{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T08:41:04Z","timestamp":1793868064642,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]],"date-time":"2019-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567641600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]],"date-time":"2019-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567641600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]],"date-time":"2019-09-05T08:04:06Z","timestamp":1567670646000},"page":"243-250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Jared A.","family":"Warren","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kavin","family":"Sundaram","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Hampton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"McLaughlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brendan","family":"Patterson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlos A.","family":"Higuera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3007-7538","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicolas S.","family":"Piuzzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"2543_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1837","DOI":"10.1001\/archinternmed.2011.534","volume":"171","author":"C Landefeld","year":"2011","unstructured":"Landefeld C (2011) Goals of care for hip fracture: promoting independence and reducing mortality. Arch Intern Med 171:1837\u20131838","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"2543_CR2","first-page":"380","volume":"152","author":"P Magazine","year":"2009","unstructured":"Magazine P, Haentjen J, Col\u00f3n-Emeri C, Vanderschueren D, Milise K, Velkeniers B, Boone B (2009) Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older. Ann Intern Med 152:380\u2013390","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2543_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s12306-017-0470-3","volume":"101","author":"E Kiriakopoulos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kiriakopoulos E, McCormick F, Nwachukwu BU et al (2017) In-hospital mortality risk of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comprehensive review of the US Medicare database from 2005 to 2010. Musculoskelet Surg 101:213\u2013218. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12306-017-0470-3","journal-title":"Musculoskelet Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1007\/s11657-018-0515-","volume":"13","author":"D Prieto-Alhambra","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prieto-Alhambra D, Reyes C, Sainz MS et al (2018) In-hospital care, complications, and 4-month mortality following a hip or proximal femur fracture: the Spanish registry of osteoporotic femur fractures prospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 13:96. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11657-018-0515-","journal-title":"Arch Osteoporos"},{"key":"2543_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0936-5","volume":"13","author":"SK-H Chow","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chow SK-H, Qin J, Wong RM-Y et al (2018) One-year mortality in displaced intracapsular hip fractures and associated risk: a report of Chinese-based fragility fracture registry. J Orthop Surg Res 13:235. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-018-0936-5","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"2543_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2011.05.017","volume":"43","author":"F Hu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J et al (2012) Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 43:676\u2013685. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2011.05.017","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"2543_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-3928-5","author":"J Moyet","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moyet J, Deschasse G, Marquant B et al (2018) Which is the optimal orthogeriatric care model to prevent mortality of elderly subjects post hip fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on current clinical practice. Int Orthop. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-3928-5","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"2543_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.5301\/hipint.5000532","volume":"28","author":"I O\u00f1ativia","year":"2018","unstructured":"O\u00f1ativia I, Slulittel PAI, Diaz Dilernia F et al (2018) Outcomes of nondisplaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with internal screw fixation in elderly patients: a systematic review. Hip Int 28:18\u201328","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"2543_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2013.878831","volume":"85","author":"S Mundi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N, Bhandari M (2014) Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years. Acta Orthop 85:54\u201359. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2013.878831","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"2543_CR10","first-page":"62","volume":"35","author":"KT Judd","year":"2015","unstructured":"Judd KT, Christianson E (2015) Expedited operative care of hip fractures results in significantly lower cost of treatment. Iowa Orthop J 35:62\u201364","journal-title":"Iowa Orthop J"},{"key":"2543_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-013-2196-7","volume":"38","author":"I Aktselis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E et al (2014) Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop 38:155\u2013161. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-013-2196-7","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"2543_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0852-8","volume":"13","author":"Z Hao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hao Z, Wang X, Zhang X (2018) Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 13:1\u20138. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-018-0852-8","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"2543_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e799","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20150902-58","volume":"38","author":"C Henzman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Henzman C, Ong K, Lau E et al (2015) Complication risk after treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the medicare population. Orthopedics 38:e799\u2013e805. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20150902-58","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"2543_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s11751-012-0146-3","volume":"7","author":"G Kouvidis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kouvidis G, Sakellariou VI, Mavrogenis AF et al (2012) Dual lag screw cephalomedullary nail versus the classic sliding hip screw for the stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective randomized study. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 7:155\u2013162. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11751-012-0146-3","journal-title":"Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr"},{"key":"2543_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2728-2","volume":"471","author":"K Matre","year":"2013","unstructured":"Matre K, Havelin LI, Gjertsen JE et al (2013) Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1379\u20131386. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-012-2728-2","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"2543_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2762","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2017.10.029","volume":"48","author":"MJ Parker","year":"2017","unstructured":"Parker MJ (2017) Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability. Injury 48:2762\u20132767. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2017.10.029","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"2543_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0134.R1","volume":"99-B","author":"AR Socci","year":"2017","unstructured":"Socci AR, Casemyr NE, Leslie MP, Baumgaertner MR (2017) Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip rationale, evidence, and recommendations. Bone Joint J 99-B:128\u2013133. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0134.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"2543_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-018-3008-3","volume":"48","author":"KK Kani","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kani KK, Porrino JA, Mulcahy H, Chew FS (2019) Fragility fractures of the proximal femur: review and update for radiologists. Skeletal Radiol 48:29\u201345. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-018-3008-3","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"2543_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s11914-018-0443-y","volume":"16","author":"AZ Khan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Khan AZ, Rames RD, Miller AN (2018) Clinical management of osteoporotic fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16:299\u2013311. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11914-018-0443-y","journal-title":"Curr Osteoporos Rep"},{"key":"2543_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-16-00818","volume":"26","author":"R Pandarinath","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pandarinath R, Amdur R, DeBritz JN, Rao RD (2018) Comparison of short-term complication rates between cephalomedullary hip screw devices and sliding hip screws: an analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26:845\u2013851. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-16-00818","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR21","first-page":"80580","volume":"2013","author":"X Huang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Huang X, Leung F, Xiang Z et al (2013) Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for trochanteric fractures : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci World J 2013:80580","journal-title":"Sci World J"},{"key":"2543_CR22","volume-title":"Hip fracture: management","author":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence","year":"2014","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014) Hip fracture: management. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London"},{"key":"2543_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-4098-1","author":"J Li","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li J, Zhang L, Zhang H et al (2018) Effect of reduction quality on post-operative outcomes in 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures following intramedullary fixation: a retrospective study based on computerised tomography findings. Int Orthop. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-4098-1","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"2543_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-03103-5","volume":"139","author":"R Morochovic","year":"2019","unstructured":"Morochovic R, Takacova K, Tomocovcivk L et al (2019) Factors influencing femoral neck fracture healing after internal fixation with dynamic locking plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:629\u2013638","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2011.05929.x","volume":"82","author":"Z Avakian","year":"2012","unstructured":"Avakian Z, Shiraev T, Lam L, Hope N (2012) Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fractures. ANZ J Surg 82:56\u201359. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2011.05929.x","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1871","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.00041","volume":"96","author":"DD Bohl","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bohl DD, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS et al (2014) Extramedullary compared with intramedullary implants for intertrochanteric hip fractures thirty-day outcomes of 4432 procedures from the ACS NSQIP database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1871\u20131877. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.N.00041","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"2543_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1279.R1","volume":"99B","author":"MJ Parker","year":"2017","unstructured":"Parker MJ, Cawley S (2017) Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PFT nail for trochanteric hip fractures. Bone Joint J 99B:1210\u20131215. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1279.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"2543_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"828","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000093.pub5","volume":"51","author":"MJ Parker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Parker MJ, Handol H (2010) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary. Acta Radiol 51:828\u2013831. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000093.pub5","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"2543_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2017.05.042","volume":"43","author":"Q Zhu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhu Q, Xu X, Yang X et al (2017) Intramedullary nails versus sliding hip screws for AO\/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in adults: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 43:67\u201374. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2017.05.042","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.5371\/hp.2016.28.4.232","volume":"28","author":"HM Cho","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cho HM, Lee K et al (2016) Clinical and functional outcomes of treatment for type A1 intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly patients: comparison of dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail antirotation. Hip Pelvis 28:232\u2013242. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5371\/hp.2016.28.4.232","journal-title":"Hip Pelvis"},{"key":"2543_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2011.12.001","volume":"3","author":"R Kumar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN (2012) Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. J Clin Orthop Trauma 3:28\u201336. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcot.2011.12.001","journal-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"2543_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1612","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00603","volume":"96","author":"E Swart","year":"2014","unstructured":"Swart E, Makhni EC, Macaulay W et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 96:1612\u20131620","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000521","volume":"30","author":"H Krigbaum","year":"2016","unstructured":"Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim HT, Kuo AC (2016) Costs and complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of OTA 31-A2 proximal femur fractures in U.S. Veterans. J Orthop Trauma 30:125\u2013129. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000521","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"2543_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2637-6","volume":"20","author":"CT Pollmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pollmann CT, R\u00f8tterud JH, Gjertsen JE et al (2019) Fast track hip fracture care and mortality\u2014an observational study of 2230 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:1\u201310. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-019-2637-6","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"2543_CR35","unstructured":"NSQIP (n.d.) American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. \nhttps:\/\/www.facs.org\/quality-programs\/acs-nsqip?\n\n Accessed 25 Aug 2018"},{"key":"2543_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.027","volume":"217","author":"ME Cohen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY et al (2013) Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 217:336\u2013346.e1. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.027","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2543_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2018.03.019","volume":"49","author":"WM Durand","year":"2018","unstructured":"Durand WM, Goodman AD, Johnson JP, Daniels AH (2018) Assessment of 30-day mortality and complication rates associated with extended deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis following hip fracture surgery. Injury 49:1141\u20131148. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2018.03.019","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"2543_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1914","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.046","volume":"33","author":"BD Haughom","year":"2018","unstructured":"Haughom BD, Basques BA, Hellman MD et al (2018) Do mortality and complication rates differ between periprosthetic and native hip fractures? J Arthroplasty 33:1914\u20131918. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.046","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"2543_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20160719-07","volume":"39","author":"ME Neufeld","year":"2016","unstructured":"Neufeld ME, O\u2019Hara NN, Zhan M et al (2016) Timing of hip fracture surgery and 30-day outcomes. Orthopedics 39:361\u2013368. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20160719-07","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"2543_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2008.05.011","author":"L Pulido","year":"2008","unstructured":"Pulido L, Parvizi J, Macgibeny M et al (2008) Hospital complications after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2008.05.011","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"2543_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7_4","volume-title":"Regression Modeling Strategies","author":"Frank E. Harrell","year":"2015","unstructured":"Harrell FEJ (2015) rms: regression modeling strategies. R package version 4.4-0"},{"key":"2543_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-019-02495-3","author":"P Bovbjerg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bovbjerg P, Froberg L, Schmal H (2019) Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02495-3","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"2543_CR43","first-page":"62","volume":"16","author":"J Gill","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gill J, Jensen L, Chin P et al (2007) Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the trochanteric fixation nail and sliding hip screw. J Surg Orthop Adv Summer 16:62\u201366","journal-title":"J Surg Orthop Adv Summer"},{"key":"2543_CR44","first-page":"5578","volume":"7","author":"Q Wang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wang Q, Yang X, He HZ et al (2014) Comparative study of interTAN and dynamic hip screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:5578\u20135582","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"2543_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e318162f67f","volume":"23","author":"M Bhandari","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, J\u00f6nsson A et al (2009) Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23:460\u2013464. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0b013e318162f67f","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"2543_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bot.0000151819.95075.ad","volume":"19","author":"AL Utrilla","year":"2005","unstructured":"Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Mu\u00f1oz FM, Tufanisco CB (2005) Trochanteric Gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 19:229\u2013233. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.bot.0000151819.95075.ad","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"2543_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200208000-00024","author":"L Ahrengart","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ahrengart L, T\u00f6rnkvist H, Fornander P et al (2002) A randomized study of the compression hip screw and gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-200208000-00024","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,3]],"date-time":"2020-09-03T23:32:08Z","timestamp":1599175928000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["2543"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-019-02543-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1633-8065","1432-1068"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1633-8065","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-1068","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 July 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 August 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 September 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}