{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T17:58:43Z","timestamp":1781632723164,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769990400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769990400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aims to describe factors associated with risk of nonunion in patients treated for humeral shaft fracture.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Adult patients treated for humeral shaft fracture at one Level 1 center from December 2009-July 2020, screened via ICD-10 code were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and radiographic analysis were recorded. Independent samples t-test was used for continuous variables, and chi squared or fishers exact test for categorical.\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05 was considered significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Of 386 patients, 15.3% went onto nonunion (mean time to diagnosis 122 days). Patients with nonunion were more likely have comorbid alcoholism (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and hypothyroidism (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.048) and were significantly more likely to have been initially managed nonoperatively (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Mechanism was significantly associated (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.008). Of those with nonunion treated surgically initially, there were differences in the number and positioning of screws utilized in ORIF, including more screws distally (4.29+\/\u2212\u20091.86 vs. 3.77+\/\u2212\u20090.92,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.048) to the fracture through the plate, and fewer screws outside of the plate in the form of lag screws (0.41+\/\u2212\u20090.87 vs. 1.13+\/\u2212\u20091.44,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.045) in diagnosed nonunion. 11 patients diagnosed with nonunion required more than 1 revision procedure (mean 2.18). 27 patients diagnosed with nonunion had available documented radiographic union (range 56\u2013872 days from date of nonunion diagnosis).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Specific comorbidities, initial nonoperative management and surgical construct configuration in patients treated with ORIF are risk factors for development of humeral shaft fracture nonunion. Treatment and recovery from humeral shaft nonunion remain varied, warranting further study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T09:58:24Z","timestamp":1770026304000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Factors associated with humeral shaft fracture nonunion"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Ellen","family":"Lutnick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bradley","family":"Hawayek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Flores","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Schauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elias","family":"Joseph","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammad","family":"Haider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Binkley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"4666_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2012.08.003","volume":"44","author":"KC Mahabier","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mahabier KC, Vogels LM, Punt BJ, Roukema GR, Patka P, Van Lieshout EM (2013) Humeral shaft fractures: retrospective results of non-operative and operative treatment of 186 patients. Injury 44(4):427\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2012.08.003","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"4","key":"4666_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200004000-00003","volume":"82","author":"A Sarmiento","year":"2000","unstructured":"Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(4):478\u2013486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200004000-00003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"7","key":"4666_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.01.072","volume":"29","author":"BJM van de Wall","year":"2020","unstructured":"van de Wall BJM, Ochen Y, Beeres FJP, Babst R, Link BC, Heng M, van der Velde D, Knobe M, Groenwold RHH, Houwert MR (2020) Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(7):1493\u20131504. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2020.01.072","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"4666_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1881","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.07.001","volume":"26","author":"FE Harkin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Harkin FE, Large RJ (2017) Humeral shaft fractures: union outcomes in a large cohort. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(11):1881\u20131888. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2017.07.001","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4666_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0173634","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0173634","volume":"12","author":"JG Zhao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhao JG, Wang J, Meng XH, Zeng XT, Kan SL (2017) Surgical interventions to treat humerus shaft fractures: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0173634. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0173634","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"4666_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jseint.2020.06.009","volume":"4","author":"JJ Olson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Olson JJ, Entezari V, Vallier HA (2020) Risk factors for nonunion after traumatic humeral shaft fractures in adults. JSES Int 4(4):734\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jseint.2020.06.009","journal-title":"JSES Int"},{"issue":"14","key":"4666_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.22.01374","volume":"105","author":"AG Zavras","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zavras AG, Monahan KT, Winek NC, Pan T, Altman GT, Altman DT, Westrick ER (2023) Conservative management with functional Brace versus various surgical fixation techniques for humeral shaft fractures: a network Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(14):1112\u20131122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.22.01374","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"10","key":"4666_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2021.01.029","volume":"30","author":"WM Oliver","year":"2021","unstructured":"Oliver WM, Searle HKC, Ng ZH, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD (2021) Factors associated with humeral shaft nonunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30(10):2283\u20132295. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2021.01.029","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4666_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B1.35682","volume":"98\u2013B","author":"M Miska","year":"2016","unstructured":"Miska M, Findeisen S, Tanner M, Biglari B, Studier-Fischer S, Grutzner PA, Schmidmaier G, Moghaddam A (2016) Treatment of nonunions in fractures of the humeral shaft according to the diamond concept. Bone Joint J 98\u2013B(1):81\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.98B1.35682","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"9","key":"4666_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82","volume":"20","author":"M Rutgers","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional Brace. J Orthop Trauma 20(9):597\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"12","key":"4666_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2015.09.041","volume":"46","author":"RM Peters","year":"2015","unstructured":"Peters RM, Claessen FM, Doornberg JN, Kolovich GP, Diercks RL, van den Bekerom MP (2015) Union rate after operative treatment of humeral shaft nonunion\u2013a systematic review. Injury 46(12):2314\u20132324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2015.09.041","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"2","key":"4666_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2014.05.009","volume":"24","author":"E Ali","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ali E, Griffiths D, Obi N, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Van Rensburg L (2015) Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(2):210\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2014.05.009","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"18","key":"4666_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1792","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.3182","volume":"323","author":"L R\u00e4m\u00f6","year":"2020","unstructured":"R\u00e4m\u00f6 L, Sumrein BO, Lepola V, L\u00e4hdeoja T, Ranstam J, Paavola M, J\u00e4rvinen T, Taimela S (2020) Effect of surgery vs functional bracing on functional outcome among patients with closed displaced humeral shaft fractures: the FISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA: J Am Med Association 323(18):1792\u20131801. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.3182","journal-title":"JAMA: J Am Med Association"},{"issue":"12","key":"4666_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.05.030","volume":"29","author":"I Lode","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lode I, Nordviste V, Erichsen JL, Schmal H, Viberg B (2020) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(12):2495\u20132504. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2020.05.030","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"4666_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00089","volume":"96","author":"V Neuhaus","year":"2014","unstructured":"Neuhaus V, Menendez M, Kurylo JC, Dyer GS, Jawa A, Ring D (2014) Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of Brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(5):403\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.M.00089","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"4666_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Denard A Jr., Richards JE, Obremskey WT, Tucker MC, Floyd M, Herzog GA (2010) Outcome of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthop 33(8). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20100625-16","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20100625-16"},{"key":"4666_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.2147\/ORR.S212998","volume":"11","author":"SM Hosseini Khameneh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hosseini Khameneh SM, Abbasian M, Abrishamkarzadeh H, Bagheri S, Abdollahimajd F, Safdari F, Rahimi-Dehgolan S (2019) Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation). Orthop Res Rev 11:141\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/ORR.S212998","journal-title":"Orthop Res Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"4666_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.16.00628","volume":"99","author":"FT Matsunaga","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matsunaga FT, Tamaoki MJ, Matsumoto MH, Netto NA, Faloppa F, Belloti JC (2017) Minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a Bridge plate versus a functional Brace for humeral shaft fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(7):583\u2013592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.16.00628","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"4666_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3265","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-022-01890-6","volume":"48","author":"D Den Hartog","year":"2022","unstructured":"Den Hartog D, Van Bergen SH, Mahabier KC, Verhofstad MHJ, Van Lieshout EMM (2022) Functional and clinical outcome after operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture (HUMMER): results of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48(4):3265\u20133277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-022-01890-6","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"18","key":"4666_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1420","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.22.01386","volume":"105","author":"AR Farid","year":"2023","unstructured":"Farid AR, Friend TH, Atarere J, Gustin M, Suneja N, Weaver MJ, Von Keudell AG (2023) Operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(18):1420\u20131429. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.22.01386","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"9","key":"4666_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1969","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2022.02.033","volume":"31","author":"HM Fox","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fox HM, Hsue LJ, Thompson AR, Ramsey DC, Hadden RW, Mirarchi AJ, Nazir OF (2022) Humeral shaft fractures: a cost-effectiveness analysis of operative versus nonoperative management. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(9):1969\u20131981. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2022.02.033","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4666_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.18203\/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20171537","volume":"3","author":"S Kumar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kumar S, Shanmugam N, Kumar S, Ramanusan K (2017) Comparison between operative and non operative treatment of fracture shaft of humerus: an outcome analysis. Int J Res Orthop 3(3):445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18203\/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20171537","journal-title":"Int J Res Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"4666_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s10195-017-0459-6","volume":"18","author":"BS Schoch","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schoch BS, Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Krieg J, Namdari S (2017) Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management. J Orthop Traumatol 18(3):259\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10195-017-0459-6","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4666_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD005959","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005959.pub2","volume":"2011","author":"H Kurup","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG, Kurup H (2011) Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews 2011(6):CD005959\u2013CD005959. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD005959.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Reviews"},{"issue":"3","key":"4666_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2012.06.007","volume":"22","author":"H Ouyang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ouyang H, Xiong J, Xiang P, Cui Z, Chen L, Yu B (2013) Plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an updated meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(3):387\u2013395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2012.06.007","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"4666_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1007\/s00776-013-0497-8","volume":"19","author":"J Dai","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, Wen G (2014) Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of RCTs and nonrandomized studies. J Orthop Sci 19(2):282\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00776-013-0497-8","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"4666_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2016.1215581","volume":"30","author":"Q Zhang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhang Q, Sun N, Huang Q, Zhu S, Wu X (2017) Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg 30(2):133\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08941939.2016.1215581","journal-title":"J Invest Surg"},{"issue":"18","key":"4666_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00238","volume":"26","author":"K Tetsworth","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tetsworth K, Hohmann E, Glatt V (2018) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: current state of the Art. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26(18):652\u2013661. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00238","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"4666_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000232","volume":"29","author":"JW Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Kim JJ, Park KC (2015) A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma 29(4):189\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000232","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"4666_CR30","first-page":"194","volume":"25","author":"TA Borus","year":"2005","unstructured":"Borus TA, Yian EH, Karunakar MA (2005) A case series and review of salvage surgery for refractory humeral shaft nonunion following two or more prior surgical procedures. Iowa Orthop J 25:194\u2013199","journal-title":"Iowa Orthop J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4666_CR31","first-page":"33","volume":"162","author":"A Decomas","year":"2010","unstructured":"Decomas A, Kaye J (2010) Risk factors associated with failure of treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures after functional bracing. J La State Med Soc 162(1):33\u201335","journal-title":"J La State Med Soc"},{"issue":"2","key":"4666_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.5435\/jaaos-d-21-00634","volume":"30","author":"EH Naclerio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Naclerio EH, McKee MD (2022) Approach to humeral shaft nonunion: evaluation and surgical techniques. JAAOS - J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30(2):50\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/jaaos-d-21-00634","journal-title":"JAAOS - J Am Acad Orthop Surg"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &amp; Traumatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T17:31:55Z","timestamp":1781631115000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4666"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-026-04666-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-1068"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-1068","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}}],"article-number":"92"}}