssykehuset I Nord Norge (UNN) 2SKDE (2018) https:\/\/www.kvalitetsregistre.no\/sites\/default\/files\/30_arsrapport_2017_ryggkirurgi_1.pdf, Accessed 17 July 2022"},{"issue":"3","key":"8060_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-021-07093-8","volume":"31","author":"OK Alhaug","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alhaug OK, Kaur S, Dolatowski F, Sm\u00e5stuen MC, Solberg TK, L\u00f8nne G (2022) Accuracy and agreement of national spine register data for 474 patients compared to corresponding electronic patient records. Eur Spine J 31(3):801\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-021-07093-8","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"8060_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2940\u20132952","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017"},{"key":"8060_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1080\/16501970306094","volume":"35","author":"M Grotle","year":"2003","unstructured":"Grotle M, Brox JI, V\u00f8llestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaption of the Norwegian versions of the roland-morris disability questionnaire and the oswestry disability index. J Rehabil Med 35:241\u2013247","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"8060_CR16","unstructured":"McCaffery M (1989) Pain, clinical manual for nursing practice. Mosby"},{"issue":"3","key":"8060_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/0168-8510(90)90421-9","volume":"16","author":"EuroQol Group","year":"1990","unstructured":"EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol\u2013a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0168-8510(90)90421-9","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"7","key":"8060_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009","volume":"63","author":"SJ Kamper","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ (2010) Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63(7):760\u2013766. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"8060_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","volume":"33","author":"RW Ostelo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Kroff M et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90\u201394","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"18","key":"8060_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E648","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da","volume":"31","author":"TJ Aalto","year":"2006","unstructured":"Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kr\u00f6ger H, Andrade J, Jim\u00e9nez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(18):E648\u2013E663. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"8060_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786","volume":"46","author":"PC Austin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786","journal-title":"Multivar Behav Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"8060_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e81045","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0081045","volume":"8","author":"Y Wang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wang Y, Cai H, Li C, Jiang Z, Wang L, Song J, Xia J (2013) Optimal caliper width for propensity score matching of three treatment groups: a Monte Carlo study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e81045. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0081045","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2010.548024","volume":"82","author":"TK Solberg","year":"2011","unstructured":"Solberg TK, S\u00f8rlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard \u00d8P, Ingebrigtsen T (2011) Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 82(1):56\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2010.548024","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"8060_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-06267-3","volume":"24","author":"S Kaur","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kaur S, Alhaug OK, Dolatowski FC et al (2023) Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24:164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-023-06267-3","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"8","key":"8060_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010","volume":"147","author":"E von Elm","year":"2007","unstructured":"von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573\u2013577 (PMID: 17938396)","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"8060_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-12-69","volume":"12","author":"MK Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kim MK, Lee SH, Kim ES et al (2011) The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:69. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2474-12-69","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"6","key":"8060_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E5","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.8.FOCUS17498","volume":"43","author":"C Yilgor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Abul K, Boissi\u00e9re L, Haddad S, Obeid I, Kleinst\u00fcck F, S\u00e1nchez P\u00e9rez-Grueso FJ, Acaro\u011flu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (2017) Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus 43(6):E5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.8.FOCUS17498","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"8060_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2040744.372","volume":"18","author":"TJ Bari","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bari TJ, Heegaard M, Bech-Azeddine R, Dahl B, Gehrchen M (2021) Lordosis distribution index in short-segment lumbar spine fusion: Can ideal lordosis reduce revision surgery and iatrogenic deformity? Neurospine. 18(3):543\u2013553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14245\/ns.2040744.372","journal-title":"Neurospine."},{"issue":"4","key":"8060_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860000239","volume":"10","author":"MN Kumar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10(4):314\u2013319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s005860000239","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8060_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semss.2011.05.008","volume":"23","author":"WMS Charles Malveaux","year":"2011","unstructured":"Charles Malveaux WMS, Sharan AD (2011) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review of the current literature. Sem Spine Surg 23(4):266\u2013274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semss.2011.05.008","journal-title":"Sem Spine Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-020-01630-9","volume":"15","author":"G Zheng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zheng G, Wang C, Wang T, Hu W, Ji Q, Hu F, Li J, Chaudhary SK, Song K, Song D, Zhang Z, Hao Y, Wang Y, Li J, Zheng Q, Zhang X, Wang Y (2020) Relationship between postoperative lordosis distribution index and adjacent segment disease following L4\u2013S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-020-01630-9","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2020.0405","volume":"16","author":"M Lenz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lenz M, Mohamud K, Bredow J, Oikonomidis S, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2022) Comparison of different approaches in lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 16(1):141\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2020.0405","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"issue":"20","key":"8060_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2126","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b612db","volume":"34","author":"DG Crandall","year":"2009","unstructured":"Crandall DG, Revella J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2126\u20132133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b612db","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"8060_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0845-0","volume":"8","author":"AA Faundez","year":"2009","unstructured":"Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 8(2):203\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-008-0845-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"8060_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.9.SPINE09272","volume":"12","author":"JS Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim JS, Lee KY, Lee SH, Lee HY (2010) Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis? J Neurosurg Spine 12(2):171\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2009.9.SPINE09272","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"12","key":"8060_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E755","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3","volume":"38","author":"IG Dorward","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dorward IG, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, O\u2019Leary PT, Stoker GE, Pahys JM, Kang MM, Sides BA, Koester LA (2013) Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila 1976). 38(12):E755\u2013E762. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3","journal-title":"Spine (Phila 1976)."},{"issue":"5","key":"8060_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.14444\/5065","volume":"12","author":"PS Upadhyayula","year":"2018","unstructured":"Upadhyayula PS, Curtis EI, Yue JK, Sidhu N, Ciacci JD (2018) Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes. Int J Spine Surg. 12(5):533\u2013542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/5065","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"8060_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2022.100960","volume":"1","author":"I Rossvoll","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rossvoll I, Hammer S, Gulati S, Solberg T, Nygaard OP (2022) Outcome of surgery for isthmic spondylolisthesis from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). Brain Spine 1(2):100960","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"8060_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-017-2641-y","volume":"137","author":"C Ren","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ren C, Qin R, Sun P, Wang P (2017) Effectiveness and safety of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(4):441\u2013450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-017-2641-y","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"8060_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000062965.47779.EB","volume":"28","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Burkus JK, LeHuec JC (2003) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 28(10):1023\u20131026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000062965.47779.EB","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"8060_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.1999.91.1.0060","volume":"91","author":"V Rajaraman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary RF, Conklin L, Jacobs GB (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 91(1):60\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/spi.1999.91.1.0060","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"10","key":"8060_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E592","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001905","volume":"42","author":"K Phan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Phan K, Xu J, Scherman DB, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ (2017) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with and without an \u201caccess surgeon\u201d: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 42(10):E592\u2013E601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001905","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"8060_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000185277.14484.4e","volume":"19","author":"AT Villavicencio","year":"2006","unstructured":"Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):92\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.bsd.0000185277.14484.4e","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"8060_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06342-6","volume":"29","author":"B Meyer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Meyer B, Shiban E, Albers LE et al (2020) Completeness and accuracy of data in spine registries: an independent audit-based study. Eur Spine J 29:1453\u20131461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06342-6","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"8060_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2015.1043174","volume":"86","author":"MLV Hooff","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hooff MLV, Jacobs WC, Willems PC, Wouters MW, Kleuver MD, Peul WC, Ostelo RW, Fritzell P (2015) Evidence and practice in spine registries. Acta Orthop 86(5):534\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2015.1043174","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"8060_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06181-0","volume":"29","author":"P Endler","year":"2020","unstructured":"Endler P, Ekman P, Hellstr\u00f6m F et al (2020) Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register. Eur Spine J 29:213\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06181-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"8060_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4127-3","volume":"25","author":"K H\u00f8jmark","year":"2016","unstructured":"H\u00f8jmark K, St\u00f8ttrup C, Carreon L et al (2016) Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry. Eur Spine J 25:282\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4127-3","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,18]],"date-time":"2024-03-18T02:36:35Z","timestamp":1710729395000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]}},"alternative-id":["8060"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08060-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 August 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 October 2023","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 November 2023","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 December 2023","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}