{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T23:24:25Z","timestamp":1770765865386,"version":"3.50.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763683200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763683200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["72374049"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["72374049"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Bone Miner Metab"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in China and imposes a substantial economic burden. Early community-level management is pivotal and community health centers play an important role in prevention and management. As shared decision-making in medication expands, understanding public preferences can help improve community health services. This study investigated public preferences of osteoporosis community-level management in China, considering access to screening information, screening duration, service supplier, mode of administration, management approach and out-of-pocket costs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in Shanghai among community-dwelling adults. We constructed a mixed logit model with a total of 14 levels of the above 6 attributes. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) and scenario predictions were performed. Exploratory subgroup analyses assessed heterogeneity by age, income, geographic location and self-reported osteoporosis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 170 valid questionnaires were collected from 6 communities in Shanghai. OOP costs had the largest impact on utility, followed by screening duration, service supplier and access to screening information. Subgroup analyses revealed that shorter screening duration and specialist-provided screening services had greater positive impact on utility among suburban residents than among urban sample. Scenario predictions suggested that the combination of shorter screening duration, service supplied by tertiary-hospital specialists and management supplied by general practitioners meaningfully increased predicted participants\u2019 utility.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Public preferences favored lower costs, convenient screening, clear information and specialist-led screening with general-practitioner-delivered management. Understanding the impact of attributes in community-level management strategies on residents\u2019 utility and willingness to pay is important for optimizing community-level management strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T16:22:25Z","timestamp":1763742145000},"page":"58-68","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Using discrete choice experiment to investigate public preferences for osteoporosis community-level management strategies in China"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Yijia","family":"Feng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Jing","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1304-4550","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luying","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"1659_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.21106","volume":"4","author":"L Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang L, Yu W, Yin X, Cui L, Tang S et al (2021) Prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture in China: the China osteoporosis prevalence study. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2121106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.21106","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"1659_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-023-15947-7","volume":"23","author":"B Zhu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhu B, Hu S, Guo J, Dong Z, Dong Y, Li F (2023) Differences in the global exposure, mortality and disability of low bone mineral density between men and women: the underestimated burden in men. BMC Public Health 23:991","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"key":"1659_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/GPhar.2021.802097","author":"J Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang J, Feng Z, Dong Z, Li W, Chen C et al (2022) Does having a usual primary care provider reduce polypharmacy behaviors of patients with chronic disease? A retrospective study in Hubei Province, China. Front Pharmacol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/GPhar.2021.802097","journal-title":"Front Pharmacol"},{"key":"1659_CR4","first-page":"1626","volume":"27","author":"Y Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang Y, Wang S, Wang F, Wang Z, Wang Y, Shen T, Cai Y, Wan H, Qiao Y (2021) Assessment of intervention effect of community prevention on osteoporosis based on propensity score matching. Chin J Osteoporos 27:1626\u20131631","journal-title":"Chin J Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR5","first-page":"1251","volume":"22","author":"X Du","year":"2019","unstructured":"Du X, Sun Y, Guo A, Ding J, Yi C, Wu L, Gao M, Huang K, Yu S (2019) Community-based standardized management algorithm of primary osteoporosis. Chin Gen Pract 22:1251\u20131257","journal-title":"Chin Gen Pract"},{"key":"1659_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-023-17099-0","volume":"23","author":"Q Hu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hu Q, Feng Z, Zong Q et al (2023) Analysis of factors that promote the participation of patients with chronic diseases in shared decision making on medication: a cross-sectional survey in Hubei Province, China. BMC Public Health 23:2440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-023-17099-0","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"key":"1659_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12877-023-03968-1","author":"Q Zong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zong Q, Feng Z, Wang J, Zheng Z, Chen C, Feng D (2023) Is shared decision-making a determinant of polypharmacy in older patients with chronic disease? A cross-sectional study in Hubei Province, China. BMC Geriatr. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12877-023-03968-1","journal-title":"BMC Geriatr"},{"key":"1659_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1007\/s40520-019-01193-8","volume":"31","author":"M de Wit","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Wit M, Cooper C, Tugwell P et al (2019) Practical guidance for engaging patients in health research, treatment guidelines and regulatory processes: results of an expert group meeting organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Aging Clin Exp Res 31:905\u2013915. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40520-019-01193-8","journal-title":"Aging Clin Exp Res"},{"key":"1659_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-018-0734-2","volume":"1","author":"V Soekhai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM (2019) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics 1:201\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-018-0734-2","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"key":"1659_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01647-z","volume":"10","author":"C Speckemeier","year":"2021","unstructured":"Speckemeier C, Krabbe L, Schwenke S, Wasem J, Buchberger B, Neusser S (2021) Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews. Syst Rev 10:121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-021-01647-z","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"1659_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-018-0954-6","volume":"19","author":"M Quaife","year":"2018","unstructured":"Quaife M, Terris-Prestholt F, Di Tanna GL, Vickerman P (2018) How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity. Eur J Health Econ 19:1053\u20131066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10198-018-0954-6","journal-title":"Eur J Health Econ"},{"key":"1659_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2641","DOI":"10.12677\/acm.2024.1441340","volume":"14","author":"Y Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang Y, Liu J, Zhang Q (2024) Research progress on the health management of patients with osteoporosis in the context of aging. Adv Clin Med 14:2641\u20132646","journal-title":"Adv Clin Med"},{"key":"1659_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.cn311282-20221115-00635","volume":"39","author":"P Guo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Guo P, Wu J, Ding Y (2023) Advances in screening methods for osteoporosis. Chin J Endocrinol Metabol 39:372\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3760\/cma.j.cn311282-20221115-00635","journal-title":"Chin J Endocrinol Metabol"},{"key":"1659_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11657-019-0666-2","volume":"14","author":"S Subramaniam","year":"2019","unstructured":"Subramaniam S, Chan C-Y, Soelaiman I-N, Mohamed N, Muhammad N, Ahmad F, Ng P-Y, Jamil NA, Aziz NA, Chin K-Y (2019) The performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) in identifying the risk of osteoporosis among Malaysian population aged 40 years and above. Arch Osteoporos 14:117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11657-019-0666-2","journal-title":"Arch Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11657-016-0298-8","volume":"12","author":"A Kharroubi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kharroubi A, Saba E, Ghannam I, Darwish H (2016) Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF one minute test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women. Arch Osteoporos 12:6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11657-016-0298-8","journal-title":"Arch Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11657-019-0624-z","volume":"14","author":"L Si","year":"2019","unstructured":"Si L, Tu L, Xie Y, Palmer AJ, Gu Y, Zheng X, Li J, Lv Q, Qi J, Lin Z, Chen M, Gu J, Hiligsmann M (2019) Chinese patients\u2019 preference for pharmaceutical treatments of osteoporosis: a discrete choice experiment. Arch Osteoporos 14:85. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11657-019-0624-z","journal-title":"Arch Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S250745","volume":"14","author":"PL Graham-Clarke","year":"2020","unstructured":"Graham-Clarke PL, Hauber B, Boeri M, Leonardi F, Burge RT, Fernandez M, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Florez S (2020) Patient preferences for biologic and biosimilar osteoporosis treatments in Colombia. Patient Prefer Adherence 14:1049\u20131064. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/PPA.S250745","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"key":"1659_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-022-06310-4","volume":"33","author":"C Beaudart","year":"2022","unstructured":"Beaudart C, Boonen A, Li N, Bours S, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, Roux C, McGowan B, Diez-Perez A, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Hiligsmann M (2022) Patient preferences for lifestyle behaviors in osteoporotic fracture prevention: a cross-European discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 33:1335\u20131346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00198-022-06310-4","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"1659_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-019-05154-9","volume":"31","author":"D Cornelissen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cornelissen D, Boonen A, Bours S, Evers S, Dirksen C, Hiligsmann M (2020) Understanding patients\u2019 preferences for osteoporosis treatment: the impact of patients\u2019 characteristics on subgroups and latent classes. Osteoporos Int 31:85\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00198-019-05154-9","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"1659_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1093\/rheumatology\/kex071","volume":"56","author":"M Hiligsmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, Watson V, Bours S, Goemaere S, Reginster J-Y, Roux C, McGowan B, Silke C, Whelan B, Diez-Perez A, Torres E, Papadakis G, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Pearson G, Boonen A (2017) Patients\u2019 preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete-choice experiment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:1167","journal-title":"Rheumatology (Oxford)"},{"key":"1659_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11926-015-0533-0","volume":"17","author":"M Hiligsmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hiligsmann M, Bours SP, Boonen A (2015) A review of patient preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17:61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11926-015-0533-0","journal-title":"Curr Rheumatol Rep"},{"key":"1659_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1947","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-010-1382-3","volume":"22","author":"J Darb\u00e0","year":"2011","unstructured":"Darb\u00e0 J, Restovic G, Kaskens L, Balbona MA, Carbonell A, Cavero P, Jordana M, Prieto C, Molina \u00c1, Padr\u00f3 I (2011) Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 22:1947\u20131954. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00198-010-1382-3","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"1659_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-007-0535-5","volume":"19","author":"EW de Bekker-Grob","year":"2008","unstructured":"de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, Pols HAP, Koes BW, Steyerberg EW (2008) Patients\u2019 preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 19:1029","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"1659_CR24","unstructured":"Orme B (2010) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research, 2nd edn. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press"},{"key":"1659_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-015-0118-z","volume":"1","author":"EW De Bekker-Grob","year":"2015","unstructured":"De Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA (2015) Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient 1:373\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40271-015-0118-z","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"1659_CR26","first-page":"1671","volume":"26","author":"Z Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Z (2023) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary osteoporosis (2022). Chin Gen Pract 26:1671\u20131691","journal-title":"Chin Gen Pract"},{"key":"1659_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1186\/s13690-021-00728-8","volume":"79","author":"X Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li X, Jiang M, Peng Y, Shen X, Jia E, Xiong J (2021) Community residents\u2019 preferences for chronic disease management in primary care facilities in China: a stated preference survey. Arch Public Health 79:211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13690-021-00728-8","journal-title":"Arch Public Health"},{"key":"1659_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2433-7","volume":"17","author":"K-S Kleij","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kleij K-S, Tangermann U, Amelung VE, Krauth C (2017) Patients\u2019 preferences for primary health care \u2013 a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments. BMC Health Serv Res 17:476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-017-2433-7","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"1659_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1625","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S265093","volume":"17","author":"Y Peng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Peng Y, Jiang M, Shen X et al (2020) Preferences for primary healthcare services among older adults with chronic disease: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence 17:1625\u20131637","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"key":"1659_CR30","first-page":"1498","volume":"25","author":"X Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang X, Jin H, Han J, Deng C, Sun M (2019) Advances in osteoporosis high-risk population screening and prevention in the community. Chin J Osteoporos 25:1498\u20131501","journal-title":"Chin J Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR31","first-page":"61","volume":"13","author":"K He","year":"2020","unstructured":"He K, Fang H (2020) Research on Chinese residents\u2019 preference to family doctors\u2019 contract services: discrete choice experiment. Chin J Health Policy 13:61\u201366","journal-title":"Chin J Health Policy"},{"key":"1659_CR32","first-page":"183","volume":"37","author":"B Gao","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gao B, Gao Z (2021) Study on the intervention effect of community comprehensive management on primary osteoporosis patients. Chin Community Doctors 37:183\u2013184","journal-title":"Chin Community Doctors"},{"key":"1659_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S371188","volume":"16","author":"H Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang H, Sun H, Jin C, Wang M, Luo Y, Song W, Wang H (2022) Preference to family doctor contracted service of patients with chronic disease in urban China: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence 16:2103\u20132114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/PPA.S371188","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"key":"1659_CR34","first-page":"2866","volume":"33","author":"Z Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang Z, Le J (2019) Intervention effect of family doctor team\u2019s knowledge attitude practice on the belief of osteoporosis among middle-aged and elderly residents in the community. Chin Nurs Res 33:2866\u20132868","journal-title":"Chin Nurs Res"},{"key":"1659_CR35","first-page":"35","volume":"44","author":"J Zhong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhong J, Lu D, Tang W, Cheng Q, Zheng S (2023) Application effect of the specialist outpatient intervention mode in the management of osteoporosis patients in the community under the background of medical consortium. Shanghai Med Pharm J 44:35\u201339","journal-title":"Shanghai Med Pharm J"},{"key":"1659_CR36","first-page":"1330","volume":"23","author":"P Wu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wu P, Li W, Chen W, Zang J, Sha Y, Han M, Chu Y (2017) Role and impact of general practitioners in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Chin J Osteoporos 23:1330\u20131333","journal-title":"Chin J Osteoporos"},{"key":"1659_CR37","first-page":"225","volume":"17","author":"H Long","year":"2014","unstructured":"Long H (2014) Practices and thoughts on comprehensively promoting the family doctor system in Shanghai municipality. Health Dev Policy Res 17:225\u2013226240","journal-title":"Health Dev Policy Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T20:04:00Z","timestamp":1770753840000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["1659"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00774-025-01659-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0914-8779","1435-5604"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0914-8779","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-5604","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}