{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:25:39Z","timestamp":1786980339623,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]],"date-time":"2025-03-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742342400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]],"date-time":"2025-03-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742342400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100015613","name":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100015613","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While tuberosity reinsertion significantly improves the short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty done for proximal humerus fracture, we do not know how well these results hold over the long term. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of tuberosity reinsertion on the quality of life of patients and the functional outcomes of the operated limb after a minimum follow-up of 5\u00a0years.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Sixty-two patients were included. Their mean age at the final review was 79\u2009\u00b1\u200910\u00a0years. The Katz and Lawton scales, Constant score, DASH and SSV were collected. Radiographs were made at the final assessment to analyze the position of the tuberosities and to look for radiological signs of implant loosening.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The mean follow-up was 6.7\u2009\u00b1\u20091.5\u00a0years. The tuberosities had been reinserted in 35 patients (56%). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the Katz (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.60) and Lawton (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.49) scales, nor the DASH (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.45) or SSV (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.49) at the final review. The Constant score was significantly better in the patients who had their tuberosities reinserted (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.01), also the active forward flexion (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.02), the internal rotation (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.01), and the external rotation arm abduction (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.02), but there was no significant difference for external rotation elbow at side (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.14). None of the patients underwent revision surgery for implant loosening.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tuberosity reinsertion has a functional benefit beyond 5\u00a0years postoperative, although it does not appear to have a significant effect on the geriatric outcomes or the subjective clinical scores. The patients regained satisfactory independence for an orthogeriatric population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level IV\u2014Retrospective study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]],"date-time":"2025-03-19T15:08:28Z","timestamp":1742396908000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: does tuberosity reinsertion improve the functional outcomes more than 5\u00a0years after surgery?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"No\u00e9mie","family":"Allio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Amouyel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Saab","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christophe","family":"Chantelot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"4227_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2012.05.013","volume":"98","author":"A Roux","year":"2012","unstructured":"Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Trojani C, Boileau P, De Peretti F (2012) Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:715\u2013719. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2012.05.013","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78","volume":"442","author":"M Palvanen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4227_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.02.014","volume":"102","author":"N Bonnevialle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bonnevialle N, Tournier C, Clavert P, Ohl X, Sirveaux F, Saragaglia D et al (2016) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 102:569\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.02.014","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR"},{"key":"4227_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2018.04.025","volume":"104","author":"D Gallinet","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gallinet D, Ohl X, Decroocq L, Dib C, Valenti P, Boileau P (2018) Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty more effective than hemiarthroplasty for treating displaced proximal humerus fractures in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:759\u2013766","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2424","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-011-1960-5","volume":"469","author":"PM Grammont","year":"2011","unstructured":"Grammont PM, Baulot E (2011) The classic: delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Clin Orthop 469:2424\u20132424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-011-1960-5","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"4227_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2009.03.018","volume":"95","author":"JF Cazeneuve","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2009) Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty: radiological outcome for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:325\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2009.03.018","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2008.09.002","volume":"95","author":"D Gallinet","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2008.09.002","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.05.030","volume":"27","author":"X Ohl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ohl X, Bonnevialle N, Gallinet D, Ramdane N, Valenti P, Decroocq L, Boileau P (2018) How the greater tuberosity affects clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:2139\u20132144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2018.05.030","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-3402459","volume":"55","author":"LH Barros","year":"2020","unstructured":"Barros LH, Figueiredo S, Marques M, Rodrigues C, Ramos J, Claro R (2020) Consolida\u00e7\u00e3o dos tub\u00e9rculos na artroplastia reversa do ombro ap\u00f3s fratura proximal do \u00famero: Existe melhoria nos resultados funcionais? Rev Bras Ortop 55:748\u2013754. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-3402459","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ortop"},{"key":"4227_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2012.03.011","volume":"22","author":"D Gallinet","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L (2013) Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:38\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2012.03.011","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.03.019","volume":"105","author":"D Gallinet","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gallinet D, Cazeneuve JF, Boyer E, Menu G, Obert L, Ohl X et al (2019) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures: Outcomes in 422 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:805\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.03.019","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1974","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2019.09.019","volume":"50","author":"P Luciani","year":"2019","unstructured":"Luciani P, Farinelli L, Procaccini R, Verducci C, Gigante A (2019) Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a 5-year long term retrospective study of elderly patients. Injury 50:1974\u20131977. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2019.09.019","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4227_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-023-03810-9","volume":"34","author":"A Derksen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Derksen A, Lill H, Ellwein A, Imrecke J (2024) Tuberosity refixation improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34:1441\u20131448. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-023-03810-9","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"4227_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1177\/1753193416641590","volume":"41","author":"JB Tang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tang JB, Giddins G (2016) Why and how to report surgeons\u2019 levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur 41:365\u2013366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1753193416641590","journal-title":"J Hand Surg Eur"},{"key":"4227_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197052060-00001","volume":"52","author":"CS Neer","year":"1970","unstructured":"Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077\u20131089","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"4227_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.09.025","volume":"29","author":"R Dukan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dukan R, Bahman M, Rousseau MA, Boyer P (2020) Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem through a superolateral approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:1197\u20131205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2019.09.025","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.02.014","volume":"28","author":"P Boileau","year":"2019","unstructured":"Boileau P, Alta TD, Decroocq L, Sirveaux F, Clavert P, Favard L et al (2019) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:437\u2013444. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.02.014","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198701000-00023","volume":"214","author":"CR Constant","year":"1987","unstructured":"Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160\u2013164","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4227_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-009-0744-x","volume":"17","author":"A Tavakkolizadeh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tavakkolizadeh A, Ghassemi A, Colegate-Stone T, Latif A, Sinha J (2009) Gender-specific constant score correction for age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:529\u2013533. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00167-009-0744-x","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"4227_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2002.124527","volume":"11","author":"P Boileau","year":"2002","unstructured":"Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mol\u00e9 D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mse.2002.124527","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2007.01.007","volume":"16","author":"A Deutsch","year":"2007","unstructured":"Deutsch A, Abboud JA, Kelly J, Mody M, Norris T, Ramsey ML et al (2007) Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:706\u2013716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2007.01.007","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2454","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.000000000000044221","volume":"476","author":"BL Young","year":"2018","unstructured":"Young BL, Cantrell CK, Hamid N (2018) Classifications in brief: the Nerot-Sirveaux classification for scapular notching. Clin Orthop 476:2454\u20132457. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.000000000000044221","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"4227_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199509000-00008","volume":"77","author":"TW Wright","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wright TW, Cofield RH (1995) Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 77:1340\u20131346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-199509000-00008","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg"},{"key":"4227_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-024-04108-0","author":"DV Papadopoulos","year":"2024","unstructured":"Papadopoulos DV, Kakogeorgou V, Mullen JR, Kontogeorgakos V, Nikolaou VS, Babis G (2024) Non-union of the greater tuberosity in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: is it associated with worse outcomes? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-024-04108-0","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"4227_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-020-04928-9","volume":"45","author":"S Gunst","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gunst S, Louboutin L, Swan J, Lustig S, Servien E, Nove-Josserand L (2021) Does healing of both greater and lesser tuberosities improve functional outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture? a retrospective study of twenty-eight cases with a computed tomography scan at a minimum of one-year follow-up. Int Orthop 45:681\u2013687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-020-04928-9","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"4227_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.07.026","volume":"105","author":"E Maugendre","year":"2019","unstructured":"Maugendre E, Gadisseux B, Chantelot C, Clavert P, Ramdane N, Werthel JD, Boileau P, (2019) Epidemiology and mortality in older patients treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:1509\u20131513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.07.026","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"4227_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1928","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.D.02675","volume":"87","author":"EH Yian","year":"2005","unstructured":"Yian EH, Werner CML, Nyffeler RW, Pfirrmann CW, Ramappa A, Sukthankar A, Gerber C (2005) Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 87:1928\u20131936. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.D.02675","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T13:43:19Z","timestamp":1767015799000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4227"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-025-04227-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-1068"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-1068","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 November 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest related directly to this work. Outside this study: MS: Associate Editor for Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, Consulting for Quanta Medical VCLS\u2122 and Cousin Surgery\u2122.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"No artificial intelligence software was used.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process"}}],"article-number":"125"}}