{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T05:23:27Z","timestamp":1789709007903,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]],"date-time":"2024-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1716768000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]],"date-time":"2024-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1716768000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]],"date-time":"2024-05-27T16:01:46Z","timestamp":1716825706000},"page":"2594-2603","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["The fragility index and reverse fragility index of FDA investigational device exemption trials in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3818-539X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joshua D.","family":"Proal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew S.","family":"Moon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brian","family":"Kwon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"8317_CR1","unstructured":"Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) (2023) U.S. Food an Drug Administration. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/medical-devices\/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-preparing-correct-submission\/investigational-device-exemption-ide. Published 2022. Accessed February 19"},{"issue":"7","key":"8317_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568220941684","volume":"10","author":"JR Dettori","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dettori JR, Norvell DC (2020) How fragile are the results of a trial? The Fragility Index. Global Spine J 10(7):940\u2013942","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(90)90186-S","volume":"43","author":"AR Feinstein","year":"1990","unstructured":"Feinstein AR (1990) The unit fragility index: an additional appraisal of statistical significance for a contrast of two proportions. J Clin Epidemiol 43(2):201\u2013209","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019","volume":"67","author":"M Walsh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF et al (2014) The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol 67(6):622\u2013628","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"8317_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2094","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.27183","volume":"128","author":"CW Noel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Noel CW, McMullen C, Yao C et al (2018) The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 128(9):2094\u20132100","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.030","volume":"55","author":"T Robinson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Robinson T, Al-Shahwani N, Easterbrook B, VanHouwelingen L (2020) The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 55(5):800\u2013804","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"8317_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ctrv.2021.102167","volume":"94","author":"A Desnoyers","year":"2021","unstructured":"Desnoyers A, Wilson BE, Nadler MB, Amir E (2021) Fragility index of trials supporting approval of anti-cancer drugs in common solid tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 94:102167","journal-title":"Cancer Treat Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"8317_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e005755","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005755","volume":"12","author":"MS Khan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khan MS, Ochani RK, Shaikh A et al (2019) Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 12(12):e005755","journal-title":"Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes"},{"issue":"7","key":"8317_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1038\/s41366-023-01298-1","volume":"47","author":"Y Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee Y, Samarasinghe Y, Chen LH et al (2023) Fragility of statistically significant outcomes in randomized trials comparing bariatric surgeries. Int J Obes (Lond) 47(7):546\u2013553","journal-title":"Int J Obes (Lond)"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.11.016","volume":"44","author":"E Pascoal","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pascoal E, Liu M, Lin L, Luketic L (2022) The fragility of statistically significant results in gynaecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 44(5):508\u2013514","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.12.015","volume":"36","author":"S Ekhtiari","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ekhtiari S, Gazendam AM, Nucci NW, Kruse CC, Bhandari M (2021) The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 36(6):2211\u20132218e2211","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"10","key":"8317_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.06.004","volume":"15","author":"N Evaniew","year":"2015","unstructured":"Evaniew N, Files C, Smith C et al (2015) The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey. Spine J 15(10):2188\u20132197","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232596712210933","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671221093391","volume":"10","author":"NP Fackler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fackler NP, Ehlers CB, Callan KT et al (2022) Statistical fragility of single-row Versus double-row anchoring for Rotator Cuff Repair: a systematic review of comparative studies. Orthop J Sports Med 10(5):23259671221093391","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"8317_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1177\/10711007221108078","volume":"43","author":"NP Fackler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fackler NP, Karasavvidis T, Ehlers CB et al (2022) The statistical fragility of operative vs Nonoperative Management for Achilles Tendon rupture: a systematic review of comparative studies. Foot Ankle Int 43(10):1331\u20131339","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"8317_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Forrester LA, McCormick KL, Bonsignore-Opp L et al (2021) Statistical fragility of Surgical clinical trials in Orthopaedic Trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 5(11)","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00197"},{"key":"8317_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2021.08.018","volume":"11","author":"CL Herndon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Herndon CL, McCormick KL, Gazgalis A, Bixby EC, Levitsky MM, Neuwirth AL (2021) Fragility index as a measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroplast Today 11:239\u2013251","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"9","key":"8317_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2164","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546516674469","volume":"45","author":"M Khan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khan M, Evaniew N, Gichuru M et al (2017) The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in sports surgery: a systematic survey. Am J Sports Med 45(9):2164\u20132170","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"8317_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e418","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000001201","volume":"38","author":"S Khormaee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Khormaee S, Choe J, Ruzbarsky JJ et al (2018) The fragility of statistically significant results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized controlled trials as quantified by the Fragility Index: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop 38(8):e418\u2013e423","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-021-01684-2","volume":"48","author":"PW Kyriakides","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kyriakides PW, Schultz BJ, Egol K, Leucht P (2022) The fragility and reverse fragility indices of proximal humerus fracture randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48(6):4545\u20134552","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1983","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.01.049","volume":"37","author":"DR Maldonado","year":"2021","unstructured":"Maldonado DR, Go CC, Huang BH, Domb BG (2021) The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey. Arthroscopy 37(6):1983\u20131989","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"issue":"8","key":"8317_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1787","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.10.028","volume":"30","author":"KL McCormick","year":"2021","unstructured":"McCormick KL, Tedesco LJ, Swindell HW, Forrester LA, Jobin CM, Levine WN (2021) Statistical fragility of randomized clinical trials in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 30(8):1787\u20131793","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"8317_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3352","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2022.07.017","volume":"53","author":"M Megafu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Megafu M, Megafu E (2022) The fragility of statistical findings in distal Radius fractures: a systematic review of Randomized controlled trials. Injury 53(10):3352\u20133356","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"8317_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Megafu M, Mian H, Megafu E et al (2022) The fragility of statistical significance in distal femur fractures: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foot.2023.102047"},{"issue":"1","key":"8317_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2022.08.014","volume":"62","author":"AJ Milto","year":"2023","unstructured":"Milto AJ, Negri CE, Baker J, Thuppal S (2023) The statistical fragility of foot and ankle surgery randomized controlled trials. J Foot Ankle Surg 62(1):191\u2013196","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"8317_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003645","volume":"46","author":"S Muthu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Muthu S, Ramakrishnan E (2021) Fragility analysis of statistically significant outcomes of Randomized Control trials in spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46(3):198\u2013208","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"8","key":"8317_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhsa.2018.10.005","volume":"44","author":"JJ Ruzbarsky","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ruzbarsky JJ, Khormaee S, Daluiski A (2019) The fragility index in hand surgery randomized controlled trials. J Hand Surg Am 44(8):698 e691-698 e697","journal-title":"J Hand Surg Am"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.22.00311","volume":"105","author":"JL Shi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shi JL, Mojica ES, Moverman MA et al (2023) The reverse fragility index: interpreting the current literature on long-term survivorship of computer-navigated Versus Conventional TKA: a systematic review and cross-sectional study of Randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(2):157\u2013163","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"8","key":"8317_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2012469","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2020.12469","volume":"3","author":"MS Khan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khan MS, Fonarow GC, Friede T et al (2020) Application of the reverse fragility index to statistically nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial results. JAMA Netw Open 3(8):e2012469","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR29","first-page":"346","volume":"38","author":"RE Carter","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carter RE, McKie PM, Storlie CB (2017) The Fragility Index: a P-value in sheep\u2019s clothing? Eur Heart J 38(5):346\u2013348","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1177\/1740774515597702","volume":"12","author":"M Walsh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Sackett DL (2015) Clinician trialist rounds: 28. When RCT participants are lost to follow-up. Part 1: why even a few can matter. Clin Trials 12(5):537\u2013539","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"8317_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01626-4","volume":"10","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10(1):89","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"8317_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.3171\/2022.7.SPINE22536","volume":"38","author":"D Coric","year":"2023","unstructured":"Coric D, Nassr A, Kim PK et al (2023) Prospective, randomized controlled multicenter study of posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 38(1):115\u2013125","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"8317_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.14444\/8084","volume":"15","author":"RD Guyer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guyer RD, Coric D, Nunley PD et al (2021) Single-level cervical disc replacement using a PEEK-on-ceramic Implant: results of a Multicenter FDA IDE Trial with 24-Month follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 15(4):633\u2013644","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.10.014","volume":"21","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2021","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Coric D, Sasso R et al (2021) Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study. Spine J 21(2):239\u2013252","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"24","key":"8317_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003171","volume":"44","author":"JJ Yue","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yue JJ, Garcia R, Blumenthal S et al (2019) Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial for lumbar Artificial discs in single-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(24):1685\u20131696","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8317_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK et al (2019) Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine :1\u201311","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157"},{"issue":"3","key":"8317_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.2.SPINE181037","volume":"31","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Dryer RF, Peloza JH, Schranck FW, Copay AG (2019) Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 31(3):347\u2013356","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"8317_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.2.SPINE1956","volume":"31","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Schranck FW, Copay AG (2019) Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level. J Neurosurg Spine 31(3):317\u2013325","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyy118","volume":"84","author":"GM Ghobrial","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ghobrial GM, Lavelle WF, Florman JE, Riew KD, Levi AD (2019) Symptomatic adjacent level Disease requiring surgery: analysis of 10-Year results from a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Fusion. Neurosurgery 84(2):347\u2013354","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"8317_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx432","volume":"83","author":"PM Arnold","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arnold PM, Sasso RC, Janssen ME et al (2018) i-Factor\u2122 bone graft vs autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2-Year follow-up of the Randomized single-blinded food and drug administration investigational device exemption study. Neurosurgery 83(3):377\u2013384","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.10.SPINE16264","volume":"26","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK et al (2017) Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine 26(6):653\u2013667","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000001237","volume":"79","author":"HW Bae","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bae HW, Davis RJ, Lauryssen C, Leary S, Maislin G, Musacchio MJ (2016) Jr. Three-year follow-up of the prospective, randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in patients with lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 79(2):169\u2013181","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15824","volume":"25","author":"K Radcliff","year":"2016","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T (2016) Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 25(2):213\u2013224","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"13","key":"8317_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001466","volume":"41","author":"PM Arnold","year":"2016","unstructured":"Arnold PM, Sasso RC, Janssen ME et al (2016) Efficacy of i-Factor bone graft versus autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: results of the prospective, randomized, single-blinded food and drug administration investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(13):1075\u20131083","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8317_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.14444\/3024","volume":"10","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE (2016) Jr. Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: seven-year outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 10:24","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"21","key":"8317_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","volume":"97","author":"ME Janssen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational device exemption study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(21):1738\u20131747","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589","volume":"23","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Argires PJ, Nian H, Harrell FE (2015) Jr. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 23(5):558\u2013573","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"8317_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.14444\/2015","volume":"9","author":"HW Bae","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bae HW, Lauryssen C, Maislin G, Leary S, Musacchio MJ Jr (2015) Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment. Int J Spine Surg 9:15","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"8317_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE13953","volume":"22","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD et al (2015) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22(1):15\u201325","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"8317_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","volume":"21","author":"JK Burkus","year":"2014","unstructured":"Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr., Mummaneni PV (2014) Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(4):516\u2013528","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527","volume":"19","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS et al (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(5):532\u2013545","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"18","key":"8317_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1529","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829a6d0a","volume":"38","author":"RJ Davis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Errico TJ, Bae H, Auerbach JD (2013) Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(18):1529\u20131539","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"15","key":"8317_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E907","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","volume":"38","author":"FM Phillips","year":"2013","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH et al (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):E907\u2013918","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"8317_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.9.SPINE11498","volume":"17","author":"JE Zigler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Delamarter RB (2012) Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine 17(6):493\u2013501","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"8317_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769","volume":"15","author":"D Coric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348\u2013358","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"18","key":"8317_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00476","volume":"93","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(18):1684\u20131692","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"25","key":"8317_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1600","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318217668f","volume":"36","author":"MF Gornet","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Dryer RF, Peloza JH (2011) Lumbar disc arthroplasty with maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(25):E1600\u20131611","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"8","key":"8317_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.00680","volume":"93","author":"R Delamarter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM (2011) Prospective, randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(8):705\u2013715","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"5","key":"8317_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.08.007","volume":"9","author":"RD Guyer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ et al (2009) Prospective, randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9(5):374\u2013386","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"8317_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006","volume":"9","author":"D Murrey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275\u2013286","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"8317_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31816043af","volume":"33","author":"RC Sasso","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M (2008) Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(2):123\u2013131","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"14","key":"8317_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e","volume":"30","author":"S Blumenthal","year":"2005","unstructured":"Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(14):1565\u20131575 discussion E1387-1591","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"13","key":"8317_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1383","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200207010-00002","volume":"27","author":"RJ Linovitz","year":"2002","unstructured":"Linovitz RJ, Pathria M, Bernhardt M et al (2002) Combined magnetic fields accelerate and increase spine fusion: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(13):1383\u20131389 discussion 1389","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"8317_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010","volume":"139","author":"BR Baer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baer BR, Gaudino M, Fremes SE, Charlson M, Wells MT (2021) The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 139:199\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"8317_CR65","unstructured":"Baer BR, Gaudino M, Fremes SE, Charlson ME, Wells MT (2020) Fragilitytools. R package version 1.0.0; https:\/\/github.com\/brb225\/ FragilityTools. Accessed: April 13, 2024"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,24]],"date-time":"2024-07-24T22:06:09Z","timestamp":1721858769000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]}},"alternative-id":["8317"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08317-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 January 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 April 2024","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 May 2024","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 May 2024","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}