{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T20:36:39Z","timestamp":1771706199453,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]],"date-time":"2011-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1304208000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acta Neurochir"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,30]],"date-time":"2011-04-30T09:30:00Z","timestamp":1304155800000},"page":"1455-1459","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":41,"title":["\"Minimally invasive\" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"153","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Payer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1023_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.972","volume":"302","author":"MP Arts","year":"2009","unstructured":"Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS) (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs. conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(2):149\u2013158","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"1023_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181c1b18e","volume":"251","author":"RS Chung","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents' open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251(2):205\u2013212","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"1023_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI.2008.9.08142","volume":"9","author":"SS Dhall","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2008) Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):560\u2013565","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"1023_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2008.10.005","volume":"71","author":"NE Epstein","year":"2009","unstructured":"Epstein NE (2009) Minimally invasive\/endoscopic vs. \"open\" posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits? Surg Neurol 71(3):330\u2013331","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1023_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.07.393","volume":"8","author":"R Gepstein","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gepstein R, Shabat S, Reichel M, Pikarsky I, Folman Y (2008) Treatment of postdiscectomy low back pain by percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus open posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws. Spine J 8(5):741\u2013746","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"1023_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1004543","volume":"51","author":"JF Harrington","year":"2008","unstructured":"Harrington JF, French P (2008) Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51(1):30\u201335","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"1023_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2006.12.012","volume":"8","author":"CW Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim CW, Lee YP, Taylor W, Oygar A, Kim WK (2007) Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J 8(4):584\u2013590","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"1023_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ceb976","volume":"36","author":"MW Mariscalco","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mariscalco MW, Yamashita T, Steinmetz MP, Krishnaney AA, Lieberman IH, Mroz TE (2010) Radiation exposure to the surgeon during open lumbar microdiscectomy and minimally invasive microdiscectomy: a prospective, controlled trial. Spine 36(3):255\u2013260","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"1023_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1247560","volume":"53","author":"V Ntoukas","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ntoukas V, M\u00fcller A (2010) Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53(1):21\u201324","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"1023_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E9","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.7.FOCUS09121","volume":"27","author":"JH Oppenheimer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27(3):E9","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"5","key":"1023_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000256473.49791.f4","volume":"32","author":"Y Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park Y, Ha JW (2007) Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 32(5):537\u2013543","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"13","key":"1023_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be","volume":"34","author":"CW Peng","year":"2009","unstructured":"Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB (2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 34(13):1385\u20131389","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"5 Suppl","key":"1023_CR13","first-page":"S26","volume":"51","author":"MJ Perez-Cruet","year":"2002","unstructured":"Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI (2002) Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S26\u2013S36","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"1023_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-008-0687-8","volume":"33","author":"C Schizas","year":"2009","unstructured":"Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V (2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33(6):1683\u20131688","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"6 Suppl","key":"1023_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25S","DOI":"10.1177\/1062860609349312","volume":"24","author":"HE Smith","year":"2009","unstructured":"Smith HE, Rihn JA, Brodke DS, Guyer R, Coric D, Lonner B, Shelokov AP, Currier BL, Riley L, Phillips FM, Albert TJ (2009) Spine care: evaluation of the efficacy and cost of emerging technology. Am J Med Qual 24(6 Suppl):25S\u201331S","journal-title":"Am J Med Qual"},{"key":"1023_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.63905","volume":"1","author":"AT Villavicencio","year":"2010","unstructured":"Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A (2010) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 1:12","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"}],"container-title":["Acta Neurochirurgica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,29]],"date-time":"2019-05-29T00:16:35Z","timestamp":1559088995000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7]]}},"alternative-id":["1023"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-011-1023-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6268","0942-0940"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6268","type":"print"},{"value":"0942-0940","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,1]]}}}