{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T14:06:29Z","timestamp":1784037989052,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,29]],"date-time":"2019-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1556496000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Johnson & Johnson K. K."}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Today"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,29]],"date-time":"2019-04-29T19:03:14Z","timestamp":1556564594000},"page":"877-884","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["A prospective multi-center registry concerning the clinical performance of laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an absorbable adhesion barrier (INTERCEED\u00ae) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7187-3664","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jun","family":"Watanabe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fumio","family":"Ishida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hideyuki","family":"Ishida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yosuke","family":"Fukunaga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazuteru","family":"Watanabe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masanori","family":"Naito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masahiko","family":"Watanabe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"1816_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2097-1","volume":"285","author":"A Hirschelmann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hirschelmann A, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, Hackethal A, De Wilde RL. A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(4):1089\u201397.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"issue":"4","key":"1816_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-012-0764-2","volume":"9","author":"RL Wilde De","year":"2012","unstructured":"De Wilde RL, Brolmann H, Koninckx PR, Lundorff P, Lower AM, Wattiez A, et al. Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological surgery: the 2012 European field guideline. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(4):365\u20138.","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"1816_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-013-0591-8","volume":"44","author":"K Okabayashi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y, Athanasiou T, et al. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today. 2014;44(3):405\u201320.","journal-title":"Surg Today."},{"issue":"9911","key":"1816_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)61687-6","volume":"383","author":"RPG Broek ten","year":"2014","unstructured":"ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):48\u201359.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"1816_CR5","first-page":"135","volume":"177","author":"R Azziz","year":"1993","unstructured":"Azziz R. Microsurgery alone or with INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier for pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. The INTERCEED (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group II. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177(2):135\u20139.","journal-title":"Surg Gynecol Obstet."},{"issue":"3","key":"1816_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00175-Q","volume":"86","author":"RR Franklin","year":"1995","unstructured":"Franklin RR. Reduction of ovarian adhesions by the use of INTERCEED. Ovarian Adhesion Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(3):335\u201340.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"1816_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/11.3.579","volume":"11","author":"J Keckstein","year":"1996","unstructured":"Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Sasse V, Roth A, Tuttlies F, Karageorgieva E. Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(3):579\u201382.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR8","first-page":"27","volume":"41","author":"B Larsson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Larsson B. Efficacy of INTERCEED in adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery: a review of 13 clinical studies. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(1):27\u201334.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"1816_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13621.x","volume":"101","author":"TC Li","year":"1994","unstructured":"Li TC, Cooke ID. The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, INTERCEED, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(4):335\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"issue":"12","key":"1816_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3133","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135873","volume":"10","author":"V Mais","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mais V, Ajossa S, Piras B, Guerriero S, Marongiu D, Melis GB. Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3133\u20135.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"5","key":"1816_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019337","volume":"11","author":"H Saravelos","year":"1996","unstructured":"Saravelos H, Li TC. Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of INTERCEED to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(5):992\u20137.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"key":"1816_CR12","unstructured":"Sekiba K. Use of INTERCEED(TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):518\u201322."},{"issue":"5","key":"1816_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.12.049","volume":"95","author":"A Tinelli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M, Tsin DA, Hudelist G, Hurst B, et al. Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1780\u20135.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00429-9","volume":"69","author":"D Wallwiener","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wallwiener D, Meyer A, Bastert G. Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers? Fertil Steril. 1998;69(1):132\u20137.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"4","key":"1816_CR15","first-page":"297","volume":"183","author":"JM Becker","year":"1996","unstructured":"Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(4):297\u2013306.","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"1816_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-0954-8","volume":"48","author":"Z Cohen","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cohen Z, Senagore AJ, Dayton MT, Koruda MJ, Beck DE, Wolff BG, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol\/sodium hyaluronate\/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(6):1130\u20139.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-005-0268-5","volume":"49","author":"VW Fazio","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):1\u201311.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum."},{"issue":"3","key":"1816_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-008-0602-1","volume":"24","author":"CM Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park CM, Lee WY, Cho YB, Yun HR, Lee WS, Yun SH, et al. Sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) reduced early postoperative intestinal obstruction after lower abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer: the preliminary report. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(3):305\u201310.","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis."},{"key":"1816_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salum M, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, Weiss E, Koruda M, Behrens K, et al. Does sodium hyaluronate- and carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) decrease operative time for loop ileostomy closure? Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10(3):187\u201390 (discussion 90\u20131).","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-006-0278-x"},{"issue":"2","key":"1816_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200202000-00006","volume":"235","author":"WW Vrijland","year":"2002","unstructured":"Vrijland WW, Tseng LN, Eijkman HJ, Hop WC, Jakimowicz JJ, Leguit P, Stassen LP, Swank DJ, Haverlag R, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel H. Fewer Intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235(2):193\u20139.","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12334","volume":"10","author":"M Naito","year":"2017","unstructured":"Naito M, Ogura N, Yamanashi T, Sato T, Nakamura T, Miura H, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study on the validity and safety of an absorbable adhesion barrier (INTERCEED(R)) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10(1):7\u201311.","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg."},{"issue":"7","key":"1816_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(05)70221-7","volume":"6","author":"R Veldkamp","year":"2005","unstructured":"Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477\u201384.","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6742","volume":"97","author":"GW Taylor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Dewberry SC, et al. Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):70\u20138.","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"9","key":"1816_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9585","volume":"101","author":"SA Bartels","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bartels SA, Vlug MS, Hollmann MW, Dijkgraaf MG, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, et al. Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study). Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1153\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"1816_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000499","volume":"260","author":"S Yamamoto","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II\/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):23\u201330.","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"13","key":"1816_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.10529","volume":"314","author":"J Fleshman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346\u201355.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"1816_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Hindocha A, Watson A. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(4):CD000475.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000475.pub3"}],"container-title":["Surgery Today"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,27]],"date-time":"2020-04-27T23:23:43Z","timestamp":1588029823000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,29]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1816"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00595-019-01816-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-1291","1436-2813"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-1291","type":"print"},{"value":"1436-2813","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 March 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 April 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}