{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]],"date-time":"2026-08-05T05:40:08Z","timestamp":1785908408112,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]],"date-time":"2021-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610150400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]],"date-time":"2021-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610150400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Today"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The choice of surgical procedure for rectal prolapse (RP) is challenging because of the high recurrence and morbidity rates. We aimed to clarify whether laparoscopic suture rectopexy (lap-rectopexy) is suitable for Japanese patients with recurrent RP.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We retrospectively evaluated 77 recurrent RP patients who had been treated on average 1.5 times between June 2008 and April 2016. Forty-one patients underwent lap-rectopexy and 36 underwent perineal procedures. We compared surgical outcomes and recurrence rate following surgery between the two groups. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors of recurrent RP.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In patients\u2019 characteristics, significant differences were observed in the type of anesthesia (<jats:italic>p\u2009<\/jats:italic>&lt;\u20090.01) and length of recurrent RP (<jats:italic>p\u2009<\/jats:italic>=\u20090.030). The mean operative time was significantly longer in the lap-rectopexy group (<jats:italic>p\u2009<\/jats:italic>&lt;\u20090.001). Blood loss, length of hospitalization, and postoperative complications were similar. The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the lap-rectopexy group (17.1% vs. 38.9%, <jats:italic>p\u2009<\/jats:italic>=\u20090.032). Multivariate analysis showed that only the laparoscopic approach was significantly associated with a low recurrence following surgery (odds ratio 0.273, 95% CI \u2212\u20092.568 to \u2212\u20090.032).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Lap-rectopexy is recommended for recurrent RP because its low recurrence rate and safety profile are similar to those of perineal procedures.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]],"date-time":"2021-01-09T09:34:52Z","timestamp":1610184892000},"page":"954-961","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["What is the recommended procedure for recurrent rectal prolapse? A retrospective cohort study in a single Japanese institution"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"Kimihiko","family":"Funahashi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akiharu","family":"Kurihara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yasuyuki","family":"Miura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mitsunori","family":"Ushigome","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoaki","family":"Kaneko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Satoru","family":"Kagami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Yoshino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takamaru","family":"Koda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yasuo","family":"Nagashima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimihiko","family":"Yoshida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Sakai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2190_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-004-0459-x","volume":"390","author":"THK Schiedeck","year":"2005","unstructured":"Schiedeck THK, Schwandner O, Scheele J, Farke S, Bruch HP. Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:8\u201314.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"2190_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-2971-4","volume":"33","author":"AC Rogers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rogers AC, McCawley N, Hanly AM, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Burke JP. Trends in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a population analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:459\u201365.","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2190_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e318251612e","volume":"55","author":"JL Faucheron","year":"2012","unstructured":"Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Riboud R, Waroquet PA, Noel J. Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy to the promontory for full-thickness rectal prolapse in 175 consecutive patients: short- and long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:660\u20135.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1597","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-008-9365-6","volume":"51","author":"CM Byrne","year":"2008","unstructured":"Byrne CM, Smith SR, Solomon MJ, Young JM, Eyers AA, Young CJ. Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1597\u2013604.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-9088-2","volume":"19","author":"D Lechaux","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lechaux D, Trebuchet G, Siproudhis L, Campion JP. Laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a single-institution retrospective study evaluating surgical outcome. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:514\u20138.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2190_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12689","volume":"16","author":"C Foppa","year":"2014","unstructured":"Foppa C, Martinek L, Arnaud JP, Bergamaschi R. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:809\u201314.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2190_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-018-1913-z","volume":"23","author":"H de Bruijn","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Bruijn H, Maeda Y, Tan KN, Jenkins JT, Kennedy RH. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:25\u201331.","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"2190_CR8","first-page":"188","volume":"31","author":"T Hori","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hori T, Yasukawa D, Machimoto T, Kadokawa Y, Hata T, Ito T, et al. Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31:188\u201397.","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2190_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1200","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-0948-6","volume":"48","author":"Y Raftopoulos","year":"2005","unstructured":"Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R, Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1200\u20136.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000001023","volume":"61","author":"T Catanzarite","year":"2018","unstructured":"Catanzarite T, Klaristenfeld DD, Tomassi MJ, Zazueta-Damian G, Alperin M. Recurrence of rectal prolapse after surgical repair in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:861\u20137.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12946","volume":"17","author":"A Hotouras","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri S, Bhan C, Wexner SD, Chan CL, et al. A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:657\u201364.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2190_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e31823f86b8","volume":"55","author":"MM Russell","year":"2012","unstructured":"Russell MM, Read TE, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, et al. Complications after rectal prolapse surgery: does approach matter? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:450\u20138.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.4174\/astr.2014.86.5.249","volume":"86","author":"JL Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee JL, Yang SS, Park IJ, Yu CS, Kim JC. Comparison of abdominal and perineal procedures for complete rectal prolapse: an analysis of 104 patients. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86:249\u201355.","journal-title":"Ann Surg Treat Res"},{"key":"2190_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-004-2812-7","volume":"34","author":"Y Kaiwa","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kaiwa Y, Kurokawa Y, Namiki K, Myojin T, Ansai M, Satomi S. Outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in patients older than 70\u00a0years versus younger patients. Surg Today. 2004;34:742\u20136.","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"2190_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"O13","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13574","volume":"19","author":"SH Emile","year":"2017","unstructured":"Emile SH, Elfeki HA, Youssef M, Farid M, Wexner SD. Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O13\u201324.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2190_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e31825042c5","volume":"55","author":"JH Ding","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ding JH, Canedo J, Lee SH, Kalaskar SN, Rosen L, Wexner SD. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for primary and recurrent rectal prolapse: are the results comparable the second time? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:666\u201370.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481307900712","volume":"79","author":"WC Mustain","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mustain WC, Davenport DL, Parcells JP, Vargas HD, Hourigan JS. Abdominal versus perineal approach for treatment of rectal prolapse: comparable safety in a propensity-matched cohort. Am Surg. 2013;79:686\u201392.","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"2190_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1177\/145749690509400306","volume":"94","author":"MV Kairaluoma","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg. 2005;94:207\u201310.","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"2190_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13160","volume":"18","author":"M Bishawi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bishawi M, Foppa C, Tou S, Bergamaschi R, Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group. Recurrence of rectal prolapse following rectopexy: a pooled analysis of 532 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:779\u201384.","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2190_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02235579","volume":"43","author":"SM Heah","year":"2000","unstructured":"Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J, Duthie GS, Monson JR. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:638\u201343.","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2190_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.124456","volume":"10","author":"MR Sahoo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sahoo MR, Thimmegowda AK, Gowda MS. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10:18\u201322.","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"}],"container-title":["Surgery Today"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T03:19:09Z","timestamp":1621826349000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["2190"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00595-020-02190-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-1291","1436-2813"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-1291","type":"print"},{"value":"1436-2813","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 July 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 October 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}