{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T22:21:36Z","timestamp":1791411696140,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]],"date-time":"2024-02-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707177600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]],"date-time":"2024-02-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707177600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007219","name":"Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["No.22ZR1450500"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No.22ZR1450500"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007219","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Excellence Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission","award":["20234Z0020"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["20234Z0020"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The cortical iliac crest autograft (CICA)\/structural allograft (SA) has still been recognized as the gold standard for the ACDF technique for its high degree of histocompatibility and osteoinduction ability though the flourishing and evolving cage development. However, there was no further indication for using CICA\/SA in ACDF based on basic information of inpatients. Our operative experience implied that applying CICA\/SA has an advantage on faster fusion but not the long-term fusion rate. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the fusion rates between CICA and cage, between SA and cage, and between CICA\/CA and cage.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was conducted to identify these clinical trials that investigated the postoperative 3, 6, 12 and 24\u00a0months fusion rates of CICA\/structural SA versus cage. Assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and statistical analysis were then carried out by two independent authors with the resolve-by-consensus method. The primary outcome was fusion rate at 3, 6, 12 and 24\u00a0months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were also meta-analyzed such as hardware complications, operative duration and hospitalization time. Our meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (Identifier: CRD42022345247).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Result<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 3451 segments (2398 patients) derived from 34 studies were included after the screening of 3366 articles. The segmental fusion rates of CICA were higher than cages at 3 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.184, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200940.9%) and 6 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.147, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200938.8%) months postoperatively, but not 12 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.988, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u20090.0%) and 24 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.055, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200965.6%) months postoperatively. And there was no significant difference in segmental fusion rates between SA and cage at none of 3 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.047, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200962.2%), 6 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.179, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200941.9%) and 12 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.049, <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2009=\u200958.0%) months after operations. As for secondary outcomes, the CICA was inferior to cages in terms of hardware complications, operative time, blood loss, hospitalization time, interbody height, disk height and Odom rating. The hardware complication of using SA was significantly higher than the cage, but not the hospitalization time, disk height, NDI and Odom rating.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Applying CICA has an advantage on faster fusion than using a cage but not the long-term fusion rate in ACDF. Future high-quality RCTs regarding the hardware complications between CICA and cage in younger patients are warranted for the deduced indication.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]],"date-time":"2024-02-06T12:02:32Z","timestamp":1707220952000},"page":"1148-1163","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["The fusion rates at different times of cortical iliac crest autograft or allograft compared with cages after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Yongai","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tong","family":"Su","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tong","family":"Meng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dianwen","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huabin","family":"Yin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"8118_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/2022.2.SPINE211500","volume":"37","author":"CJ Chang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chang CJ, Liu YF, Hsiao YM et al (2022) Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 37:1\u201310","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8118_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e365","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002324","volume":"43","author":"G Gutman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gutman G, Rosenzweig DH, Golan JD (2018) Surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:e365\u2013e72","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195840030-00009","volume":"40","author":"GW Smith","year":"1958","unstructured":"Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:607\u2013624","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"8118_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1958.15.6.0602","volume":"15","author":"RB Cloward","year":"1958","unstructured":"Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15:602\u2013617","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR5","first-page":"191","volume":"45","author":"RM DeBowes","year":"1984","unstructured":"DeBowes RM, Grant BD, Bagby GW et al (1984) Cervical vertebral interbody fusion in the horse: a comparative study of bovine xenografts and autografts supported by stainless steel baskets. Am J Vet Res 45:191\u2013199","journal-title":"Am J Vet Res"},{"key":"8118_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199806010-00019","volume":"23","author":"SD Kuslich","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL et al (1998) The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1267\u20131278 (discussion 79)","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-015-3076-1","volume":"44","author":"M Rickert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rickert M, Rauschmann M, Fleege C et al (2015) Interbody fusion procedures development from a historical perspective. Orthopade 44:104\u201313","journal-title":"Orthopade"},{"key":"8118_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"8118_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"8118_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1297","volume":"9","author":"R Bender","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bender R, Friede T, Koch A et al (2018) Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies. Res Synth Methods 9:382\u2013392","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"key":"8118_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181657f49","volume":"33","author":"M Fern\u00e1ndez-Fairen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Fairen M, Sala P, Dufoo M Jr et al (2008) Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:465\u2013472","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2005.02.018","volume":"13","author":"KJ Song","year":"2006","unstructured":"Song KJ, Lee KB (2006) A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease. J Clin Neurosci 13:181\u2013187","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"8118_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31827b94d4","volume":"72","author":"CH Kim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kim CH, Chung CK, Hahn S (2013) Autologous iliac bone graft with anterior plating is advantageous over the stand-alone cage for segmental lordosis in single-level cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 72:257\u2013265 (discussion 66)","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"8118_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1645","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31825413fe","volume":"37","author":"P Vanek","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vanek P, Bradac O, DeLacy P et al (2012) Comparison of 3 fusion techniques in the treatment of the degenerative cervical spine disease. Is stand-alone autograft really the \u201cgold standard?\u201d: prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1645\u201351","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2014.55.1.12","volume":"55","author":"SJ Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kim SJ, Kim SD (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a double cylindrical cage versus an anterior cervical plating system with iliac crest autografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 55:12\u201317","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"8118_CR16","first-page":"1003","volume":"102","author":"P Tantammaroj","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tantammaroj P (2019) The results of anterior cervical fusion compared between autologous iliac bone graft and beta-tricalcium phosphate: clinical and radiological results. J Med Assoc Thai 102:1003\u20131008","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"8118_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1080\/02688690310001611206","volume":"17","author":"C Wigfield","year":"2003","unstructured":"Wigfield C, Robertson J, Gill S et al (2003) Clinical experience with porous tantalum cervical interbody implants in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Neurosurg 17:418\u2013425","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1161-z","volume":"19","author":"H L\u00f6fgren","year":"2010","unstructured":"L\u00f6fgren H, Engquist M, Hoffmann P et al (2010) Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 19:464\u2013473","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"8118_CR19","first-page":"46","volume":"5","author":"T Orief","year":"2010","unstructured":"Orief T, Ramadan I, Seddik Z et al (2010) Comparative evaluation of bone-filled Polymethylmethacrylate implant, autograft fusion, and Polyetheretherketone cervical cage fusion for the treatment of single -level cervical disc disease. Asian J Neurosurg 5:46\u201356","journal-title":"Asian J Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/foc.2002.12.1.3","volume":"12","author":"D Zevgaridis","year":"2002","unstructured":"Zevgaridis D, Thom\u00e9 C, Krauss JK (2002) Prospective controlled study of rectangular titanium cage fusion compared with iliac crest autograft fusion in anterior cervical discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 12:E2","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"8118_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000142626.90278.9e","volume":"430","author":"FC Kao","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kao FC, Niu CC, Chen LH et al (2005) Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:108\u2013116","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"8118_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2007.05.016","volume":"15","author":"YC Chou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chou YC, Chen DC, Hsieh WA et al (2008) Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts. J Clin Neurosci 15:1240\u20131245","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"8118_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2006.4.1.1","volume":"4","author":"C Thom\u00e9","year":"2006","unstructured":"Thom\u00e9 C, Leheta O, Krauss JK et al (2006) A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 4:1\u20139","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8118_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2006.4.4.292","volume":"4","author":"F Schils","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schils F, Rilliet B, Payer M (2006) Implantation of an empty carbon fiber cage or a tricortical iliac crest autograft after cervical discectomy for single-level disc herniation: a prospective comparative study. J Neurosurg Spine 4:292\u2013299","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8118_CR25","first-page":"165","volume":"8","author":"J Huh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Huh J, Oh JY, Chough CK et al (2011) Polyetheretherketone cage filled with beta-tricalcium phosphate versus autogenous tricortical iliac bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurospine 8:165\u2013171","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"8118_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.4184\/jkss.2011.18.4.186","volume":"18","author":"J-Y Chung","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chung J-Y, Yim J-H, Seo H-Y et al (2011) A comparative study of the anterior cervical fusion with harms cage versus iliac bone block: clinical and radiological outcomes. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 18:186\u2013194","journal-title":"J Korean Soc Spine Surg"},{"key":"8118_CR27","first-page":"Rc05","volume":"10","author":"P Singh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Singh P, Kumar A, Shekhawat V (2016) Comparative Analysis of Interbody Cages Versus Tricortical Graft with Anterior Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease. J Clin Diagn Res 10:Rc05\u2013Rc08","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"8118_CR28","first-page":"1940","volume":"21","author":"M Li","year":"2013","unstructured":"Li M, Yu Y, Ni B (2013) Outcome comparison between the use of nano-artificial bone cage and autografts to treat two\u2014level continuous cervical spondylosis. Orthop J China 21:1940\u20131946","journal-title":"Orthop J China"},{"key":"8118_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-010-0821-4","volume":"153","author":"J Zhou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zhou J, Xia Q, Dong J et al (2011) Comparison of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages and iliac crest autografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:115\u2013122","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"8118_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2015.0203.014","volume":"60","author":"SH Kim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kim SH, Lee JK, Jang JW et al (2017) Polyetheretherketone cage with demineralized bone matrix can replace iliac crest autografts for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in subaxial cervical spine injuries. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60:211\u2013219","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"8118_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2004.01.021","volume":"62","author":"DY Cho","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC (2004) Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol 62:378\u201385 (discussion 85\u201386)","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"key":"8118_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e8e4a3","volume":"36","author":"A Hermansen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hermansen A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L et al (2011) A comparison between the carbon fiber cage and the cloward procedure in cervical spine surgery: a ten- to thirteen-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:919\u201325","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2017.02.009","volume":"155","author":"JM Liu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liu JM, Xiong X, Peng AF et al (2017) A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 155:30\u201335","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR34","first-page":"877","volume":"41","author":"Q Fang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fang Q, Li Y, Wu W et al (2019) Clinical efficiency of a new allograft cervical cage in treatment of cervical spondylosis. J Third Milit Med Univ 41:877\u2013884","journal-title":"J Third Milit Med Univ"},{"key":"8118_CR35","first-page":"448","volume":"36","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lee CJ, Rhee DY, Heo W et al (2004) The advantages of rectangular titanium cage (RABEA) fusion after anterior cervical discectomy\u202f: comparative study of fusion allograft. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36:448\u2013453","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"8118_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-0951-1","volume":"15","author":"SI Ryu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ryu SI, Mitchell M, Kim DH (2006) A prospective randomized study comparing a cervical carbon fiber cage to the Smith-Robinson technique with allograft and plating: up to 24 months follow-up. Eur Spine J 15:157\u2013164","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"8118_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.7.SPINE19563","volume":"32","author":"M Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang M, Chou D, Chang CC et al (2019) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using structural allograft or polyetheretherketone: pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 32:1\u20138","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8118_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000017935","volume":"98","author":"S Yang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yang S, Yu Y, Liu X et al (2019) Clinical and radiological results comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone cage for one to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e17935","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"8118_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-019-01225-x","volume":"43","author":"HC Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim HC, Oh JK, Kim DS et al (2020) Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation. Neurosurg Rev 43:1423\u20131430","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"key":"8118_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0351-9","volume":"16","author":"R Vaidya","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vaidya R, Carp J, Sethi A et al (2007) Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J 16:1257\u20131265","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"8118_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.05.143","volume":"141","author":"S Park","year":"2020","unstructured":"Park S, Lee DH, Seo J et al (2020) Feasibility of CaO-SiO(2)-P(2)O(5)-B(2)O(3) bioactive glass ceramic cage in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg 141:e358\u2013e366","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2013.07.013","volume":"115","author":"F Chen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chen F, He W, Mahaney K et al (2013) Alternative grafts in anterior cervical fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:2049\u20132055","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"8118_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1017\/S0317167100011100","volume":"38","author":"JS Wilkinson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wilkinson JS, Mann SA, Stoneham GW et al (2011) Comparison of post-operative lordosis with the PEEK cage and the cervical plate. Can J Neurol Sci 38:72\u201377","journal-title":"Can J Neurol Sci"},{"key":"8118_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.SPINE10231","volume":"18","author":"DC Lu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lu DC, Tumial\u00e1n LM, Chou D (2013) Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 18:43\u201349","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8118_CR45","first-page":"231","volume":"119","author":"MD Brown","year":"1976","unstructured":"Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB (1976) A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:231\u2013236","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"8118_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199307000-00002","volume":"18","author":"WF Young","year":"1993","unstructured":"Young WF, Rosenwasser RH (1993) An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1123\u20131124","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002854","volume":"44","author":"S Pirkle","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pirkle S, Kaskovich S, Cook DJ et al (2019) Cages in ACDF are associated with a higher nonunion rate than allograft: a stratified comparative analysis of 6130 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:384\u20138","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8118_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218797096","volume":"9","author":"V Goz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Goz V, Buser Z, D\u2019Oro A et al (2019) Complications and risk factors using structural allograft versus synthetic cage: analysis 17 783 anterior cervical discectomy and fusions using a national registry. Global Spine J 9:388\u2013392","journal-title":"Global Spine J"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,18]],"date-time":"2024-03-18T02:39:09Z","timestamp":1710729549000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]}},"alternative-id":["8118"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-023-08118-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 April 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2023","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 December 2023","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 February 2024","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Ethic Committee approval was not requested for this study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}}]}}