{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T08:30:17Z","timestamp":1786609817134,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Surg Today"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T07:37:56Z","timestamp":1779781076000},"page":"2008-2016","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic distal pancreatectomy has a lower incidence than open surgery of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula: a propensity score\u2013matched analysis with emphasis on inflammation and microbial contamination"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"56","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8476-3985","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hironobu","family":"Suto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroyuki","family":"Matsukawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yasuhisa","family":"Ando","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Minoru","family":"Oshima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yoshio","family":"Shimizu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takuro","family":"Fuke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mina","family":"Nagao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koji","family":"Fujita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kiyoyuki","family":"Kobayashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hideki","family":"Kamada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hideki","family":"Kobara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kensuke","family":"Kumamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keiichi","family":"Okano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"3330_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000251438.43135.fb","volume":"245","author":"J Kleeff","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z\u2019Graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245(4):573\u201382.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"3330_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584\u201391.","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"3330_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001888","volume":"264","author":"T de Rooij","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, Bonsing BA, Daams F, van Dam RM, et al. Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):754\u201362.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3330_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001869","volume":"264","author":"AH Zureikat","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, Gillespie TW, Weber SM, Abbott DE, et al. A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264(4):640\u20139.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"3330_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-09894-y","volume":"37","author":"TME van Ramshorst","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Ramshorst TME, van Bodegraven EA, Zampedri P, Kasai M, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(6):4131\u201343.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"3330_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1098","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.881","volume":"28","author":"P Magistri","year":"2021","unstructured":"Magistri P, Boggi U, Esposito A, Carrano FM, Pesi B, Ballarin R, et al. Robotic vs open distal pancreatectomy: A multi-institutional matched comparison analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(12):1098\u2013106.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"3330_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2017.04.005","volume":"17","author":"I Karabicak","year":"2017","unstructured":"Karabicak I, Satoi S, Yanagimoto H, Yamamoto T, Yamaki S, Kosaka H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of three different stump closure techniques during distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology. 2017;17(3):497\u2013503.","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"issue":"2","key":"3330_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.1030","volume":"29","author":"D Hashimoto","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hashimoto D, Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Yamaki S, Ishida M, Sakaguchi T, et al. Validation of the triple-checked criteria for drain management after pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29(2):271\u201381.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"8","key":"3330_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-017-1634-1","volume":"402","author":"M Kawai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kawai M, Hirono S, Okada KI, Satoi S, Yanagimoto H, Kon M, et al. Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(8):1197\u2013204.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"3330_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1866","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-012-1595-z","volume":"36","author":"D Ban","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ban D, Shimada K, Konishi M, Saiura A, Hashimoto M, Uesaka K. Stapler and nonstapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: multicenter retrospective analysis of 388 patients. World J Surg. 2012;36(8):1866\u201373.","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"102\u2013103","key":"3330_CR11","first-page":"1309","volume":"57","author":"K Okano","year":"2010","unstructured":"Okano K, Kakinoki K, Suto H, Oshima M, Maeda N, Kashiwagi H, et al. Slow parenchymal flattening technique for distal pancreatectomy using an endopath stapler: simple and safe technical management. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57(102\u2013103):1309\u201313.","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology"},{"issue":"8","key":"3330_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2017.0904","volume":"152","author":"SI Berr\u00edos-Torres","year":"2017","unstructured":"Berr\u00edos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784\u201391.","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"3330_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205\u201313.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3330_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1002\/bimj.200410135","volume":"47","author":"R Fluss","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005;47(4):458\u201372.","journal-title":"Biom J"},{"issue":"12","key":"3330_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9899","volume":"102","author":"T Sugiura","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sugiura T, Mizuno T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Yamamoto Y, Kawamura I, et al. Impact of bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity during pancreaticoduodenectomy on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2015;102(12):1561\u20136.","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"3330_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.746","volume":"27","author":"K Taniguchi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Taniguchi K, Matsuyama R, Yabushita Y, Homma Y, Ota Y, Mori R, et al. Prophylactic drain management after pancreaticoduodenectomy without focusing on the drain fluid amylase level: A prospective validation study regarding criteria for early drain removal that do not include the drain fluid amylase level. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020;27(12):950\u201361.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"3330_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181e61e88","volume":"252","author":"C Bassi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):207\u201314.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"3330_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2022.10.008","volume":"173","author":"M Kawai","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kawai M, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Kitahata Y, Motobayashi H, Ueno M, et al. Positive drain fluid culture on postoperative day 1 predicts clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in early drain removal with higher drain fluid amylase after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2023;173(2):511\u201320.","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"3330_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-019-01885-8","volume":"50","author":"T Hata","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hata T, Mizuma M, Motoi F, Nakagawa K, Masuda K, Ishida M, et al. Early postoperative drainage fluid culture positivity from contaminated bile juice is predictive of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Today. 2020;50(3):248\u201357.","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"issue":"11","key":"3330_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.589","volume":"25","author":"F Yang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yang F, Jin C, Li J, Di Y, Zhang J, Fu D. Clinical significance of drain fluid culture after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(11):508\u201317.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"3330_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2024.03.008","volume":"24","author":"N Kimura","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kimura N, Ishido K, Wakiya T, Nagase H, Odagiri T, Wakasa Y, et al. Revealing the role of early peripancreatic bacterial contamination and Enterococcus faecalis in pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Implications for useful antibiotic prophylaxis-An observational cohort study. Pancreatology. 2024;24(4):630\u201342.","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"key":"3330_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoffmann M, Anthuber L, Anthuber M, Pinto D, Schrempf M. Positive Intraoperative Bile Culture and Antibiotic Resistance Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Fistula in Patients After Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Clin Med. 2025;14(2).","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14020455"},{"issue":"12","key":"3330_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1551","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9919","volume":"102","author":"K Okano","year":"2015","unstructured":"Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M, Fujii T, Yoshitomi H, Suzuki S, et al. Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2015;102(12):1551\u201360.","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"3330_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.04.033","volume":"170","author":"T Guilbaud","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guilbaud T, Garnier J, Girard E, Ewald J, Risse O, Moutardier V, et al. Postoperative day 1 combination of serum C-reactive protein and drain amylase values predicts risks of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. The 90-1000 score. Surgery. 2021;170(5):1508\u201316.","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"10","key":"3330_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.927","volume":"28","author":"K Sakamoto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sakamoto K, Ogawa K, Tamura K, Iwata M, Matsui T, Nishi Y, et al. Postoperative elevation of C-reactive protein levels and high drain fluid amylase output are strong predictors of pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(10):874\u201382.","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"3330_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.12131","volume":"48","author":"H Suto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Suto H, Matsukawa H, Ando Y, Oshima M, Fuke T, Norikane T, et al. A combined score for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula based on inflammatory parameters and drainage fluid culture results on postoperative day 3. World J Surg. 2024;48(5):1231\u201341.","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3330_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002561","volume":"269","author":"J van Hilst","year":"2019","unstructured":"van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):10\u20137.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3330_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lanepe.2023.100673","volume":"31","author":"M Korrel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Korrel M, Jones LR, van Hilst J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;31:100673.","journal-title":"Lancet Reg Health Eur"},{"issue":"6","key":"3330_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1048","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318251ee09","volume":"255","author":"R Venkat","year":"2012","unstructured":"Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1048\u201359.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"}],"container-title":["Surgery Today"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T08:01:08Z","timestamp":1786608068000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["3330"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00595-026-03330-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0941-1291","1436-2813"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0941-1291","type":"print"},{"value":"1436-2813","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 February 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"We have no conflicts of interests to declare.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}