{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T09:06:16Z","timestamp":1774515976106,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]],"date-time":"2025-08-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1755475200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]],"date-time":"2025-08-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1755475200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005609","name":"University of Turku","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005609","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can be treated surgically by decompressing the affected nervous structures, either by removing or preserving the midline structures. There is no conclusive evidence demonstrating the superiority of either surgical technique in the treatment of LSS. Our purpose was to compare the posterior midline-preserving techniques with midline-removing techniques separately for central stenosis and lateral recess stenosis to evaluate whether either technique leads to superior postoperative results in terms of functional outcome or pain reduction, by using data from the Finnish Spine Registry (FinSpine).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 7577 patients underwent decompression surgery for central (n=5670) or lateral recess (n=1907) stenosis in the lumbar spine between 2015 and 2022. In the central stenosis group 3025 patients were operated using midline-preserving techniques and 2645 using midline-removing techniques. In the lateral recess stenosis group, the corresponding numbers were 1536 and 371, respectively. Patients with less than 3mm degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. We recorded the baseline information, and the primary outcomes were the between-group differences in improvement in functional outcome and back and leg pain at one, two and five years postoperatively. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were used to assess clinical outcomes. We compared midline-preserving and midline-removing techniques separately in central and lateral recess stenosis groups.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Regardless of the surgical technique, patients improved in terms of functional outcome and pain during the 5-year follow-up. In the central stenosis group, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in primary outcomes. However, in the midline-preserving group, there were more new operations during the follow-up period as a secondary outcome. In the lateral recess stenosis group, there was a statistically significant improvement in the midline-preserving group in the change of ODI; 7.9 (95% C.I. [1.7, 14.1], p=0.01), and in the change in VAS leg; 12.8 (95% C.I. [0.5, 25.0], p=0.04) at the 5-year follow-up, compared to the midline-removing group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Based on a nationwide registry, the majority of patients improved in the primary outcomes and were satisfied with the operative treatment. Our study suggests that concerning central stenosis both techniques lead to good results, but midline-preserving techniques may lead to new operations more often than after midline-removing decompression in 5 years. Alternatively, in case of lateral recess stenosis, a question is raised whether surgery by midline-preserving decompression might benefit patients in terms of disability and leg pain.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]],"date-time":"2025-08-18T15:05:14Z","timestamp":1755529514000},"page":"5681-5689","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Midline-preserving vs. midline-removing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: national registry study based on the Finnish spine registry (FinSpine)"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-2134-6660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Noora","family":"Paturi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6203-1900","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ida","family":"Rantalaiho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8325-0379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katri","family":"Pernaa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9883-1256","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joel","family":"Kostensalo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6374-9444","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Henri","family":"Salo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6272-4010","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Inari","family":"Laaksonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"9271_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2536","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5075-x","volume":"26","author":"P Wessberg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wessberg P, Frennered K (2017) Central lumbar spinal stenosis: natural history of non-surgical patients. Eur Spine J 26(10):2536\u20132542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5075-x","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","volume":"32","author":"A Malmivaara","year":"2007","unstructured":"Malmivaara A et al (2007) Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32(1):1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"9271_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200003010-00005","volume":"25","author":"SJ Atlas","year":"2000","unstructured":"Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 25(5):556","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"9271_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0","volume":"30","author":"SJ Atlas","year":"2005","unstructured":"Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 30(8):936. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9271_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010036.pub2","author":"GM Overdevest","year":"2015","unstructured":"Overdevest GM, Jacobs W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Thom\u00e9 C, Gunzburg R, Peul W (2015) Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD010036.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"11","key":"9271_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012421","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012421","volume":"2016","author":"GC Machado","year":"2016","unstructured":"Machado GC et al (2016) Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11):CD012421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012421","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"9271_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang C, Chen L, Li J, Huang D, Zhang W, Lin J (Oct. 2022) Should posterior midline structures be preserved in decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg 35(8):341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001268","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001268"},{"issue":"7","key":"9271_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004313","volume":"47","author":"E Elmqvist","year":"2022","unstructured":"Elmqvist E, Lindhagen L, F\u00f6rsth P (2022) No benefit with preservation of midline structures in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: results from the national Swedish spine registry 2-year post-op. Spine 47(7):531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004313","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9271_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h1603","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h1603","volume":"350","author":"US Nerland","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nerland US et al (2015) Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. BMJ 350:h1603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.h1603","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"11","key":"9271_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07874-3","volume":"32","author":"J Marjamaa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Marjamaa J et al (2023) The Finnish spine register (FinSpine): development, design, validation and utility. Eur Spine J 32(11):3731\u20133743. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-023-07874-3","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9271_CR11","unstructured":"Selk\u00e4rekisteri (kansallinen laaturekisteri). Accessed: Mar. 27 (2025) [Online]. Available: https:\/\/aineistokatalogi.fi\/catalog\/studies\/4fcb31f5-2ac7-4ebc-bf40-39388a5a8337"},{"issue":"5","key":"9271_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C","volume":"41","author":"GR Norman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/81.3.515","volume":"81","author":"PM Grambsch","year":"1994","unstructured":"Grambsch PM, Therneau TM (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81(3):515\u2013526. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/biomet\/81.3.515","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2011.588863","volume":"82","author":"J Ranstam","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ranstam J et al (2011) Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. Acta Orthop 82(3):258\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2011.588863","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"9271_CR15","unstructured":"A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"issue":"no. 9596","key":"9271_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","volume":"370","author":"E von Elm","year":"2007","unstructured":"von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, G\u00f8tzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453\u20131457. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"9271_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chung AS, Copay AG, Olmscheid N, Campbell D, Walker JB, Chutkan N (Jul. 2017) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the spine literature. Spine 42(14):1096. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001990","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001990"},{"key":"9271_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG (Jan. 2009) A Biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34(1):17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318191438b","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318191438b"},{"issue":"19","key":"9271_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1789","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c9b8d6","volume":"35","author":"MJ Lee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee MJ et al (2010) The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine 35(19):1789. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c9b8d6","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"10","key":"9271_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.03.020","volume":"13","author":"KE Radcliff","year":"2013","unstructured":"Radcliff KE et al (2013) Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J 13(10):1339\u20131349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.03.020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2010.548024","volume":"82","author":"TK Solberg","year":"2011","unstructured":"Solberg TK, S\u00f8rlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard \u00d8P, Ingebrigtsen T (2011) Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 82(1):56\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2010.548024","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"9271_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.2340\/17453674.2025.42849","volume":"96","author":"J Hatakka","year":"2025","unstructured":"Hatakka J, Laaksonen I, Kostensalo J, T M\u00e4kel\u00e4 K, Salo H, Pernaa K (2025) 1-year results of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in Finland: a national FinSpine register study. Acta Orthop 96:154\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/17453674.2025.42849","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,18]],"date-time":"2025-12-18T10:04:45Z","timestamp":1766052285000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9271"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09271-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 July 2025","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 August 2025","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 August 2025","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no known potential conflicts of interest influencing the work with this paper. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Other financial disclosures outside the submitted work: I. Laaksonen: yearly institutional research support funding from Southwestern Finland, institutional travel fund from Arthrex and Styker.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}