{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T02:52:33Z","timestamp":1793242353963,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669593600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinik M\u00fcnchen"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The influence of different cleaning methods, air-abrasion parameters, and aging on shear bond strength (SBS) and tensile bond strength (TBS) of 3D resin luted to composite resin.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Nine hundred resin substrates were 3D printed (D20II, Rapid Shape) and cleaned with either isopropanol (ISO), butyldiglycol-based solution (BUT), or centrifugation (CEN). After 24-h storage in 37\u00a0\u00b0C water, specimens were air-abraded (mean particle size 50\u00a0\u00b5m; <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200960) with either alumina at 0.1\u00a0MPa (AL0.1) or 0.4\u00a0MPa (AL0.4) and glass pearls at 0.1\u00a0MPa (GP0.1) and 0.4\u00a0MPa (GP0.4) or conditioned with visio.link (control) and luted with PanaviaV5. Initially (24\u00a0h, 37\u00a0\u00b0C water storage) or after aging (10,000 thermal cycles), SBS and TBS were measured, and fracture types were examined. Surface free energy (SFE) and roughness (Ra) were determined after air-abrasion. Kolmogorov\u2013Smirnov, Kruskal\u2013Wallis <jats:italic>H<\/jats:italic>, Mann\u2013Whitney <jats:italic>U<\/jats:italic>, chi-square, and partial eta-squared were computed.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>SBS measurements presented higher values than TBS (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001\u20130.033). Within the pretreatment groups, CEN showed the highest SBS and TBS values compared to cleaning with ISO or BUT (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001\u20130.040). Pretreatment with GP0.1 displayed the lowest bond strength values (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001\u20130.049), and mostly adhesive fractures occurred. The highest Ra values (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) were observed for AL0.4 pretreatment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Pretreatment with AL0.4 and the control group mainly presented the highest bond strength values. Thermocycling had a positive effect on the bond strength.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>According to this study, 3D-printed restorations should be pretreated with AL0.4 or with visio.link before adhesive luting, regardless of their cleaning.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T07:04:58Z","timestamp":1669619098000},"page":"31-43","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"title":["Bond strength between temporary 3D printable resin and conventional resin composite: influence of cleaning methods and air-abrasion parameters"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Valerie","family":"Lankes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcel","family":"Reymus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anja","family":"Liebermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bogna","family":"Stawarczyk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"4800_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14s","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.2006.0397","volume":"137","author":"R Giordano","year":"2006","unstructured":"Giordano R (2006) Materials for chairside CAD\/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137:14s\u201321s. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14219\/jada.archive.2006.0397","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"key":"4800_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schweiger J, Edelhoff D and G\u00fcth JF (2021) 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med 10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm10092010","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10092010"},{"key":"4800_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12651","volume":"33","author":"CS Sampaio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sampaio CS, Niemann KD, Schweitzer DD, Hirata R, Atria PJ (2021) Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 33:487\u2013495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.12651","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.02.024","volume":"123","author":"CC Peng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT, Ramos V Jr (2020) Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent 123:514\u2013522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.02.024","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2020.12.4.218","volume":"12","author":"T Reeponmaha","year":"2020","unstructured":"Reeponmaha T, Angwaravong O, Angwarawong T (2020) Comparison of fracture strength after thermo-mechanical aging between provisional crowns made with CAD\/CAM and conventional method. J Adv Prosthodont 12:218\u2013224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2020.12.4.218","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"key":"4800_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2017.10.003","volume":"34","author":"T Anthony","year":"2018","unstructured":"Anthony T, MaryCatherine M, Ana PF, Despoina B, Avathamsa A, Carmem SP, Jack LF, Luiz EB (2018) 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater 34:192\u2013200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2017.10.003","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2777","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2717-2","volume":"23","author":"M Zimmermann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zimmermann M, Ender A, Egli G, \u00d6zcan M, Mehl A (2019) Fracture load of CAD\/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness. Clin Oral Investig 23:2777\u20132784. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-018-2717-2","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"4800_CR8","first-page":"116","volume":"6","author":"PP Lad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB (2014) Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: a review. Journal of international oral health\u202f: JIOH 6:116\u2013120","journal-title":"Journal of international oral health : JIOH"},{"key":"4800_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2017.10.001","volume":"77","author":"E Elbahie","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elbahie E, Beitzel D, Mutluay MM, Majd H, Yahyazadehfar M, Arola D (2018) Durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure involving the DEJ. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:557\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2017.10.001","journal-title":"J Mech Behav Biomed Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2014.06.007","volume":"31","author":"M Kern","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kern M (2015) Bonding to oxide ceramics\u2014laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 31:8\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2014.06.007","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR11","first-page":"97","volume":"31","author":"AH Nejat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nejat AH, Lee J, Shah S, Lin CP, Kulkarni P, Chavali R, Lawson NC (2018) Retention of CAD\/CAM resin composite crowns following different bonding protocols. Am J Dent 31:97\u2013102","journal-title":"Am J Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3290\/j.jad.a33525","volume":"17","author":"M \u00d6zcan","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u00d6zcan M, Bernasconi M (2015) Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 17:7\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.jad.a33525","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3935","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14143935","volume":"14","author":"E Kuscu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kuscu E, Klink A, Spintzyk S, Kraemer Fernandez P, Huettig F (2021) Bonding interface and repairability of 3D-printed intraoral splints: shear bond strength to current polymers, with and without ageing. Materials 14:3935. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma14143935","journal-title":"Materials"},{"key":"4800_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1590\/1678-775720150261","volume":"23","author":"A Nobuaki","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nobuaki A, Keiichi Y, Takashi S (2015) Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD\/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements. J Appl Oral Sci 23:629\u2013636. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1678-775720150261","journal-title":"J Appl Oral Sci"},{"key":"4800_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2020.12.5.322","volume":"12","author":"NK Lim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lim NK, Shin SY (2020) Bonding of conventional provisional resin to 3D printed resin: the role of surface treatments and type of repair resins. J Adv Prosthodont 12:322\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2020.12.5.322","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"key":"4800_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e367","DOI":"10.4317\/jced.55617","volume":"11","author":"L Holmer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Holmer L, Othman A, L\u00fchrs AK, von See C (2019) Comparison of the shear bond strength of 3D printed temporary bridges materials, on different types of resin cements and surface treatment. J Clin Exp Dent 11:e367\u2013e372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4317\/jced.55617","journal-title":"J Clin Exp Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1177\/2280800018764770","volume":"16","author":"G Taormina","year":"2018","unstructured":"Taormina G, Sciancalepore C, Messori M, Bondioli F (2018) 3D printing processes for photocurable polymeric materials: technologies, materials, and future trends. J App Biomater Funct Mater 16:151\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2280800018764770","journal-title":"J App Biomater Funct Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mayer J, Reymus M, Wiedenmann F, Edelhoff D, Hickel R and Stawarczyk B (2021) Temporary 3D printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: impact of post printing cleaning methods on degree of conversion as well as surface and mechanical properties. Int J Prosthodont. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.7048","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.7048"},{"key":"4800_CR19","first-page":"231","volume":"22","author":"M Reymus","year":"2019","unstructured":"Reymus M, L\u00fcmkemann N, Stawarczyk B (2019) 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent 22:231\u2013237","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.2012-329","volume":"32","author":"N B\u00e4hr","year":"2013","unstructured":"B\u00e4hr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD\/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 32:492\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.2012-329","journal-title":"Dent Mater J"},{"key":"4800_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-014-1215-4","volume":"19","author":"C Keul","year":"2015","unstructured":"Keul C, Kohen D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2015) The effect of different pretreatment methods of PMMA-based crowns on the long-term tensile bond strength to dentin abutments. Clin Oral Investig 19:35\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-014-1215-4","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"4800_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2461-7","volume":"23","author":"M Reymus","year":"2019","unstructured":"Reymus M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Hickel R, Stawarczyk B (2019) Bonding to new CAD\/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. Clin Oral Investig 23:529\u2013538. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-018-2461-7","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"4800_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijadhadh.2013.06.003","volume":"46","author":"C Keul","year":"2013","unstructured":"Keul C, Martin A, Wimmer T, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Tensile bond strength of PMMA- and composite-based CAD\/CAM materials to luting cements after different conditioning methods. Int J Adhes Adhes 46:122\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijadhadh.2013.06.003","journal-title":"Int J Adhes Adhes"},{"key":"4800_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.27.455","volume":"27","author":"L Han","year":"2008","unstructured":"Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T (2008) Evaluation of flowable resin composite surfaces eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. Dent Mater J 27:455\u2013465. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.27.455","journal-title":"Dent Mater J"},{"key":"4800_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(12)60031-6","volume":"107","author":"B Stawarczyk","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stawarczyk B, Basler T, Ender A, Roos M, Ozcan M, H\u00e4mmerle C (2012) Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD\/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 107:94\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-3913(12)60031-6","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2016.12.003","volume":"33","author":"K Yoshihara","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater 33:e124\u2013e135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2016.12.003","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-5712(98)00037-2","volume":"27","author":"MS Gale","year":"1999","unstructured":"Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0300-5712(98)00037-2","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2011.08.594","volume":"28","author":"SC Bayne","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bayne SC (2012) Correlation of clinical performance with \u201cin vitro tests\u201d of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent Mater 28:52\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2011.08.594","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2004.06.027","volume":"92","author":"A Piwowarczyk","year":"2004","unstructured":"Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA (2004) In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 92:265\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2004.06.027","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR30","first-page":"24","volume":"13","author":"B Torstenson","year":"1988","unstructured":"Torstenson B, Br\u00e4nnstr\u00f6m M (1988) Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 13:24\u201331","journal-title":"Oper Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1591","DOI":"10.1177\/00220345950740091401","volume":"74","author":"A Della Bona","year":"1995","unstructured":"Della Bona A, van Noort R (1995) Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 74:1591\u20131596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00220345950740091401","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"4800_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.12.002","volume":"26","author":"SS Scherrer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV (2010) Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 26:e78\u2013e93. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.12.002","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2006.10.002","volume":"23","author":"E Placido","year":"2007","unstructured":"Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, de Souza RM, Ballester RY (2007) Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater 23:1086\u20131092. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2006.10.002","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/0109-5641(94)90067-1","volume":"10","author":"H Sano","year":"1994","unstructured":"Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH (1994) Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength\u2013evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236\u2013240. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0109-5641(94)90067-1","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.150","volume":"26","author":"RR Braga","year":"2010","unstructured":"Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of \u201cmacro\u201d test methods. Dent Mater 26:e38-49. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.150","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.139823","volume":"17","author":"K Sirisha","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P (2014) Validity of bond strength tests: a critical review-part II. J Conserv Dent 17:420\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0972-0707.139823","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.3109\/00016357.2012.741696","volume":"71","author":"D Eren","year":"2013","unstructured":"Eren D, Bekta\u015f \u00d6, Siso SH (2013) Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scand 71:978\u2013983. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016357.2012.741696","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"key":"4800_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.155","volume":"26","author":"S Armstrong","year":"2010","unstructured":"Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of \u201cmicro\u201d bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 26:e50-62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.155","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"4800_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.136340","volume":"17","author":"K Sirisha","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P (2014) Validity of bond strength tests: a critical review: part I. J Conserv Dent 17:305\u2013311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0972-0707.136340","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"4800_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1177\/00220345010800070301","volume":"80","author":"G Leloup","year":"2001","unstructured":"Leloup G, D\u2019Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J (2001) Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 80:1605\u20131614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00220345010800070301","journal-title":"J Dent Res"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,25]],"date-time":"2023-01-25T09:11:14Z","timestamp":1674637874000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["4800"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04800-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 September 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 November 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"For this type of study, formal consent was not required.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}