{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T12:29:29Z","timestamp":1781612969252,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778630400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778630400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Spine J"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To perform a narrative review of the biomechanics of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies (L-PSO) and associated surgical constructs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A non-systematic literature search was performed. PubMed was queried for investigations published between 2010 and 2025 with the following search terms: \u201clumbar\u201d, \u201cPSO\u201d, \u201cbiomechanics, \u201cfinite element analysis\u201d, \u201ccadaver\u201d. Studies evaluating biomechanical properties of L-PSO (L1-L5) constructs were included. Clinical studies and non-lumbar level (cervical\/thoracic) PSOs were excluded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>L-PSOs create a highly destabilized environment, particularly in axial rotation. Two-rod constructs significantly reduce range of motion (ROM) relative to the uninstrumented spine but are associated with high rod stresses. Multi-rod constructs (satellite and accessory rods) consistently reduce ROM and primary rod stresses, although the magnitude of benefit varies across studies and configurations. Rod material (cobalt chrome) and increased rod diameter further enhance construct rigidity but may increase stress shielding. Cross-links may increase rod stress when placed near a L-PSO site, while monoaxial screws increase construct stiffness compared to polyaxial screws. Interbody cages placed adjacent to L-PSOs improve load sharing and reduce posterior rod strains, particularly when used in a \u201csandwich\u201d configuration. Biomechanical improvements, such as reduced rod strain and ROM, have not been directly linked to clinical outcomes, including fusion rates or rod fractures.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While biomechanical studies demonstrate multi-rod constructs and adjunct techniques improve construct stability, the relationship between these biomechanical advantages and clinical outcomes, including osseous healing and rod fractures, remains unclear. In L-PSOs, increasing construct rigidity alone is not the primary goal; instead, optimal load sharing across the osteotomy site is a critical biomechanical consideration. As such, future work should focus on elucidating the optimal balance between protecting posterior instrumentation through construct rigidity and preserving adequate compressive forces across L-PSOs, integrating biomechanical findings with clinical data, and developing patient-specific biomechanical modeling to further refine L-PSO instrumentation techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T03:14:25Z","timestamp":1778642065000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Biomechanics of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies and associated reconstructive instrumentation strategies: a comprehensive narrative review"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Ramin","family":"Shekouhi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ernesto","family":"Quinto Jr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Niloufar","family":"Shekouhi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ehsan","family":"Tabaraee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alekos A.","family":"Theologis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"9999_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198504000-00019","author":"E Thomasen","year":"1985","unstructured":"Thomasen E (1985) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-198504000-00019","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"9999_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.ST.19.00028","author":"MC Gupta","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gupta MC, Gupta S, Kelly MP, Bridwell KH (2020) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.ST.19.00028","journal-title":"JBJS Essent Surg Tech"},{"key":"9999_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2030","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000179085.92998.ee","volume":"30","author":"K-J Cho","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cho K-J, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2005) Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 30:2030\u20132037 discussion 2038","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S171","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38","volume":"31","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine 31:S171\u2013S178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200303000-00009","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG et al (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200303000-00009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"9999_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2036","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200109150-00020","volume":"26","author":"SH Berven","year":"2001","unstructured":"Berven SH, Deviren V, Smith JA et al (2001) Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: results of the transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy. Spine 26:2036\u20132043. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200109150-00020","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2189","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b8371","volume":"32","author":"YJ Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine 32:2189\u20132197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b8371","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1169","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001107","volume":"40","author":"MC Gupta","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gupta MC, Ferrero E, Mundis G et al (2015) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity patient: is there a difference in correction and complications? Spine 40:E1169-75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001107","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.9.SPINE10129","volume":"14","author":"V Lafage","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S et al (2011) Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction? J Neurosurg Spine 14:184\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2010.9.SPINE10129","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"9999_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S66","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3669-0","volume":"24","author":"R Cecchinato","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Aguirre M-F, Lamartina C (2015) Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine in combined coronal and sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 1):S66-71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-014-3669-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2093","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000090891.60232.70","volume":"28","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C et al (2003) Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 28:2093\u20132101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000090891.60232.70","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b2d52","volume":"32","author":"JM Buchowski","year":"2007","unstructured":"Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 32:2245\u20132252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b2d52","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1817","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000526","volume":"39","author":"Y-C Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kim Y-C, Lenke LG, Hyun S-J et al (2014) Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. Spine 39:1817\u20131828. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000526","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000380","volume":"39","author":"DD Dickson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA (2014) Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. Spine 39:1190\u20131195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000380","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E388","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001282","volume":"41","author":"DW Hallager","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hallager DW, Gehrchen M, Dahl B et al (2016) Use of supplemental short pre-contoured accessory rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy posterior rods reduces primary rod strain and range of motion across the pedicle subtraction osteotomy level: an in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 41:E388-95. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001282","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331460","volume":"2","author":"V Deviren","year":"2012","unstructured":"Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK et al (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Global Spine J 2:213\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0032-1331460","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5084-9","volume":"26","author":"A Luca","year":"2017","unstructured":"Luca A, Ottardi C, Lovi A et al (2017) Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 26:450\u2013456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5084-9","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9999_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31827ba066","volume":"72","author":"JA Tang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tang JA, Leasure JM, Smith JS et al (2013) Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery 72(2):276\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31827ba066","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"9999_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3050","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-022-07331-7","volume":"31","author":"N Shekouhi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shekouhi N, Vosoughi AS, Zavatsky JM et al (2022) Biomechanical comparison of multi-rod constructs by satellite rod configurations (in-line vs. lateral) and screw types (monoaxial vs. polyaxial) spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): is there an optimal configuration? Eur Spine J 31:3050\u20133059. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-022-07331-7","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-022-00627-0","volume":"11","author":"N Shekouhi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shekouhi N, Vosoughi AS, Goel VK, Theologis AA (2023) Does number of rods matter? 4-, 5-, and 6-rods across a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis. Spine Deform 11:535\u2013543. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-022-00627-0","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"key":"9999_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.07.005","volume":"24","author":"N Shekouhi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shekouhi N, Tripathi S, Theologis A et al (2024) Evaluating the biomechanical effects of pedicle subtraction osteotomy at different lumbar levels: a finite element investigation. Spine J 24:2191\u20132203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.07.005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2016.02.002","volume":"38","author":"C Ottardi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ottardi C, Galbusera F, Luca A et al (2016) Finite element analysis of the lumbar destabilization following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Med Eng Phys 38:506\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.medengphy.2016.02.002","journal-title":"Med Eng Phys"},{"key":"9999_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2340","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3295-x","volume":"23","author":"S Charosky","year":"2014","unstructured":"Charosky S, Moreno P, Maxy P (2014) Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 23:2340\u20132349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-014-3295-x","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2773","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5222-4","volume":"26","author":"BT Dahl","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dahl BT, Harris JA, Gudipally M et al (2017) Kinematic efficacy of supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral levels in thoracolumbosacral deformity correction with and without pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3: an in vitro cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 26:2773\u20132781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5222-4","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4859-8","volume":"26","author":"A Luca","year":"2017","unstructured":"Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M et al (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26:764\u2013770. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-016-4859-8","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2357","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-018-5623-z","volume":"27","author":"L La Barbera","year":"2018","unstructured":"La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Liebsch C et al (2018) Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J 27:2357\u20132366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-018-5623-z","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.11.003","volume":"19","author":"SA Vosoughi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vosoughi SA, Joukar A, Kiapour A et al (2019) Optimal satellite rod constructs to mitigate rod failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study. Spine J 19:931\u2013941. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.11.003","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2198","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06012-2","volume":"28","author":"P Berjano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Berjano P, Xu M, Damilano M et al (2019) Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study. Eur Spine J 28:2198\u20132207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06012-2","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"9999_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.9.SPINE131176","volume":"21","author":"JS Smith","year":"2014","unstructured":"Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E et al (2014) Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 21:994\u20131003. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.9.SPINE131176","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1093\/ons\/opx151","volume":"14","author":"S Gupta","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gupta S, Eksi MS, Ames CP et al (2018) A novel 4-rod technique offers potential to reduce rod breakage and pseudarthrosis in pedicle subtraction osteotomies for adult spinal deformity correction. Oper Neurosurg 14:449\u2013456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ons\/opx151","journal-title":"Oper Neurosurg"},{"key":"9999_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.6.SPINE20678","volume":"34","author":"MH El Dafrawy","year":"2021","unstructured":"El Dafrawy MH, Adogwa O, Wegner AM et al (2021) Comprehensive classification system for multirod constructs across three-column osteotomies: a reliability study. J Neurosurg Spine 34:103\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2020.6.SPINE20678","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003723","volume":"46","author":"DE Gelb","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gelb DE, Tareen J, Jazini E et al (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of accessory rod position, rod material and diameter, use of cross-connectors, and anterior column support in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model: Part I: effects on apical rod strain: an in vitro and in silico biomechanical study. Spine 46:E1\u2013E11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003723","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001486","volume":"36","author":"JK Scheer","year":"2023","unstructured":"Scheer JK, Clark AJ, Mitsunaga K et al (2023) Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a novel surgical technique for correction of sagittal and coronal imbalance using laterally based satellite rods. Clin Spine Surg 36:317\u2013322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001486","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"9999_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1680","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000224177.97846.00","volume":"31","author":"C Lindsey","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lindsey C, Deviren V, Xu Z et al (2006) The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine 31:1680\u20131687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000224177.97846.00","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"9999_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e520","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20150603-61","volume":"38","author":"S Demura","year":"2015","unstructured":"Demura S, Murakami H, Hayashi H et al (2015) Influence of rod contouring on rod strength and stiffness in spine surgery. Orthopedics 38:e520-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20150603-61","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"9999_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2019.04.036","volume":"66","author":"TH Park","year":"2019","unstructured":"Park TH, Woo SH, Lee SJ et al (2019) Cross-link is a risk factor for rod fracture at pedicle subtraction osteotomy site: a finite element study. J Clin Neurosci 66:246\u2013250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2019.04.036","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"9999_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2020.01.053","volume":"73","author":"JB Hong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hong JB, Son DM, Park TH et al (2020) Risk of rod fracture according to cross-link position in pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study. J Clin Neurosci 73:304\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2020.01.053","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"7","key":"9999_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2025.01.001","volume":"25","author":"JP Mullin","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mullin JP, Quiceno E, Soliman MAR et al (2025) Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of 3-column lumbar osteotomies with and without interbody cages for adult spinal deformity. Spine J 25(7):1508\u20131522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2025.01.001","journal-title":"Spine J"}],"container-title":["European Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T03:14:33Z","timestamp":1778642073000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["9999"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-026-09999-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0940-6719","1432-0932"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0940-6719","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0932","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 March 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 May 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 May 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}