{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T18:31:38Z","timestamp":1791570698166,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]],"date-time":"2022-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641254400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]],"date-time":"2022-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641254400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005722","name":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005722","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Objectives<\/jats:title>\n To compare the accuracy (trueness and precision) of direct digitization of four different dental gap situation with two IOS (intraoral scanner).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n \n Four partially edentulous polyurethane mandible models were used: (1) A (46, 45, 44 missing), (2) B (45, 44, 34, 35 missing), (3) C (42, 41, 31, 32 missing), and (4) D (full dentition). On each model, the same reference object was fixed between the second molars of both quadrants. A dataset (REF) of the reference object was generated by a coordinate measuring machine. Each model situation was scanned by (1) OMN (Cerec AC Omnicam) and (2) PRI (Cerec Primescan AC) (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u200930). Datasets of all 8 test groups (\n N<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u2009240) were analyzed using inspection software to determine the linear aberrations in the X-, Y-, Z-axes and angular deviations. Mann\u2013Whitney\n U<\/jats:italic>\n and two-sample Kolmogorov\u2013Smirnov tests were used to detect differences for trueness and precision.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n PRI revealed higher trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters (\n \n \n $${\\overrightarrow{V}}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n \u00a0120.95 to 175.01\u00a0\u03bcm,\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n (\n x<\/jats:italic>\n )\u2009\u2212\u200958.50 to\u2009\u2212\u20099.40\u00a0\u03bcm,\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n (\n z<\/jats:italic>\n )\u2009\u2212\u200970.35 to 63.50\u00a0\u03bcm), while OMN showed higher trueness for\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n \u00a0(\n y<\/jats:italic>\n ) regardless of model situation (\u2212\u2009104.90 to 34.55\u00a0\u03bcm). Model D revealed the highest trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters regardless of IOS (\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n \u00a0120.95 to 195.74\u00a0\u03bcm,\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n (\n x<\/jats:italic>\n )\u2009\u2212\u20099.40 to 66.75\u00a0\u03bcm,\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n (\n y<\/jats:italic>\n )\u2009\u2212\u200914.55 to 51.50\u00a0\u03bcm,\n \n \n $$\\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n \n \n \n V<\/mml:mi>\n \u2192<\/mml:mo>\n <\/mml:mover>\n E<\/mml:mi>\n <\/mml:msub>\n <\/mml:math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>\n (\n z<\/jats:italic>\n ) 63.50 to 120.75\u00a0\u03bcm).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n PRI demonstrated higher accuracy in the X- and Z-axes, while OMN depicted higher trueness in the Y-axis. For PRI, Model A revealed the highest distortion, while for OMN, Model B produced the largest aberrations in most parameters.<\/jats:p>\n Clinical relevance<\/jats:p>\n Current results suggest that both investigated IOS are sufficiently accurate for the manufacturing of tooth-borne restorations and orthodontic appliances. However, both hardware specifications of IOS and the presence of edentulous gaps in the dental model have an influence on the accuracy of the virtual model dataset.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]],"date-time":"2022-01-03T22:02:33Z","timestamp":1641247353000},"page":"3651-3662","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws \u2014 a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Panagiotis","family":"Kontis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan-Frederik","family":"G\u00fcth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christine","family":"Keul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"4335_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD\/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204:505\u2013511","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2008.350"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR2","first-page":"101","volume":"26","author":"J Abduo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abduo J, Elseyoufi M (2018) Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 26(3):101\u2013121","journal-title":"Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR3","first-page":"157","volume":"24","author":"A Schmidt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schmidt A et al (2021) Do different methods of digital data analysis lead to different results? Int J Comput Dent 24(2):157\u2013164","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-019-02965-2","volume":"24","author":"C Keul","year":"2020","unstructured":"Keul C, Guth JF (2020) Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 24(2):735\u2013745","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"7","key":"4335_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1487","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-015-1626-x","volume":"20","author":"JF Guth","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guth JF et al (2016) A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 20(7):1487\u20131494","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2019.01.012","volume":"35","author":"S O'Toole","year":"2019","unstructured":"O\u2019Toole S et al (2019) Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment. Dent Mater 35(3):495\u2013500","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4335_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2016.10.002","volume":"55","author":"F Kuhr","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kuhr F et al (2016) A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 55:68\u201374","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.06.006","volume":"64","author":"A Schmidt","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schmidt A et al (2020) Torsion and linear accuracy in intraoral scans obtained with different scanning principles. J Prosthodont Res 64(2):167\u2013174","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2606","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-82218-z","volume":"11","author":"RJY Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim RJY, Benic GI, Park JM (2021) Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies. Sci Rep 11(1):2606","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"4335_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.10.018","volume":"122","author":"KR Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim KR, Seo KY, Kim S (2019) Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression. J Prosthet Dent 122(6):543\u2013549","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2014.01.006","volume":"30","author":"C Keul","year":"2014","unstructured":"Keul C et al (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization\u2013a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30(4):400\u2013407","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-012-0795-0","volume":"17","author":"JF Guth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Guth JF et al (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17(4):1201\u20131208","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"6","key":"4335_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.05.027","volume":"112","author":"RG Nedelcu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nedelcu RG, Persson AS (2014) Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112(6):1461\u20131471","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"4335_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amin S et al (2017) Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(11):1360\u20131367","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12994"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR15","first-page":"11","volume":"14","author":"A Ender","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions\u2013an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14(1):11\u201321","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"6","key":"4335_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.11.007","volume":"115","author":"ID Jeong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeong ID et al (2016) Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 115(6):755\u2013759","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"6","key":"4335_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-013-1132-y","volume":"18","author":"SB Patzelt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Patzelt SB et al (2014) Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18(6):1687\u20131694","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"688","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm9030688","volume":"9","author":"A Schmidt","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schmidt A et al (2020) Accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions in patients: an update. J Clin Med 9(3):688","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"4335_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.2013.0209","volume":"144","author":"SB Patzelt","year":"2013","unstructured":"Patzelt SB et al (2013) Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 144(8):914\u2013920","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.09.017","volume":"121","author":"M Iturrate","year":"2018","unstructured":"Iturrate M et al (2018) Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device. J Prosthet Dent 121(3):447\u2013454","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.10.007","volume":"122","author":"M Braian","year":"2019","unstructured":"Braian M, Wennerberg A (2019) Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 122(2):129\u2013136","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"4335_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roig, E., et al., In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants. PLoS One, 2020. 15(2): p. e0228266.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0228266"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2017.01.005","volume":"61","author":"S Fukazawa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H (2017) Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res 61(4):450\u2013459","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"4335_CR24","unstructured":"Geometrical product specifications (GPS) acceptance re-verification test for coordinated measuring machines (CMM) -part 2: CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions (ISO 10360-2: 2009)"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2018.01.003","volume":"62","author":"H Hayama","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hayama H et al (2018) Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 62(3):347\u2013352","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"4335_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.09.016","volume":"117","author":"JE Kim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kim JE et al (2017) Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 117(6):755\u2013761","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-020-01090-x","volume":"20","author":"Z Nagy","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nagy Z et al (2020) Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. BMC Oral Health 20(1):97","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"4335_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8427595","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/8427595","volume":"2017","author":"R Richert","year":"2017","unstructured":"Richert R et al (2017) Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017:8427595","journal-title":"J Healthc Eng"},{"key":"4335_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017","volume":"54","author":"S Logozzo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Logozzo S et al (2014) Recent advances in dental optics \u2013 Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 54:203\u2013221","journal-title":"Opt Lasers Eng"},{"key":"4335_CR30","first-page":"258","volume":"39","author":"I Janakova","year":"2006","unstructured":"Janakova I, Lisztwan M (2006) Industrial applications of triangulation technique. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 39:258\u2013263","journal-title":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.06.003","volume":"124","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2020","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n M et al (2020) Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 124(3):372\u2013378","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.11.018","volume":"125","author":"S Reich","year":"2020","unstructured":"Reich S, Yatmaz B, Raith S (2020) Do \u201ccut out-rescan\u201d procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans? J Prosthet Dent 125(1):89\u201394","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"3","key":"4335_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.09.011","volume":"115","author":"A Ender","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A (2016) In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115(3):313\u2013320","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR34","first-page":"11","volume":"22","author":"A Ender","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A (2019) Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 22(1):11\u201319","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"4335_CR35","unstructured":"Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results\u2014part 1: general principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1: 1994)"},{"key":"4335_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2017.12.006","volume":"69","author":"R Nedelcu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nedelcu R et al (2018) Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: a novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent 69:110\u2013118","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR37","first-page":"307","volume":"22","author":"L Passos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Passos L et al (2019) Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 22(4):307\u2013319","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.12.003","volume":"64","author":"G Hack","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hack G et al (2020) Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - an in vivo feasibility study. J Prosthodont Res 64(4):444\u2013453","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"4335_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm8081187","volume":"8","author":"JH Lee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee JH et al (2019) Repeatability of intraoral scanners for complete arch scan of partially edentulous dentitions: an in vitro study. J Clin Med 8(8):1187","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"4335_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-020-03486-z","volume":"25","author":"M Schimmel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schimmel M et al (2021) Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig 25(4):1839\u20131847","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"4335_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferrini F et al (2019) Influence of intra-oral scanner (I.O.S.) on the marginal accuracy of CAD\/CAM single crowns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(4):544","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph16040544"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR42","first-page":"99","volume":"16","author":"M Portelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Portelli M et al (2015) Unilateral condylar hyperplasia: diagnosis, clinical aspects and operative treatment A case report. Eur J Paediatr Dent 16(2):99\u2013102","journal-title":"Eur J Paediatr Dent"},{"key":"4335_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1080\/00016350802577818","volume":"67","author":"B Yu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yu B, Ahn J-S, Lee Y-K (2008) Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 67:57\u201364","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"issue":"4 Suppl. 1","key":"4335_CR44","first-page":"87","volume":"35","author":"F Manazza","year":"2021","unstructured":"Manazza F et al (2021) A simplified digital workflow for the prosthetic finishing of implant rehabilitations: a case report. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 35(4 Suppl. 1):87\u201397","journal-title":"J Biol Regul Homeost Agents"},{"issue":"2","key":"4335_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aanat.2011.09.007","volume":"194","author":"J Boldt","year":"2012","unstructured":"Boldt J et al (2012) Measurement of tooth and implant mobility under physiological loading conditions. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger 194(2):185\u2013189","journal-title":"Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger"},{"issue":"1","key":"4335_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1007\/s13191-013-0343-x","volume":"14","author":"MM Buzayan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Buzayan MM, Yunus NB (2014) Passive fit in screw retained multi-unit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving: a review of the literature. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14(1):16\u201323","journal-title":"J Indian Prosthodont Soc"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-022-04418-9","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,21]],"date-time":"2022-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1645401600000}}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,4]],"date-time":"2022-04-04T02:17:28Z","timestamp":1649038648000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}},"alternative-id":["4335"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04335-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 February 2022","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"A Correction to this paper has been published:","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04418-9","URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04418-9","order":7,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}